| Literature DB >> 35990113 |
Marcelo Zambrano-Vizuete1,2, Miguel Botto-Tobar3,4, Carmen Huerta-Suárez1, Wladimir Paredes-Parada1, Darwin Patiño Pérez4, Tariq Ahamed Ahanger5, Neilys Gonzalez6.
Abstract
Image segmentation and computer vision are becoming more important in computer-aided design. A computer algorithm extracts image borders, colours, and textures. It also depletes resources. Technical knowledge is required to extract information about distinctive features. There is currently no medical picture segmentation or recognition software available. The proposed model has 13 layers and uses dilated convolution and max-pooling to extract small features. Ghost model deletes the duplicated features, makes the process easier, and reduces the complexity. The Convolution Neural Network (CNN) generates a feature vector map and improves the accuracy of area or bounding box proposals. Restructuring is required for healing. As a result, convolutional neural networks segment medical images. It is possible to acquire the beginning region of a segmented medical image. The proposed model gives better results as compared to the traditional models, it gives an accuracy of 96.05, Precision 98.2, and recall 95.78. The first findings are improved by thickening and categorising the image's pixels. Morphological techniques may be used to segment medical images. Experiments demonstrate that the recommended segmentation strategy is effective. This study rethinks medical image segmentation methods.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35990113 PMCID: PMC9391132 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6872045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Image segmentation process with FCNN.
Figure 2Model based on artificial neural networks (ANNs).
Figure 3The design of a convolution neural network's architecture.
Figure 4The proposed dilated ghost model.
Figure 5(a) A CT picture of the heart. (b) A CT scan of the heart.
Figure 6Training, testing, and validation process of the proposed model.
Comparison of (I) accuracy, (II) precision, (III) recall, and (IV) F1-measure of various methods.
| Methods | I | II | III | IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active appearance model | 87.11 | 83.45 | 88.36 | 90.32 |
| Support vector machine | 96.23 | 89.78 | 96.67 | 94.71 |
| RCNN | 88.41 | 78.30 | 83.50 | 84.30 |
| The proposed model | 96.05 | 98.2 | 95.78 | 96.46 |
Analysis of confusion measures for the purpose of applying a classifier predictive negative (PN), predictive positive (PP), actual negative, and actual positive (AP).
| Method | Label | PN | PP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active appearance model | AN | 7425 | 7325 |
| AP | 6187 | 6253 | |
|
| |||
| SVM | AN | 6314 | 6014 |
| AP | 5410 | 5142 | |
|
| |||
| RCNN | AN | 5897 | 5001 |
| AP | 4517 | 4221 | |
|
| |||
| The proposed model | AN | 5794 | 5001 |
| AP | 4876 | 4221 | |