| Literature DB >> 35990042 |
Xulong Zhu1,2, Jianxiong Wang2, Shuhan Wu2, Tian Liu1,3, Guangshuai Lin2, Bin Shang4, Jia Ma1,2, Wudang Lu4, Feifei Zhang2, Jianhui Li2, Jue Wang1,3.
Abstract
Degradable hemostatic materials have unique advantages in reducing the amount of bleeding, shortening the surgical operation time, and improving patient prognosis. However, none of the current hemostatic materials are ideal and have disadvantages. Therefore, a novel biodegradable cellulose-based composite hemostatic material was prepared by crosslinking sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CCNa) and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), following an improved vacuum freeze-drying method. The resulting cellulose composite material was neutral in pH and spongy with a density of 0.042 g/cm3, a porosity of 77.68%, and an average pore size of 13.45 μm. The composite's compressive and tensile strengths were 0.1 MPa and 15.2 MPa, respectively. Under in vitro conditions, the composites were degraded gradually through petite molecule stripping and dissolution, reaching 96.8% after 14 days and 100% degradation rate at 21 days. When implanted into rats, the degradation rate of the composite was slightly faster, reaching 99.7% in 14 days and 100% in 21 days. Histology showed a stable inflammatory response and no evidence of cell degeneration, necrosis, or abnormal hyperplasia in the tissues around the embedded material, indicating good biocompatibility. In the hemorrhagic liver model, the time to hemostasis and the total blood loss in the cellulose composite group was significantly lower than in the medical gauze group and the blank control group (P < 0.05). These data indicate that the novel cellulose composite is a promising implantable hemostatic material in clinical settings.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35990042 PMCID: PMC9385320 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4083477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.529
Figure 1The gross morphology of cellulose composite, a degradable hemostatic material.
Figure 2Scanning electron microscope observation of cellulose composite hemostatic material.
Figure 3Degradation rate of cellulose composite hemostatic materials in rats and phosphate-buffered solutions.
Figure 4Morphological changes in the degradation of cellulose composite in rats. After degradation.
Figure 5Histological evaluation of implantation in rats.
Hemostasis time and amount of blood loss in rat liver bleeding wound model treated with different hemostatic materials. ∗P < 0.05.
| Group | The bleeding time (min) | The bleeding (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Cellulose composite | 3.11 ± 0.70∗ | 12.98 ± 2.28∗ |
| Medical gauze | 4.58 ± 0.42 | 17.89 ± 4.32 |
| Blank control group | 5.77 ± 1.00 | 22.66 ± 0.93 |