| Literature DB >> 35989693 |
Shan Randima Nawarathne1, Dong-Myung Kim1, Hyun-Min Cho1, Junseon Hong1, Yubin Kim1, Myunghwan Yu1, Young-Joo Yi2, Hans Lee3, Vannie Wan3, Noele Kai Jing Ng3, Chuan Hao Tan3, Jung-Min Heo1.
Abstract
We aimed to compare the combinatorial effect of 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid (THB) and oregano extracts (OE) with THB alone on the growth performance and elimination of deleterious effects in coccidiosis-infected broilers. A total of 210 one-day-old broilers were randomly assigned to one of five dietary treatments, with six replicates each, for 35 days. Dietary treatments were: 1) non-challenged, non-treated (NC); 2) challenged, non-treated (PC); 3) PC+ Salinomycin (0.05 g/kg; AB); 4) PC+THB (0.1 g/kg; THB); and 5) PC+THB+OE (0.1 g/kg; COM). On day 14, all groups except for NC were challenged with a 10-fold dose of Livacox® T anticoccidial vaccine to induce mild coccidiosis. All treatments significantly improved (P<0.05) body weight, average daily gain, and average daily feed intake, compared to PC, on days 21, 28, and 35. However, all treatments significantly reduced (P<0.05) the feed conversion ratio of PC by more than 14.60% on day 35, 11.76% during growing period, and 10.36% through the entire period. Broilers receiving anticoccidial treatments had 54.23% and 51.86% lower lesion scores (P<0.05) at 4 and 7 days post-infection, respectively, compared to PC. Additionally, the villus height of COM was significantly longer (P < 0.05) than that of THB. Although the molecular action of COM remains unclear, OE addition to THB reduced the shedding of oocysts better than THB alone (P<0.05, 9-11 days post-infection). Most importantly, COM effectively minimized the mortality of challenged birds from as high as 11.90% (PC) to 0%, a level similar to NC and AB, while THB maintained a mortality of 2.38%. In conclusion, the anticoccidial effect of THB can be enhanced by the addition of OE for better animal performance and the elimination of deleterious effects from coccidiosis-infected broilers for 35 days. 2022, Japan Poultry Science Association.Entities:
Keywords: 3,4,5-trihydroxy benzoic acid; broiler; coccidiosis; elimination; growth performance; oregano extracts
Year: 2022 PMID: 35989693 PMCID: PMC9346594 DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0210116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Poult Sci ISSN: 1346-7395 Impact factor: 1.768
Dietary treatments
| Treatment | Identity | Details |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | NC | Control diet with no coccidiosis challenge or anti-coccidiosis treatment / non-challenged, non-treated |
| 2 | PC | Control diet with coccidiosis challenge and no anti-coccidiosis treatment / challenged, non-treated |
| 3 | AB | PC+Salinomycin (0.05 g/kg) |
| 4 | THB | PC+THB (0.1 g/kg) |
| 5 | COM | PC+THB+OE (0.1 g/kg) |
Composition (g/kg, as-fed basis) of the experimental diets
| Item | Starting period | Growing period |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 48.51 | 60.96 |
| Wheat, Hard Red Winter | 8.40 | 4.12 |
| Wheat bran | 4.10 | — |
| Soybean meal 48% | 31.15 | 27.62 |
| Vegetable Oil | 3.30 | 3.30 |
| Limestone | 1.20 | 0.95 |
| Mono-calcium Phosphate | 1.65 | 1.39 |
| Salt | 0.30 | 0.35 |
| Vitamin-Mineral Premix | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Lysine-HCl | 0.34 | 0.30 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.20 | 0.19 |
| L-Threonine | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| L-Cystine | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Cr2O3 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Calculated values | ||
| Crude protein, % | 22.0 | 20.0 |
| Metabolizable energy, kcal/kg | 3050 | 3200 |
| Lysine, % | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Methionine, % | 0.62 | 0.60 |
Provided per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 12,000 IU; vitamin D3, 2,500 IU; vitamin E, 30 IU; vitamin K3, 3 mg; D-pantothenic acid, 15 mg; nicotinic acid, 40 mg; choline, 400 mg; and vitamin B12, 12 µg; Fe, 90 mg from iron sulfate; Cu, 8.8 mg from copper sulfate; Zn, 100 mg from zinc oxide; Mn, 54 mg from manganese oxide; I, 0.35 mg from potassium iodide; Se, 0.30 mg from sodium selenite.
The values were calculated according to the values of feedstuffs in NRC (1994) and “Ross 308” Broiler Nutrition Specification (2013).
Effect of dietary treatments on growth performance of coccidiosis challenged broiler chickens.1
| Period | Experimental Diets | SEM | P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | AB | THB | COM | |||
| Body weight, g | |||||||
| Day 1 | 44.67 | 44.67 | 44.57 | 44.50 | 44.62 | 0.106 | 0.989 |
| Day 7 | 158.19 | 145.02 | 148.17 | 146.88 | 143.40 | 2.241 | 0.258 |
| Day 14 | 333.31 | 310.98 | 326.43 | 328.17 | 310.29 | 5.580 | 0.611 |
| Day 21 | 788.11c | 537.53a | 725.83bc | 695.21b | 689.32b | 17.217 | <0.001 |
| Day 28 | 1376.d | 881.50a | 1253.23c | 1142.23b | 1165.37bc | 32.855 | <0.001 |
| Day 35 | 2003.39d | 1253.37a | 1840.81c | 1692.12b | 1763.94bc | 48.721 | <0.001 |
| Average daily gain, g/d | |||||||
| Day 7 | 16.22 | 14.34 | 14.80 | 14.63 | 14.11 | 0.318 | 0.254 |
| Day 14 | 25.02 | 23.71 | 25.47 | 25.90 | 23.84 | 0.704 | 0.841 |
| Day 21 | 64.97c | 32.36a | 57.06bc | 52.43b | 54.15b | 2.237 | <0.001 |
| Day 28 | 84.04d | 49.14a | 77.72cd | 63.86b | 68.01bc | 2.567 | <0.001 |
| Day 35 | 89.57c | 53.12a | 83.94bc | 78.55b | 85.51bc | 2.677 | <0.001 |
| Day 1–21 | 35.40c | 23.47a | 32.44bc | 30.99b | 30.70b | 0.820 | <0.001 |
| Day 22–35 | 86.81d | 51.13a | 80.83cd | 71.21b | 76.76bc | 2.382 | <0.001 |
| Day 1–35 | 55.96d | 34.53a | 51.80c | 47.08b | 49.12bc | 1.397 | <0.001 |
| Average daily feed intake, g/d | |||||||
| Day 7 | 23.40 | 22.67 | 23.00 | 22.57 | 22.89 | 0.305 | 0.936 |
| Day 14 | 39.16 | 38.32 | 38.00 | 38.46 | 35.87 | 0.601 | 0.513 |
| Day 21 | 92.59c | 58.90a | 86.18bc | 81.86b | 81.39b | 2.365 | <0.001 |
| Day 28 | 121.91d | 80.27a | 114.12cd | 96.60ab | 101.08bc | 3.180 | <0.001 |
| Day 35 | 131.23c | 91.37a | 123.77bc | 117.13b | 125.33bc | 2.932 | <0.001 |
| Day 1–21 | 51.71c | 39.96a | 49.06bc | 47.63b | 46.72b | 0.821 | <0.001 |
| Day 22–35 | 126.57d | 85.82a | 118.94cd | 106.86b | 113.21bc | 2.797 | <0.001 |
| Day 1–35 | 81.66c | 58.31a | 77.01bc | 71.32b | 73.31b | 1.567 | <0.001 |
| Feed conversion ratio, g/g | |||||||
| Day 7 | 1.45 | 1.60 | 1.58 | 1.55 | 1.65 | 0.039 | 0.582 |
| Day 14 | 1.57 | 1.64 | 1.50 | 1.54 | 1.56 | 0.043 | 0.903 |
| Day 21 | 1.43a | 1.83b | 1.51a | 1.58ab | 1.53a | 0.039 | 0.006 |
| Day 28 | 1.46 | 1.64 | 1.48 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 0.024 | 0.142 |
| Day 35 | 1.47a | 1.73b | 1.48a | 1.49a | 1.47a | 0.024 | <0.001 |
| Day 1–21 | 1.48a | 1.69b | 1.53a | 1.56ab | 1.58ab | 0.024 | 0.047 |
| Day 22–35 | 1.47a | 1.68b | 1.48a | 1.50a | 1.48a | 0.019 | <0.001 |
| Day 1–35 | 1.48a | 1.69b | 1.51a | 1.53a | 1.54a | 0.018 | <0.001 |
Values are the mean of six replicates per treatment; a–d Values in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). NC, non-challenged, non-treated; PC, challenged, non-treated; AB, PC+Salinomycin; THB, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid; COM, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid+oregano extracts
Pooled standard error of the mean.
Effect of dietary treatments on overall mean lesion score of coccidiosis challenged broiler chickens.1
| Period | Experimental diets | SEM | P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | AB | THB | COM | |||
| Lesion Score | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 0.00a | 3.24d | 0.46b | 2.06c | 1.93c | 0.314 | <0.001 |
| 7 dpi | 0.00a | 3.58d | 0.67b | 2.36c | 2.14c | 0.425 | <0.001 |
Values are the mean of six replicates per treatment; a–d Values in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). NC, non-challenged, non-treated; PC, challenged, non-treated; AB, PC+Salinomycin; THB, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid; COM, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid+oregano extracts
Pooled standard error of the mean
Days post-infection
Effect of dietary treatments on lesion score in caeca, jejunum, and ilium of coccidiosis challenged broiler chickens.1
| Period | Experimental diets | SEM | P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | AB | THB | COM | |||
| Caeca | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 0.00a | 3.33d | 0.78b | 2.00c | 1.83c | 0.309 | <0.001 |
| 7 dpi | 0.00a | 3.58d | 0.83b | 2.33c | 2.25c | 0.419 | <0.001 |
| Jejunum | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 0.00a | 2.83e | 0.44b | 2.28d | 1.89c | 0.294 | <0.001 |
| 7 dpi | 0.00a | 3.33c | 0.50a | 2.42bc | 2.08b | 0.416 | <0.001 |
| Ileum | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 0.00a | 3.56c | 0.17a | 1.89b | 2.06b | 0.359 | <0.001 |
| 7 dpi | 0.00a | 3.83d | 0.67b | 2.33c | 2.08c | 0.449 | <0.001 |
Values are the mean of six replicates per treatment; a–e Values in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). NC, non-challenged, non-treated; PC, challenged, non-treated; AB, PC+Salinomycin; THB, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid; COM, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid+oregano extracts
Pooled standard error of the mean
Days post-infection
Effect of dietary treatments on oocysts per gram in feces of coccidiosis challenged broiler chickens.1
| Period | Experimental diets | SEM | P-Value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | AB | THB | COM | |||
| OPG count (Log10 Oocysts) | |||||||
| 7 dpi | 0.00a | 4.06d | 2.75b | 3.64c | 3.55c | 0.391 | <0.001 |
| 8 dpi | 0.00a | 4.11d | 3.01b | 3.78c | 3.68c | 0.401 | <0.001 |
| 9 dpi | 0.00a | 4.16e | 3.16b | 3.85d | 3.76c | 0.408 | <0.001 |
| 10 dpi | 0.00a | 4.09e | 2.96b | 3.75d | 3.61c | 0.398 | <0.001 |
| 11 dpi | 0.00a | 4.02e | 2.62b | 3.63d | 3.46c | 0.387 | <0.001 |
Values are the mean of six replicates per treatment; a–e Values in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). NC, non-challenged, non-treated; PC, challenged, non-treated; AB, PC+Salinomycin; THB, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid; COM, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid+oregano extracts
Pooled standard error of the mean
Days post-infection
Effect of dietary treatments on nutrient digestibility coefficient of coccidiosis challenged broiler chickens.1
| Period | Experimental Diets | SEM | P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | AB | THB | COM | |||
| Dry Matter | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.020 | 0.228 |
| 7 dpi | 0.77 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.026 | 0.137 |
| Crude Protein | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 0.83b | 0.60a | 0.80b | 0.73ab | 0.76ab | 0.024 | 0.012 |
| 7 dpi | 0.87b | 0.66a | 0.81ab | 0.75ab | 0.78ab | 0.024 | 0.049 |
| Energy | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.027 | 0.099 |
| 7 dpi | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.028 | 0.121 |
Values are the mean of six replicates per treatment; a–b Values in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). NC, non-challenged, non-treated; PC, challenged, non-treated; AB, PC+Salinomycin; THB, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid; COM, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid+oregano extracts
Pooled standard error of the mean
Days post-infection
Effect of dietary treatments on villus height, crypt depth and V: C ratio of coccidiosis challenged broiler chickens.1
| Period | Experimental Diets | SEM | P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | AB | THB | COM | |||
| Villus height (µm) | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 974.24e | 605.84a | 880.04d | 753.73b | 821.50c | 19.247 | <0.001 |
| 7 dpi | 1133.91d | 693.91a | 955.09c | 817.11b | 898.59c | 23.004 | <0.001 |
| Crypt depth (µm) | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 76.96a | 109.54c | 90.20b | 94.14b | 93.44b | 1.783 | <0.001 |
| 7 dpi | 85.34a | 118.38c | 94.83ab | 99.08b | 95.70ab | 2.003 | <0.001 |
| Villus height: Crypt depth ratio (V: C) | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 12.71d | 5.55a | 9.38c | 8.39b | 8.81bc | 0.358 | <0.001 |
| 7 dpi | 13.28d | 5.87a | 10.22c | 8.64b | 9.13bc | 0.390 | <0.001 |
Values are the mean of six replicates per treatment; a–e Values in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). NC, non-challenged, non-treated; PC, challenged, non-treated; AB, PC+Salinomycin; THB, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid; COM, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid+oregano extracts
Pooled standard error of the mean
Days post-infection
Effect of dietary treatments on dressing percentage, relative breast meat weight, and relative drumstick weight of coccidiosis challenged broiler chickens.1
| Period | Experimental diets | SEM | P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | AB | THB | COM | |||
| Dressing percentage | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 88.96 | 84.64 | 87.86 | 87.11 | 87.38 | 0.512 | 0.078 |
| 7 dpi | 89.24 | 85.84 | 89.05 | 87.70 | 87.85 | 1.015 | 0.836 |
| Relative breast meat weight | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 25.86 | 23.65 | 25.11 | 24.14 | 24.91 | 0.444 | 0.584 |
| 7 dpi | 26.16 | 25.65 | 26.05 | 25.33 | 25.76 | 0.361 | 0.963 |
| Relative drumstick weight | |||||||
| 4 dpi | 9.91b | 8.93a | 9.86b | 9.76b | 9.81b | 0.123 | 0.048 |
| 7 dpi | 10.64b | 9.67a | 10.39ab | 9.97ab | 10.14ab | 0.131 | 0.036 |
Values are the mean of six replicates per treatment; a–b Values in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). NC, non-challenged, non-treated; PC, challenged, non-treated; AB, PC+Salinomycin; THB, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid; COM, PC+3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid+oregano extracts
Pooled standard error of the mean
Dressing percentage=[Carcass weight/Live body weight]×100%
Relative breast meat weight=[Breast meat weight/Carcass weight]×100%
Relative drumstick weight=[Drumstick weight/Carcass weight]×100%
Days post-infection