Literature DB >> 35989412

Metagenomic Insights into the Gut Microbiota of Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg) and Its Potential Roles in Agroecosystem.

Samrendra Singh Thakur1, Azhar Rashid Lone2, Sailu Yellaboina3, Subodh Tambat4, Ajar Nath Yadav5, Subodh Kumar Jain2, Shweta Yadav6.   

Abstract

Gut microbiomes, a consortium of microorganisms that live in the animal gut, are highly engineered microbial communities. It makes a major contribution to digestive health, metabolism management, and the development of a strong immune system in the host. The present study was taken up to answer the long-running question about the existence of truly indigenous microflora of the epigeic earthworm gut. This is due to the general difficulties of culturing many of the microorganisms found in soil or earthworms' gut. Keeping this fact in a view, the metagenomics approach using 16S rRNA marker gene incorporated with amplicon-based sequencing was used to explore microbiota of commercially overriding, diversely fed epigeic earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg) in three varied habitats viz., artificial soil (AS), organic agricultural farm soil (OAFS) and conventional agriculture farm soil (CAFS). There are predominant bacteria that belong to different phyla such as Proteobacteria (29.72-76.81%), Actinobacteria (11.06-34.42%), Firmicutes (6.02-19.81%), and Bacteroidetes (2.40-9.22%) present in the gut of E. eugeniae. The alpha diversity (Observed species, Chao1, ACE, Shannon, Simpson, and Fisher alpha) indices showed that OAFS had significantly higher alpha diversity than AS and CAFS groups. The core microbiota analysis showed that OAFS and AS groups had a relatively similar bacterial panel in comparison to the CAFS group. Various statistical tools i.e. MetagenomeSeq, LEfSe, and Random Forest analysis were performed and the findings demonstrated prevalence of the most significant bacterial genera; Aeromonas, Gaiella, and Burkholderia in CAFS group. Nonetheless, in AS and OAFS groups, the common existence of Anaerosporobacter and Aquihabitans were found respectively. Metagenomic functional prediction revealed that earthworms' gut microbial communities were actively involved in multiple organic and xenobiotics compound degradation-related pathways. This is the first research to use high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to show the gut microbiota of E. eugeniae in diverse agricultural systems. The findings suggest the configuration of the gut microbiota of earthworms and its potential role in the soil ecosystem depends on the microbial communities of the soil.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35989412     DOI: 10.1007/s00284-022-02988-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.343


  34 in total

Review 1.  As the worm turns: the earthworm gut as a transient habitat for soil microbial biomes.

Authors:  Harold L Drake; Marcus A Horn
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.500

2.  Changes of bacterial and fungal community compositions during vermicomposting of vegetable wastes by Eisenia foetida.

Authors:  Kui Huang; Fusheng Li; Yongfen Wei; Xuemin Chen; Xiaoyong Fu
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Role of indigenous microbiota from heavily contaminated sediments in the bioprecipitation of arsenic.

Authors:  Erika E Rios-Valenciana; Roberto Briones-Gallardo; Luis F Cházaro-Ruiz; Nadia Martínez-Villegas; Lourdes B Celis
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 4.  The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health.

Authors:  Harry J Flint; Karen P Scott; Petra Louis; Sylvia H Duncan
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Feeding on microbiomes: effects of detritivory on the taxonomic and phylogenetic bacterial composition of animal manures.

Authors:  Manuel Aira; Seth Bybee; Marcos Pérez-Losada; Jorge Domínguez
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.194

6.  The effect of anthropogenic arsenic contamination on the earthworm microbiome.

Authors:  Daniel Antony Pass; Andrew John Morgan; Daniel S Read; Dawn Field; Andrew J Weightman; Peter Kille
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  Taxonomic and functional annotation of gut bacterial communities of Eisenia foetida and Perionyx excavatus.

Authors:  Arjun Singh; Dushyant P Singh; Rameshwar Tiwari; Kanika Kumar; Ran Vir Singh; Surender Singh; Radha Prasanna; Anil K Saxena; Lata Nain
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 5.415

8.  Gut wall bacteria of earthworms: a natural selection process.

Authors:  Dwipendra Thakuria; Olaf Schmidt; Dillon Finan; Damian Egan; Fiona M Doohan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  A perspective on 16S rRNA operational taxonomic unit clustering using sequence similarity.

Authors:  Nam-Phuong Nguyen; Tandy Warnow; Mihai Pop; Bryan White
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 7.290

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.