Literature DB >> 35988115

Patients older than 55 years regain sporting and recreational activities after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Philips Ogunleye1, Hannah Jäger1, Felix Zimmermann1, Peter Balcarek1, Christian Sobau1, Andree Ellermann1, Alexander Zimmerer2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: (1) To compare sporting and recreational activity levels before and at a minimum 6 year follow-up, and (2) to assess the clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients older than 55 years.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data of 150 patients with a mean age of 64 ± 4.5 (57-74) years was evaluated 8.6 ± 1.4 (6-11) years after primary ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. All patients were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee scoring system (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner activity level, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The level of recreational activities was assessed using a sport-specific questionnaire. All patients were categorized according to Isolated and Combined ACL injury groups.
RESULTS: The data of 125 patients were analyzed at the last follow-up. While 25 patients were lost to follow-up, 117 of 125 patients were active before their injury in at least one sports discipline compared to 121 of 125 patients after ACL reconstruction. One hundred and two (82%) patients had returned to their recreational activities at the final follow-up. The mean IKDC subjective score increased from 49.5 ± 23.2 (11.5-100) to 76.2 ± 14.8 (33.3-100) (p < 0.0001). The mean KOOS sport increased significantly from 36 ± 36.2 (0-100) to 74.1 ± 25.5 (0-100) (p < 0.0001). The mean VAS score improved from 6.0 ± 2.6 (0-10) to 1.0 ± 1.4 (0-6) (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the median Tegner activity level (preoperative 5 (2-8) vs. follow-up 5 (2-8) (n.s). There was no significant difference in the number of sports disciplines and duration when comparing pre-injury and mid-term follow-up activity after ACL reconstruction. High-impact activities experienced a significant decline, while a significant increase in participation in low-impact activities was recorded.
CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with symptomatic instability regained their pre-injury recreational activity level with excellent clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Nevertheless, a change from high-to low-impact activities has been observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament; Older patient; Sports activities

Year:  2022        PMID: 35988115     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07116-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  34 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of operative or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture--is sports activity a determining variable?

Authors:  C Fink; C Hoser; W Hackl; R A Navarro; K P Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 2.  Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Joseph A Abate; Braden C Fleming; Claude E Nichols
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern; Nicholas F Taylor; Julian A Feller; Timothy S Whitehead; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Return to play after all-inside meniscal repair in competitive football players: a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pedro Alvarez-Diaz; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Federico Llobet; Nelson Granados; Gilbert Steinbacher; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Alberto Grassi; Simone Perelli; Giuseppe Agrò; Federico Bozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 50 years of age.

Authors:  David Figueroa; Francisco Figueroa; Rafael Calvo; Alex Vaisman; Gonzalo Espinoza; Federico Gili
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Factors affecting outcome of ACL reconstruction in over-50-year-olds.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Fayard; Frank Wein; Matthieu Ollivier; Regis Paihle; Matthieu Ehlinger; Sébastien Lustig; Jean-Claude Panisset
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 8.  Reconstruction versus conservative treatment after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Christian Gerber; Dominik C Meyer; Alexander Schwab; Patricia R Blank; Thomas Szucs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in the Older Athlete.

Authors:  Matthew J Best; Bashir A Zikria; John H Wilckens
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  The Role of Psychological Readiness in Return to Sport Assessment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anne Gro Heyn Faleide; Liv Heide Magnussen; Torbjørn Strand; Bård Erik Bogen; Rolf Moe-Nilssen; Ingunn Fleten Mo; Willemijn Vervaat; Eivind Inderhaug
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.