Niclas Schmitt1, Lena Wucherpfennig2, Lukas T Rotkopf3, Stefan Sawall4, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor2, Martin Bendszus1, Markus A Möhlenbruch1, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer3, Dominik F Vollherbst5. 1. Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Division of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Dominik.Vollherbst@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is a promising new technique for CT imaging. The aim of the present study was the in vitro comparison of coil-related artifacts in PCD-CT and conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) using a comparable standard brain imaging protocol before and after metal artifact reduction (MAR). METHODS: A nidus-shaped rubber latex, resembling an aneurysm of the cerebral arteries, was filled with neurovascular platinum coils and inserted into a brain imaging phantom. Image acquisition and reconstruction were repeatedly performed for PCD-CT and EID-CT (n = 10, respectively) using a standard brain imaging protocol. Moreover, linear interpolation MAR was performed for PCD-CT and EID-CT images. The degree of artifacts was analyzed quantitatively (standard deviation in a donut-shaped region of interest) and qualitatively (5-point scale analysis). RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative analysis demonstrated a lower degree of metal artifacts in the EID-CT images compared to the total-energy PCD-CT images (e.g., 82.99 ± 7.89 Hounsfield units (HU) versus 90.35 ± 6.28 HU; p < 0.001) with no qualitative difference between the high-energy bin PCD-CT images and the EID-CT images (4.18 ± 0.37 and 3.70 ± 0.64; p = 0.575). After MAR, artifacts were more profoundly reduced in the PCD-CT images compared to the EID-CT images in both analyses (e.g., 2.35 ± 0.43 and 3.18 ± 0.34; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PCD-CT in combination with MAR have the potential to provide an improved option for reduction of coil-related artifacts in cerebral imaging in this in vitro study. KEY POINTS: • Photon-counting detector CT produces more artifacts compared to energy-integrating detector CT without metal artifact reduction in cerebral in vitro imaging after neurovascular coil-embolization. • Spectral information of PCD-CT provides the potential for new post-processing techniques, since the coil-related artifacts were lower in PCD-CT images compared to EID-CT images after linear interpolation metal artifact reduction in this in vitro study.
OBJECTIVES: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is a promising new technique for CT imaging. The aim of the present study was the in vitro comparison of coil-related artifacts in PCD-CT and conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) using a comparable standard brain imaging protocol before and after metal artifact reduction (MAR). METHODS: A nidus-shaped rubber latex, resembling an aneurysm of the cerebral arteries, was filled with neurovascular platinum coils and inserted into a brain imaging phantom. Image acquisition and reconstruction were repeatedly performed for PCD-CT and EID-CT (n = 10, respectively) using a standard brain imaging protocol. Moreover, linear interpolation MAR was performed for PCD-CT and EID-CT images. The degree of artifacts was analyzed quantitatively (standard deviation in a donut-shaped region of interest) and qualitatively (5-point scale analysis). RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative analysis demonstrated a lower degree of metal artifacts in the EID-CT images compared to the total-energy PCD-CT images (e.g., 82.99 ± 7.89 Hounsfield units (HU) versus 90.35 ± 6.28 HU; p < 0.001) with no qualitative difference between the high-energy bin PCD-CT images and the EID-CT images (4.18 ± 0.37 and 3.70 ± 0.64; p = 0.575). After MAR, artifacts were more profoundly reduced in the PCD-CT images compared to the EID-CT images in both analyses (e.g., 2.35 ± 0.43 and 3.18 ± 0.34; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PCD-CT in combination with MAR have the potential to provide an improved option for reduction of coil-related artifacts in cerebral imaging in this in vitro study. KEY POINTS: • Photon-counting detector CT produces more artifacts compared to energy-integrating detector CT without metal artifact reduction in cerebral in vitro imaging after neurovascular coil-embolization. • Spectral information of PCD-CT provides the potential for new post-processing techniques, since the coil-related artifacts were lower in PCD-CT images compared to EID-CT images after linear interpolation metal artifact reduction in this in vitro study.