| Literature DB >> 35986381 |
Sherif Ramzy1, Ahmed H Abdelazim2, Mohamed A Hasan1.
Abstract
Fexofenadine hydrochloride and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride are prescribed in a combined dosage form for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. In the present work, a sensitive synchronous fluorescence spectroscopic method was applied in conjunction with first derivative for quantitative estimation of fexofenadine hydrochloride and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride in pure form, pharmaceutical tablets and spiked human plasma. Fexofenadine hydrochloride showed its conventional emission spectrum at 294 nm when excited at 267 nm. On the other hand, pseudoephedrine hydrochloride showed its conventional emission spectra at 286 nm when excited at 261 nm. The fluorescence intensities were greatly enhanced by the use of sodium dodecyl sulphate as a micellar surfactant. Application of the synchronous mode to measure the fluorescence spectra of the above drugs provided sharp narrowing bands, but the overlap was not completely resolved. Derivatization of the synchronous spectra to the first order completely resolved the overlap of the fluorescence spectra and allowed simultaneous quantitative determination of the drugs under study. Fexofenadine hydrochloride and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride could be determined from their first-order synchronous spectra at 286 and 294 nm, respectively, without interfering with each other. The method showed linearity with an excellent correlation coefficient in the concentration range of 100-1500 ng/mL for Fexofenadine hydrochloride and 50-1000 ng/mL for pseudoephedrine hydrochloride. The method was successfully applied for the simultaneous determination of the studied drugs in pharmaceutical formulation, with mean percent recoveries for Fexofenadine hydrochloride and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride of 99.49 ± 0.931 and 98.67 ± 0.634, respectively, and in spiked human plasma, with mean percent recoveries for Fexofenadine hydrochloride and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride of 95.21 ± 1.938 and 94.89 ± 1.763, respectively. Furthermore, the greenness of the described method was assessed using four different tools namely, the national environmental method index, the analytical eco-scale, the green analytical procedure index and the AGREE evaluation method. The proposed method seemed to be superior to the reported HPLC method with respect to the metrics of the greenness characters.Entities:
Keywords: Fexofenadine hydrochloride; Green chemistry; Pseudoephedrine hydrochloride; Synchronous fluorescence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35986381 PMCID: PMC9389777 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-022-00855-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Chem ISSN: 2661-801X
Fig. 1Structural formula of FEX (a) and PSE (b)
Fig.2Excitation (A) and emission (B) spectra of FEX (1000 ng/ml) in ethanol
Fig.3Excitation (A) and emission (B) spectra of PSE (800 ng/ml) in ethanol
Fig.4Emission spectra of FEX (1000 ng/ml) and PSE (800 ng/ml) in ethanol after excitation at λex. = 265 nm
Fig.5Synchronous fluorescence spectra of FEX (1000 ng/ml) and PSE (800 ng/ml) in ethanol using Δλ = 25 nm
Fig.6First derivative synchronous fluorescence spectra of FEX (1000 ng/ml) and PSE (800 ng/ml) in ethanol using Δλ = 25 nm
Fig.7Optimization of experimental conditions for FEX and PSE including diluting solvent (a), surfactant type (b), surfactant volume (c), buffer type (d) and buffer volume (e)
Regression and validation data for the determination of FEX and PSE by the proposed method
| Parameters | FEX | PSE |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelength (nm) | 286 | 294 |
| Linearity range (ng/mL) | 100–1500 | 50–1000 |
| LOD (ng/mL) | 24.15 | 12.88 |
| LOQ (ng/mL) | 73.49 | 39.21 |
| Slope | 0.0377 | 0.0623 |
| Intercept | 9.6551 | 8.8644 |
| Coefficient of determination (r2) | 0.9995 | 0.9994 |
| Accuracy (%R)a | 99.13 | 98.46 |
| Precision (RSD)b | ||
| Repeatability | 1.369 | 0.493 |
| Intermediate precision | 1.012 | 1.207 |
| Robustness (%R ± RSD) | ||
| Δλ (± 1 nm.) | 100.63 ± 0.926 | 99.20 ± 1.017 |
| pH (± 0.1) | 99.98 ± 1.066 | 99.82 ± 1.314 |
| Buffer volume (± 0.1 mL) | 100.89 ± 0.878 | 100.12 ± 0.950 |
aAverage of nine determinations (three concentrations repeated three times)
bRSD of nine determinations (three concentrations repeated three times)
Determination of FEX and PSE in synthetic laboratory mixtures by the proposed method
| FEX | PSE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Added (ng/mL) | Founda (ng/mL) | %Recovery | Added (ng/mL) | Founda (ng/mL) | %Recovery |
| 100 | 100.94 | 100.94 | 200 | 196.7 | 98.35 |
| 150 | 152.75 | 101.83 | 300 | 300.57 | 100.19 |
| 200 | 203.44 | 101.72 | 400 | 397.64 | 99.41 |
| 250 | 249.65 | 99.86 | 500 | 491.9 | 98.38 |
| 300 | 302.73 | 100.91 | 600 | 601.56 | 100.26 |
| Mean ± RSD | 101.05 ± 0.783 | Mean ± RSD | 99.32 ± 0.938 | ||
aAverage of three determinations
Recovery study of FEX and PSE by standard addition technique using the proposed method
| Drug | Pharmaceutical taken (ng/mL) | Pharmaceutical founda (ng/mL) | Pure added (ng/mL) | Pure foundb (ng/mL) | % Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEX | 150 | 149.24 | 100 | 99.27 | 99.27 |
| 200 | 196.62 | 98.31 | |||
| 300 | 303.24 | 101.08 | |||
| Mean ± %RSD | 99.55 ± 1.431 | ||||
| PSE | 300 | 296.01 | 100 | 100.12 | 100.12 |
| 200 | 196.38 | 98.19 | |||
| 300 | 297.21 | 99.07 | |||
| Mean ± %RSD | 99.13 ± 0.975 |
a Average of five determinations
b Average of three determinations
Determination of FEX and PSE in spiked human plasma by the proposed method
| FEX | PSE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Added (ng/mL) | Founda (ng/mL) | %Recovery | Added (ng/mL) | Founda (ng/mL) | %Recovery |
| 100 | 95.38 | 95.38 | 200 | 184.48 | 92.24 |
| 150 | 139.79 | 93.19 | 300 | 288.03 | 96.01 |
| 200 | 192.54 | 96.27 | 400 | 377.28 | 94.32 |
| 250 | 233.98 | 93.59 | 500 | 477.35 | 95.47 |
| 300 | 292.83 | 97.61 | 600 | 578.34 | 96.39 |
| Mean ± RSD | 95.21 ± 1.938 | Mean ± RSD | 94.89 ± 1.763 | ||
a Average of three determinations
Comparison and statistical assessment of the results obtained by the proposed and the reported methods
| Parameters | Proposed method | Reported method [ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEX | PSE | FEX | PSE | |
| Linearity range | 100─1500 (ng/mL) | 50─1000 (ng/mL) | 10–80 (µg/mL) | 5–40 (µg/mL) |
| LOD | 24.15 (ng/mL) | 12.88 (ng/mL) | 0.75 (µg/mL) | 0.27 (µg/mL) |
| % Ra | 99.49 | 98.67 | 99.02 | 99.63 |
| RSD | 0.931 | 0.634 | 1.072 | 1.257 |
| Student’s | 0.759 | 1.540 | – | – |
| 1.312 | 4.006 | – | – | |
a Average of five determinations
b The values in parenthesis are tabulated values of “t “and “F” at (P = 0.05)
Greenness evaluation and comparison of the developed method and reported one using described metrics
| Proposed method | Reported HPLC method [ |
|---|---|
| National environmental method index | |
|
|
|
| Green analytical procedure index | |
|
|
|
| The AGREE evaluation method | |
|
|
|