| Literature DB >> 35986253 |
Fede Berckx1, Thanh Van Nguyen1, Cyndi Mae Bandong1,2, Hsiao-Han Lin3,4, Takashi Yamanaka5, Sae Katayama6, Daniel Wibberg7, Jochen Blom8, Jörn Kalinowski7, Masaki Tateno6, Jessica Simbahan2, Chi-Te Liu3,9, Andreas Brachmann10, Katharina Pawlowski11.
Abstract
It is currently assumed that around 100 million years ago, the common ancestor to the Fabales, Fagales, Rosales and Cucurbitales in Gondwana, developed a root nodule symbiosis with a nitrogen-fixing bacterium. The symbiotic trait evolved first in Frankia cluster-2; thus, strains belonging to this cluster are the best extant representatives of this original symbiont. Most cluster-2 strains could not be cultured to date, except for Frankia coriariae, and therefore many aspects of the symbiosis are still elusive. Based on phylogenetics of cluster-2 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), it has been shown that the genomes of strains originating in Eurasia are highly conserved. These MAGs are more closely related to Frankia cluster-2 in North America than to the single genome available thus far from the southern hemisphere, i.e., from Papua New Guinea.To unravel more biodiversity within Frankia cluster-2 and predict routes of dispersal from Gondwana, we sequenced and analysed the MAGs of Frankia cluster-2 from Coriaria japonica and Coriaria intermedia growing in Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines. Phylogenetic analyses indicate there is a clear split within Frankia cluster-2, separating a continental from an island lineage. Presumably, these lineages already diverged in Gondwana.Based on fossil data on the host plants, we propose that these two lineages dispersed via at least two routes. While the continental lineage reached Eurasia together with their host plants via the Indian subcontinent, the island lineage spread towards Japan with an unknown host plant.Entities:
Keywords: Actinorhizal symbiosis; Biogeography; Coriaria; Frankia; Root nodules
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35986253 PMCID: PMC9392346 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08838-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 4.547
Inocula used and MAGs sequenced in this study. The Philippine inoculum CiP1 was used for cross-inoculation studies and was not sequenced on its original host
| Host | Inocolum | Origin | Genome | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CiT1 | Taiwain | CiT1_Ci_nod | CAKJTL010000001- CAKJTL010000192 | |
| CiP2 | Philippines | CiP2_Ci_nod | CAKJTS010000001- CAKJTS010000335 | |
| CiP3 | Philippines | CiP3_Ci_nod | CAKJTM010000001- CAKJTM010000241 | |
| CiP4 | Philippines | CiP4_Ci_nod | CAKJTN010000001- CAKJTN010000207 | |
| CiP5 | Philippines | CiP5_Ci_nod | CAKJTT010000001- CAKJTT010001025 | |
| CiP1 | Philippines | CiP1_Cm_nod | CAKKTM010000001- CAKKTM010000479 | |
| Coriaria myrtifolia | CiP1 | Philippines | CiP1_Cm_nod2 | CAKKTL010000001- CAKKTL010000399 |
| Cj2 | Japan | Cj2_Cj_nod | CAKJTP010000001- CAKJTP010000304 | |
| Cj2 | Japan | Cj3_Cj_nod | CAKJTQ010000001- CAKJTQ010000325 | |
| Cj4 | Japan | Cj4_Cj_nod | CAKJTR010000001- CAKJTR010000337 | |
| Cj5 | Japan | Cj5_Cj_nod | CAKJTO010000001- CAKJTO010000213 | |
| Cppng1 | Papua New Guinea | Cppng1_Ct_nod | CAKKTK010000001- CAKKTK010000151 |
Features of MAGs sequenced in this study. The complete results of the BUSCO analysis are presented in Supplementary Table S2
| Genome | Strains | Size (bp) | N50 | Used Reads | Coverage | % GC | Completeness | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CiT1_Ci_nod | 1 | 4,987,545 | 37,416 bp | 611,363 | 37x | 67.04% | 91.9% BUSCO | – |
| CiP2_Ci_nod | 2 | 5,044,359 | 27,610 bp | 511,456 | 30x | 67.86% | 48.8% BUSCO | |
| CiP3_Ci_nod | 1 | 6,243,892 | 8663 bp | 412,578 | 19x | 68.05% | 91.9% BUSCO | |
| CiP4_Ci_nod | 1 | 5,207,054 | 42,806 bp | 912,478 | 53x | 67.93% | 86.5% BUSCO | – |
| CiP5_Ci_nod | 1 | 5,352,883 | 5918 bp | 452,147 | 25x | 67.80% | 58.5% BUSCO | |
| CiP1_Cm_nod1 | 1 | 5,200,215 | 16,642 bp | 441,095 | 25x | 71.03% | 89.2% BUSCO | – |
| CiP1_Cm_nod2 | 1 | 5,375,179 | 20,496 bp | 531,234 | 30x | 71.04% | 87.8% BUSCO | – |
| Cj2_Cj_nod | 1 | 4,918,503 | 28,956 bp | 520,408 | 32x | 68.07% | 91.2% BUSCO | – |
| Cj3_Cj_nod | 1 | 5,373,832 | 24,916 bp | 499,754 | 28x | 67.92% | 89.2% BUSCO | – |
| Cj4_Cj_nod | 1 | 5,193,180 | 25,314 bp | 498,419 | 29x | 67.92% | 84.5% BUSCO | – |
| Cj5_Cj_nod | 1 | 5,233,754 | 41,892 bp | 784,521 | 44x | 67.99% | 88.5% BUSCO | – |
| Cppng_Ct_nod | 1 | 4,844,797 | 50,015 bp | 658,720 | 41x | 68.14% | 91.2% BUSCO |
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree based on whole-genome sequences inferred using the neighbor-joining algorithm as implemented in the PHYLIP package [22]. The tree was built for 34 Frankia genomes out of a core of 214 genes per genome, 7276 in total, by EDGAR 2.0 [23, 24]. The core has 92,816 amino acid residues per genome, 3,155,744 in total. Genomes used were Candidatus Frankia datisca Dg1 (NC_015656.1), Frankia coriariae BMG5.1 (NZ_JWIO00000000.1), Candidatus Frankia californiensis Dg2 (FLUV00000000.1), Candidatus Frankia meridionalis Cppng1 (CADDZT010000001-CADDZT010000101), Frankia asymbiotica M16386 (NZ_MOMC00000000.1), Frankia saprophytica CN3 (NZ_AGJN00000000.2), Frankia inefficax EuI1c (NC_014666.1), Frankia irregularis DSM45899 (NZ_FAOZ00000000.1), Frankia elaeagni BMG5.12 (NZ_ARFH00000000.1), Frankia discariae BCU110501 (NZ_ARDT00000000.1), Frankia soli NRRL B-16219 (MAXA00000000.1), Frankia casuarinae CcI3 (NC_007777.1), Frankia canadensis ARgP5 (GCF_900241035.1), Candidatus Frankia nodosporulans AgTrS (NZ_CADCWS000000000.1), Candidatus Frankia alpina AiOr (GCA_902806485), Frankia alni ACN14a (NC_008278.1), Frankia torreyi CpI1 (NZ_JYFN00000000.1) and Frankia sp. QA3 (AJWA00000000). The genomes of Cryptosporangium arvum DSM44712 (JFBT01000000) and Jatrophihabitans endophyticus DSM45617 (NZ_FQVU00000000.1) were added for rooting. Bootstrap values are 100 for every branch; they were calculated in R [25] using the packages APE [26] and phangorn [27]. The genomes sequenced from nodules of Coriaria myrtifolia induced by the inoculum from the Philippines, CiP1, are labeled by a green outline. The size bar denotes 0.01 changes
Host specificity analysis for different inocula. Data on Cppng1 and Dg1 were presented in Nguyen et al. [14]. PNG: Papua New Guinea. (nodulation)* - the MAG that was sequenced in the induced nodules belonged to a different lineage than the MAGs present in nodules induced on the original host
| Inoculum | Taiwan | Philippines | PNG | Pakistan | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CiT1 | CiP1 | Cppng1 | Dg1 | |||
| Northern hemisphere | North America | no nodulation | no nodulation | no nodulation | nodulation | |
| Eurasia | not tested | (nodulation)* | not tested | nodulation | ||
| not tested | no nodulation | nodulation | nodulation | |||
| nodulation | nodulation | not tested | no nodulation | |||
| Southern hemisphere | New Zealand | nodulation | not tested | nodulation | no nodulation | |
Fig. 2Map illustrating the location of Frankia samples and their host specificity. Black symbol: nodulation is possible. White symbol: nodulation was tried and was unsuccessful. Square: Coriaria myrtifolia or Coriaria nepalensis; diamond: Coriaria terminalis; down-facing triangle: Coriaria japonica or Coriaria intermedia; up-facing triangle: Coriaria sp. from the Southern hemisphere lineage; hexagon: Datisca glomerata. Colored dots of sampling represent species of Frankia as followed: magenta: Candidatus Frankia californiensis; green: Candidatus Frankia datiscae; blue: novel island lineage species presented in this study; yellow: Candidatus Frankia meridionalis, also part of the island lineage
Fig. 3How cluster-2 Frankia strains spread from Gondwana across the world. (A) Geography from 100 mya, (B) current geography. Geography is according to the plate reconstruction of Zahirovic et al. [49] and paleo-environments from Cao et al. [50]. Land is given in green, deep sea in dark blue, and shallow sea as light blue. For reference, present-day coastlines and geological terrane boundaries are reconstructed using brown lines. Black lines indicate tectonic plate boundaries. Spread of Coriaria with cluster-2 Frankia is indicated by red arrows, hypothetical alternatives are indicated by dashed arrows. Coriaria nodule sampling points referred to in this study are indicated by white triangles. (A) Coriaria spread with the future continental cluster-2 lineage from Gondwana to India (1; continental lineage of Frankia cluster-2), and from Gondwana to South America (2; South American lineage). Distribution from Gondwana to New Zealand and Papua New Guinea (PNG; 3; island lineage of Frankia cluster-2) could have taken place via Australia (3a) or via New Zealand (3b) or in both directions simultaneously. (B) Distribution between PNG and New Zealand is ascertained by the fact that Coriaria is indigenous in all islands of the area [7], but the direction cannot be determined at this point (dashed line). When India had collided with Asia, Coriaria spread in Northern India-Pakistan-Nepal and from there westward to the Mediterranean and eastward into China. The precursor of C. nepalensis spread to the North (dashed arrow, since Coriaria is not found in Northern China today) towards Japan (C. japonica), and from there southward to Taiwan and the Philippines (C. intermedia); the separation of C. japonica and C. intermedia was recent (ca. 10 mya) [7]. The island lineage of Frankia cluster-2 spread from PNG to the Philippines and further to Taiwan (blue arrow), but the original host plants lost the symbiosis or went extinct. Strains of the island lineage outcompeted those of the continental lineage of Frankia when Coriaria spp. spread to Japan and from there to Taiwan and the Philippines. All cluster-2 Frankia strains sampled in continental Eurasia belong to the continental lineage. MD, Madagascar; PH, Philippines; PNG, Papua New Guinea; TW, Taiwan