Literature DB >> 35986111

The impact of mucormycosis (black fungus) on SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: at a glance.

Md Rezaul Islam1, Md Mominur Rahman1, Md Tanjimul Ahasan1, Nadia Sarkar1, Shopnil Akash1, Mahfuzul Islam1, Fahadul Islam1, Most Nazmin Aktar1, Mohd Saeed2, Md Harun-Or-Rashid1, Md Kawsar Hosain1, Md Saidur Rahaman1, Sadia Afroz1, Shabana Bibi3,4, Md Habibur Rahman5,6, Sherouk Hussein Sweilam7,8.   

Abstract

The emergence of various diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic made health workers more attentive, and one of the new pathogens is the black fungus (mucormycosis). As a result, millions of lives have already been lost. As a result of the mutation, the virus is constantly changing its traits, including the rate of disease transmission, virulence, pathogenesis, and clinical signs. A recent analysis revealed that some COVID-19 patients were also coinfected with a fungal disease called mucormycosis (black fungus). India has already categorized the COVID-19 patient black fungus outbreak as an epidemic. Only a few reports are observed in other countries. The immune system is weakened by COVID-19 medication, rendering it more prone to illnesses like black fungus (mucormycosis). COVID-19, which is caused by a B.1.617 strain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has been circulating in India since April 2021. Mucormycosis is a rare fungal infection induced by exposure to a fungus called mucormycete. The most typically implicated genera are Mucor rhyzuprhizopusdia and Cunninghamella. Mucormycosis is also known as zygomycosis. The main causes of infection are soil, dumping sites, ancient building walls, and other sources of infection (reservoir words "mucormycosis" and "zygomycosis" are occasionally interchanged). Zygomycota, on the other hand, has been identified as polyphyletic and is not currently included in fungal classification systems; also, zygomycosis includes Entomophthorales, but mucormycosis does not. This current review will be focused on the etiology and virulence factors of COVID-19/mucormycosis coinfections in COVID-19-associated mucormycosis patients, as well as their prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Black fungus; Diagnosis; Etiology; Mucormycosis; SARS-CoV-2; Zygomycosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35986111      PMCID: PMC9391068          DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22204-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   5.190


Introduction

Mucormycosis is a deadly fungal disease caused by the Mucoraceae fungus. Rhizopus, Mucor, and Absidia species are the most common pathogens in this family. These organisms are members of the Phycomycetes class, which also includes the Entomophthorales order (Walther et al. 2019). Mucormycosis frequently affects immunocompromised people, such as those with diabetes, severe burns, blood dyscrasias, renal disease (Georgopoulou et al. 2003), sepsis, severe dehydration, and cirrhosis (Hoeprich 1995; Nussbaum and Hall 1994). The significant morbidity and mortality of rhino-orbit-cerebral mucormycosis make it stand out (Nussbaum and Hall 1994; Yohai et al. 1994). Early detection of this illness, especially in medically impaired patients, results in timely medical and surgical treatment, which leads to a better prognosis (Behl et al. 2022). In the past, only a few individuals survived without orbital exenteration to eliminate the infection (Kohn and Hepler 1985). The presenting complaints and care of twenty-seven patients of rhino-orbit-cerebral mucormycosis handled at our institute for 8 years were discussed. Friedrich Küchenmeister may have described the first instance of mucormycosis in 1855 (Chander 2017). In 1884, Lichtheim reported two species of rabbits, Mucor corymbiform and Mucor rhizopodiformis, which eventually became known as Lichtheimia and Rhizopus, respectively. In three cases with significant sinus, brain, and ocular involvement, it was linked to poorly treated diabetes in 1943. Saksenarae vasiform was isolated from Indian forest soil in 1953, and P.C. Misra studied soil from an Indian mango orchard in 1979 and identified Apophysomyces, which was later discovered to be a major cause of mucormycosis. The term “mycosis” was coined by Arnold Paltauf. This disease has been linked to natural disasters and catastrophes, including a tsunami in the Indian Ocean in 2004 and a tornado in Missouri in 2011 (Wani 2021a). In the aftermath of the Joplin tornado in 2011, a cluster of infections arose. A total of 18 probable cases of mucormycosis of the skin have been identified by July 19, 2011, with 13 of them being confirmed. After television and press stories in response to a publication in a pediatric medical journal (Sundermann et al. 2019), details of a lethal mucormycosis outbreak that happened in 2008 became public in 2014. Many freshly cleaned hospital lines delivered to US transplant facilities were contaminated with Mucorales, according to a 2018 study (Seyedmousavi et al. 2018). In addition to humans, cases of mucormycosis have been reported in cats, dogs, cows, horses, dolphins, bison, and seals (Sen et al. 2021; Wani 2021b). While the world struggles to cope with the deadly effects of COVID-19, a new menace known as the “black fungus” has appeared throughout the world, particularly in India, Bangladesh’s neighbor. COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) has been found in several Asian nations (Garg et al. 2021; Kumer et al. 2021). Black fungus, also known as “mucormycosis,” is an uncommon but severe illness with a fatality rate of more than 50% (Jalal et al. 2022). When COVID-19 individuals are affected, the condition has grown deadlier. Mucormycosis is most linked with immunocompromised people with poorly managed diabetes, as well as long-term usage of steroids for COVID-19 therapy. More than 90% of CAM patients had diabetes, according to data throughout the world (Behl et al. 2022a; John et al. 2021). Pulmonary mucormycosis, disseminated mucormycosis, rhinoorbital mucormycosis, and other CAM forms have clinical signs and pathogenesis (Otrisal et al. 2021b; Singh et al. 2021). The bulk of reported CAM cases (71%) came from India, with 14,872 instances (Raut and Huy 2021). In Bangladesh, however, the number is quite low, with only a few cases; all of them had diabetes. Both Bangladesh and India have comparable and higher diabetes rates (8.1% vs. 8.9% of total people), implying that Bangladesh is likewise in danger of CAM epidemic ("Federation ID, n. d. List of countries and territories in South-East Asia with members. Available via https://idf.org/our-network/regions-members/south-east-asia/membershtml2020 (Accessed 23 June 2021),”). Mucorales may also be found in a variety of settings, such as soil and decomposing organic waste including compost piles, leaves, rotten wood, and animal dung (Richardson and Infection 2009). People are continually exposed to Mucorales due to the extensive existence of Mucorales in the environment. As a result, excellent hygiene practices may aid in the prevention of mucormycosis. Unfortunately, many people in Bangladesh (about 107 million) still suffer from poor household hygiene (Organization 2021). Most of the fungal pathogens are opportunistic. Fungal infections have been increasing due to the increased number of immunocompromised hosts, and various types of mycoses may develop depending on the immune status of the patients (Huq et al. n.d). COVID-19 patients were also shown to have fungal infections such as Aspergillus, Candida, and mucormycetes. Mucormycosis, popularly known as the black fungus, is a fungal infection caused mostly by Mucorales species such as Rhizopus and Mucor. The disease is rare but may be serious around the globe, with a high incidence in India (Skiada et al. 2020; Slavin and Chakrabarti 2012). The majority of invasive fungal infections occur in immunocompromised patients due to the poor health management system (Badiee and Hashemizadeh 2014; Slavin and Chakrabarti 2012). Mucormycosis has been linked to a number of pre-existing health conditions, including diabetes mellitus, iron overload, cancers, organ transplant, kidney failure, coinfection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and immunosuppressive therapy (Lin et al. 2017; Prakash and Chakrabarti 2019, 2021). In addition, COVID-19 patients may develop immunosuppression as well as increased blood glucose levels in both non-diabetic and diabetic cases. Therefore, CAM has been reported in the post-treated or recovered patients (Garg et al. 2021) (Boiko et al. 2022). CAM reports are currently on the rise all over the world, especially in Asiatic regions where the fatality rate among COVID-19 patients is high (Garg et al. 2021; Hoenigl et al. 2021). With various comorbid disorders such diabetic mellitus, heart problems, and immune-impaired states, the effects of COVID-19 range from mild to moderate to life threatening (Apicella et al. 2020; Gandhi et al. 2020). Research articles further discussed how individuals with COVID-19 infection developed severe opportunistic infectious diseases such as pneumonia, candidiasis, and pulmonary aspergillosis (Chowdhary et al. 2020; Salehi et al. 2020). Additionally, there are stories of people with COVID-19 developing a strange fungal condition known as mucormycosis or black fungus (Sarkar et al. 2021). With 8848 cases of mucormycosis recorded as of May 22, 2021, COVID-19 patients in India also experience this epidemic disease (Akter et al. 2021a) (Afroze et al. 2017). However, given the high prevalence of untreated diabetes in Bangladesh, diabetes may be a critical risk factor for CAM. Furthermore, during COVID-19 infection, patients in Bangladesh are given steroids out of fear, which may damage their immune systems and put them at risk of mucormycosis ("Two black fungus cases detected in Bangladesh (9. Star TD, n. d. Two black fungus cases detected in Bangladesh. Available via https://www.thedailystar.net/bangladesh/news/two-black- fungus-cases-detected-20983092021 (Accessed 23 June 2021).),"). Overall, there is a scarcity of information on the agents that cause mucormycosis and CAM. As a result, the taxonomy and genetic properties of mucormycosis etiologies, as well as transmission, clinical symptoms, pathogenesis, and other topics, are the subject of this review. This current review will be focused on the etiology and virulence factors of COVID-19/mucormycosis coinfections in CAM patients, as well as their prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment options.

Signs and symptoms

Fever, headache, coughing, shortness of breath, bloody vomit, and neurological symptoms, as well as discomfort and redness around the eyes or nose, are all warning signs (Tagde et al. 2021b) (Rahman et al. 2020) (Sharma et al. 2022) (Kaur et al. 2021) (Rahman et al. 2021a). Loss of sensation or swelling on one side of the face, local discomfort on the cheekbone over the bridge of the nose/palate, there is a blackish discoloration. Teeth loosening, jaw involvement with discomfort and blurred or double vision, thrombosis, necrosis, and skin lesions are all examples of thrombosis. Chest discomfort, pleural effusion, and increased respiratory difficulties are all indications of a pleural effusion. Experts advise that all cases of blocked noses should not be mistaken for bacterial sinusitis, particularly in the event of immunosuppression and/or COVID-19 patients using immunomodulators. They advise that if you suspect a fungal infection, you should undergo rigorous examinations (Karthika et al. 2021) (Goyal et al. 2022) (Rahman et al. 2021b). Mucormycosis is a fungal infection that commonly affects the sinuses, brain, and lungs. Mucormycosis is most commonly found in the brain and mouth cavity, but the fungus can also infect other parts of the body, including the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and other organ systems (Muma and Chipalo-Mutati 2010). In rare circumstances, the maxilla may also be affected. Although more virulent fungi, such as those responsible for mucormycosis, can often overcome this obstacle, the strong blood vascular supply of craniofacial areas usually precludes fungal infections (Auluck 2007). Infection usually starts in the mouth or nose and spreads through the eyes to the central nervous system. When a sinus or the brain is impacted, the face swells one way, and headaches and congestion in the nose and sinuses are experienced, which leads to “black lesions” across the nose or upper side of the mouth; fever and eye swelling might develop. When the lungs are affected, the eyes may bulge, and fever, cough, chest pain, and difficulty in breathing can develop, as can coughing up blood. Nausea, abdominal soreness, vomiting, and bleeding are all symptoms of gastrointestinal system infection (Walia et al. 2021) (Purohit et al. 2022) (Zehravi et al. 2022). Due to tissue loss, the afflicted skin may appear as a darkish reddish sensitive patch with a darkening center (Hurt and Weedon 2012). Ulcers can arise at any time and can be extremely painful. When the fungus invades blood arteries, blood clots form and the surrounding tissue dies as a result of a lack of blood flow (Hurt and Weedon 2012). Because disseminated (widespread) mucormycosis usually occurs in patients who are already sick from other medical problems, it might be difficult to tell which symptoms are caused by the fungus (mucormycosis). Mental status changes or coma can occur in people who have a brain infection (Gambhir et al. 2021).

Transmission

Mucorales, also known as thermotolerant molds, are widespread in nature and are most usually discovered in soil and organic matter that has started to rot, such as leaves, compost piles, rotting wood, and animal dung. Aerosolization makes it simple to disperse Mucorales sporangiospores in the environment, which range in diameter from 3 to 11 m. Because the spores are airborne and can be found on any human surface that comes into touch with air, this is the main mechanism of transmission. Consumption of contaminated food and soil penetration through any burned, cut, or wounded skin are two additional potential transmission routes. Insects, such as those that sting or bite, can also spread fungi. And lastly, there are many different ways that nosocomial transmission can take place (Maniruzzaman et al. 2022) (Richardson and Infection 2009).

Risk factors

Mucormycosis is most common in those who are unable to resist infection (Wani 2021a). People with a low neutrophil count are at risk of infection, and tuberculosis (TB) is another risk factor. Mucormycosis has been linked to an increase in iron levels caused by deferoxamine treatment in kidney failure (Ibrahim et al. 2008). Steroids are widely used to treat COVID-19 and minimize damage produced by the body’s variables (Tagde et al. 2022) (Howard 1999) (Akter et al. 2021a). Organ transplantation, AIDS, poorly controlled diabetes, iron overload, malignancies such as those of the immune system during coronavirus infection. Corticosteroids inhibit the immune system and raise blood sugar levels in both diabetic and non-diabetic people, which may lead to cases of mucormycosis. Immunocompromised individuals who have certain risk factors for mucormycosis may suffer negative effects from it. However, mucormycosis can also infect immunocompetent hosts in extremely small numbers (Chakrabarti et al. 2006b; Roden et al. 2005b). The hosts’ immune systems are weakened by the risk factors for mucormycosis, which also encourage the growth of the agents and allow them to disseminate into the environment where they can cause harmful invasive infections. Risk factors for mucormycosis differed by geographic region, just like the etiological agents. For instance, compared to hematological malignancies in Europe, diabetes mellitus is more prevalent in India, Mexico, Iran, and various Middle Eastern and North African countries.

Mechanism

For cell growth and development, iron is a critical element, as it participates in various critical processes within the cell (Howard 1999). At present, it has been demonstrated that the level of accessible, free iron in serum is a significant element in the development of particular susceptibility to mucormycosis in individuals with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (Artis et al. 1982). Iron is coupled to serum proteins in mammalian hosts, such as transferrin, ferritin, and lactoferrin, which transport iron throughout the body. The sequestration of iron prevents the harmful effects of free iron (Artis et al. 1982; Howard 1999) from occurring. It is proved that Rhizopus oryzae growth is less in normal serum unless iron is supplied externally (Artis et al. 1982; Boelaert et al. 1993). Limiting iron availability in blood serum acts as a protective mechanism for the host against normal pathogens and also against Mucorales in particular. Because individuals with DKA are more susceptible to mucormycosis, the normal healthy people, the clinical finding that iron intake performs a function in the pathophysiology of the disease gives weight to this theory. Infusing serum with exogenous iron allowed R. oryzae to thrive in abundance under acidic but not alkaline circumstances (pH 7.4). In an acidic environment, the iron-binding capacity decreased, which indicates an acidosis environment lowers transferrin’s ability to bind iron by converting ferric iron from transferrin by proton-mediated transfer (Ibrahim et al. 2008). Animal investigations have demonstrated that treating mice with DKA with iron chelators such deferiprone and deferasirox (Ibrahim et al. 2006, 2007), which are not used by Mucorales as xenosiderophores, protected them from R. oryzae infection. On the other hand, not all Mucorales are equally vulnerable to efficient iron chelators (Lewis et al. 2011). Another clinical observation emphasizes the critical role played by the availability of host iron in the predisposition of patients to mucormycosis. Patients undergoing dialysis who are simultaneously receiving treatment with the iron chelator deferoxamine are at an increased risk of contracting a lethal form of mucormycosis (Boelaert et al. 1991) (Boelaert et al. 1991), which is a fungal infection (Fig. 1). Xenosiderophores such as deferoxamine, produced by bacteria, predispose people to Rhizopus infection by serving as bacterial siderophores (Boelaert et al. 1991). Deferoxamine connects to the mold via an inducible receptor after degrading ferric iron from transferrin. The iron is transported intracellularly when the ferric form is changed into the more soluble ferrous form by an active reduction of the ferric form into the more soluble ferrous form (De Locht et al. 1994). This happens when ferric iron is transformed to ferrous iron, which is more soluble. This is consistent with prior results that suggest that the administration of deferoxamine affects survival in Rhizopus infection, but does not influence survival in Candida albicans (Boelaert et al. 1993) (Boelaert et al. 1993). Deferoxamine administration decreases survival in Rhizopus infection but does not affect survival in Candida albicans infection (Boelaert et al. 1993). Finally, an underlying myelodysplastic syndrome is a significant risk factor for mucormycosis in transplantation, which is thought to predispose individuals to the disease as a result of iron overload caused by recurrent blood transfusions (Maertens et al. 1999). To get iron from the host, fungi can make use of iron permeases with high affinity for iron or iron chelators with low molecular weight (siderophores) (Maertens et al. 1999; Stearman et al. 1996). Fungi have iron permeases with a high affinity for ferric ions as part of a reductive system that also includes redundant surface reductases that convert ferric to the more soluble ferrous form of iron. When the surface reductase generates reduced ferrous iron, ferrous permease captures the reduced ferrous iron and transports it to the ferrous permease complex (Jung et al. 2008; Stearman et al. 1996). R. oryzae expresses the gene encoding high-affinity iron permease (FTR1) during mouse infection, and suppressing FTR1 gene expression with RNA-I or lowering the FTR1 copy number using gene disruption decreases the fungus’ pathogenicity in experimental animals of mucormycosis, according to a recent study. Passive vaccination with anti-Ftr1p immune serum has been shown to protect DKA mice against R. oryzae infection (Jung et al. 2008), which was significant. As a result, FTR1 is a critical virulence factor for R. oryzae, and passive immunotherapy using anti-Ftr1p is a viable method for improving outcomes in the severe mucormycosis disease. In addition to rhizoferrin, which is a siderophore that belongs to the polycarboxylate family (Jung et al. 2008), Rhizopus is also known to secrete rhizoferrin. In a receptor-mediated, energy-dependent mechanism (Jung et al. 2008), this siderophore provides iron to Rhizopus (Jung et al. 2008). In addition, it has been demonstrated that rhizoferrin is ineffective in collecting iron from serum (De Locht et al. 1994), implying that the contribution of the organism’s endogenous siderophores to the organism’s pathogenicity in a mammalian host is likely to be low. The host can get iron from a third mechanism by using heme (Ibrahim et al. 2010). Two homologs of heme oxygenase were found in the Rhizopus genome project (Ma et al. 2009). These 2 R. oryzae counterparts may enable R. oryzae to access host hemoglobin iron and explain R. oryzae’s angioinvasive nature. Of note, we discovered that the trailing medium development of R. oryzae, which has lower FTR1 copy numbers, was likewise supplemented with heme (Ibrahim et al. 2010). In R. oryzae, thus, FTR1 can operate as a cytoplasmic membrane permease which enables intracellular heme absorption, followed by the release of ferrous iron by intracellular breakdown with heme oxygenase. Other genes suspected to be involved in R. oryzae’s ability to absorb iron include Sree, a transcription regulator reported in Aspergillus fumigatus, which is necessary to adapt to the availability of ambient iron [40].
Fig. 1

Mucormycosis is a fungal infection with a typical etiology. The spores of the ubiquitous fungus enter the body through a skin injury or the naso-oral route, and then escape owing to pathological or immunocompromised situations, from the host immune cells. Fungal spores penetrate the cellular barrier and produce hyphae in blood vessels, which disseminate to other organs and cause fungal infection at the entry site. DKA diabetic ketoacidosis

Mucormycosis is a fungal infection with a typical etiology. The spores of the ubiquitous fungus enter the body through a skin injury or the naso-oral route, and then escape owing to pathological or immunocompromised situations, from the host immune cells. Fungal spores penetrate the cellular barrier and produce hyphae in blood vessels, which disseminate to other organs and cause fungal infection at the entry site. DKA diabetic ketoacidosis

Diagnosis

Early identification of mucormycosis is extremely important because it can improve results. Studies have revealed that survival increases (Chamilos et al. 2008) and surgical resection, disfiguration, and suffering may also be needed or degraded. This disease is considered a rare disease, and the suspicion index is crucial. In diagnosis, we must consider several major points like identification of risk factors, clinical symptoms evaluation, imaging techniques, and finally cultures of the organism.

Direct microscopy

Images are taken directly with a camera using direct microscopy, and for preliminary diagnosis within a short period of time, a KOH wet mount is used. For better visualization of the samples in the laboratory, fluorescent brighteners such as Blankophor and Calcofluor white are used that are conjugated with KOH (Walsh et al. 2012). Direct microscopy of fresh material is a low-cost yet exceptionally effective way for obtaining a tentative diagnosis and defining clean surgical margins for invasive fungal infection during surgery [44]. These approaches, on the other hand, are not capable of distinguishing between fungi at the genus or species level. An additional method, immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies against R. arrhizus (which has recently become commercially available), can help diagnose cultures that are negative and shown to be useful in distinguishing aspergillosis from mucormycosis (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100% for mucormycosis) (Jensen et al. 1997) and has received a moderate recommendation of B IIu in the recent ECMM/ESMM consensus statement (Cornely et al. 2019).

Culture

When diagnosing mucormycosis, specimen culture is critical since it enables genus- and species-level identification of the fungus, as well as antifungal susceptibility testing. The most therapeutically important Mucorales are thermotolerant, meaning they can grow at temperatures as high as 37 °C. They may be grown on almost any carbohydrate substrate, with colonies often emerging in 24–48 h. They are identified based on colonial and microscopic morphology and the temperature of growth (Walsh et al. 2012). Culture of the Mucorales is identified by MALDI-TOP spectroscopy (Cornely et al. 2019). For commercial availability, more enriched databases and validation data are needed. Molecular identification will continue to be the gold standard until that time. If the positive culture is obtained from a sterile site, the diagnosis is confirmed. Suppose the positive culture is obtained from a non-sterile site (Cornely et al. 2019). Mucormycosis culture is not without its drawbacks, the most serious of which is its low sensitivity, resulting in false-negative results in up to 50% of cases Several factors may be responsible for this, grinding or homogenization of tissue specimens, which can destroy micromycetes’ fragile hyphae; the existence of taxa that require particular culture conditions; recent or continuing therapy with antifungals effective on Mucorales; or even a lack of experience are all factors to consider. To acquire the best potential output, adequate specimen sampling and management are required prior to the evaluation. As a result, efficient communication and close coordination between doctors and the microbiology laboratory are essential when a case is suspected to guarantee that all parts of the diagnostic procedure are accomplished appropriately (Walsh et al. 2012).

Predisposing conditions

According to various studies, the most critical mucormycosis-predisposing conditions are: With or without stem cell transplantation in malignant hematological illness Severe and prolonged neutropenia Diabetes mellitus that is poorly managed with diabetic ketoacidosis or not Iron overload The biggest trauma Long corticosteroid usage Illegal use of intravenous drugs Premature neonatal A history of HIV infection Voriconazole and caspofungin, antifungal drugs that have no efficacy against Zygomycetes, have also been linked to breakthrough zygomycosis development (Hemsley and Kibbler 2008). Aside from these host-related risk factors, many cases have been related to the hospital environment, either entirely or in part. Construction labor, unclean air filters, or a range of healthcare-related procedures and equipment have all been linked to nosocomial mucormycosis (Petrikkos et al. 2003a), among other things. Several cases of iatrogenic mini-outbreaks have been reported (Skiada et al. 2011a) (Petrikkos et al. 2003b). The present edition contains an in-depth examination of the relevant literature on the subject matter.

HM and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is utilized for both hematological malignancies and non-malignant disorders, as well as salvage therapy in patients with no standard chemotherapy response chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The following are some of the general principles of allogeneic HSCT: (1) it allows patients to be rescued after receiving potentially myeloablative doses of chemotherapy and radiation in aggressive diseases, or after developing conventional therapeutic dosage resistance, and (2) it induces a significant graft-versus-malignancy response, which increases the likelihood of eradication of the malignancy and the development of conventional therapeutic dosage resistance. Acute myeloid leukemia (roughly one-third of cases), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (approximately 10–15% of cases), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (approximately 10–15% of cases) patients and myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic disorders (each about 10–15% of cases) were the most frequently diagnosed. Treatment begins with a conditioning regimen of chemotherapy, immunosuppressive medications, and radiation treatment before the infusion of donor hematopoietic stem cells is carried out in the clinic. To prevent or treat GvHD, immunosuppressive medication is later provided. The conditioning regimen accomplished both eradicating malignant cells and suppressing the recipient’s immune reaction. This prevents the recipient’s immune response from reacting against the donor hematopoietic cells (Maedler-Kron et al. 2016).

Solid organ malignancies and solid organ transplantation

Specific fungal infections in recipients account for just a tiny proportion of total invasive fungal infections; nonetheless, mucormycosis is associated with a significant mortality rate. Depending on the solid organ transplantation (SOT) type, the predicted incidence ranges from 0.4 to 16.0% (Nampoory et al. 1996; Park et al. 2004). Renal transplant recipients have a range of 0.2 to 1.2%, liver transplant recipients have a range of 0 to 1.6%, heart transplant recipients have a range of 0 to 0.6%, and lung transplant recipients have a range of 0 to 1.5%. When neutropenia was assessed in a retrospective research and literature review, it was shown that SOT recipients did not have it, nor did they have acidosis with or without hyperglycemia or usage of deferoxamine (DFO) (Singh et al. 2009). On the other hand, all patients were subjected to long-term immunosuppression, which was often accompanied by high doses of systemic corticosteroids. The skin and soft tissues were the most frequently affected, whereas the brain was the least affected. An increased incidence of mucormycosis was seen in a prospective, matched, case-controlled investigation of mucormycosis in SOT recipients who had previously used voriconazole and caspofungin, as well as those who had previously had renal failure or diabetes mellitus (Maurer et al. 1992).

Diabetes mellitus and ketoacidosis

Mucormycosis may be the initial symptom in some individuals with undetected diabetes mellitus (Mok et al. 2003), but it is uncommon in patients with metabolically managed diabetes (Petrikkos et al. 2012) (Kabir et al. 2022) (Karthika et al. 2022a). The epidemiology of mucormycosis in diabetes people is still being studied and is changing. Roden et al. (Park et al. 2004) (Tagde et al. 2021a) discovered that diabetic patients accounted for 36% of 929 reported cases but that the incidence of mucormycosis in diabetics has been decreasing over time (Reed et al. 2008). It has been hypothesized that treatment with statins, which are often used to treat metabolic disorders in the Western world, may have played a part in this reduced frequency because statins are active against some Zygomycetes (Mok et al. 2003; Roden et al. 2005a). Mucormycosis, on the other hand, continues to pose a serious concern to people with diabetes. According to a recent statewide retrospective research conducted in France, mucormycosis incidence among diabetics has increased by 9% every year (Mok et al. 2003). Another retrospective study conducted at two American teaching and tertiary care institutions found that 83% of patients with ROCM were diabetics, with 41% of those patients having no known history of the disease (Chakrabarti et al. 2006a). Fungal infection affecting the lungs is mucormycosis. These findings highlight the link between poor diabetes control and low socioeconomic level in the USA. Because healthcare is mainly out of reach of low-income folks until issues arise, they postpone seeking medical assistance unless complications occur. Another point to consider is that low- and middle-income individuals account for over 80% of all type 2 diabetes–related deaths (Arce-Salinas and Pérez-Silva 2010). Many of these cases of mucormycosis could have been avoided if diabetes control strategies had been implemented (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Complex biochemical connections and immunomodulated interactions in COVID-19-related mucormycosis lead to death in hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis. Hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis develop when the transferrin protein fails to isolate free iron in the blood. Free iron molecules, glucose, and β-hydroxy butyrate (BHB) ketone bodies influence the immunity that also help to boost up the expression of fungal CotH (coat protein homologs), resulting formation of mucor inside blood vessels. GRP78 glucose regulatory protein-78

Complex biochemical connections and immunomodulated interactions in COVID-19-related mucormycosis lead to death in hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis. Hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis develop when the transferrin protein fails to isolate free iron in the blood. Free iron molecules, glucose, and β-hydroxy butyrate (BHB) ketone bodies influence the immunity that also help to boost up the expression of fungal CotH (coat protein homologs), resulting formation of mucor inside blood vessels. GRP78 glucose regulatory protein-78

Corticosteroid use and rheumatic diseases

Systemic lupus erythematosus in mucormycosis patients is documented in the research article (Arce-Salinas and Pérez-Silva 2010; Artis et al. 1982). Still, disseminated mucormycosis was prevalent and had a high mortality rate (88%) (Shenoi and Emery 2010). In addition to hypocomplementemia, nephrotic syndrome, uremia, leukopenia, and diabetes mellitus, there are several more risk factors for opportunistic mucormycosis to consider. Opportunistic mucormycosis is a fungal infection that can emerge in persons suffering from various autoimmune disorders. Another significant risk factor for mucormycosis is chronic corticosteroid-based medication, which increases a patient’s vulnerability to the infection by inducing abnormalities in macrophages and neutrophils, as well as steroid-induced hyperglycemia (Daly et al. 1989).

Iron overload and chelation therapy with DFO

According to data from an international registry of mycoses, mucormycosis is treated with deferoxamine (DFO) in 78% of dialysis patients (McNab and McKelvie 1997). Mucormycosis is associated with other factors such as DFO and iron overload, which can be produced by transfusion or by dyserythropoiesis (Morrison and McGlave 1993) (Marty et al. 2004) (Vigouroux et al. 2005). According to the literature, the disseminated form of mucormycosis is the most prevalent presentation in patients receiving DFO (44%), and this presentation is related to a high death rate, which has been reported to approach 80% (McNab and McKelvie 1997; Torres-Narbona et al. 2007).

Prolonged use of voriconazole

Mucormycosis incidence has increased in several institutions around the world because of the Aspergillus-active agents used. The findings of recent two randomized studies showed results comparing voriconazole prophylaxes with fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxes in allogeneic transplant patients were inconclusive (Antinori et al. 2009) (Moraru and Grossman 2000), but they did not rule out the possibility that this was the case.

HIV or AIDS

Antinori et al. (2009) conducted a comprehensive retrospective investigation of 1630 autopsies of patients who died of AIDS between 1984 and 2002 and found only two cases of mucormycosis. In HIV-infected patients, mucormycosis is uncommon compared to other immunocompromised populations, which explains the low occurrence of the disease in this community. The use of intravenous drugs is connected with the majority of mucormycosis cases in HIV-infected patients (Blatt et al. 1991; Van den Saffele and Boelaert 1996).

Mucormycosis in children

Mucormycosis in children is quite uncommon. Zaoutis and colleagues systematically assessed all accessible English-language reports of pediatric mucormycosis cases published before 2004. One hundred fifty-seven cases (64% of whom were male) with a median age of 5 years were identified by the researchers. Twenty-eight patients (18%) were diagnosed with HMs, and nine patients (6%) had received HSCT. From 2004 through 2008, an additional 30 pediatric cases were reported by the authors (Roilides et al. 2009).

Antifungal therapy challenges in COVID-19-infected patients

Researchers are investigating how common fungal coinfections are in COVID-19 patients and how to detect and treat them. For patient survival, early discovery, therapy initiation, and an understanding of the limitations of the continually updating COVID-19 therapeutic guidelines are crucial (Mekonnen et al. 2021) (Negrut et al. 2021). Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS) is a potentially fatal fungal illness (Deutsch et al. 2019) (Behl et al. 2020) (Negru et al. 2022). Immunocompromised patients are more vulnerable, such as those with hematological malignancies, diabetes, or organ transplantation (Hirabayashi et al. 2019) (Bhattacharya et al. 2021) (Mazumdar et al. 2016). COVID-19 infected over 18 million peoples globally, 4 million in the USA, and 2 million in Bangladesh (Dong et al. 2020) (Sindhu et al. 2021a). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by a coronavirus can increase the risk of pulmonary fungal infections (Song et al. 2020a). Invasive mold infection is a serious consequence seen in people who have had acute viral pneumonia (Schauwvlieghe et al. 2018). In Europe, China, and the USA, fungal superinfections have been identified (COVID-19). Aspergillosis is the most prevalent cause, with prevalence rates ranging from 7.7 to 27.7% (Hughes et al. 2020; Marr et al. 2021). Based on histology, microbiology, imaging data, and clinical variables, COVID-19-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) has been identified (Koehler et al. 2020) (Al-Harrasi et al. 2022a). Hospitals are facing new clinical issues as the global coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) spreads around the world. The increased chance of coinfections is one of these concerns that pose a significant risk to patients. Although the number of COVID-19 patients who developed secondary fungal infections resulting in severe complications and even death is still low due to the pandemic’s short duration, studies have been published that show a huge number of COVID-19 hospitalized patients who developed secondary fungal infections resulting in severe complications and even death (Segrelles-Calvo et al. 2021) (Tagde et al. 2021c) (Karthika et al. 2021).

Epidemiology of fungal coinfections in COVID-19 patients

COVID-19 is a severe acute respiratory infection that has been spreading over the world (Song et al. 2020b; Fatima et al. 2022; Behl et al. 2022b). In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, fungal coinfections, particularly with Aspergillus and Candida species, are frequent, impacting patient outcomes and treatment efforts. However, there is currently a paucity of knowledge and expertise about the causative association between fungal coinfections and the severity of COVID-19 disease in patients. If and when such data becomes available, it will help with proper case management (Ezeokoli and Pohl 2020). Fungal infections can make COVID-19 diagnosis, treatment, and development more challenging, whether they occur before or after COVID-19 exposure (Karthika et al. 2022b; Chaung et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2020; Ding et al. 2020; Gangneux et al. 2020). Pre-existing fungal infections are uncommon at this period. This is due to the likelihood of previously unknown fungal infections in healthy persons prior to COVID-19 exposure, a lack of accurate clinical symptom descriptions, and a preference for COVID-19 diagnosis over fungal infection detection (Ezeokoli and Pohl 2020). Although COVID-19-related conditions are widespread in ICU patients, they are not the only source of infection (Bassetti et al. 2017). Mucormycosis is an example of an opportunistic fungal infection. It was once debatable whether persons who take immunosuppressants such corticosteroids and monoclonal antibodies are more prone to get COVID-19 or whether the immunosuppressive condition makes COVID-19 disease worse. Immunosuppressive drugs are still needed unless the patient is at a higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection or is on excess dose of corticosteroids (Otrisal et al. 2021a). As far as we know, COVID-19 disease causes severe and long-term lymphopenia, which raises the risk of opportunistic infections (Sindhu et al. 2021b).

The global popularity of COVID-19 and the possibility of fungal coinfections

Coronaviruses are transmitted from human to human that infect respiratory tract and also have become a worldwide public health issue (of the International 2020; Zhou et al. 2020). SARS-CoV-2, like SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, causes respiratory illnesses (Huang et al. 2020) (Chahal et al. 2021). Extremely unwell patients, patients who were admitted in an intensive care unit (ICU), required mechanical ventilation, or had spent more than 50 days in the hospital, were more likely to have fungal coinfections (Raedler and Schaub 2014). At this moment, there are no known treatment drugs for this virus. COVID-19 is being treated with antiviral methods that are currently being explored (Al-Harrasi et al. 2022b). Infections in the respiratory system, such as influenza, predispose patients to coinfections, worsening the sickness and increasing the likelihood of death (Mirzaei et al. 2020). The 2019 coronavirus infection caused by coronavirus two and produced severe acute respiratory syndrome has decimated the world (SARS-CoV-2). Based on review data from SARS and influenza, we believe that fungal coinfections linked to COVID-19 may be overlooked or misdiagnosed. Despite the absence of evidence, patients with COVID-19 are more likely to develop invasive mycoses, especially those severely ill or immunocompromised. Risk factors, forms of invasive mycoses, diagnostic strengths and limitations, clinical scenarios, and the need for a measure or individualized treatment are all explored (Tilavberdiev and Madaminov 2021). COVID is related to any infectious disease, and the metabolites generated by microorganisms such as bacteria, fungus, and protozoa can be implicated in necrotizing pneumonia and other necrotizing medical diseases found in COVID-19 (Akter et al. 2021b) (Karthika et al. 2021).

Clinical manifestations

Lyme infection caused by a spirochete that is carried by insects begins with an erythema chronicum migrans rash. Evanescent red blotches or circles, malar or urticarial rash, conjunctivitis, and periorbital edema were seen in nearly half of the 314 Lyme disease patients. Dermatological symptoms, quickly shifting system involvement, and, if required, serologic tests can all be used to diagnosis early Lyme disease (Paley 2021). Staphylococcus aureus is a type of bacteria that cause a variety of illnesses in humans. Bacteremia, infective endocarditis, osteoarticular infections, skin and soft tissue infections, pleuropulmonary infections, and infection caused by medical equipment are all examples of joint disorders. This study delves into the epidemiology, etiology, clinical symptoms, and treatment of each of these clinical entities. While reviewing the literature to support management strategies for various clinical presentations, we discovered a paucity of high-quality evidence for several critical clinical concerns (Tong et al. 2015). Staphylococcus aureus is both a disease and a commensal bacterium in humans. S. aureus has colonized around 30% of the human population (Wertheim et al. 2005). Hemoglobinopathies are one of the world’s most frequent hereditary disorders. Due to immigration, they have grown much more frequent throughout northern and central Europe, particularly in Germany (Kohne 2011). Two hundred forty individuals with common variable immunodeficiency, seven patients with thymoma-associated hypogammaglobulinemia, and 44 patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia had their records analyzed at this clinic over the last 20 years. Despite significant therapeutic improvements, there is still a long time between diagnosis and treatment and high death and morbidity rates. Hypogammaglobulinemia has been associated with chronic sinopulmonary infection, chronic diarrhea, malignancy, joint sickness, and hepatitis. Mycoplasma infections and enterovirus infections can be resistant to treatment, which is a severe problem. The increased frequency of lymphoma and stomach cancer in people with common variable immunodeficiency is highlighted (Eastwood and Nyhlin 1995).

Pulmonary mucormycosis

Pulmonary mucormycosis is caused by a severe but rare opportunistic fungus that affects persons who are immunocompromised. There is a paucity of research on the subject. To evaluate the clinical aspects of this infection, we examine a recent case and do a literature study. After reviewing the MEDLINE database for publications published in the English-language literature from 1970, we found 87 instances. Diabetes, hematologic malignancies, renal insufficiency, and organ transplantation were all significant risk factors. Several patients looked to have weakened immune systems. The top lobes tended to become entangled. Air crescent signals on chest x-rays indicated pulmonary hemorrhage and hemoptysis mortality. Histopathologic examination was found to be more sensitive than fungal cultures, and fiber-optic bronchoscopy was found to be a proper diagnostic technique. In total, 44% of the victims were rescued. Patients who received a combination of medicinal and surgical treatment fared better than those who did not. As a result, immunocompromised people who do not respond to antibiotics should be suspected of having this infrequent but often fatal infection. To maximize the chances of cure, early detection and active management are critical. Systemic antifungal medicine, surgical excision, and, if possible, repair of the patient’s underlying condition are all required for effective treatment (Lee et al. 1999). Mucormycosis is an opportunistic fungal infection that commonly begins in the lungs (Tedder et al. 1994). Mucormycosis has recently been identified as a serious lung infection in hematologic patients and transplant recipients who were given antifungal prophylaxis using antifungals that were efficacious against Aspergillus but not Mucorales. Unlike pulmonary aspergillosis, pulmonary mucormycosis has not improved considerably in the previous decade because of difficulties with early identification and the low efficacy of present antifungal therapies for Mucorales (Hamilos et al. 2011).

Rhinocerebral mucormycosis

The rhinocerebral type of the illness, which accounts for around half of all newly described cases, is most commonly observed in poorly managed diabetics or extremely dehydrated young children. We have dealt with 13 cases since 1963, which are detailed in this report. The chance of long-term survival is around 85%. The rigorous surgical treatment, which included regular debridement and intravenous amphotericin B, is responsible for the remarkable cure rate (Kvijayan and Specialities 2019). Rhinocerebral mucormycosis is caused by an invasive, opportunistic fungus that typically affects people who are immunocompromised, such as those who have diabetes or other immunological problems. The colonization of the nasal mucosa is thought to be the site of entry, allowing the fungus to proceed into the orbit via the paranasal sinuses. Because the orbital apex is implicated in the infection of the brain and cavernous sinus, spheno-ethmoidectomy with or without maxillectomy appears to be the most effective therapy. From February 2000 to April 2004, 10 persons with rhinocerebral mucormycosis were assessed in prospective research. Eleven people were diagnosed with rhinocerebral mucormycosis clinically, and ten of them were included in our study following histological confirmation. In nine out of ten instances, the underlying illness was diabetes (Hosseini et al. 2005). Rhinocerebral mucormycosis is a severe and sometimes fatal fungal illness. Nasal mucosa involvement with the invasion of the paranasal sinuses and orbit is the classic presentation. Mucormycosis is most typically associated with diabetic ketoacidosis; however, since the introduction of AIDS and potent immunosuppressive drugs, disease demographics have changed. Aggressive debridement, systemic antifungal medication, and management of underlying comorbid variables are all part of the therapy plan (Peterson et al. 1997). Rhinocerebral mucormycosis is only observed in people with substantial metabolic or immunologic issues, with a few exceptions. Factors that may predispose to mucormycosis development are studied. Ketoacidosis and immunologic insufficiency caused by the underlying disease or treatment for other disorders are examples of these. Understanding these risk factors is crucial to initiate proactive diagnosis and treatment as soon as feasible (Mcnulty 1982).

Cutaneous mucormycosis

The fungus Zygomycetes, which belong to the Mucorales family, causes mucormycosis. Immunocompromised people are more likely to be impacted by this disease, which has a severe and rapid course. Mucormycosis can manifest itself in a variety of clinical manifestations and locations. Although obtaining the correct diagnosis can be challenging, it is essential for a patient’s survival. Mucormycosis manifests itself in a variety of ways. Cutaneous mucormycosis is less common than other varieties of mucormycosis, but if not treated promptly, it can be fatal. Histology and tissue culture both indicate a fungal infection. As a typical treatment, antifungal medicines are utilized in conjunction with surgical debridement. We present five different cases of cutaneous mucormycosis treated at our clinic, as well as the treatments used in each patient (Arnáiz-García et al. 2009). Cutaneous mucormycosis is the third most common clinical kind of mucormycosis, after pulmonary and rhinocerebral mucormycosis. The most common factors predisposed to this infection are hematological malignancies and diabetes mellitus, but many individuals are immune-competent. Mucormycosis agents can be found worldwide and are transmitted to the skin via direct inoculation due to various injuries. Among these are needlesticks, animal stings and bites, car accidents, natural disasters, and burn injuries. The most common symptom of mucormycosis is necrotic eschar; however, it can sometimes develop with other symptoms. The infection could be limited, penetrating nearby fat, muscle, fascia, and bone, or spreading throughout the body. The vague symptoms of mucormycosis make diagnosis difficult. A biopsy, as well as a culture, is required. Surgical debridement, antifungal medicines (amphotericin B and posaconazole), and, when possible, reversal of underlying risk factors are used to treat mucormycosis. Although fatality rates are lower than in other varieties of the disease, they are nevertheless substantial, ranging from 4 to 10% when the infection is contained [48]. Cutaneous mucormycosis is a novel fungal infection caused by the opportunistic Glomeromycota fungus. It is common in poorly controlled diabetes patients and immunocompromised individuals. Following a traumatic experience, it is typically obtained through direct inoculation. Although an indurated plaque that progresses to necrosis is typical, the clinical picture is not always clear. The etiological agent must be identified to confirm the diagnosis, and new molecular diagnostic techniques have recently been established. It is a life-threatening, invasive disease that necessitates early detection and intensive treatment to improve survival. The therapy of choice is amphotericin B, but novel azoles such as posaconazole and isavuconazole should also be investigated (Gómez-Camarasa et al. 2014).

Gastrointestinal mucormycosis

The gastrointestinal mucormycosis of twenty patients is investigated. Colonization (five patients), infiltration (seven patients), and vascular invasion (four patients) were the histological findings for this potentially fatal opportunistic fungal infection (eight patients). There were no deaths because of colonization. Mucormycosis exacerbated the peptic ulcer disease in ten patients. An infiltrative or invasive illness developed in seven of the individuals. Five of the seven patients’ presentation and operational results resembled cancer, and six received successful surgical surgery. The other patient could only be helped by medical intervention. Patients with post-traumatic peritonitis (4), transmural amoebiasis (2), tuberculosis (1), gastroenteritis (1), stomach cancer (1), and diabetes were among the ten patients who had infections linked with other gastrointestinal illnesses (1). Only one of the eight patients was able to avoid a life-threatening disease. When mucormycosis was related to a peptic ulcer in this study, it took a less aggressive course than when it was linked to other gastrointestinal disorders (Thomson et al. 1991). Mucormycosis is a life-threatening infection caused by fungus in the Mucoromycotina subphylum of the Mucorales order (Hibbett et al. 2007). Diabetes, abnormalities in host phagocytes, corticosteroid use, organ or stem cell transplantation, and high levels of accessible blood iron due to acidosis or deferoxamine treatment are all traditional risk factors for the development of invasive mucormycosis (Goldstein et al. 2009; Spellberg et al. 2005). The illness has been described in an increasing number of patients who do not have usual risk factors in recent years (Roden et al. 2005a). Over the last decade, mucormycosis has become a leading cause of death among people with diabetes and other immunocompromised people. Mucormycosis symptoms include rhinosinusitis, pansinusitis, rhinoorbital, and rhinocerebral symptoms. Primary GI mucormycosis, on the other hand, is an uncommon condition with a high fatality rate. The stomach is the most common location of GI mucormycosis. In the literature, only a few cases of GI mucormycosis in an immunocompetent host have been recorded. A young child developed fungal sepsis due to GI mucormycosis in an immunocompetent person (Benjamin 2009).

Disseminated mucormycosis

Early detection of invasive mucormycosis is critical for effective treatment, higher survival rates, and lower morbidity (Walsh et al. 2012). Disseminated mucormycosis, which first manifested as indurated skin nodules and pneumonia, exacerbated the clinical history with acute granulocytic leukemia. This is the first time cutaneous vasculitis has been characterized as a mucormycosis dermatologic presentation (Meyer et al. 1973). Isavuconazole is only approved to treat invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis in adults because no pediatric pharmacology studies have been published so far. Isavuconazole has only been used in a few pediatric cases that have been published. Even with the liposomal formulation, amphotericin B is the only antifungal treatment recommended for pediatric mucormycosis. However, side effects, particularly nephrotoxicity, could be a problem. In this case, other antifungal drugs that are effective against Mucorales are required (Cornu et al. 2018).

Uncommon forms of mucormycosis

Molds other than Aspergillus are causing a growing number of people to become ill. The ever-increasing use of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, as well as more stringent myeloablative therapy for malignant tumors and more intense care for critically ill patients, contributes to the spread of these infections. Invasive mold infection fatality rates remain high, despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic options. This paper summarizes the current state of knowledge about non-Aspergillus mold infections of the chest, focusing on risk factors, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and therapy (Quan and Spellberg 2010). Mucormycosis (Fig. 3), a life-threatening disease caused by a Mucorales fungus, is becoming more common. Direct inoculation causes skinny mucormycosis, which commonly occurs after trauma or surgery. Gastrointestinal mucormycosis affects the stomach and colon after consuming infected food or using contaminated equipment. Disseminated illness, the most severe form of the disease, is accompanied by significant immunosuppression. Endocarditis, osteoarthritis, and isolated brain infections are just a few of the unusual symptoms that have been reported. Finally, in preterm newborns and burn units, mucormycosis associated with medical care is a concern. Only the early reversed halo sign is connected to pulmonary mucormycosis, regardless of clinical symptoms or CT scan results. Circulating Mucorales DNA detection is a potential new diagnostic tool that can help diagnose and treat antifungal medication, underlying disease repair, and surgery if necessary (Serris et al. 2019).
Fig. 3

Based on case reports, a clinical depiction of several kinds of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM)

Based on case reports, a clinical depiction of several kinds of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM)

Bangladesh reports 1st death by black fungus

Many web databases were used to obtain crucial information regarding these diseases. According to published reports and evaluations, the long-term repercussions of these simultaneous epidemics on global socioeconomic and public health status can be projected based on earlier outbreak experiences, notably the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, continued local government restrictions may lead to food insecurity, global recession, and a significant impact on the mental health of people of all ages, especially in developing countries. Slowed national economic growth, greater political insecurity, and a shortage of essential commodities are just a few of the far-reaching impacts that have already been noticed. Despite several efforts to solve the situation, such as immunization, clinical management, further research, social separation, and lockdown, among others, emerging variations and accompanying genetic changes may make containment more difficult, exacerbating the problem once more. Continuous preparedness and updated clinical care backed by epidemiological studies and novel scientific endeavors are unavoidable in confronting many infectious disease waves simultaneously, given the pathogens’ current mutational dynamics and prior experiences (Khan et al. 2021).

Drug treatment for mucormycosis

The diagnostic approach used in clinical practice is insufficiently sensitive and specific. On radiography, pulmonary mucormycosis has been related to many (10) nodules and pleural effusion. The inverted halo sign is another finding on computed tomography (CT) scan that appears to suggest the presence of mucormycosis. The cornerstones of diagnosis are microscopy (direct and on histology) and culture. Micromycetes can be detected or identified via molecular testing, and they may be recommended as a valuable adjunct to conventional diagnostic processes. An effective mucormycosis treatment plan includes reversing or terminating underlying predisposing factors, early delivery of active antifungal drugs at appropriate doses, full excision of all diseased tissues, and the use of various adjuvant therapies (Hadiyanto et al. 2021). In recent years, significant progress has been made in the treatment of mucormycosis. Maintaining a high index of suspicion and actively biopsying suspicious lesions has become apparent, emphasizing the need for beginning therapy as soon as feasible. According to emerging data, surgical removal of sick and necrosed tissue is suggested whenever possible. Amphotericin B lipid formulations have become the usual therapy for mucormycosis due to their superior safety and efficacy. According to preclinical and limited retrospective clinical evidence, combining amphotericin lipid formulations with an echinocandin enhances mucormycosis survival (Najafi et al. 2019). Polyene should be used as the first antifungal therapy for mucormycosis. Although amphotericin B (AmB) deoxycholate has long been the gold standard for mucormycosis therapy, lipid formulations of AmB are significantly less nephrotoxic. They can be given in bigger dosages for longer periods of time than AmB. The anti-mucormycosis activity of fluconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole is inconsistent.

Prophylaxes

Pre- and post-exposure prophylaxes (PrEP and PEP) can help prevent HIV infection. However, the most vulnerable populations in sub-Saharan Africa, such as sex workers, are usually inaccessible and underutilized. Based on in-depth interviews conducted in Mombasa, Kenya, with 21 female and 23 male HIV-negative sex workers, we discovered that despite a solid willingness to utilize both, comprehension and expertise of PrEP and PEP were poor. Despite concerns about side effects, participants believed PrEP would empower them and give additional infection prevention. Even though PEP was widely available, few people were aware of it, and even fewer had used it; those who had, however, stated that they would do so again. Healthcare for sex workers required strict HIV/STI testing, as well as secrecy, anonymity, and a user-friendly website (Restar et al. 2017). Periodontitis can be slowed down using dental prophylaxis, which entails eliminating supragingival calculus and plaque. The impact of dental prophylaxis on T2DM patients’ periodontitis was studied in a randomized controlled experiment.

Secondary prophylaxis

While primary prophylaxis for children with severe hemophilia is well-established and recommended, less study on the benefits of secondary prevention began in adolescence or adulthood (Tagliaferri et al. 2008). Prophylaxis is usually recommended to treat severe hemophilia A. Prophylaxis is utilized in less than half of extreme cases in the USA, even though it is widely employed in other countries. One indication is that many people with severe hemophilia are affected. Prophylaxis’s potential benefits will only be realized if supplied to a community as secondary prophylaxis. The arthropathy of thirteen children with severe hemophilia was treated with frequent factor VIII or IX replacement infusions in this study. The children, who were 6.9 years old at the time (range 2.0–12.5), had an average of 43 acute hemorrhages (range 8–127) in the year preceding up to prophylaxis, with a mean of 24 (range 5–46) into joints. Five boys were given factor VIII concentrate (20 U/kg) three times each week, while one child was given factor IX concentrate (40 U/kg) twice per week. This dosage regimen was insufficient for three factor VIII–deficient boys and one factor IX secondary child. Two of the three factor VIII–deficient boys reacted to a 30 U/kg increase before the 3-day delay.

Fever-driven treatment

There is no single therapeutic strategy appropriate for all patients; for example, empirical antifungal medication may be advised for individuals at very high risk, while others at moderate risk may benefit from a preventative approach. Two antifungal drugs with different modes of action (echinocandins + azoles or polyenes, for example) could be combined to take advantage of their synergistic and additive effects. Assume there is much pharmacokinetic variability and the dose-concentration effect correlations are not evident. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the medications should be examined once therapy has begun (e.g., for itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole) (Candoni et al. 2012). Earlier antifungal therapy was linked to fluconazole non-susceptible strains, whereas previous echinocandin treatment was related to C. parapsilosis–related breakthrough candidemia (BrC). These findings must be considered while treating BrC experimentally (Cuervo et al. 2016). Invasive mold sickness is becoming more common among immunocompromised people. It is a hot topic of debate regarding the ideal time to use mold-active antifungal drugs. Current antifungal prophylaxis, early treatment, and proven mold infections in one hematology patient are discussed (Maertens et al. 2011).

Diagnosis-driven treatment

The reasons for comprehensive periodontal treatment, as well as the stages of treatment, are discussed. The phases naturally progress one after the other. Periodontal health, gingivitis, and periodontitis are the three major treatment groups that can be formed. Within the periodontitis group, the main ideas and techniques for treating chronic and aggressive periodontitis patients are entirely different. Gingivitis and chronic periodontitis results are largely predictable, and traditional non-surgical and surgical therapy can reduce inflammation, delay periodontal deterioration, and restore gingival periodontal health. Patients’ motivation and upkeep are critical for long-term effects. It is harder to predict late treatment effects and aggressive periodontitis case maintenance. Regenerative surgical treatments, on the other hand, can completely restore the vertical component of bone loss. Because no periodontal regenerative therapy can replace the missing alveolar crest and interdental septa, the horizontal bone loss should be irreversible (Gera 2004). The purpose of this study was to see how successful and safe low-dose amphotericin B (AmB) was in treating using various antifungal techniques (Yang et al. 2017).

First-line antifungal monotherapy

Aspergillosis is an invasive fungal infection (IFI) that can be fatal in persons who have weakened immune systems. A fungus causes it, and it spreads throughout the body. In the 1990s, for example, the development and widespread use of fluconazole prophylaxis resulted in lower mortality from yeast infections. As a result, invasive aspergillosis has become the most prevalent IFI, especially among patients with hematological malignancies, solid organ transplantation, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patients who are at risk of contracting aspergillosis are put on long-term immunosuppressive medicines (e.g., corticosteroids). Earlier reports of antifungal prophylaxis changes in lung transplant (LTx) recipients have been published, but the current therapeutic practice is unfamiliar. This research aimed to see what antifungal prophylactic techniques are currently being employed at LTx centers worldwide. Each active center’s designated LTx clinician received an e-mail invitation to engage in a web-based survey between September 2009 and January 2010. A total of 57% of those asked (58/102) responded. Medical directors at LTx facilities in the USA provided most responses (72.4%). Most centers (58.6%) utilized universal prophylaxis within the first 6 months following LTx, with 97.1% targeting Aspergillus species. The first-line therapies were voriconazole alone and in combination with inhaled amphotericin B (AmB) (Neoh et al. 2011). A airway infection caused by bacteria and fungus characterizes cystic fibrosis (CF). Conditions with the Scedosporium/Lomentospora species are widespread and challenging to treat. Molds from the genus Scedosporium/Lomentospora are the most prevalent molds detected in CF patients’ respiratory samples, second only to Aspergillus spp. This study aimed to explore antimycotic treatment options for Scedosporium/Lomentospora lung fungal infections in CF patients (Schwarz et al. 2019). The optimum treatment for mucormycosis is yet to be determined, thanks to the emergence of novel antifungals. In this study, the current management of mucormycosis and its effects were thoroughly examined (Jeong et al. 2019).

First-line antifungal combination therapy

This multicenter observational trial looked into the feasibility, effectiveness, and toxicity of antifungal combination therapy (combo) to treat confirmed or suspected invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in patients with hematological malignancies (Candoni et al. 2014). Antifungal combination treatment is a novel approach to treating fungal infections in the clinic. The evidence from in vitro, experimental, and clinical trials is examined in this research to provide clinical answers for this exciting new therapy strategy (Fohrer et al. 2006). Invasive fungal infections (candidiasis, aspergillosis, and cryptococcosis) cause severe morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised people. Except for cryptococcosis, invasive fungal infections are treated with single antifungal medicines based on randomized clinical studies or expert advice. The dismal prognosis of these infections has attracted antifungal associations’ attention as a first- or second-line treatment, and a plethora of experimental data has been published on the subject. In humans, mainly HIV-positive persons, the combination therapy of amphotericin B and flucytosine for cryptococcal meningitis has been thoroughly validated. According to a few studies, fluconazole and amphotericin B are not antagonistic in candidiasis, and caspofungin plus polyene or caspofungin plus azole combinations may be helpful in invasive aspergillosis. Randomized investigations are required to verify these findings. Research on the effects of anidulafungin and voriconazole in the treatment of aspergillosis is currently being conducted (Gellen-Dautremer et al. 2009).

Antifungal salvage treatment

Posaconazole was given at a dose of 21 mg/kg (range 4.8–33.3) for 32 days (range 4–262). None of the patients stopped taking their medication because of side effects, which were largely minor and only happened to 11 of them. We feel that posaconazole has a high level of safety and tolerance and that it could be beneficial in treating individual pediatric patients with invasive infections based on the data (Lehrnbecher et al. 2010). There are now a variety of novel therapeutic options for dangerous fungal infections. All three echinocandin medicines now available effectively treat candidemia and invasive candidiasis in randomized, blinded clinical trials. In previously controlled salvage treatment trials in patients who had failed or were intolerant to conventional medication, echinocandins effectively treat invasive aspergillosis. Voriconazole and posaconazole, two new triazole antifungal medicines, provide a broad spectrum of antifungal activity. Invasive aspergillosis has traditionally been treated with voriconazole. Posaconazole appears to be successful in the treatment of zygomycosis based on compassionate treatment evidence. Non-Aspergillus mold infections, endemic mycoses, and severe Candida infections have been successfully treated with these medications (Kauffman 2006) (Karthika et al. 2022a).

Treatment duration for mucormycosis

Despite the addition of mold-active drugs (posaconazole and isavuconazole) to our armory against mucormycosis, there are still many unanswered concerns about treating this uncommon opportunistic infection. We cover the current state of therapy choices in this mini-review. Mucormycosis treatment requires a tailored approach that takes into account the host’s overall immunosuppression, as well as comorbidities, the certainty of diagnosis, infection site, and antifungal pharmacological properties, due to the disease’s diversity (Sipsas et al. 2018). The Zygomycetes class is divided into two orders: Mucorales and Entomophthorales (Prabhu and Patel 2004). The Tunisian infectious disease department conducted research in 2000 and 2013 on four men and one lady, all of whom were in their 60 s. One of the patients had severe leukemia, while the other three had diabetes. Mucormycosis was discovered in rhinocerebral, rhinoorbital, auricular, pulmonary, and cutaneous mucormycosis. Mucorales Rhizopus arrhizus and Lichtheimia were found in three and two cases, respectively. Amphotericin B was given to all the patients, and two of them additionally had surgical debridement. Two patients died, while the other two were left with peripheral facial paralysis (Bellazreg et al. 2015).

Dexamethasone treatment

Dexamethasone’s main anti-inflammatory impact was to stop a pro-inflammatory gene from triggering the acute inflammatory response (Saraya et al. 2012). Low doses of dexamethasone work via the genomic mechanism (Fig. 4) (Mitre-Aguilar et al. 2015), which takes longer and has fewer adverse effects; greater dosages, on the other hand, act quickly via non-genomic channels (Fig. 5) and have more side effects (Lecoq et al. 2009). Corticosteroids were found to be effective in both in vitro and in vivo against COVID-19 and pneumonia infections in clinical trials. Dexamethasone, the most common corticosteroid, was administered to treat the infection. Lower dosages, on the other hand, decreased mortality and were significant in individuals with severe COVID symptoms. However, because of the potential for damage at greater dosages, the therapy should be used with caution (Ahmed and Hassan 2020).
Fig. 4

Dexamethasone’s typical genomic mechanism in COVID-19 corticosteroid treatment. Dexamethasone (DM) is a lipophilic substance that quickly diffuses over the cell membrane and into the cytoplasm. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) on the cell membrane binds to DM, generating the glucocorticoid receptor complex (GR-RC), which allows corticosteroids to enter the cell. The GR-GC binds to certain DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) sequences, causing transactivation and transrepression to happen at the same time. TNF (tumor necrosis factor) and IFN (interferon)-gamma, as well as interleukins (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8) are inhibited, but anti-inflammatory cytokine production is increased

Fig. 5

Dexamethasone’s typical non-genomic mechanism in COVID-19 corticosteroid treatment. A large dose of corticosteroids is necessary due to the severity of the illness. Dexamethasone (DM) binds to the membrane-associated glucocorticoid receptor (GR) on T lymphocytes at higher concentrations, lowering the immunological response these cells generate. An integrin binds to the GR complex in the cytoplasm and activates focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Furthermore, high dosages of DM reduce inflammation via altering calcium and sodium ion active transport

Dexamethasone’s typical genomic mechanism in COVID-19 corticosteroid treatment. Dexamethasone (DM) is a lipophilic substance that quickly diffuses over the cell membrane and into the cytoplasm. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) on the cell membrane binds to DM, generating the glucocorticoid receptor complex (GR-RC), which allows corticosteroids to enter the cell. The GR-GC binds to certain DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) sequences, causing transactivation and transrepression to happen at the same time. TNF (tumor necrosis factor) and IFN (interferon)-gamma, as well as interleukins (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8) are inhibited, but anti-inflammatory cytokine production is increased Dexamethasone’s typical non-genomic mechanism in COVID-19 corticosteroid treatment. A large dose of corticosteroids is necessary due to the severity of the illness. Dexamethasone (DM) binds to the membrane-associated glucocorticoid receptor (GR) on T lymphocytes at higher concentrations, lowering the immunological response these cells generate. An integrin binds to the GR complex in the cytoplasm and activates focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Furthermore, high dosages of DM reduce inflammation via altering calcium and sodium ion active transport

Treatment pathways for mucormycosis

The point of entry is assumed to be the colonization of the nasal mucosa, which allows the fungus to travel into the orbit via the paranasal sinuses. Spheno-ethmoidectomy with or without maxillectomy appears to be the most successful treatment since the orbital apex is involved in the infection of the brain and cavernous sinus. We evaluated ten people with rhinocerebral mucormycosis in a prospective study from February 2000 to April 2004. Eleven individuals had clinically diagnosed rhinocerebral mucormycosis, with ten included in our survey after histological confirmation (Hosseini and Borghei 2005). Mucormycosis is a fungal infection with few therapeutic options that are becoming more common. Blocking EGFR signaling with FDA-approved medicines enhanced survival in mice infected with R. arrhizus var. dilemma. This research contributes to our knowledge of how the Mucorales fungus infiltrates host cells during lung mucormycosis and shows that FDA-approved EGFR inhibitors can be repurposed (Watkins et al. 2018).

Mortality and fatality case rate

Mucormycosis an uncommon but usually fatal illness. The case fatality rate (CFR) of mucormycosis varies depending on the underlying environments, health, and fungus type. Due to the disease’s extreme rarity, it is difficult to determine the precise rates of morbidity and death for mucormycosis. But other earlier investigations revealed conflicting information about the CFR of mucormycosis (Table 1).
Table 1

Mucormycosis mortality or case fatality rate in various case studies throughout the world

Study numberCase fatality rate or mortality rateReferences
1Overall 64% (11/17) Petrikkos et al. (2003a)
2Overall 54% (501/929)Roden et al. (2005b)
- 96% (disseminated mucormycosis)
- 85% (gastrointestinal mucormycosis)
- 76% (pulmonary mucormycosis)
- 46% (sinus infection)
332% (19/60)Pagano et al. (2009)
- 36% (immunocompromised)
- 22% (immunocompetent)
- 18% (treated with liposomal amphotericin B)
411.5% (61/531)Bitar et al. (2009)
- 47.8% (hematologic malignancies)
- 36.4% (bone marrow transplantation)
553% (10/19)Ambrosioni et al. (2010)
- 75% (antifungal treatment alone)
- 14% (antifungal treatment and surgery)
647% (108/230)Skiada et al. (2011b)
- 76% (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation)
- 58% (disseminated mucormycosis)
- 56% (pulmonary mucormycosis)
- 52% (hematologic malignancies)
- 44% (diabetes)
744% (44/101)Lanternier et al. (2012)
- 25% (rhinocerebral mucormycosis)
- 79% (disseminated mucormycosis)
- 48% (pulmonary mucormycosis)
- 22% (cutaneous mucormycosis)
Mucormycosis mortality or case fatality rate in various case studies throughout the world

Estimated prevalence globally

It is difficult to get a sample from deep tissue, and because diagnostic techniques have a limited sensitivity, the actual incidence or prevalence of mucormycosis may be higher. The burden of major fungal diseases worldwide has been evaluated by the Leading International Fungal Education (LIFE) webpage (Table 2).
Table 2

Burden of major fungal diseases worldwide as evaluated by LIFE

CountryTotal population (in millions)Total estimated fungal burdenMucormycosisInvasive aspergillosisReference
Total burdenRate/100 KTotal burdenRate/100 K
Algeria40.4568,942790.228657.1Chekiri-Talbi et al. (2017)
Argentina43.8881,023750.1725365.8Sacarlal and Denning (2018)
Australia23.57693,708210.065603–29%Prakash and Chakrabarti (2019)
Belgium11.1233,000310.586756.08Bongomin et al. (2017)
Brazil194.03,800,0002430.286644.47Giacomazzi et al. (2016); Prakash and Chakrabarti (2019)
Cameroon24.21,126,33250.211755.3Sacarlal and Denning (2018)
Canada35.5652,932430.125661.59Dufresne et al. (2017); Prakash and Chakrabarti (2019)
Chile17.5325,036350.22961.7Álvarez Duarte et al. (2017)
Colombia49.3760,808990.228205.7Alvarez-Moreno et al. (2018)
Czech Republic10.5176,073220.22972.8Chrdle et al. (2015)
Denmark5.6894,43010.022945.3Beardsley et al. (2015)
Dominican Republic10.92,293,681200.2610.8Gugnani et al. (2016)
France65.8968,143790.1211851.8Gangneux et al. (2016)
Greece10.8194,06770.06112510.4Gamaletsou et al. (2016)
India1300.0NA171,50414NANAChakrabarti and Dhaliwal (2013)
Ireland6.4117,384130.24457Dorgan et al. (2015)
Japan127.02,370,3142540.213081Prakash and Chakrabarti (2019)
Jordan6.3119,15310.02841.34Wadi and Denning (2018)
Kazakhstan17.7300,824160.095112.8Kemaykin et al. (2018)
Kenya43.63,186,766800.22390.6Guto et al. (2016)
Korea48.0985,079680.1421504.48Huh et al. (2017)
Malawi17.71,338,523300.211866.7Kalua et al. (2018)
Mexico112.32,749,1591340.1245104Bongomin et al. (2017)
Nigeria15517,983,5173000.29280.6Bongomin et al. (2017)
Norway5.2839,08770.12785.3Nordøy et al. (2018)
Pakistan184.53,280,55425,8301410,9495.9Jabeen et al. (2017)
Philippines98.41,852,137200.0230853Batac et al. (2017)
Portugal10.61,695,514109.52402.3Sabino et al. (2017)
Qatar1.933,448231.23110.6Alfouzan et al. (2020)
Romania19.7436,23070.0415247.7Alvarez-Moreno et al. (2018)
Russia142.93,082,9072320.1632382.27Klimko et al. (2015)
Serbia7.1156,825230.336198.8Arsenijević and Denning (2018)
Spain47.08,144,605200.0412932.75Alastruey-Izquierdo et al. (2013)
Thailand65.11,254,5621300.29411.4Chayakulkeeree et al. (2017)
Ukraine45.5999,152900.197512332.7067Bongomin et al. (2017)
UK63.18241,525–662,987570.092901–29124.59–4.61Pegorie et al. (2017)
USANANA360.33012.4Webb et al. (2018)
Republic of Uzbekistan30.7536,978270.0815214.8Tilavberdiev et al. (2017)
Burden of major fungal diseases worldwide as evaluated by LIFE

Conclusion and future perspectives

Rhinocerebral or craniofacial mucormycosis, formerly thought to be exclusive to diabetes, can now be found in immunocompromised patients as well as seemingly healthy people. Patients may not have a typical, unilateral acute sickness with black eschar, but this entity should be considered in the context of long-term, smoldering sinus symptomatology. The correct diagnosis is aided by clinical suspicion, which is supported by radiological investigations. To achieve a good outcome, immunosuppression and other predisposing factors must be controlled quickly, amphotericin B therapy must be started, and meticulous, extensive surgical debridement of the involved tissues and drainage of the focal collections in the orbit and cranial cavity must be performed. In some patients, orbital exenteration may help to improve illness management. Mucormycosis has become more common as a result of the prolonged survival of debilitated patients, as well as greater therapeutic use of antibiotics and immunosuppressive drugs. Our increased understanding of this life-threatening ailment is the first step toward a better prognosis in this disease. Numerous organisms of the genera Rhizopus, Mucor, and Lichtheimia may cause mucormycosis because of the vast number of immunosuppressed patients. There is a strong correlation between COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) and pre-existing risk factors for the development of mucormycosis. Patients at risk from CAM include those with concurrent medical conditions like diabetes and those taking immunosuppressive drugs like steroids for treatment. Therefore, while treating COVID-19 patients who have risk factors for CAM, immunosuppressive drugs should be administered with caution and, if possible, avoided. To prevent the condition from worsening, a prompt diagnosis and course of medication should be started in COVID-19 patients if CAM is suspected.
  201 in total

1.  Rhinocerebral zygomycosis in a patient with AIDS.

Authors:  S P Blatt; D R Lucey; D DeHoff; R B Zellmer
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 2.  A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi.

Authors:  David S Hibbett; Manfred Binder; Joseph F Bischoff; Meredith Blackwell; Paul F Cannon; Ove E Eriksson; Sabine Huhndorf; Timothy James; Paul M Kirk; Robert Lücking; H Thorsten Lumbsch; François Lutzoni; P Brandon Matheny; David J McLaughlin; Martha J Powell; Scott Redhead; Conrad L Schoch; Joseph W Spatafora; Joost A Stalpers; Rytas Vilgalys; M Catherine Aime; André Aptroot; Robert Bauer; Dominik Begerow; Gerald L Benny; Lisa A Castlebury; Pedro W Crous; Yu-Cheng Dai; Walter Gams; David M Geiser; Gareth W Griffith; Cécile Gueidan; David L Hawksworth; Geir Hestmark; Kentaro Hosaka; Richard A Humber; Kevin D Hyde; Joseph E Ironside; Urmas Kõljalg; Cletus P Kurtzman; Karl-Henrik Larsson; Robert Lichtwardt; Joyce Longcore; Jolanta Miadlikowska; Andrew Miller; Jean-Marc Moncalvo; Sharon Mozley-Standridge; Franz Oberwinkler; Erast Parmasto; Valérie Reeb; Jack D Rogers; Claude Roux; Leif Ryvarden; José Paulo Sampaio; Arthur Schüssler; Junta Sugiyama; R Greg Thorn; Leif Tibell; Wendy A Untereiner; Christopher Walker; Zheng Wang; Alex Weir; Michael Weiss; Merlin M White; Katarina Winka; Yi-Jian Yao; Ning Zhang
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2007-03-13

3.  Zygomycosis in Europe: analysis of 230 cases accrued by the registry of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) Working Group on Zygomycosis between 2005 and 2007.

Authors:  A Skiada; L Pagano; A Groll; S Zimmerli; B Dupont; K Lagrou; C Lass-Florl; E Bouza; N Klimko; P Gaustad; M Richardson; P Hamal; M Akova; J F Meis; J-L Rodriguez-Tudela; E Roilides; A Mitrousia-Ziouva; G Petrikkos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Deferiprone iron chelation as a novel therapy for experimental mucormycosis.

Authors:  Ashraf S Ibrahim; John E Edwards; Yue Fu; Brad Spellberg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  Intensive care medicine research agenda on invasive fungal infection in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Jose Garnacho-Montero; Thierry Calandra; Bartjan Kullberg; George Dimopoulos; Elie Azoulay; Arunaloke Chakrabarti; Daniel Kett; Cristobal Leon; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Jean-Francois Timsit; Malcom D Richardson; Andrew Shorr; Oliver A Cornely
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Genomic and non-genomic effects of glucocorticoids: implications for breast cancer.

Authors:  Irma B Mitre-Aguilar; Alberto J Cabrera-Quintero; Alejandro Zentella-Dehesa
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-01-01

7.  Population-based survey of filamentous fungi and antifungal resistance in Spain (FILPOP Study).

Authors:  A Alastruey-Izquierdo; E Mellado; T Peláez; J Pemán; S Zapico; M Alvarez; J L Rodríguez-Tudela; M Cuenca-Estrella
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Xing-Lou Yang; Xian-Guang Wang; Ben Hu; Lei Zhang; Wei Zhang; Hao-Rui Si; Yan Zhu; Bei Li; Chao-Lin Huang; Hui-Dong Chen; Jing Chen; Yun Luo; Hua Guo; Ren-Di Jiang; Mei-Qin Liu; Ying Chen; Xu-Rui Shen; Xi Wang; Xiao-Shuang Zheng; Kai Zhao; Quan-Jiao Chen; Fei Deng; Lin-Lin Liu; Bing Yan; Fa-Xian Zhan; Yan-Yi Wang; Geng-Fu Xiao; Zheng-Li Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 9.  Updates on the Taxonomy of Mucorales with an Emphasis on Clinically Important Taxa.

Authors:  Grit Walther; Lysett Wagner; Oliver Kurzai
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-14

Review 10.  The emergence of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: a review of cases from 18 countries.

Authors:  Martin Hoenigl; Danila Seidel; Agostinho Carvalho; Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy; Amir Arastehfar; Jean-Pierre Gangneux; Nosheen Nasir; Alexandro Bonifaz; Javier Araiza; Nikolai Klimko; Alexandra Serris; Katrien Lagrou; Jacques F Meis; Oliver A Cornely; John R Perfect; P Lewis White; Arunaloke Chakrabarti
Journal:  Lancet Microbe       Date:  2022-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.