Literature DB >> 35984589

Covalent docking in CDOCKER.

Yujin Wu1, Charles L Brooks Iii2,3.   

Abstract

Targeted covalent inhibitors (TCIs) are considered to be an important component in the toolbox of drug discovery and about 30% of currently marketed drugs are TCIs. Although these drugs raise concerns about toxicity, their high potencies and prolonged effects result in less-frequent drug dosing and wide therapeutic margins for patients. This leads to increased interests in developing new computational methods to identify novel covalent inhibitors. The implementation of successful in silico docking algorithms have the potential to provide significant savings of time and money in the discovery of lead compounds. In this paper, we describe the implementation and testing of a covalent docking methodology in Rigid CDOCKER and the optimization of the corresponding physics-based scoring function with an additional customizable covalent bond grid potential which represents the free energy change of bond formation between the ligand and the receptor. We optimize the covalent bond grid potential for different common covalent bond formation reaction in TCIs. The average runtime for docking one covalent compound is 15 minutes which is comparable or faster than other well-established covalent docking methods. We demonstrate comparable top rank accuracy compared with other covalent docking algorithms using the pose prediction benchmark dataset for covalent docking algorithms developed by the Keserű group. Finally, we construct a retrospective virtual screening benchmark dataset containing 8 different receptor targets with different covalent bond formation reactions. To our knowledge, this is the largest dataset for benchmarking covalent docking methods. We show that our new covalent docking algorithm has the ability to identify lead compounds among a large chemical space. The largest AUC value is 0.909 for the target receptor CATK and the warhead chemistry of the covalent inhibitors is addition to the aldehyde functionality.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covalent docking; Rigid CDOCKER; Virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35984589     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-022-00472-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   4.179


  28 in total

Review 1.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods.

Authors:  R D Taylor; P J Jewsbury; J W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.

Authors:  Marcel L Verdonk; Jason C Cole; Michael J Hartshorn; Christopher W Murray; Richard D Taylor
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-09-01

3.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Covalent docking using autodock: Two-point attractor and flexible side chain methods.

Authors:  Giulia Bianco; Stefano Forli; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Docking covalent inhibitors: a parameter free approach to pose prediction and scoring.

Authors:  Kai Zhu; Kenneth W Borrelli; Jeremy R Greenwood; Tyler Day; Robert Abel; Ramy S Farid; Edward Harder
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Covalent Docking Identifies a Potent and Selective MKK7 Inhibitor.

Authors:  Amit Shraga; Evgenia Olshvang; Natalia Davidzohn; Payam Khoshkenar; Nicolas Germain; Khriesto Shurrush; Silvia Carvalho; Liat Avram; Shira Albeck; Tamar Unger; Bruce Lefker; Chakrapani Subramanyam; Robert L Hudkins; Amir Mitchell; Ziv Shulman; Takayoshi Kinoshita; Nir London
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 8.116

7.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-01-06       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Covalent docking of large libraries for the discovery of chemical probes.

Authors:  Nir London; Rand M Miller; Shyam Krishnan; Kenji Uchida; John J Irwin; Oliv Eidam; Lucie Gibold; Peter Cimermančič; Richard Bonnet; Brian K Shoichet; Jack Taunton
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 10.  Theory and applications of covalent docking in drug discovery: merits and pitfalls.

Authors:  Hezekiel Mathambo Kumalo; Soumendranath Bhakat; Mahmoud E S Soliman
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.