C Schnurr1,2, J Beckmann3,4, C Lüring3,5, C Tibesku6, K U Schlüter-Brust3,7, M Ettinger8, J Franke3,9. 1. AGITEC-Arbeitsgemeinschaft für intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologie Integration der DGOU, Berlin, Germany. christoph.schnurr@gmx.de. 2. Klinik für Orthopädie, St. Vinzenz Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Schloßstr. 85, 40477, Düsseldorf, Germany. christoph.schnurr@gmx.de. 3. AGITEC-Arbeitsgemeinschaft für intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologie Integration der DGOU, Berlin, Germany. 4. Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Munich, Germany. 5. Orthopädische Klinik, Klinikum Dortmund, Mitglied der Fakultät Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Dortmund, Germany. 6. Kniepraxis, Straubing, Germany. 7. Klinik für Orthopädie, St. Franziskus Hospital Köln, Cologne, Germany. 8. Orthopädische Klinik der MHH im DIAKOVERE Annastift, Hannover, Germany. 9. Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The orthopedic community is divided on the question of whether modern technologies in arthroplasty improve outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this initiative of the working group on intraoperative imaging and technology integration (Arbeitsgemeinschaft intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologieintegration, AGiTEC) is to initiate the collection of additional data for the scientific evaluation of modern technologies. QUESTION: To what extent are modern technologies currently used and which implementations are planned? Do the members of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) consider the acquisition of additional data for scientific assessment necessary? METHODS: Members of the DGOU were asked via an e‑mail survey about the distribution and projected introduction of modern technologies in arthroplasty. They were also asked whether sufficient data were collected for scientific evaluation and whether acquisition of additional data in studies or arthroplasty registries were considered necessary. RESULTS: Of the 7923 probands surveyed, 428 completed the questionnaire in full (5.4%). It was found that individual implants and navigation are currently the most frequently used (31% and 29%, respectively). The largest increases in the next 2 years are projected for virtual reality and robotics (+30% and +23%, respectively), 85% of respondents indicated that insufficient data were collected for scientific evaluation, and 89% each requested initiation of multicenter studies and inclusion of technologies in the arthroplasty registry. CONCLUSION: The results of this study should motivate the scientific community, industry, and those responsible for the arthroplasty registries to collect and analyze data for the scientific assessment of modern technologies.
BACKGROUND: The orthopedic community is divided on the question of whether modern technologies in arthroplasty improve outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this initiative of the working group on intraoperative imaging and technology integration (Arbeitsgemeinschaft intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologieintegration, AGiTEC) is to initiate the collection of additional data for the scientific evaluation of modern technologies. QUESTION: To what extent are modern technologies currently used and which implementations are planned? Do the members of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) consider the acquisition of additional data for scientific assessment necessary? METHODS: Members of the DGOU were asked via an e‑mail survey about the distribution and projected introduction of modern technologies in arthroplasty. They were also asked whether sufficient data were collected for scientific evaluation and whether acquisition of additional data in studies or arthroplasty registries were considered necessary. RESULTS: Of the 7923 probands surveyed, 428 completed the questionnaire in full (5.4%). It was found that individual implants and navigation are currently the most frequently used (31% and 29%, respectively). The largest increases in the next 2 years are projected for virtual reality and robotics (+30% and +23%, respectively), 85% of respondents indicated that insufficient data were collected for scientific evaluation, and 89% each requested initiation of multicenter studies and inclusion of technologies in the arthroplasty registry. CONCLUSION: The results of this study should motivate the scientific community, industry, and those responsible for the arthroplasty registries to collect and analyze data for the scientific assessment of modern technologies.
Authors: Geoffrey S Tompkins; Katie S Sypher; Hsin-Fang Li; T Michael Griffin; Paul J Duwelius Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 4.435