| Literature DB >> 35984184 |
Siyu Liang1, Zhongyu Ren2, Guang Yang1.
Abstract
Severe internet addiction (IA) is associated with a higher risk of musculoskeletal pain, but whether there is a significant prospective association between IA and fatigue is unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between IA and fatigue level among Chinese college students. A cross-sectional (n = 1011) and prospective study (n = 653) was conducted to examine the association between IA and risk of fatigue. IA was measured using Young internet addiction test. Fatigue level was evaluated using the Chalder fatigue scale. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed a cross-sectional association between IA and the risk of fatigue. The odds ratios (95% CIs) of fatigue for normal, mild, and moderate to severe groups were 1.00 (reference), 1.88 (1.20, 2.95), and 5.60 (3.33, 9.42), respectively (P for trend: <0.001). Similarly, multivariate logistic regression analyses also revealed a significant prospective relationship between IA and the risk of fatigue during the 1-year follow-up period. The odds ratios (95% CIs) of fatigue for normal, mild, and moderate to severe groups were 1.00 (reference), 1.56 (0.67, 3.67), and 3.29 (1.08, 10.04), respectively (P for trend: 0.046). Our findings indicate that IA is positively related to risk of fatigue among Chinese college students. Further interventional studies are needed to explore the causality underlying the effects of IA on fatigue.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35984184 PMCID: PMC9387967 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Participants’ characteristics according to IA categories*
| N = 1011 | Total | Normal (n = 329) | Mild (n = 533) | Moderate to severe (n = 149) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA score | 37.3 ± 12.2 | 25.5 ± 3.3 | 38.5 ± 5.2 | 59.1 ± 9.9 | — |
| Female sex, % | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.1 | 89.9 | 0.998 |
| Age, yr | 18.7 ± 1.0 | 18.7 (18.6, 18.8) | 18.6 (18.5, 18.7) | 18.6 (18.4, 18.7) | 0.690 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 21.0 ± 4.8 | 20.8 (20.3, 21.3) | 21.1 (20.7, 21.5) | 21.3 (20.5, 22.2) | 0.533 |
| Smoking status, % | |||||
| Never | 92.8 | 92.4 (89.5, 95.3) | 93.6 (91.5, 95.7) | 90.6 (85.9, 95.3) | 0.431 |
| Occasionally or regularly | 7.2 | 7.6 (4.7, 10.5) | 6.4 (4.3, 8.5) | 9.4 (4.7, 14.1) | |
| Drinking status, % | |||||
| Never | 45.5 | 54.1 (48.8, 59.5) | 42.6 (38.4, 46.8) | 36.9 (29.0, 44.9) | <0.001 |
| Occasionally or regularly | 54.5 | 45.9 (40.5, 51.3) | 57.4 (53.2, 61.6) | 63.1 (55.3, 70.9) | |
| Sleep duration, hr | 6.7 ± 1.1 | 6.9 (6.8, 7.0) | 6.6 (6.5, 6.7) | 6.3 (6.2, 6.5) | <0.001 |
| Good sleep quality, % | 75.8 | 82.7 (78.6, 86.8) | 75.4 (71.8, 79.1) | 61.7 (53.9, 69.6) | <0.001 |
| Depressive symptoms (= >50), % | 10.6 | 8.8 (5.6, 12.1) | 7.5 (4.9, 10.1) | 25.5 (20.7, 30.4) | <0.001 |
| Breakfast consumption frequency, % | |||||
| 2–5 times/week | 41.3 | 33.1 (27.8, 38.4) | 44.7 (40.5, 48.8) | 47.7 (39.8, 55.5) | 0.003 |
| ≥6 times/week | 54.4 | 63.5 (58.2, 68.9) | 50.8 (46.6, 55.0) | 47.0 (39.0, 54.9) | 0.001 |
BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval, IA = internet addiction, SD = standard deviation.
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD or mean (95% CI), and categorical variables are expressed as percentages (95% CI).
Analysis of variance or chi-square test for continuous or categorical variables, respectively.
Adjusted associations between IA and fatigue level at baseline.
| N = 1011 | Normal (n = 329) | Mild (n = 533) | Moderate to severe (n = 149) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 3.1 (2.2, 4.2) | 8.7 (6.8, 11.2) | 15.2 (9.5, 24.3) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 3.3 (2.4, 4.6) | 8.6 (6.7, 11.0) | 13.5 (8.4, 21.7) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 3.3 (2.4, 4.5) | 8.4 (6.6, 10.8) | 14.8 (9.2, 24.0) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 3.3 (2.4, 4.5) | 8.4 (6.6, 10.8) | 14.8 (9.2, 24.0) | <0.001 |
P for trend was obtained using ANCOVA.
Model 1 adjusted for sex and age (continuous variable).
Model 2 adjusted for Model 1 covariates + smoking status (never, occasionally, or regularly), drinking status (never, occasionally, or regularly), sleep quality (good or not), sleep duration (continuous variable), and BMI (continuous variable).
Model 3 adjusted for Model 2 covariates + depressive symptoms (categorical variable).
Model 4 adjusted for Model 3 covariates + breakfast consumption frequency (≤1 time/week, 2–5 times/week, ≥6 times/week).
Adjusted data are expressed as estimated geometric means (95%CI).
Adjusted associations between IA and risk of fatigue at baseline.
| N = 1011 | Normal (n = 329) | Mild (n = 533) | Moderate to severe (n = 149) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of fatigue | 31 | 93 | 67 | — |
| CrudeModel | 1.00 (reference) | 2.03 (1.32, 3.13) | 7.85 (4.81, 12.83) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (reference) | 2.03 (1.32, 3.12) | 7.83 (4.79, 12.79) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.84 (1.18, 2.86) | 6.28 (3.78, 10.45) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.93 (1.23, 3.03) | 5.73 (3.42, 9.62) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.88 (1.20, 2.95) | 5.60 (3.33, 9.42) | <0.001 |
P for trend was obtained using multivariate logistic regression analyses.
Model 1 adjusted for sex and age (continuous variable).
Model 2 adjusted for Model 1 covariates + smoking status (never, occasionally, or regularly), drinking status (never, occasionally, or regularly), sleep quality (good or not), sleep duration (continuous variable), and BMI (continuous variable).
Model 3 adjusted for Model 2 covariates + depressive symptoms (categorical variable).
Model 4 adjusted for Model 3 covariates + breakfast consumption frequency (≤1 time/week, 2–5 times/week, ≥6 times/week).
Adjusted data are expressed as odds ratio (95% confidence interval).
Adjusted associations between IA and risk of fatigue during the 1-year follow-up period.
| N = 653 | Normal (n = 242) | Mild (n = 346) | Moderate to severe (n = 65) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of fatigue | 9 | 18 | 7 | — |
| CrudeModel | 1.00 (reference) | 1.42 (0.63, 3.22) | 3.13 (1.12, 8.74) | 0.045 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.39 (0.61, 3.17) | 3.22 (1.14, 9.05) | 0.044 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.59 (0.68, 3.71) | 3.48 (1.16, 10.44) | 0.034 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.61 (0.69, 3.75) | 3.36 (1.11, 10.23) | 0.040 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.56 (0.67, 3.67) | 3.29 (1.08, 10.04) | 0.046 |
Model 1 adjusted for sex and age (continuous variable) at baseline.
Model 2 adjusted for Model 1 covariates + smoking status (never, occasionally, or regularly), drinking status (never, occasionally, or regularly), sleep quality (good or not), sleep duration (continuous variable) and BMI (continuous variable).
Model 3 adjusted for Model 2 covariates + depressive symptoms (categorical variable) at baseline.
Model 4 adjusted for Model 3 covariates + breakfast consumption frequency (≤1 time/week, 2–5 times/week, ≥6 times/week) at baseline.
Adjusted data are expressed as odds ratio (95% confidence interval).
P for trend values were obtained using multivariate logistic regression analyses.