| Literature DB >> 35983532 |
Yang Zhao1, Xiaohong Dai2, Yan Sun1, Weixiang Liao1, Yan Peng2, Jiuyi Yang1.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and application value of compound Phellodendron liquid (CPL) for negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers by observing the improvement of diabetic foot ulcers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35983532 PMCID: PMC9381186 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7540020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Comparison of general data from the two groups of patients.
| Indicator | CPL NPWTi group ( | Normal saline NPWTi group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.425 | 0.567 | ||
| Male | 23 (76.7%) | 21 (70%) | ||
| Female | 7 (23.3%) | 9 (30%) | ||
| Age | 65.4 ± 7.00 | 65.57 ± 6.34 | 0.299 | 0.923 |
| Height | 170.2 ± 8.25 | 168.93 ± 8.96 | 0.100 | 0.571 |
| Weight | 62.33 ± 4.41 | 60.9 ± 5.47 | 0.987 | 0.268 |
| Blood glucose level | 11.39 ± 0.86 | 11.74 ± 0.90 | 1.000 | 0.124 |
| Complication | 0.919 | 0.705 | ||
| Numb | 2 | 1 | ||
| Pain | 1 | 1 | ||
| Skin ulceration | 2 | 2 | ||
| Infection | 3 | 3 |
Quantitative table of diabetic foot symptoms.
| Symptoms | 0 points | 1 point | 2 points | 3 points | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wound area (cm2) | 0-4 | 5-8 | 9-12 | 13-16 | 2 |
| Carrion | None | Small amount | Medium | Substantial | 2 |
| Granulation tissue | Heal | Red | Pale edema | The color is gray and dark | 2 |
| Wound depth | Heal | Subcutaneous tissue | Deep tendon | Deep bone | 2 |
| Creation of skin color | Normal | Reddish | Redder | Bright red and shiny | 1 |
| Swelling around the wound | None | Slight swelling | Pronounced swelling | Severe swelling | 1 |
| Temperature around the wound | Normal | Slightly hot | Hotter | Hot | 1 |
| Pain | None | Mild | Moderate | Severe | 1 |
Note: the wound area is traced using a transparent checkerboard, and the Image J image processing software calculates the size. Determination of the amount of carrion: based on the wound area occupied, it is divided into no (0), a small amount (<25%), medium amount (25% to 50), and a large amount (≥50%). Pain levels are assessed using a pain visual simulation scale.
Comparison of wound healing conditions from the two groups of patients.
| Indicator | Normal saline NPWTi group ( | CPL NPWTi group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | ||||
| Wound area(cm2) | 9.263 ± 1.619 | 9.212 ± 1.991 | 0.831 | 0.914 |
| Wound symptom scores | 19.833 ± 2.479 | 20.333 ± 1.807 | 0.996 | 0.376 |
| Treatment for 10 days | ||||
| Wound area (cm2) | 5.566 ± 1.518 | 8.146 ± 1.644 | 0.961 | 0.309 |
| Wound symptom scores | 17.600 ± 1.905 | 16.500 ± 2.177 | 0.991 | 0.042 |
| Treatment for 20 days | ||||
| Wound area (cm2) | 6.461 ± 1.328 | 5.663 ± 1.708 | 0.889 | 0.048 |
| Wound symptom scores | 12.367 ± 1.328 | 10.633 ± 2.109 | 0.859 | 0.002 |
| Treatment for 30 days | ||||
| Wound area (cm2) | 4.874 ± 1.725 | 2.446 ± 1.365 | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| Wound symptom scores | 6.933 ± 1.337 | 5.5 ± 1.503 | 0.920 | <0.001 |
Figure 1Wound healing condition from the two groups of patients. (a) Wound area (cm2). (b) Wound symptom scores. The measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (−x ± s). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01.
Comparison of inflammatory factor indicators from the two groups of patients.
| Inflammatory factor indicators | CPL NPWTi group ( | Normal saline NPWTi group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | ||||
| PCT | 0.358 ± 0.061 | 0.35 ± 0.074 | 0.642 | 0.596 |
| ESR | 28.789 ± 1.931 | 29.218 ± 2.224 | 0.577 | 0.428 |
| CRP | 25.533 ± +6.458 | 25.400 ± 6.200 | 3.261 | 0.258 |
| Treatment for 10 days | ||||
| PCT | 0.211 ± 0.049 | 0.248 ± 0.058 | 1.233 | 0.011 |
| ESR | 24.366 ± 1.634 | 25.517 ± 2.262 | 1.402 | 0.254 |
| CRP | 16.300 ± 2.493 | 18.2 ± 3.478 | 0.403 | 0.018 |
| Treatment for 20 days | ||||
| PCT | 0.097 ± 0.029 | 0.129 ± 0.041 | 0.993 | 0.001 |
| ESR | 20.997 ± 1.935 | 19.748 ± 2.049 | 0.997 | 0.018 |
| CRP | 5.333 ± 1.093 | 6.433 ± 1.888 | 0.967 | 0.008 |
| Treatment for 30 days | ||||
| PCT | 0.075 ± 0.029 | 0.102 ± 0.027 | 1.411 | <0.001 |
| ESR | 17.681 ± 1.458 | 16.634 ± 1.399 | 0.999 | 0.006 |
| CRP | 4.500 ± 0.900 | 5.5 ± 1.570 | 0.805 | 0.003 |
Figure 2Inflammatory factor indicators from the two groups of patients. (a) PCT. (b) ESR. (c) CRP. The measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (−x ± s).∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01.
Comparison of positive bacterial culture from the two groups of patients.
| Positive bacterial culture | CPL NPWTi group ( | Normal saline NPWTi group ( |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 29 (96.67%) | 30 (100%) | 1.113 | 0.321 | |||
| Treatment for 10 days | 18 (60%) | 23 (76%) | 0.981 | 0.034 | |||
| Treatment for 20 days | 8 (26.6%) | 19 (63.3%) | 0.962 | 0.008 | |||
| Treatment for 30 days | 6 (20%) | 16 (53.3%) | 0.989 | 0.007 |
Comparison of number of days in hospital and from the two groups of patients.
| Indicator | CPL NPWTi group ( | Normal saline NPWTi group ( |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of days in hospital | 27.2 ± 8.3 | 39.1 ± 15.2 | -0.572 | <0.001 | |||
| Pain scores during dressing change | 2.7 ± 1.4 | 3.9 ± 2.5 | -3.466 | 0.015 |