Literature DB >> 35983495

Leveraging Patient-Specific Simulated Angiograms to Characterize Cerebral Aneurysm Hemodynamics using Computational Fluid Dynamics.

V Chivukula1, R White1, A Shields2,3, J Davies4, M Mokin5, D R Bednarek2,3, S Rudin2,3,4, C Ionita2,3,4.   

Abstract

Cerebral aneurysms (CA) affect nearly 6% of the US population and its rupture is one of the major causes of hemorrhagic stroke. Neurointerventionalists performing endovascular therapy (ET) to treat CA rely on qualitative image sequences obtained under fluoroscopy guidance alone, and do not have access to crucial quantitative information regarding blood flow before, during and after treatment - partially contributing to a failure rate of up to 30%. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a powerful tool that can provide a wealth of quantitative data; however, CFD has found limited utility in the clinic due to the challenges in obtaining hemodynamic boundary conditions for each patient. In this work, we present a novel CFD-based simulated angiogram approach (SAA) that resolves the blood flow physics and interaction between blood and injected contrast agent to extract quantitative hemodynamic parameters which can be used to design real-time parametric imaging analysis. The SAA enables correlating contrast agent transport to the underlying hemodynamic conditions via time-density curves (TDC) obtained at several points in the region of interest. The ability of the TDC and the SAA to provide critical hemodynamic parameters in and around CA anatomies, such as washout and local flow changes is explored and presented. This provides invaluable quantitative data to the clinician at the time of intervention, since it incorporates the physics of blood flow and correlates the contrast transport to hemodynamic parameters quantitatively - thereby enabling the clinician to take informed decisions that improve treatment outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral Aneurysms; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Hemodynamics; Simulated Angiogram; Time Density Curve

Year:  2022        PMID: 35983495      PMCID: PMC9385184          DOI: 10.1117/12.2611473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature, part 1: reducing recurrence after endovascular coiling.

Authors:  E Crobeddu; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: A systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Briganti; Giuseppe Leone; Mariano Marseglia; Giuseppe Mariniello; Ferdinando Caranci; Arturo Brunetti; Francesco Maiuri
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-08-27

Review 3.  Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.

Authors:  Joshua B Bederson; E Sander Connolly; H Hunt Batjer; Ralph G Dacey; Jacques E Dion; Michael N Diringer; John E Duldner; Robert E Harbaugh; Aman B Patel; Robert H Rosenwasser
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysm coiling using high-resolution and high-energy synchrotron X-ray microtomography: comparison with the homogeneous porous medium approach.

Authors:  Michael R Levitt; Michael C Barbour; Sabine Rolland du Roscoat; Christian Geindreau; Venkat K Chivukula; Patrick M McGah; John D Nerva; Ryan P Morton; Louis J Kim; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Numerical simulation of aneurysmal haemodynamics with calibrated porous-medium models of flow-diverting stents.

Authors:  Yujie Li; Mingzi Zhang; David I Verrelli; Winston Chong; Makoto Ohta; Yi Qian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: An updated review of current concepts for risk factors, detection and management.

Authors:  G Boulouis; C Rodriguez-Régent; E C Rasolonjatovo; W Ben Hassen; D Trystram; M Edjlali-Goujon; J-F Meder; C Oppenheim; O Naggara
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 2.607

7.  Differences in Hemodynamics and Rupture Rate of Aneurysms at the Bifurcation of the Basilar and Internal Carotid Arteries.

Authors:  R Doddasomayajula; B Chung; F Hamzei-Sichani; C M Putman; J R Cebral
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Sensitivity of patient-specific numerical simulation of cerebal aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions.

Authors:  Prem Venugopal; Daniel Valentino; Holger Schmitt; J Pablo Villablanca; Fernando Viñuela; Gary Duckwiler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Hemodynamic findings associated with intraoperative appearances of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Pengjun Jiang; Qingyuan Liu; Jun Wu; Xin Chen; Maogui Li; Fan Yang; Zhengsong Li; Shuzhe Yang; Rui Guo; Bin Gao; Yong Cao; Rong Wang; Fei Di; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.

Authors:  Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 3-9       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.