| Literature DB >> 35983289 |
James P Hovis1, Stephanie N Moore-Lotridge1, Ashton Mansour1, Breanne H Y Gibson2, Douglas R Weikert1, Mihir J Desai1, Sandra S Gebhart1, Jonathan G Schoenecker1,2,3,4, Donald H Lee1.
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that sterile equipment is frequently contaminated intraoperatively, yet the incidence of miniature c-arm (MCA) contamination in hand and upper extremity surgery is unclear. To examine this incidence, a prospective study of MCA sterility in hand and upper extremity cases was performed in a hospital main operating room (MOR) ( n = 13) or an ambulatory surgery center operating room (AOR) ( n = 16) at a single tertiary care center. Case length, MCA usage parameters, and sterility of the MCA through the case were examined. We found that MOR surgical times trended toward significance ( p = 0.055) and that MOR MCAs had significantly more contamination prior to draping than AOR MCAs ( p < 0.001). In MORs and AORs, 46.2 and 37.5% of MCAs respectively were contaminated intraoperatively. In MORs and AORs, 85.7 and 80% of noncontaminated cases, respectively, used the above hand- table technique, while 50 and 83.3% of contaminated MOR and AOR cases, respectively, used a below hand-table technique. Similar CPT codes were noted in both settings. Thus, a high-rate of MCA intraoperative contamination occurs in both settings. MCA placement below the hand-table may impact intraoperative contamination, even to distant MCA areas. Regular sterilization of equipment and awareness of these possible risk factors could lower bacterial burden. Society of Indian Hand Surgery & Microsurgeons. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Miniature C-arm; contamination; hand; infection; surgery; surgical contamination
Year: 2020 PMID: 35983289 PMCID: PMC9381171 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hand Microsurg ISSN: 0974-3227