| Literature DB >> 35983182 |
Yan Lin1,2, Xiangming Hu2,3, Weimian Wang2,3, Bingyan Yu2,4, Langping Zhou2, Yingling Zhou2, Guang Li2, Haojian Dong2.
Abstract
Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMVD), an important etiology of ischemic heart disease, has been widely studied. D-dimer is a simple indicator of microthrombosis and inflammation. However, whether an increase in D-dimer is related to CMVD is still unclear. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: D-dimer; TIMI myocardial perfusion grade; coronary microvascular dysfunction; non-obstructive coronary artery disease; preserved ejection fraction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35983182 PMCID: PMC9378984 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.937952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
FIGURE 1Study flowchart.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients included in the study.
| Non-CMVD | CMVD | ||
| Age, years | 61 ± 11 | 64 ± 9 | 0.043 |
| Male sex | 150 (53.00%) | 56 (59.57%) | 0.268 |
| Current smoking | 64 (22.61%) | 31 (32.98%) | 0.045 |
| Alcohol consumption | 16 (5.65%) | 7 (7.45%) | 0.529 |
| Hypertension | 134 (47.35%) | 65 (69.15%) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes | 50 (17.67%) | 19 (20.21%) | 0.580 |
| CKD | 30 (10.60%) | 11 (11.70%) | 0.766 |
| WBC, 109/L | 7.20 ± 2.04 | 7.33 ± 1.88 | 0.269 |
| Platelets, 109/L | 223.42 ± 61.03 | 216.52 ± 66.36 | 0.354 |
| Hemoglobin, g/L | 132.50 ± 15.33 | 134.86 ± 16.28 | 0.203 |
| Glucose, mmol/L | 5.61 ± 1.58 | 5.86 ± 2.37 | 0.248 |
| TG, mmol/L | 1.58 ± 1.25 | 1.66 ± 1.09 | 0.601 |
| TC, mmol/L | 4.62 ± 1.24 | 4.55 ± 1.01 | 0.615 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 2.68 ± 1.08 | 2.61 ± 0.87 | 0.587 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.16 ± 0.29 | 1.15 ± 0.27 | 0.783 |
| Creatine, μmol/L | 78.20 ± 27.60 | 77.72 ± 22.31 | 0.877 |
| D-dimer, ng/mL | 330.00 (270.00–470.00) | 360.00 (270.00–747.50) | 0.028 |
| CRP, mg/L | 1.52 (0.55–4.35) | 1.64 (0.57–3.58) | 0.669 |
| LVEF, % | 66 (62–69) | 65 (61–70) | 0.383 |
|
| |||
| ACE inhibitor or ARB, % | 44 (15.55%) | 14 (14.89%) | 0.879 |
| Beta-blocker, % | 42 (14.84%) | 10 (10.64%) | 0.306 |
| Calcium channel blocker, % | 30 (10.60%) | 15 (15.96%) | 0.165 |
| Diuretics, % | 7 (2.47%) | 1 (1.06%) | 0.685 |
| Statin, % | 50 (17.67%) | 19 (20.21%) | 0.580 |
CMVD, coronary microvascular dysfunction; CKD, chronic kidney disease; WBC, white blood cells; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; CRP, C-reactive protein; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker.
Association of CMVD and D-dimer in study participants.
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
|
| ||||
| OR | 2.12 | 1.91 | 1.88 | 1.86 |
| 95% CI | 1.29–3.50 | 1.13–3.22 | 1.10–3.23 | 1.09–3.19 |
| Chi-square (DF) | 8.49 (1) | 11.91 (3) | 25.11 (7) | 26.31 (8) |
| P-value | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.021 | 0.024 |
|
| ||||
| OR | 2.25 | 2.06 | 1.95 | 1.92 |
| 95% CI | 1.29–3.91 | 1.17–3.62 | 1.10–3.48 | 1.08–3.43 |
| Chi-square (DF) | 7.95 (1) | 12.40 (3) | 24.87 (7) | 26.00 (8) |
| P-value | 0.004 | 0.012 | 0.023 | 0.027 |
CMVD, coronary microvascular dysfunction. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; DF, degrees of freedom.
FIGURE 2Restricted cubic spline curve to fit the relationship between D-dimer level and CMVD. The model adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, alcohol consumption, and platelets. The middle area of the dash represents 95% confidence interval (CI), and the reference line represents D-dimer margin level. The relationship between D-dimer level and CMVD is not shown for those D-dimer >2,500 ng/mL due to the large (95%) CI.
FIGURE 3Subgroup analysis of the association between CMVD and D-dimer in prespecified and exploratory subgroups. CI, confidence interval.