William H Zhang1, Graham J Day1, Ioannis Zampetakis2, Michele Carrabba3, Zhongyang Zhang4, Ben M Carter1, Norman Govan5, Colin Jackson6,7,8, Menglin Chen4, Adam W Perriman1. 1. School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom. 2. Bristol Composites Institute (ACCIS), University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, United Kingdom. 3. Bristol Medical School, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8DZ, United Kingdom. 4. Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus DK-8000, Denmark. 5. Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom. 6. Australian National University, Research School of Chemistry, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. 7. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. 8. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Abstract
Here, we describe a facile route to the synthesis of enzymatically active highly fabricable plastics, where the enzyme is an intrinsic component of the material. This is facilitated by the formation of an electrostatically stabilized enzyme-polymer surfactant nanoconstruct, which, after lyophilization and melting, affords stable macromolecular dispersions in a wide range of organic solvents. A selection of plastics can then be co-dissolved in the dispersions, which provides a route to bespoke 3D enzyme plastic nanocomposite structures using a wide range of fabrication techniques, including melt electrowriting, casting, and piston-driven 3D printing. The resulting constructs comprising active phosphotriesterase (arPTE) readily detoxify organophosphates with persistent activity over repeated cycles and for long time periods. Moreover, we show that the protein guest molecules, such as arPTE or sfGFP, increase the compressive Young's modulus of the plastics and that the identity of the biomolecule influences the nanomorphology and mechanical properties of the resulting materials. Overall, we demonstrate that these biologically active nanocomposite plastics are compatible with state-of-the-art 3D fabrication techniques and that the methodology could be readily applied to produce robust and on-demand smart nanomaterial structures.
Here, we describe a facile route to the synthesis of enzymatically active highly fabricable plastics, where the enzyme is an intrinsic component of the material. This is facilitated by the formation of an electrostatically stabilized enzyme-polymer surfactant nanoconstruct, which, after lyophilization and melting, affords stable macromolecular dispersions in a wide range of organic solvents. A selection of plastics can then be co-dissolved in the dispersions, which provides a route to bespoke 3D enzyme plastic nanocomposite structures using a wide range of fabrication techniques, including melt electrowriting, casting, and piston-driven 3D printing. The resulting constructs comprising active phosphotriesterase (arPTE) readily detoxify organophosphates with persistent activity over repeated cycles and for long time periods. Moreover, we show that the protein guest molecules, such as arPTE or sfGFP, increase the compressive Young's modulus of the plastics and that the identity of the biomolecule influences the nanomorphology and mechanical properties of the resulting materials. Overall, we demonstrate that these biologically active nanocomposite plastics are compatible with state-of-the-art 3D fabrication techniques and that the methodology could be readily applied to produce robust and on-demand smart nanomaterial structures.
Functional bionanomaterials
comprising enzymes and synthetic polymers
provide an attractive opportunity to increase the diversity of chemical
milieu encountered by protein-based components. This is because the
chemical construction of a surface-bound polymer surfactant corona
enables biomolecules to be utilized in a range of dielectric media
and, potentially, in both the solid and liquid phases. Here, the polymer
surfactant corona serves two primary purposes. It provides an interface
with a polarity that is compatible with the desired dispersion media,
and it supports correct folding of the protein. Moreover, a well-designed
corona has the potential to even improve the performance of enzymes
by increasing the rate of substrate and product transport by varying
the dielectric constant in the vicinity of the active site.[1]Our previous work has shown that discrete
hybrid macromolecules
comprising electrostatically stabilized protein–polymer surfactant
nanoconjugates with well-defined stoichiometries can be used to generate
a raft of biologically active materials with emergent properties.
For example, the bioconjugates can be dehydrated to produce solvent-free
liquid proteins with oxygen-binding properties,[2] hierarchically self-assembled to produce porous membranes
with recyclable catalytic activity,[3−5] or partitioned into hydrophobic
cell membrane domains to yield artificial membrane-binding proteins.[6−8] Significantly, the proteins in these hybrid materials are folded,
biologically active, hyper-thermostable (T = 155 °C),[9] and have protein dynamics
that closely resembled those of fully hydrated proteins.[10−12] Moreover, using this approach, we developed a new self-contained
enzymatic biofluid, where lipases were re-engineered to produce room
temperature liquids that required no dispersion medium, could solubilize
substrates, and catalyze the hydrolysis of fatty acid esters up to
temperatures of 150 °C.[13]Rationally
modifying enzymes such that they could be utilized in
heterogeneous catalysis is an attractive prospect. Accordingly, there
has been a significant research effort focused on the incorporation
of enzymes into functional solid materials through surface immobilization[14−16] or via the development of biomimetic hydrogels.[17] Surface immobilization has allowed enzymes to
be incorporated as persistent components of flow reactors, resulting
in increased product yields,[18] and these
immobilization methods can also be combined with quantum-dot technologies
to generate enzymatically active quantum dot fibres.[19] Biomimetic hydrogels show immense promise in biomedical
applications, facilitating the slow release of bioactive enzymes such
as RNases, globulins,[20] or antibodies,[21] and can provide a bioresorbable 3D scaffold
that promotes wound healing.[22,23] However, despite the
advances in solid-state enzymolysis, there are still key limitations
that reduce their widespread industrial utility. For example, surface-immobilized
enzymes may be denatured, depleted, or fouled and thus require a tailored
environment to preserve surface activity.[14] Moreover, enzymes immobilized in hydrogel matrices typically have
limited mechanical and environmental stability and can require specific
conditions to retain their gel phase,[24] meaning that their application is generally restricted to controlled
biomedical environments.[25−27] A significant improvement would
therefore be to successfully integrate enzymes into more ubiquitous
structural materials that have widespread utility.An attractive
alternative to gel integration or surface immobilization
is to re-engineer the surface of an enzyme such that it is readily
dispersible in a hydrophobic medium, which would provide a route to
integration with a suitable material feedstock for the fabrication
of “smart” solid-state structures; materials able to
autonomously perform specific functions in response to environmental
stimuli or substrates. In this scenario, the enzyme exists as an integral
component within the material, which could even present new active
surfaces through tunable material degradation profiles. There are
a number of reported examples of enzymes that retain their native
structure and catalytic activity in organic solvents and ionic liquids
when enclosed in a sheath of polymers,[28−32] which opens up exciting new possibilities in the
field of smart material fabrication. Until recently, there have only
been very few examples of enzymes being utilized as integrated components
in plastics, with the closest examples being the fabrication of enzyme-rich
cross-linked membranes,[4] enzyme–silk
composites,[33] or enzymes adsorbed onto
plastics through electrospinning.[34] However,
there have been great strides in regards to the integration of enzymes,
with significant focus on the incorporation of lipases within plastics
to generate impressive self-biodegrading materials.[35−38] Collectively, these studies have
exploited the promiscuous hydrolytic capacity of lipases toward polymer
chains, where in the presence of a suitable catalytic environment
(usually buffered water), the catalysis of the plastic polymers occurs
rapidly within days. Excitingly, the scope of possible functionalities
has expanded further, where exogenous substrate catalysis has also
shown to be possible, where recently Xu and colleagues used random
heteropolymers (RHP) to encapsulate the enzyme organophosphorus hydrolase
(OPH) and provide stability in toluene for polycaprolactone (PCL)
film and fiber formation. Here, the authors demonstrated that the
reusable and robust OPH-loaded fiber mats were capable of degrading
organophosphates over a period of 3 months with residual activities
of at least 40%. Such materials have immense promise as a means of
bioremediation, as pollutants such as organophosphates persist for
long periods of time in the environment and cause long term adverse
health effects and deaths.[39] Such compounds
have lipophilic properties and are known to sequester into similarly
composed materials, such as polymer paint coatings or tar roads,[40] and as such, imbuing these types of materials
with self-decontaminating properties would counteract such sequestration.Within the rapidly emerging field of smart nanostructures and devices,
demonstrating the compatibility of these smart hybrid materials with
modern high-resolution fabrication techniques is key for their adoption
as a viable and practical material. Accordingly, we show that enzymatically
active plastics can be readily fabricated into high-resolution 3D
structures on demand using piston-driven 3D (PD3D) printing and thermal
extrusion methods, including melt electrowriting (MEW). These enzyme
plastics retain function, with catalytic activity persisting across
multiple assays and throughout prolonged exposure to an aqueous environment.
As we have previously shown that this protein surface reengineering
methodology is widely applicable across different structural and evolutionary
families of enzymes,[1] the approach could
be readily adopted using a wide range of fabrication techniques to
produce bespoke solid structures with complex chemistries.
Results
and Discussion
Using our recently reported sequential electrostatic
addition strategy,
which provides a route to functional bioconjugates without the need
for covalent protein modifications or mutagenesis (Figure a),[1] we produced polymer surfactant nanoconjugates of phosphotriesterase
from Agrobacterium radiobacter (arPTE),[41] as well as superfolder green fluorescent protein
(sfGFP).[42] The resulting aqueous protein–polymer
surfactant nanoconstructs were then lyophilized and thermally annealed
to form solvent-free protein “melts” (Figure a), termed [arPTE][S+][S–] and [sfGFP][S+][S–], respectively. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) performed
on the anhydrous liquids showed an endothermic melting transition
at 33.9 ± 0.1 °C for [arPTE][S+][S–] and 33.0 ± 0.04 °C for [sfGFP][S+][S–] (Figure S1). Temperature-dependent synchrotron
radiation wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) experiments performed
on the [arPTE][S+][S–] showed that the
endothermic transition observed in the DSC was commensurate with a
loss of the crystalline features at q-values of 1.34
and 1.63 Å and a midpoint melting transition temperature of approximately
33.6 °C (Figure S2). These features
correspond to the PEG–PEG chain and nonylphenyl–nonylphenyl
tail interaction distances[43] and support
the transition from a semi-crystalline solid to an amorphous fluid.
Temperature-dependent synchrotron radiation–circular dichroism
spectroscopy showed a significant increase in the thermal stability
of the [arPTE][S+][S–] melt (T = 102.4 ± 2.0 °C), when compared
with the native arPTE enzyme (T = 71.2
± 0.6 °C; Figure S3).
Figure 1
(a) Schematic
demonstrating the formation of the solvent-free protein
melt. The surface of the enzyme (arPTE) or protein (sfGFP) is modified via the sequential addition of cationic and anionic polymer
surfactants and is then lyophilized to create a dry powder. Upon heating,
the powder melts form a solvent-free liquid. Crucially, this does
not inhibit the biological function, as shown by the retention of
sfGFP fluorescence. (b) The resulting protein melts can be co-solubilized
with plastic precursors in organic solvents to provide access to a
range of enzymatically active plastics, including active coatings,
piston-driven 3D (PD3D) printed structures, membrane fabrics from
melt electrowriting (MEW), and large monoliths from thermal molding.
(a) Schematic
demonstrating the formation of the solvent-free protein
melt. The surface of the enzyme (arPTE) or protein (sfGFP) is modified via the sequential addition of cationic and anionic polymer
surfactants and is then lyophilized to create a dry powder. Upon heating,
the powder melts form a solvent-free liquid. Crucially, this does
not inhibit the biological function, as shown by the retention of
sfGFP fluorescence. (b) The resulting protein melts can be co-solubilized
with plastic precursors in organic solvents to provide access to a
range of enzymatically active plastics, including active coatings,
piston-driven 3D (PD3D) printed structures, membrane fabrics from
melt electrowriting (MEW), and large monoliths from thermal molding.The viscous anhydrous protein melts could be readily
dispersed
in a range of organic solvents, including acetone, tetrahydrofuran,
acetonitrile, and chloroform (Figure S4). Acetone was used to produce co-dispersions of [arPTE][S+][S–] and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
and chloroform for analogous formulations in PCL. PCL was of special
interest as it is biocompatible, biodegradable, and can be thermally
extruded or molded at lower temperatures (ca. 60
°C) than many other plastics.[44,45] Removal of
the solvent from these co-dispersions gave solid enzymatically active
plastic materials. To demonstrate the utility of the approach, the
enzyme plastics were applied as solid film coatings to metals, 3D
printed using piston-based extrusion, or directly fabricated from
the bulk material using thermal extrusion or molding (Figure b). Evaporative coating was
the simplest method of preparation, where a solid template could be
dip-coated or painted with the enzyme–plastic dispersion (Figure a), and multiple
applications could be applied to increase the layer thickness of the
enzymatically active coatings. [arPTE][S+][S–]–ABS-coated rings also exhibited organophosphate hydrolase
activity (Figure b),
and the material showed an asymptotic decline in activity (Figure c) over 300 h that
plateaued after 24–48 h.
Figure 2
(a) A 20 mm-diameter stainless steel metal
washer before (left)
and after evaporative coating from acetone containing 1% w/v [arPTE][S+][S–] and 10% w/v acrylonitrile butadiene
styrene (ABS) (middle), and chloroform containing 1% w/v [arPTE][S+][S–] and 10% w/v polycaprolactone (PCL)
(right). (b) Paraoxon hydrolysis activity of [arPTE][S+][S–]–ABS-coated rings (blue) compared to
the activity of enzyme-free control rings (black). (c) Activity of
the [arPTE][S+][S–]–ABS coated
rings over an extended time period across multiple assays to assess
lifetime and reusability. The exact same ring was used for the series
of assays with persistent exposure to an aqueous environment between
assays.
(a) A 20 mm-diameter stainless steel metal
washer before (left)
and after evaporative coating from acetone containing 1% w/v [arPTE][S+][S–] and 10% w/v acrylonitrile butadiene
styrene (ABS) (middle), and chloroform containing 1% w/v [arPTE][S+][S–] and 10% w/v polycaprolactone (PCL)
(right). (b) Paraoxon hydrolysis activity of [arPTE][S+][S–]–ABS-coated rings (blue) compared to
the activity of enzyme-free control rings (black). (c) Activity of
the [arPTE][S+][S–]–ABS coated
rings over an extended time period across multiple assays to assess
lifetime and reusability. The exact same ring was used for the series
of assays with persistent exposure to an aqueous environment between
assays.This activity profile was mirrored
in plastic structures fabricated
using PD3D printing of the [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL chloroform dispersions.[46−48] This method allows the
controlled deposition of the low-viscosity solution, enabling structures
such as discs and woodpiles to be reliably printed (Figure a–d). We focused on
the use of PCL with these more advanced fabrication techniques, as
ABS lacks the biodegradable and biocompatible properties of PCL, and
otherwise requires much higher temperatures for thermal printing.
As with the coated rings, 3D-printed [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL rings (1% enzyme w/w) both retained significant
activity and exhibited an asymptotic decline and plateau of enzymatic
activity (Figure e,f),
with this plateau of activity persisting beyond 650 h. PD3D printing
was also used to produce 3D structures with the same volumes but increased
surface areas. In practice, this was performed by printing ring structures
with varying surface areas and layer numbers (Figure S5). Interestingly, the activity did not correlate
with the external surface area but rather with the number of printed
layers (Pearson’s r = 0.99; Figure S6). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images from
delaminated multilayer structures revealed high levels of interlayer
roughness (Figure S7). Accordingly, it
is likely that the correlation between the activity and layer number
resulted from the increase in the reaction surface area from these
high surface area interlayer structures.
Figure 3
(a) Example of piston-driven
3D (PD3D) printing, where a mixture
of PCL, enzyme, and solvent ([arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL in chloroform 10–15% w/v) can be extruded through
a piston-driven printing system to create structures such as multilayered
rings. As with the coatings, enzyme loading was at 1% w/w enzyme/plastic.
(b) An example of a multilayer 3D woodpile structure that can be created
using this fabrication method, 1.5 cm2 in size. (c) An
example of a multilayer ring also created with the PD3D method, 2
cm in diameter. (d) A close-up view of the woodpile structure printed
with PD3D printing, showing 3D layering. (e) Paraoxon hydrolysis activity
of [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL rings (blue)
compared to the activity of enzyme-free control rings (black). (f)
The activity of the [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL
solvent-printed rings over an extended time period across multiple
assays to assess lifetime and re-usability. As with the coated rings,
the exact same ring was used for the series of assays with persistent
exposure to an aqueous environment between assays.
(a) Example of piston-driven
3D (PD3D) printing, where a mixture
of PCL, enzyme, and solvent ([arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL in chloroform 10–15% w/v) can be extruded through
a piston-driven printing system to create structures such as multilayered
rings. As with the coatings, enzyme loading was at 1% w/w enzyme/plastic.
(b) An example of a multilayer 3D woodpile structure that can be created
using this fabrication method, 1.5 cm2 in size. (c) An
example of a multilayer ring also created with the PD3D method, 2
cm in diameter. (d) A close-up view of the woodpile structure printed
with PD3D printing, showing 3D layering. (e) Paraoxon hydrolysis activity
of [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL rings (blue)
compared to the activity of enzyme-free control rings (black). (f)
The activity of the [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL
solvent-printed rings over an extended time period across multiple
assays to assess lifetime and re-usability. As with the coated rings,
the exact same ring was used for the series of assays with persistent
exposure to an aqueous environment between assays.The [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL
enzyme
plastics could also be directly fabricated using thermal extrusion
or molding of the solid matrix after removal of the solvent. This
provided access to 3D printer filaments and thermally molded monoliths,
allowing for the fabrication of larger structures (Figure S8). Moreover, the high-resolution 3D fabrication technique
MEW could be used to produce precise micrometer resolution structures
from [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL and [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL, such as fabric meshes
with ultrafine threads (<5 μm, 0.1% enzyme w/w; Figure ).
Figure 4
(a) Melt electrowriting
allows for the PCL to be printed as fine
threads, which can be used to create active enzyme–PCL fabrics
([arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL). The fabric
shown is 3 cm2 in size. (b) Close examination of the [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL fabric with widefield microscopy
show that it is composed of tight tangles of enzyme–PCL threads
arranged in a discrete repetitive pattern (fibers, <5 μm
in thickness). (c) Enzymatic activity of the material is retained
after the melt electrowriting process, as shown through widefield
fluorescence microscopy of the fabric in the presence of Coumaphos,
a phosphothioate that is hydrolyzed by arPTE into the fluorescent
product chlorferon (excitation wavelength 355 nm, emission peak 460
nm). (d) sfGFP can similarly be infused into PCL in the same manner
as arPTE, to create fluorescent plastics ([sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL). Shown here is the resulting solid bulk
material under normal lighting (left) and when illuminated with blue
light (right). (e) The [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL material can be printed to create fine fluorescent structures
such as the ordered grid shown. (f) The [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL material can similarly be used to create
fabrics, with the same ordered repetitive tangles as previously shown
with [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL.
(a) Melt electrowriting
allows for the PCL to be printed as fine
threads, which can be used to create active enzyme–PCL fabrics
([arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL). The fabric
shown is 3 cm2 in size. (b) Close examination of the [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL fabric with widefield microscopy
show that it is composed of tight tangles of enzyme–PCL threads
arranged in a discrete repetitive pattern (fibers, <5 μm
in thickness). (c) Enzymatic activity of the material is retained
after the melt electrowriting process, as shown through widefield
fluorescence microscopy of the fabric in the presence of Coumaphos,
a phosphothioate that is hydrolyzed by arPTE into the fluorescent
product chlorferon (excitation wavelength 355 nm, emission peak 460
nm). (d) sfGFP can similarly be infused into PCL in the same manner
as arPTE, to create fluorescent plastics ([sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL). Shown here is the resulting solid bulk
material under normal lighting (left) and when illuminated with blue
light (right). (e) The [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL material can be printed to create fine fluorescent structures
such as the ordered grid shown. (f) The [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL material can similarly be used to create
fabrics, with the same ordered repetitive tangles as previously shown
with [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL.Quantitative nanomechanics (QNM) mapping of the
MEW plastic fibers
was used to investigate the impact of the protein guest identity (arPTE
or sfGFP) on the morphology and mechanical properties of the [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL and [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL. Here, nanoscale topographical
morphology mapping and nanoindentation experiments were performed
and the Young’s moduli were evaluated for three different materials
(PCL, [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL, and
[sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL; Figure ). When compared
with the neat PCL (Figure a), both [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL
(Figure b) and [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL (Figure c) appeared to exhibit morphologies with
increased levels of ordered structure. This was particularly apparent
in the [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL plastic,
with highly aligned fibrillar structures perpendicular to the extrusion
axis, which is indicative of high-order molecular orientation and
crystallinity. The differences in the nanoscale morphology also impacted
on the nanomechanical properties of the materials. Here, the QNM maps
(Figure S9) were used to determine the
Young’s modulus through DMT model fitting, and the overall
statistical average modulus of these materials were found to be 26.2
± 11.6, 133.7 ± 49.8, and 499.6 ± 182.0 MPa for PCL,
[sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL, and [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL, respectively (Figure d).
Figure 5
Topographical morphology
of melt electrowritten fibers from AFM
analysis of (a) PCL, (b) [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL, and (c) [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL, where [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL
shows fiber alignment that is not present in the PCL topography. Scale
bar, 200 nm. (d) Histograms of Young’s modulus with Gaussian
fittings obtained from PCL, [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL, and [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL
showing a progressive increase in stiffness.
Topographical morphology
of melt electrowritten fibers from AFM
analysis of (a) PCL, (b) [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL, and (c) [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL, where [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL
shows fiber alignment that is not present in the PCL topography. Scale
bar, 200 nm. (d) Histograms of Young’s modulus with Gaussian
fittings obtained from PCL, [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL, and [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL
showing a progressive increase in stiffness.To investigate whether the variation in the Young’s moduli
could be reconciled with either a change in the degree of crystallinity
or lattice arrangement in the two different protein-based plastics,
differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to map the crystallization
transition temperature (T) and melting
temperature (T) of the enzyme plastics
(Figure S10). Significantly, the increase
in the Young’s modulus of the samples corresponded to an increase
in T (30.2 ± 0.1 °C for PCL,
30.8 ± 0.2 °C for [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL, and 32.7 ± 0.1 °C for [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL at 0.1% enzyme w/w), and this
observation is consistent with a change in the crystal lattice arrangement
of the plastic.[49] For T, the small increase in the total enthalpy of melting (ΔH) of the enzyme plastic also reflects the small
increase in the degree of crystallinity. Although modest changes to
the degree of crystallinity can result in large changes in the Young’s
modulus,[50] the large magnitude of increase
for the Young’s modulus relative to the small change in the
degree of crystallinity indicates that the stiffening of the material,
in this instance, is unlikely to be a result of a change in the degree
of crystallinity. Furthermore, incorporation of the neat surfactants
into the PCL plastic ([S+][S–]–PCL)
reduced the T but had a comparatively
larger effect on total ΔH, indicating
that the presence of surfactant alone can account for an increase
in the degree of crystallinity but did not wholly account for the
difference in crystal packing and thus necessitates that the presence
of the enzyme has a distinct influence on the observed changes to
the physical properties of the material. The increase in the Young’s
modulus is thus not adequately accounted for by a change in the degree
of crystallinity, contrary to our initial assumptions.It is
therefore likely that the effect is due to a change in the
lattice structure or material arrangement adopted by the hybrid material
upon cooling, and this is further supported by the presence of nanofibers
in the material (Figure S9), which is indicative
of higher-order assemblies within the material. Conceptually, it is
possible that the enzyme is ionically anchored to multiple surfactant
chains that are unidirectionally entangled with the surrounding PCL
chains, and this may have a pseudo-cross-linking effect. This would
not necessarily increase or decrease the degree of crystallization
but would require the packing of the PCL polymers to change. The permanent
(plastic/inelastic) displacement of the enzyme nanoconjugate in the
“cross-linked” composite material would thus require
a greater degree of physical stress compared to the pure material.
We stress the speculative nature of this model and recognize that
the mechanistic process between the protein structures influencing
the crystallization of the overall material is still not known. This
observation does, however, open interesting avenues of material modification
if alteration of material crystallinity, and therefore stiffness,
is of interest for future study.For the enzyme plastics, the
decrease in the enzymatic rate over
time likely arises from the reduced substrate or product diffusion
from enzymatic active sites at the solution–surface interface
of the material. This phenomenon has also been recognized by other
surface area-dependent technologies, such as surface or quantum-dot
immobilization,[19] where the effective catalytic
rate of the material was lower due to diffusion limitations that are
not accounted for in the classical Michaelis–Menten model of
enzyme catalysis. For our material, this effect was observed directly
using time-lapse widefield fluorescence microscopy of the material
with the fluorescence-yielding organothiophosphate substrate coumaphos.[51] Here, the surface of the fibrous [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL material becomes fluorescent,
and only after an extended period does the fluorescent product diffuse
into the bulk solution (Figure S11), confirming
that microenvironmental effects, such as the presence of diffusion
layers, influence the effective activity of the material. Moreover,
the observed decrease then plateau in activity is unlikely to be due
to enzyme liberation through washing, as multiple assays within the
same day with rinsing did not show a decrease in activity (Figure S12a). Furthermore, as with the materials
developed by DelRe et al.,[52] this decrease is time-dependent, with a dry and unused stored sample
showing the same decrease in activity when compared to a sample stored
in solution (Figure S12b). This residual
activity appears to persist for at least 3 months when stored in solution
(Figure S12c), which demonstrates that
the material is remarkably robust. It is still not clear what causes
this loss of activity with phosphotriesterase; however, it is possible
that the enzyme may end up locked into a thermodynamically favorable,
but inactive, conformation.[53,54] As the material is
not stored under completely anhydrous conditions, it is possible that
residual ambient water is sufficient enough co-crystallize with the
material, thereby facilitating the slow transition of the enzyme into
the inactive state.[55] Investigation into
this mechanism would require dedicated computational approaches, which
is currently beyond the scope of this work.Additional characterization
of the material with SEM was used to
assess the degradation of the material. Storage of the enzyme–PCL
material for up to 4 weeks in an aqueous environment showed that PCL
with 1% w/w enzyme degrades at an accelerated rate compared to unmodified
PCL (Figure S13). The observed cavity formation
is similar to what has been previously reported for PCL degradation.[56] This is most likely occurring at sites of high
local concentrations of enzyme, which when dissolved or liberated
back into aqueous solution, creates a site of structural weakness
that will promote erosion at the defect. However, as the observable
enzymatic activity remains at a consistent plateau despite the increase
in physical cavitation, this would necessitate that the exposure of
new surfaces of active enzyme, confirming that the enzyme is distributed
throughout the material. PCL with a lower enzyme composition (0.1%)
did not exhibit the same rapid decay, confirming that the defect formation
is dependent on the enzyme complex loading, and pH measurements of
0.1% [sfGFP][S+][S–]–PCL and [arPTE][S+][S–]–PCL stored in pure water did
not significantly acidify, indicating that the PCL was not degraded
(Figure S14). This maintenance of activity
is a distinct advantage, as this increases the functional lifetime
of the material in comparison to materials that only have a monolayer
of an active component. This particularly promising for the fabrication
of medically relevant bioactive implants and tools, where surface-functionalized
materials have shown immense success for tissue culture and growth
promotion,[57−59] and the preservation of activity would greatly increase
the viable lifetime of implants and implements.
Conclusions
We
have demonstrated that these composite enzyme plastics have
high levels of temporal activity retention and can be readily fabricated
using 3D printing technologies to create micro- and macroscale structures,
both with and without thermal extrusion. These materials also have
the capacity for high enzyme loadings to increase total activity.
The arPTE-infused plastics can in principle be utilized to develop
self-decontaminating surfaces, while the sfGFP-infused plastics may
serve as an avenue to develop a fully biodegradable fluorescent plastic,
without the need for synthetic dyes. We show that these materials
can be exploited through thermally driven 3D-printing methods, allowing
for the fabrication of detailed and complex creations such as fabrics.
In cases where the thermostability of the enzyme is of concern or
the plastic matrix has a high melting temperature, evaporative printing
provides an alternative to thermal extrusion to also create complex
3D structures without thermally compromising activity. In principle,
this technology is compatible with a wide array of polymeric materials,
provided that an appropriate solvent can be used as a medium to generate
the enzyme plastic composite. Furthermore, as these materials are
surface-area dependent; fine control of material’s porosity
may allow the activity of such materials to be further maximized;
and thus, this is of keen interest as a future endeavor. Overall,
these materials open new avenues for the successful practical application
of enzymes and may have significant medical and industrial utility.
Authors: Angelique F Greene; Alankar Vaidya; Christophe Collet; Kelly R Wade; Meeta Patel; Marc Gaugler; Mark West; Miruna Petcu; Kate Parker Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2021-04-18 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Joyce C Breger; Scott A Walper; Eunkeu Oh; Kimihiro Susumu; Michael H Stewart; Jeffrey R Deschamps; Igor L Medintz Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: François-Xavier Gallat; Alex P S Brogan; Yann Fichou; Nina McGrath; Martine Moulin; Michael Härtlein; Jérôme Combet; Joachim Wuttke; Stephen Mann; Giuseppe Zaccai; Colin J Jackson; Adam W Perriman; Martin Weik Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Kamendra P Sharma; Yixiong Zhang; Michael R Thomas; Alex P S Brogan; Adam W Perriman; Stephen Mann Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 2.991