| Literature DB >> 35982869 |
Prasad Dange1, Seema Tyagi2, Richa Juneja3, Tulika Seth2, Renu Saxena4.
Abstract
Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous disorder consisting of clonal expansion of myeloblasts. Tumor immunity plays an important part in the pathobiology of AML. Understanding the components of tumor immunity is important for understanding tumor pathogenesis and the principles of immunotherapy. Methods We studied 41 patients with AML, for total lymphocyte, CD4 positive helper T cells, CD8 positive cytotoxic T cells, and CD16/56 positive natural killer (NK) cells proportion. Quantification was done on bone marrow aspirate sample by flowcytometry. Whenever available, post induction bone marrow was also analyzed for the lymphocyte subset. Results No significant difference was noted in the percentage of blasts among the three risk categories: favorable, intermediate, and adverse. However, there was significant difference in the total lymphocyte among the risk stratification groups, being highest in the favorable group and lowest in the adverse group. CD8 positive cytotoxic T cells were significantly less in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APML) cases ( p = 0.001). Total lymphocytes were, however, more numerous in APML ( p = 0.005). NK cell proportion was not significantly different between APML and non-APML patients. On completion of induction chemotherapy, bone marrow samples for 12 patients could be processed for lymphocyte subset. On comparing the baseline against the post induction bone marrow, it was observed that there was significant increment in the proportion of CD4 positive T lymphocytes ( p = 0.046). Conclusion There is a difference in lymphocyte subset amongst patients with AML. Larger studies including functional aspects are needed to better define the role of lymphocytes in disease pathogenesis. The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Entities:
Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; flowcytometry; immunity; lymphocyte subset
Year: 2021 PMID: 35982869 PMCID: PMC9381311 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lab Physicians ISSN: 0974-2727
Fig. 1Lymphocyte subset analysis in pretreatment bone marrow—CD45 versus side scatter plot shows mostly blasts and lymphocytes.
Total lymphocyte and subset proportion in bone marrow in AML patients (n = 41)
| Lymphocyte subset | Median (Range) | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| CD4:CD8 ratio | 0.91 (0.42–1.94) | 1.04 ± 0.36 |
| CD4 positive % | 31.4 (16.4–47.3) | 31.2 ± 7.3 |
| CD8 positive % | 32.9 (15.9–51.7) | 32.7 ± 10.1 |
| NK cells % | 7.3 (3–31.1) | 9.7 ± 6.4 |
| Total lymphocyte % | 5.5 (1.1–28.6) | 6.7 ± 5.2 |
Abbreviation: AML, acute myeloid leukemia.
Comparison of median (and range) of lymphocyte subset with risk stratification of AML (total n = 41)
| Lymphocyte | Parameter | Adverse | Favorable | Intermediate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD4:CD8 ratio | Mean ± SD | 0.76 ± 0.26 | 1.11 ± 0.43 | 1.05 ± 0.32 | 0.078 |
| Median (range) | 0.65 (0.47–1.12) | 1 (0.64–1.94) | 0.9 (0.42–1.84) | ||
| CD4 positive | Mean ± SD | 29.8 ± 7.1 | 30.9 ± 8.8 | 31.8 ± 6.6 | 0.855 |
| Median (range) | 27.5 (23.5–40.4) | 31.25 (16.4–47.3) | 31.45 (18.1–43.8) | ||
| CD8 positive | Mean ± SD | 40.44 ± 8.18 | 30.53 ± 11.47 | 32.38 ± 9.1 | 0.168 |
| Median (range) | 41.8 (29.7–51.7) | 30.2 (15.9–47.5) | 32.8 (16.2–48.8) | ||
| NK cells | Mean ± SD | 6.8 ± 3.9 | 7.5 ± 4.6 | 11.7 ± 7.2 | 0.578 |
| Median (range) | 5.6 (3–12.9) | 5.8 (3.4–19.4) | 9.3 (4.4–31.1) | ||
| Total lymphocyte | Mean ± SD | 3.0 ± 1.7 | 9.9 ± 7.1 | 5.6 ± 3.2 | 0.005 |
| Median (range) | 3.5 (1.2–4.7) | 8.35 (3.2–28.6) | 5.05 (1.1–11.4) | ||
| Bone marrow blast (%) | Mean ± SD | 64.8 ± 25.1 | 67.8 ± 23.1 | 72.9 ± 18.1 | 0.631 |
| Median (range) | 72 (22–85) | 75 (24–90) | 77.5 (28–94) |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Comparison of lymphocyte subset in APML vs. non-APML
| Lymphocyte subset | Parameter |
PML-RARA negative (
|
PML-RARA positive (
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD4:CD8 ratio | Mean ± SD | 0.98 ± 0.32 | 1.27 ± 0.47 | 0.11 |
| Median (range) | 0.88 (0.42–1.84) | 1.26 (0.66–1.94) | ||
| CD4 positive | Mean ± SD | 32.3 ± 6.6 | 27.0 ± 8.9 | 0.068 |
| Median (range) | 32.2 (18.1–47.3) | 26.1 (16.4–44.2) | ||
| CD8 positive | Mean ± SD | 35.2 ± 9.2 | 22.4 ± 6.8 | 0.001 |
| Median (range) | 35.8 (16.2–51.7) | 20.9 (15.9–35.7) | ||
| NK cells | Mean ± SD | 9.9 ± 6.6 | 8.9 ± 5.7 | 0.554 |
| Median (range) | 7.3 (3–31.1) | 7.1 (3.4–19.4) | ||
| Total lymphocyte | Mean ± SD | 5.4 ± 3.1 | 12.4 ± 8.3 | 0.005 |
| Median (range) | 4.7 (1.1–11.9) | 9.3 (5.3–28.6) |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Comparison of lymphocyte subset with study by Ismail 10
| Cell subtype |
Ismail (
|
Control (
|
Present study (
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Total lymphocytes | 10.5 ± 9.2 | 15.1 (6.4–30.7) | 6.79 ± 5.29 |
| CD4 | 37.9 ± 13.1 | Total T cells | 31.28 ± 7.36 |
| CD8 | 37.2 ± 12.0 | 32.73 ± 10.12 | |
| CD4:CD8 | 1.2 ± 0.6 | Not mentioned | 1.04 ± 0.36 |
| NK cell | 7.9 ± 4.4 | 15.3 (3.1–28.0) | 9.72 ± 6.43 |
Comparison of lymphocyte subset for APML and non-APML patients
| Parameter for APML vs. non-APML patients |
Alcasid et al
| Present study |
|---|---|---|
| NK cells |
Higher than non-APML (
| Not different than non-APML |
| CD4 T cells |
Decreased than non-APML(
|
Tend to be decreased (
|
| Total T cells | Decreased than non-APML | Decreased than non-APML |
| CD8 T cells | Not mentioned |
Decreased than non-APML (
|