Literature DB >> 35982866

Unmasking Hypoxia in Cirrhosis Patients: Six-Minute Walk Test as a Screening Tool for Hepatopulmonary Syndrome.

Abhishek Singhai1, Manaswinee Mallik1, Pragya Jain2.   

Abstract

Background: Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is one of the complications of advanced cirrhosis which has a serious impact on prognosis of patient. Finding arterial deoxygenation early and initiating higher-level treatment is one of the most critical strategies in the therapy of HPS. In this study, we aimed to assess the utility of six-minute walk test (6MWT) in the diagnosis of HPS. Materials and
Methods: We have enrolled 100 consecutive cirrhosis patients referred to the Liver Clinic of a tertiary care centre of India for >1 year. The Child-Pugh score and the MELD score were used to determine the severity of cirrhosis. All the patients underwent transthoracic contrast echocardiography, arterial blood gas measurements on room air, 6MWT, and chest imaging.
Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the study after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. HPS was present in 21 out of 100 patients (21%). Median (twenty fifth to seventy fifth percentile) MELD score in patients with HPS was 29 (26-33), which was significantly higher as compared to patients without HPS 22 (14.5-26); P <.0001. The 6MWT was positive in 20 (95.23%) HPS patients, while only 1 patient (4.77%) of HPS had negative 6MWT. If 6MWT is positive, then there was 76.92% probability of HPS and if 6MWT is negative, then 98.65% chances of no HPS.
Conclusion: The 6MWT is a simple and effective screening test for HPS, it helps in identifying the patients early who have a potential to deteriorate. This simple intervention would help in prioritizing patients for liver transplantation as liver transplant is the only effective treatment for HPS. Copyright:
© 2022 Advanced Biomedical Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatopulmonary syndrome; MELD score; hypoxia; liver transplant

Year:  2022        PMID: 35982866      PMCID: PMC9379911          DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_150_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Biomed Res        ISSN: 2277-9175


Introduction

Cirrhosis is an end-stage liver disease marked by hepatic architectural distortion and the production of regenerating nodules as a result of increased hepatic fibrosis. Various complications can develop due to cirrhosis and affect the life expectancy of the patients. Major complications of cirrhosis are variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), and hepatocellular carcinoma. HPS is one of the complications of advanced cirrhosis which have a serious impact on the prognosis of the patient. HPS is a classical triad of chronic liver disease, arterial deoxygenation due to pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities, and diffuse intrapulmonary vascular dilatation (IPVD).[1] Severe hypoxemia (PO2 <60 mmHg) in cirrhosis patients without any cardiovascular disease strongly suggests HPS.[234] Diagnostic criteria for HPS are (a) partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) <80 mm Hg, or alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A–aO2) ≥15 mm on room air (A–aO2 >20 mm Hg in patients >64 years), (b) pulmonary vascular dilatation as shown by radioactive lung-perfusion scanning or positive contrast-enhanced echocardiography, and (c) portal hypertension. This syndrome is often under-diagnosed, due to the fact that most of the affected patients are either asymptomatic or present vague complaints of dyspnea and fatigue. Prevalence of HPS in cirrhosis varies from 4% to 47%, depending upon the diagnostic criteria used and the population studied.[5678] Sufficient data about HPS in Indian patients are not available despite the high prevalence of liver cirrhosis in India and advances in our knowledge of HPS. Currently, the only definitive treatment of HPS is liver transplantation. Finding arterial deoxygenation early and initiating higher-level treatment is one of the most critical strategies in the therapy of HPS. A simple six-minute walk test (6MWT) to look for inducible hypoxia for a patient who looks comfortable and is not hypoxic at rest, may help in the early detection of HPS and in initiating early higher-level care. The 6MWT aids in assessing the functional capacity of patients with cardiopulmonary disease. In this study, we aimed to assess the utility of 6MWT in the diagnosis of HPS.

Materials and Methods

Study design and study subjects

This was a cross-sectional hospital-based study. We have enrolled 100 consecutive cirrhosis patients referred to the Liver Clinic of a tertiary care center in India for >1 year. Patients with underlying cardiovascular disease with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification grade 2 and more and respiratory diseases were excluded from this study. Institutional ethical board approval (No.IHEC-LOP/2019/MD0089) and written informed consent from participants were taken before starting the study.

Data collection and variables

All patients participating in this study have been confirmed for liver cirrhosis by clinical, laboratory, ultrasonography, and liver elastography as well as on liver histology, when a liver biopsy specimen was available. The Child-Pugh score and the MELD score were used to determine the severity of cirrhosis. If a patient had tense ascites, therapeutic ascitic tapping was performed before subjecting to further tests. Clinical and laboratory assessment was performed as per standard protocol in cirrhosis patients including the grade of ascites, grade of encephalopathy, liver function test, serum creatinine, prothrombin time, serum albumin, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and any other investigations to detect etiology of cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiogram was performed on all the subjects. At the start of the procedure, an intravenous cannula was secured in the right hand cubital vein of the patient, and 10 ml of agitated saline was injected into it. After five beats, echocardiography was used to assess the cardiac chambers. An intrapulmonary shunt was defined as the presence of microbubbles in the left atrium after five beats. A percutaneous radial artery puncture was used to obtain an arterial blood gas sample. The difference between alveolar oxygen pressure (PAO2) and PaO2 was used to determine A–a O2, with PAO2 = [0.21 (barometric pressure-47)] (1.25PaCO2)]. A second sample was collected after 1 h in the upright position in all patients, and orthodeoxia was defined as a reduction in SaO2 of >4% after changing from the supine to the upright position. The 6MWT was performed in an outdoor or indoor hospital setting; one healthcare worker supervised the test. A baseline oxygen saturation using a finger pulse oximeter probe was noted. Patients were asked to walk with their self-pace and oxygen saturation was measured again at the end of 6 minutes. Positive 6MWT is defined as fall in SpO2 level less than 94% or drop in SpO2 by 3% or more from baseline.

Statistical analysis

The categorical variables were expressed as numbers (n) and percentages, whereas the continuous variables were expressed as mean and median (percent). The Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical and continuous variables, while the student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare continuous and categorical variables. Significant difference is defined as P < 0.05.

Results

A total of 100 patients were included in the study after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Among them, 69% of the patients were males and 31% of the patients were females. In majority (63%) of the patients, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was 25–29.99 (overweight). Comorbidities were present in only 18 (18%) patients. Mean age (years) of the study subjects was 46.31 ± 9.5 with median (twenty fifth to seventy fifth percentile) of 45.5 (39–53) [Table 1]. Diabetes mellitus was the most common comorbidity (15%), followed by coronary artery disease (4%), hypothyroidism (3%), systemic hypertension (2%), and chronic kidney disease (1%).
Table 1

Distribution of sociodemographic characteristics of study subjects

Sociodemographic characteristicsFrequencyPercentage
Age (years)
 Mean±SD46.31±9.5
 Median (twenty fifth to seventy fifth percentile)45.5 (39-53)
 Range21-70
Gender
 Female3131.00%
 Male6969.00%
BMI (kg/m2)
 18.5-24.99 (normal)2424.00%
 25-29.99 (overweight)6363.00%
 ≥30 (obese)1313.00%
 Mean±SD26.23±3.11
 Median (twenty fifth to seventy fifth percentile)26 (25-28)
 Range19-33
Comorbidities
 No8282.00%
 Yes1818.00%
Distribution of sociodemographic characteristics of study subjects In our study, the most common cause of cirrhosis was alcohol (44%) followed by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (15%), hepatitis B (14%), idiopathic (13%), and hepatitis C (6%). Less common causes of cirrhosis were autoimmune hepatitis, biliary, congestive cardiac failure, and Wilson’s disease. Cyanosis was not seen in any patient and clubbing was present in only 1 patient. Mean duration since diagnosis (years) of cirrhosis was 4.87 ± 3.3 with a median (twenty fifth to seventy fifth percentile) of 4 (2.75–7). Mean value of MELD score of study subjects was 22.39 ± 7.06 with median (twenty fifth to seventy fifth percentile) of 23 (17–27.25). In our study, majority of the patients were in Child Pugh class C (73%) followed by B (21%). Only six (6%) patients were in Child Pugh class was A. Mean value of SpO2 at room air (%) and SpO2 after 6MW (%) of study subjects was 95.61 ± 2 and 92.62 ± 4.1 with median (twenty fifth to seventy fifth percentile) of 96 (95–97) and 94 (91.75–95), respectively. HPS was present in 21 out of 100 patients (21%). Median (twenty fifth to seventy fifth percentile) MELD score in patients with HPS was 29 (26–33) which was significantly higher as compared to patients without HPS (22 (14.5–26); P <.0001) [Table 2].
Table 2

Association of MELD score with HPS

MELD scoreNo HPS (n=79)HPS (n=21)Total P
Mean±SD20.47±6.3729.62±4.3622.39±7.06<.0001
Median (twenty fifth to seventy fifth percentile)22 (14.5-26)29 (26-33)23 (17-27.25)
Range8-3322-368-36

  Mann Whitney test

Association of MELD score with HPS Mann Whitney test Prevalence of HPS was higher in Child Pugh class C patients (65.82%) compared to class B (26.58%) and class A (0%). (P = 0.004) [Table 3].
Table 3

Association of Child Pugh class with HPS

Child Pugh classNo HPS (n=79)HPS (n=21)Total P
A6 (7.59%)0 (0%)6 (6%)0.004
B21 (26.58%)0 (0%)21 (21%)
C52 (65.82%)21 (100%)73 (73%)
Total79 (100%)21 (100%)100 (100%)

  Fisher’s exact test

Association of Child Pugh class with HPS Fisher’s exact test The 6MWT was positive in 20 (95.23%) HPS patients, while only 1 patient (4.77%) of HPS had negative 6MWT [Table 4]. If 6MWT is positive, then there was 76.92% probability of HPS and if 6MWT negative, then 98.65% chances of no HPS. Among patients who did not have HPS, 92.4% of patients had negative 6MWT [Table 5]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic for 6MWT predicting HPS was 0.938 (0.872–0.977), thus demonstrating excellent diagnostic performance. It was statistically significant (P < 0.001) [Figure 1].
Table 4

Association of 6MWT with HPS

6MWTNo HPS (n=79)HPS (n=21)Total P
Negative73 (92.4%)1 (4.77%)74<.0001
Positive6 (7.6%)20 (95.23%)26
Total7921100
Table 5

Sensitivity, specificity of 6MWT for predicting HPS

HPS6MWT
Sensitivity (95% CI)95.24% (76.18-99.88%)
Specificity (95% CI)92.41% (84.20-97.16%)
AUC (95% CI)0.938 (0.872-0.977)
Disease prevalence (95% CI)21% (13.49-30.29%)
Positive predictive value (95% CI)76.92% (60.56-87.86%)
Negative predictive value (95% CI)98.65% (91.50-99.80%)
Diagnostic accuracy93%
Figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic curve of 6MWT for predicting HPS

Association of 6MWT with HPS Sensitivity, specificity of 6MWT for predicting HPS Receiver operating characteristic curve of 6MWT for predicting HPS

Discussion

The first recorded description of hypoxemia with liver diseases was by Flückiger in 1884. In 1977, Kennedy and Knudson described classical findings in a case of chronic liver disease and invented the term “hepatopulmonary syndrome.”[9] At present, HPS is a widely known disease but it remains a rare entity as only cirrhosis patients have it. Majority of HPS patients (82%) are asymptomatic for lung involvement and are present with symptoms related to liver disease only. Among symptomatic patients’ the most common complaint is an insidious onset of progressive dyspnea that usually develops after years of liver disease.[10] However, dyspnea in cirrhosis patients can be multifactorial and this symptom is often overlooked. Therefore diagnosis of HPS is delayed in most of the patients and dyspnea progresses. This progression may occur despite stable liver function.[11] A single center prospective study of 789 patients referred for liver transplantation reported that compared with patients without HPS, patients with HPS had a significant increase in hospital cost, prolonged intensive care unit stay, and prolonged hospital stay.[12] Only effective treatment available for HPS is liver transplantation. Significant improvement in lung functions occurs within 1 year of transplantation.[13] In our study, patients with HPS had more severe liver disease as measured by the MELD and Child Pugh scores. Haj et al.[14] also found association between HPS and the severity of liver illness. The authors looked on HPS in compensated cirrhosis patients who were ambulatory. They discovered positive association between HPS and severe cirrhosis, as measured by the Child Pugh score or the MELD. Similar findings were also found in other studies.[61516] Exercise capacity, functional condition, and respiratory muscle strength are all lower in cirrhotic individuals with HPS than in cirrhotic patients without HPS. Only 38% of candidates for liver transplantation had normal peak oxygen consumption, according to Parikh et al.,[17] and patients with values <60% of the expected value have a higher mortality rate than patients with values ≥60% of the predicted value. Marroni et al.[18] discovered that people with alcoholic cirrhosis who had reduced peak oxygen intake had a 60% mortality rate in the next three t years. The 6MWT can be used to assess the functional status of the lungs. Correlation between the 6MWT and peak oxygen consumption is also well described in the literature.[192021] The 6MWT is a useful tool to screen patients for HPS with a sensitivity and specificity of 95.24% and 92.41%, respectively. Though our study’s sample size is small, it serves as a springboard for larger studies to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between 6MWT and HPS. Other tests for diagnosis of HPS are transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), contrast pulmonary angiography, and macroaggregated albumin scanning. TEE allows direct visualization of microbubbles in the pulmonary veins as they enter the left atrium but it is more invasive and often avoided in this population due to the risk of bleeding from esophageal varices. Technetium 99m-labeled macroaggregated albumin scanning is an alternative method of confirming and quantifying shunt from IPVDs. Pulmonary angiography is invasive and, therefore, seldom performed in patients with suspected HPS. Large pulmonary arteriovenous malformations can be embolized through this procedure.

Conclusion

The 6MWT is a simple and effective screening test for HPS, it helps in identifying patients early who have a potential to deteriorate. This simple intervention would help in prioritizing patients for liver transplantation as liver transplant is the only effective treatment for HPS. It can also be used as a prognostic indicator in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  21 in total

1.  Hepatopulmonary syndrome.

Authors:  Valentin Fuhrmann; Michael Krowka
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 2.  Predictors of clinical outcomes in cirrhosis patients.

Authors:  Mona Haj; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.287

3.  Parasympathetic modulation withdrawal improves functional capacity in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Gabriela Roncato; Fabrício Farias da Fontoura; Fernanda Brum Spilimbergo; Gisela Martina Bohns Meyer; Guilherme Watte; Walter Oliveira de Vargas; Karina Rabello Casali; Danilo Cortozi Berton; Katya Rigatto
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 4.  [Liver diseases and pulmonary vascular disorders].

Authors:  M Riou; E-M Jutant; X Mignard; M Canuet; M Humbert; O Sitbon; L Savale; D Montani
Journal:  Rev Med Interne       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 0.728

5.  Hepatopulmonary Syndrome and Portopulmonary Hypertension: Current Status and Implications for Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Kelley Weinfurtner; Kimberly Forde
Journal:  Curr Hepatol Rep       Date:  2020-07-11

6.  A more effective alternative to the 6-minute walk test for the assessment of functional capacity in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Aline Marsico; Simone Dal Corso; Etiene Farah de Carvalho; Vivian Arakelian; Shane Phillips; Roberto Stirbulov; Igor Polonio; Flavia Navarro; Fernanda Consolim-Colombo; Lawrence P Cahalin; Luciana M Malosa Sampaio
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 7.  Review article: Update on current and emergent data on hepatopulmonary syndrome.

Authors:  Stergios Soulaidopoulos; Evangelos Cholongitas; George Giannakoulas; Maria Vlachou; Ioannis Goulis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Liver transplantation and alcoholic liver disease: History, controversies, and considerations.

Authors:  Claudio Augusto Marroni; Alfeu Medeiros Fleck; Sabrina Alves Fernandes; Lucas Homercher Galant; Marcos Mucenic; Mario Henrique de Mattos Meine; Guilherme Mariante-Neto; Ajacio Bandeira de Mello Brandão
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Resources Utilization After Liver Transplantation in Patients With and Without Hepatopulmonary Syndrome: Cleveland Clinic Experience.

Authors:  Jacek B Cywinski; Natalya Makarova; Andrea Arney; Qiang Liu; Masato Fujiki; K V Narayanan Menon; Cristiano Quintini
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2020-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.