Douglas R Haase1, Lucas R Haase2, Tyler J Moon2, Marcus Trotter3, Joshua K Napora2, Brent T Wise3. 1. University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. haase1822@gmail.com. 2. University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: External fixator pin site overlap with definitive fixation implants (pin-plate overlap) has been identified as a risk factor for surgical site infection in tibial plateau fractures. Despite this, pin-plate overlap occurs in 24-38% of patients. This study sought to identify radiographic characteristics associated with pin-plate overlap to help minimize occurrences. METHODS: 283 patients at two Level I trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic measurements were recorded including fracture length, distance from fracture to proximal tibial pin site, and pin site distance-to-fracture (PSF) ratio. RESULTS: 70 (24.7%) cases of pin-plate overlap were identified. Pin-plate overlap was associated with increased fracture length (81.5 ± 32.1 mm vs 56.9 ± 26.1 mm, p < 0.001) and decreased distance from fracture to proximal tibial pin site (84.5 ± 37.1 mm vs 126.9 ± 35.8 mm). Pins placed greater than 100 mm and 150 mm from the fracture eliminated 36/70 (51%) and 67/70 (96%) pin-plate overlaps, respectively. Pins placed with a PSF ratio greater than 1.5 and 2.0 eliminated 47/70 (67%), and 57/70 (81%) of pin-plate overlaps, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longer fractures, pins closer to the fracture, and decreased PSF ratio were associated with overlap. Placing proximal tibial pins more than 100 mm from the fracture eliminated most pin-plate overlaps.
PURPOSE: External fixator pin site overlap with definitive fixation implants (pin-plate overlap) has been identified as a risk factor for surgical site infection in tibial plateau fractures. Despite this, pin-plate overlap occurs in 24-38% of patients. This study sought to identify radiographic characteristics associated with pin-plate overlap to help minimize occurrences. METHODS: 283 patients at two Level I trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic measurements were recorded including fracture length, distance from fracture to proximal tibial pin site, and pin site distance-to-fracture (PSF) ratio. RESULTS: 70 (24.7%) cases of pin-plate overlap were identified. Pin-plate overlap was associated with increased fracture length (81.5 ± 32.1 mm vs 56.9 ± 26.1 mm, p < 0.001) and decreased distance from fracture to proximal tibial pin site (84.5 ± 37.1 mm vs 126.9 ± 35.8 mm). Pins placed greater than 100 mm and 150 mm from the fracture eliminated 36/70 (51%) and 67/70 (96%) pin-plate overlaps, respectively. Pins placed with a PSF ratio greater than 1.5 and 2.0 eliminated 47/70 (67%), and 57/70 (81%) of pin-plate overlaps, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longer fractures, pins closer to the fracture, and decreased PSF ratio were associated with overlap. Placing proximal tibial pins more than 100 mm from the fracture eliminated most pin-plate overlaps.
Authors: Ahmed M Thabet; Joshua E Simson; Chris Gerzina; Sherif Dabash; Adam Adler; Amr A Abdelgawad Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2017-08-07
Authors: Patrick Henry; David Wasserstein; Michael Paterson; Hans Kreder; Richard Jenkinson Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Michael R Ruffolo; Franklin K Gettys; Harvey E Montijo; Rachel B Seymour; Madhav A Karunakar Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.512