| Literature DB >> 35982162 |
Hamid Reza Talari1, Mohamad Reza Molaqanbari2, Milad Mokfi1, Mohsen Taghizadeh3, Fereshteh Bahmani3, Seyed Mohammad Hossein Tabatabaei1, Nasrin Sharifi4.
Abstract
The present study is the first effort to evaluate the effects of vitamin B12 supplementation on the serum level of liver enzymes, homocysteine, grade of hepatic steatosis, and metabolic profiles in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Forty patients with NAFLD were enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial to receive either one oral tablet of vitamin B12 (1000 µg cyanocobalamin) or a placebo per day for 12 weeks. We investigated serum levels of homocysteine, aminotransferases, fasting blood glucose (FBG), lipids, malondialdehyde (MDA), and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). The grade of liver steatosis and fibrosis was measured by real-time 2-dimensional shear wave elastography. Vitamin B12 supplementation significantly decreased serum levels of homocysteine compared to placebo (medians: - 2.1 vs. - 0.003 µmol/l; P = 0.038). Although serum alanine transaminase (ALT) in the vitamin B12 group decreased significantly, this change did not reach a significant level compared to the placebo group (medians: - 7.0 vs. 0.0 IU/l; P > 0.05). Despite the significant within-group decrease in FBG, MDA, and liver steatosis in the vitamin B12 group, between-group comparisons did not reveal any significant difference. Vitamin B12 supplementation might decrease serum levels of homocysteine in patients with NAFLD. The fasting blood glucose and serum levels of MDA were significantly improved in the trial group who received vitamin B12. However, these changes did not reach a significant level compared to the placebo group. In this respect, further studies with larger sample sizes, different doses, and types of vitamin B12 will reveal additional evidence.Trial Registration: At http://irct.ir/ as IRCT20120718010333N5 on December 25, 2019.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35982162 PMCID: PMC9388548 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18195-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Flowchart of patients’ recruitment.
Baseline characteristics of 40 patients with NAFLD.
| Characteristics | Vitamin B12 | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male) (%)a | 55 | 60 | 0.75 |
| Smoker (n)a | 3 | 3 | 1.00 |
| History of diabetes mellitus (%)a | 25 | 5 | 0.18 |
| Metformin | 6 (30) | 5 (25) | 0.72 |
| ACEIs | 1 (5) | 1 (5) | 1.00 |
| Statins | 4 (20) | 1 (5) | 0.34 |
| PPIs | 3 (15) | 2 (10) | 0.62 |
| Ageb | 41.30 ± 6.33 | 39.10 ± 9.96 | 0.41 |
ACEIs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, NAFLD non alcoholic fatty liver disease, PPIs Proton-pump inhibitors.
aData is tested by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.
bData is expressed as mean ± standard deviation and tested by two sample t-test.
Within-group and between-group comparisons of the baseline, endpoint and changes values for anthropometric, physical activity, and dietary variables in vitamin B12 and placebo groups.
| Variables | Vitamin B12 groupa (n = 20) | Placebo groupa (n = 20) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 87.25 (78.50, 101.22) | 92.70 (85.92, 105.75) | 0.307 |
| Endpoint | 85.70 (79.75, 90.06) | 91.61 (86.92, 103.07) | 0.063 |
| Changec | − 1.55 (− 3.00, 0.40) | − 0.95 (− 4.15, 2.69) | 0.607e |
| 0.097 | 0.424 | ||
| Baseline | 31.42 (27.77, 34.92) | 30.74 (27.83, 35.66) | 0.940 |
| Endpoint | 30.67 (28.08, 33.55) | 32.09 (28.70, 35.44) | 0.164 |
| Change | − 0.54 (− 1.15, 0.27) | − 0.35 (− 1.45, 0.59) | 0.685e |
| 0.149 | 0.714 | ||
| Baseline | 0.0 (0.0, 561) | 0.0 (0.0, 408) | 0.905e |
| Endpoint | 216 (0.0, 289) | 217 (0.0, 525) | 0.422e |
| Change | 0.0 (− 306, 234) | 0.0 (− 77, 244) | 0.224e |
| 0.341e | 0.233e | ||
| Baseline | 1975.49 ± 450.27 | 1994.29 ± 454.19 | 0.904 |
| Endpoint | 1838.91 ± 352.81 | 1903.95 ± 341.73 | 0.590 |
| Change | − 136.58 ± 677.26 | − 90.34 ± 478.33 | 0.822 |
| 0.404 | 0.462 | ||
| Baseline | 3.65 ± 0.70 | 3.24 ± 0.82 | 0.124 |
| Endpoint | 2.85 ± 0.96 | 2.92 ± 0.88 | 0.841 |
| Change | − 0.80 ± 1.35 | − 0.32 ± 1.09 | 0.270 |
| 0.022 | 0.253 | ||
| Baseline | 304.95 ± 112.11 | 267.53 ± 80.16 | 0.277 |
| Endpoint | 198.61 ± 90.41 | 156.84 ± 77.27 | 0.160 |
| Change | − 106.33 ± 178.08 | − 110.68 ± 107.52 | 0.931 |
| 0.021 | 0.001 | ||
BMI body mass index, MET metabolic equivalent of task.
aValues are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (25th, 75th percentiles).
bP-value for comparing the values between the study groups at baseline, at the endpoint and the change from baseline. Two sample t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were used for parametric and non-parametric comparisons, respectively.
cEndpoint values minus the baseline ones.
dP-value for comparing baseline with the end point values within each group. Paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon Paired Rank test were used for parametric and non-parametric comparison, respectively.
eP-value obtained from a non-parametric test.
fTotal MET-minutes/week = Walking (3.3METs × min × days) + Moderate intensity (4 METs × min × days) + Vigorous intensity(8METs*min*days), based on the short form of International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
Within-group and between-group comparisons of the baseline, endpoint and changes’ values for the study primary outcomes in vitamin B12 and placebo groups.
| Variables | Vitamin B12 groupa (n = 20) | Control groupa (n = 20) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 1.59 (1.49, 2.04) | 1.54 (1.49, 1.64) | 0.529g | |
| Endpoint | 1.30 (1.08, 1.52) | 1.30 (1.12, 1.49) | 0.516 | 0.802 |
| Changee | − 0.41 (− 0.54, − 0.14) | − 0.30 (− 0.65, − 0.02) | 0.417g | |
| < 0.001g | 0.001g | |||
| Baseline | 7.05 (5.60, 7.97) | 6.20 (5.57, 7.40) | 0.567 | |
| Endpoint | 6.60 (5.22, 7.40) | 6.50 (5.96, 7.07) | 0.968g | 0.821 |
| Change | − 0.35 (− 2.20, 1.70) | 0.10 (− 0.95, 0.85) | 0.788 | |
| 0.587g | 0.727g | |||
| Baseline | 99.50 (91.00, 113.50) | 92.50 (87.00, 97.75) | 0.091g | |
| Endpoint | 96.77 (89.00, 100.98) | 88.50 (81.75, 99.99) | 0.134g | 0.167 |
| Change | − 5.00 (− 15.50, 1.75) | − 1.50 (− 7.25, 2.94) | 0.265g | |
| 0.025g | 0.360g | |||
| Baseline | 13.46 (11.47, 19.73) | 15.03 (9.59, 18.48) | 0.588g | |
| Endpoint | 14.61 (9.28, 20.41) | 12.21 (9.59, 18.39) | 0.818g | 0.740 |
| Change | − 1.46 (− 5.48, 2.92) | − 0.21 (− 4.59, 6.84) | 0.570g | |
| 0.351g | 0.970g | |||
| Baseline | 3.74 (2.75, 6.15) | 3.50 (2.06, 4.49) | 0.351g | |
| Endpoint | 3.94 (2.42, 6.28) | 3.12 (2.11, 7.05) | 0.766g | 0.408 |
| Change | − 0.23 (− 0.88, 2.34) | 0.06 (− 1.64, 2.49) | 0.534g | |
| 0.794g | 0.550g | |||
| Baseline | 44 (24, 70) | 33 (20, 60) | 0.203g | |
| Endpoint | 30 (19, 47) | 30.5 (19, 40) | 0.978g | 0.824 |
| Change | − 7 (− 17, − 0.75) | 0.0 (− 11, .8) | 0.559 | |
| 0.005g | 0.102g | |||
| Baseline | 31 (26, 36) | 27.5 (21, 40) | 0.357g | |
| Endpoint | 19.5 (16, 23) | 21 (16, 23) | 0.807g | 0.859 |
| Change | − 12 (− 14.7, − 4.9) | − 8 (− 8, − 3) | 0.516g | |
| < 0.001g | < 0.001g | |||
| Baseline | 15.1 (12, 17.8) | 14.5 (13, 16.8) | 0.933g | |
| Endpoint | 11.5 (10, 16.7) | 14.1 (12.7, 16.1) | 0.258 | 0.038 |
| Change | − 2.1 (− 4.3, − 0.003) | − 0.003 (− 1.7, 0.47) | 0.036 | |
| 0.005 | 0.351g | |||
ALT alanin transaminase, ANCOVA analysis of covariance, AST aspartate transaminase, FBG fasting blood glucose; HOMA-IR homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance.
aValues are expressed as mean ± standard or median (25th, 75th percentiles).
bP-value for comparing the values between the study groups at baseline, at the endpoint and the change from baseline. Two sample t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were used for parametric and non-parametric comparisons, respectively.
cP value for ANCOVA test to determine the significant levels of differences between the two groups post-intervention while adjusting for baseline measurements and covariates.
dAdjusted for baseline values of corresponding variable, age, and the baseline values of FBG.
eEndpoint values minus the baseline ones.
fP-value for comparing baseline with end point values within each group. Paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon Paired Rank test were used for parametric and non-parametric comparison, respectively.
gP-value obtained from a non-parametric test.
Within-group and between-group comparisons of the baseline, endpoint and changes’ values for the study secondary outcomes in vitamin B12 and placebo groups.
| Variables | Vitamin B12 groupa (n = 20) | Control groupa (n = 20) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 170 (126, 256) | 140 (103, 177) | 0.127g | |
| Endpoint | 153 (121, 186) | 149 (108, 173) | 0.607 | 0.568f |
| Changee | − 12 (− 45, 35) | 4.5 (− 34, 21) | 0.577 | |
| 0.446 | 0.940 g | |||
| Baseline | 96 (80, 108) | 99 (83, 115) | 0.732 | |
| Endpoint | 97 (80, 115) | 102 (95, 114) | 0.559 | 0.597f |
| Change | 13 (− 12, 29) | 7.5 (− 10, 21) | 0.854 | |
| 0.678 | 0.319 | |||
| Baseline | 41.5 (36.2, 46) | 45 (39.2, 52.7) | 0.230 | |
| Endpoint | 40.9 (32.2, 46.8) | 43 (40.1, 45.7) | 0.471 | 0.783f |
| Change | − 1.9 (3.8, 1.6) | − 2 (− 8, 2) | 0.635g | |
| 0.054 | 0.045 | |||
| Baseline | 4.37 ± 0.89 | 4.38 ± 1.05 | 0.969 | |
| Endpoint | 3.77 ± 0.56 | 4.17 ± 0.66 | 0.049 | 0.119 |
| Change | − 0.60 ± 1.14 | − 0.21 ± 1.13 | 0.292 | |
| 0.029 | 0.402 | |||
ANCOVA analysis of covariance, HDL-c high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, MDA Malondialdehyde, TG triglyceride.
aValues are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (25th, 75th percentiles).
bP-value for comparing the values between the study groups at baseline, at the endpoint and the change from baseline. Two sample t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were used for parametric and non-parametric comparisons, respectively.
cP value for ANCOVA test to determine the significant levels of differences between the two groups post-intervention while adjusting for baseline measurements and covariates.
dAdjusted for baseline values of corresponding variable, age, and the baseline values of FBG.
eEndpoint values minus the baseline ones.
fP-value for comparing baseline with end point values within each group. Paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon Paired Rank test were used for parametric and non-parametric comparison, respectively.
gP-value obtained from a non-parametric test.