| Literature DB >> 35982150 |
Sayaka Kuba1, Shigeto Maeda2, Shigeki Minami3, Hiroki Moriuchi4, Aya Tanaka5, Momoko Akashi3, Michi Morita6, Chika Sakimura3, Masayuki Baba5, Ryota Otsubo5, Megumi Matsumoto5, Kosho Yamanouchi6,7, Hiroshi Yano5,8, Kengo Kanetaka6, Takeshi Nagayasu5, Susumu Eguchi6.
Abstract
In Japan, asymptomatic metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is often detected using tumor markers or imaging tests. We aimed to investigate differences in clinicopathological features, prognosis, and treatment between asymptomatic and symptomatic MBCs. Patients with MBC were retrospectively divided into asymptomatic and symptomatic groups to compare their prognosis by breast cancer subtype: luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive, and triple negative. Of 204 patients with MBC (114 asymptomatic, 90 symptomatic), the symptomatic group had a higher frequency of multiple metastatic sites and TN subtype. All cohorts in the asymptomatic group tended to or had longer post-recurrence survival (PRS) than those in the symptomatic group. In contrast, all cohorts and TN patients in the asymptomatic group tended to have or had longer overall survival (OS) than those in the symptomatic group, although no significant difference was observed in the luminal and HER2 subtypes. In the multivariate analysis, TN, recurrence-free survival, multiple metastatic sites, and symptomatic MBC were independently predictive of PRS. Regarding the luminal subtype, the asymptomatic group had longer chemotherapy duration than the symptomatic group, with no significant difference in OS between the groups. Asymptomatic and symptomatic MBCs differ in terms of subtypes and prognosis, and whether they require different treatment strategies for each subtype warrants further investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35982150 PMCID: PMC9388511 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18069-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Flowchart showing the patient selection process.
Comparison of clinicopathological factors between the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups (all cases).
| Asymptomatic MBC | Symptomatic MBC | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agea, years | 59.5 (36–88) | 59 (26–91) | 0.93 |
| Recurrence-free survival, months | 40.5 (4–237) | 41 (4–309) | 0.99 |
| Visceral metastasisa | 70 (61.4%) | 48 (53.3%) | 0.32 |
| Multiple metastatic sitesa | 40 (35.1%) | 48 (53.3%) | 0.01 |
| Lung | 46 | 29 | 0.25 |
| Bone | 40 | 36 | 0.56 |
| Lymph node | 33 | 36 | 0.10 |
| Liver | 32 | 15 | 0.07 |
| Chest wall | 3 | 17 | < 0.001 |
| Brain | 4 | 7 | 0.22 |
| Stage 0/1/2/3 | 1/22/44/43/4 | 0/12/48/26/4 | 0.49 |
Subtype Luminal/HER2/Triple negative | 75/27/12 | 45/23/22 | 0.02 |
HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, MBC metastatic breast cancer.
aAt the time of confirmation of metastasis
bThere are duplicate cases.
Comparison of clinicopathological factors between the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups according to subtype.
| Luminal | HER2 | Triple negative | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asymptomatic MBC (n = 75) | Symptomatic MBC (n = 45) | Asymptomatic MBC (n = 27) | Symptomatic MBC (n = 23) | Asymptomatic MBC (n = 12) | Symptomatic MBC (n = 22) | |
| Agea, years | 62 (36–88) | 59 (26–91) | 56 (36–77) | 56 (31–82) | 56 (41–81) | 59 (26–88) |
| Recurrence-free survival, months | 46 (13–237) | 54 (5–309) | 54.5 (7–182) | 54.5 (13–210) | 20 (4–108) | 22 (4–71) |
| Visceral metastasisa | 49 (65.3%) | 23 (51.1%) | 16 (59.3%) | 15 (65.2%) | 5 (41.7%) | 10 (45.5%) |
| Multiple metastatic sitesa | 28 (37.3%) ⁋ | 25 (55.6%) ⁋ | 8 (29.6%) ⁋ | 13 (56.5%) ⁋ | 4 (33.3%) | 10 (45.5%) |
| Lung | 33 | 15 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| Bone | 29 | 20 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| Lymph node | 20 | 19 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| Liver | 22† | 6† | 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 |
| Chest wall | 0† | 5† | 2 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Brain | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Stage 0/1/2/3/Unknown | 0/14/30/28/3 | 0/4/28/12/1 | 1/6/8/11/1 | 0/4/7/9/2 | 0/2/6/4 | 0/4/13/5 |
HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, MBC metastatic breast cancer, OS overall survival, PRS post-recurrence survival.
aAt the time of confirmation of metastasis.
bThere are duplicate cases.
†p-value less than 0.05.
⁋p-value greater than 0.05, less than 0.1.
Figure 2Survival analysis of all patients. (a) Post-recurrence survival (PRS), (b) overall survival (OS).
Comparison of OS and PRS between the asymptomatic and symptomatic MBC groups according to subtype.
| Overall survival (months) | 95% Confidence interval | p-value | Post-recurrence survival (months) | 95% Confidence interval | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asymptomatic MBC | 112 | 98–150 | 0.91 | 54 | 48–73 | 0.08 |
| Symptomatic MBC | 124 | 72–146 | 41 | 29–56 | ||
| Asymptomatic MBC | 113 | 59–195 | 0.40 | 71 | 25–89 | 0.09 |
| Symptomatic MBC | 72 | 49–112 | 27 | 16–57 | ||
| Asymptomatic MBC | 46 | 24–112 | 0.06 | 28 | 8–100 | 0.01 |
| Symptomatic MBC | 37.5 | 19–63 | 10.5 | 5–23 | ||
HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, MBC metastatic breast cancer, OS overall survival, PRS post-recurrence survival.
Multivariate analysis of post-recurrence survival.
| Hazard ratio | 95% Confidence interval | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triple negative vs no triple negative | 2.563 | 1.686–3.896 | < 0.001 |
| Recurrence-free survival, year | 0.914 | 0.871–0.959 | < 0.001 |
| Multiple metastasis site vs single metastasis site | 1.855 | 1.316–2.614 | < 0.001 |
| Symptomatic MBC vs Asymptomatic MBC | 1.759 | 1.263–2.451 | < 0.001 |
MBC metastatic breast cancer.
Figure 3Treatment duration according to the asymptomatic/symptomatic luminal subtype. (a) Endocrine therapy, (b) chemotherapy.