Tianjiao Wang1,2, Paul Scuffham3,4, Joshua Byrnes3,4, Martin Downes3,4. 1. Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia. tianjiao.wang@griffithuni.edu.au. 2. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. tianjiao.wang@griffithuni.edu.au. 3. Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia. 4. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an inherited neuromuscular disorder and regarded as one of the most frequent genetic causes of infant mortality. The aim of this study is to develop a cost-effectiveness analysis of AVXS-101 (Onasemnogene Abeparvovec/Zolgensma®) and nusinersen (Spinraza®) for SMA to inform decision-making on reimbursement policies in Australia. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with five health states to evaluate the costs and effects for patients with SMA Type I from a healthcare system perspective over a time-horizon of 100 years. The model parameters were based on clinical trials, parametric distributions, published literature, and Australian registries. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to appraise the uncertainties of the parameters in the model. A threshold analysis was conducted to estimate the cost of AVXS-101 of being cost-effective. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of AVXS-101 was $1,808,471 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and that of nusinersen was $2,772,798 per QALY, compared to standard of care, respectively. The ICER of AVXS-101 was $1,238,288 per QALY compared to nusinersen. The key drivers influencing on ICERs were costs of using treatments and utility values of sitting and walking independently. CONCLUSION: Both nusinersen and AVXS-101 resulted in health benefits, but they were not cost-effective with a commonly used willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY. Developing high-quality clinical data and exploring appropriate WTP thresholds are critical for decision-making on reimbursement policies in the treatment of rare diseases.
INTRODUCTION: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an inherited neuromuscular disorder and regarded as one of the most frequent genetic causes of infant mortality. The aim of this study is to develop a cost-effectiveness analysis of AVXS-101 (Onasemnogene Abeparvovec/Zolgensma®) and nusinersen (Spinraza®) for SMA to inform decision-making on reimbursement policies in Australia. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with five health states to evaluate the costs and effects for patients with SMA Type I from a healthcare system perspective over a time-horizon of 100 years. The model parameters were based on clinical trials, parametric distributions, published literature, and Australian registries. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to appraise the uncertainties of the parameters in the model. A threshold analysis was conducted to estimate the cost of AVXS-101 of being cost-effective. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of AVXS-101 was $1,808,471 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and that of nusinersen was $2,772,798 per QALY, compared to standard of care, respectively. The ICER of AVXS-101 was $1,238,288 per QALY compared to nusinersen. The key drivers influencing on ICERs were costs of using treatments and utility values of sitting and walking independently. CONCLUSION: Both nusinersen and AVXS-101 resulted in health benefits, but they were not cost-effective with a commonly used willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY. Developing high-quality clinical data and exploring appropriate WTP thresholds are critical for decision-making on reimbursement policies in the treatment of rare diseases.
Authors: Santiago Zuluaga-Sanchez; Megan Teynor; Christopher Knight; Robin Thompson; Thomas Lundqvist; Mats Ekelund; Annabelle Forsmark; Adrian D Vickers; Andrew Lloyd Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Eugenio Mercuri; Richard S Finkel; Francesco Muntoni; Brunhilde Wirth; Jacqueline Montes; Marion Main; Elena S Mazzone; Michael Vitale; Brian Snyder; Susana Quijano-Roy; Enrico Bertini; Rebecca Hurst Davis; Oscar H Meyer; Anita K Simonds; Mary K Schroth; Robert J Graham; Janbernd Kirschner; Susan T Iannaccone; Thomas O Crawford; Simon Woods; Ying Qian; Thomas Sejersen Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Richard S Finkel; Michael P McDermott; Petra Kaufmann; Basil T Darras; Wendy K Chung; Douglas M Sproule; Peter B Kang; A Reghan Foley; Michelle L Yang; William B Martens; Maryam Oskoui; Allan M Glanzman; Jean Flickinger; Jacqueline Montes; Sally Dunaway; Jessica O'Hagen; Janet Quigley; Susan Riley; Maryjane Benton; Patricia A Ryan; Megan Montgomery; Jonathan Marra; Clifton Gooch; Darryl C De Vivo Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Alison Dalton Archibald; Melanie Jane Smith; Trent Burgess; Katrina Louise Scarff; Justine Elliott; Clare Elizabeth Hunt; Zoe McDonald; Caitlin Barns-Jenkins; Chelsea Holt; Karina Sandoval; Vanessa Siva Kumar; Lisa Ward; Emily Caroline Allen; Sarah Valerie Collis; Shannon Cowie; David Francis; Martin B Delatycki; Eppie Mildred Yiu; R John Massie; Mark Domenic Pertile; Desirée du Sart; Damien Bruno; David J Amor Journal: Genet Med Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 8.822