| Literature DB >> 35979226 |
Xiaoying Ning1, Yanfei Zhang1, Wei Wang1, Huling Yan1, Yumin Xia1.
Abstract
Background: Vitiligo is a common, acquired depigmenting disorder. The pathogenesis is not clear, neuropsychological factors may be involved. Vitiligo will affect the individual's physical and psychological health, leading to different levels of psychological behavior problems. However, there are few research on psychological symptoms in patients with vitiligo in China.Entities:
Keywords: behavioral and psychological symptoms; psychological health status; quality of life; vitiligo
Year: 2022 PMID: 35979226 PMCID: PMC9377344 DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S370445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Res Behav Manag ISSN: 1179-1578
Demographic Data of Patients with Vitiligo
| Clinical Data | N (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 49 (41.9) | |
| Female | 68 (58.1) | |
| 18–25 | 35 (29.9) | |
| 25–40 | 44 (37.6) | |
| 40–60 | 34 (29.1) | |
| >60 | 4 (3.4) | |
| Unmarried | 49 (41.9) | |
| Married | 68 (58.1) | |
| Junior middle school | 9 (7.7) | |
| Junior high school | 44 (37.6) | |
| Junior college and Bachelor | 54 (46.2) | |
| Master and Doctor | 10 (8.5) | |
| Civil servant | 34 (29.1) | |
| Enterprise staff | 44 (37.6) | |
| Students | 18 (15.4) | |
| Other | 21 (17.9) | |
| Yes | 27 (23.1) | |
| No | 90 (76.9) | |
| <1 | 36 (30.8) | |
| 1–2 | 30 (25.6) | |
| 2–5 | 21 (17.9) | |
| >5 | 30 (25.6) | |
| Yes | 86 (73.5) | |
| No | 31 (26.5) | |
| Mild | 77 (65.8) | |
| Moderate | 24 (20.5) | |
| Moderate to severe | 13 (11.1) | |
| Severe | 3 (2.6) | |
| Rapid progress | 14 (12.0) | |
| Progressive | 68 (58.1) | |
| Stable | 35 (29.9) | |
Figure 1The distribution of DLQI (dermatology quality of life index) scores of patients with vitiligo.
Comparison Between SCL-90 Score in Patients with Vitiligo and Chinese Norms (mean±SD)
| Variables | Patients | Chinese Norms | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136.44 ± 39.19 | 129.19 ± 40.25 | 2.000 | 0.048 | |
| 1.36 ± 0.48 | 1.37 ± 0.46 | −0.166 | 0.868 | |
| 1.73 ± 0.64 | 1.66 ± 0.58 | 1.184 | 0.239 | |
| 1.73 ± 0.59 | 1.51 ± 0.55 | 3.990 | 0.000 | |
| 1.58 ± 0.60 | 1.45 ± 0.53 | 2.268 | 0.025 | |
| 1.59 ± 0.57 | 1.40 ± 0.49 | 3.591 | 0.000 | |
| 1.54 ± 0.36 | 1.48 ± 0.57 | 1.894 | 0.061 | |
| 1.32 ± 0.39 | 1.23 ± 0.39 | 2.652 | 0.009 | |
| 1.46 ± 0.49 | 1.41 ± 0.50 | 1.047 | 0.297 | |
| 1.34 ± 0.41 | 1.34 ± 0.44 | −0.085 | 0.933 | |
| 1.46 ± 0.50 | 1.51 ± 0.58 | −1.106 | 0.271 |
Abbreviations: SCL-90, symptom checklist 90; SD, standard deviation.
Univariate Analysis of Patients with Vitiligo in the Score of Total SCL-90 and Interpersonal Sensitivity, Depression, Anxiety and Phobia (Mean ± SD)
| Variables | SCL-90 Total Score | Interpersonal Sensitivity | Depression | Anxiety | Phobia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143.22 ± 43.66 | 1.83 ± 0.63 | 1.74 ± 0.69 | 1.67 ± 0.62 | 1.39 ± 0.44 | |
| 127.02 ± 29.91 | 1.59 ± 0.50 | 1.35 ± 0.37 | 1.47 ± 0.47 | 1.23 ± 0.27 | |
| 2.381 | 2.145 | 3.906 | 2.007 | 2.462 | |
| 0.019 | 0.034 | 0.000 | 0.047 | 0.015 | |
| 128.50 ± 31.73 | 1.61 ± 0.50 | 1.43 ± 0.47 | 1.47 ± 0.44 | 1.26 ± 0.30 | |
| 147.45 ± 45.75 | 1.90 ± 0.66 | 1.78 ± 0.71 | 1.75 ± 0.68 | 1.42 ± 0.47 | |
| −2.499 | −2.690 | −2.969 | −2.474 | −2.078 | |
| 0.015 | 0.008 | 0.004 | 0.016 | 0.041 | |
| 132.75 ± 41.71 | 1.63 ± 0.59 | 1.50 ± 0.63 | 1.56 ± 0.60 | 1.29 ± 0.40 | |
| 135.00 ± 26.96 | 1.78 ± 0.58 | 1.54 ± 0.42 | 1.54 ± 0.43 | 1.34 ± 0.34 | |
| 151.69 ± 37.72 | 2.09 ± 0.46 | 1.85 ± 0.52 | 1.75 ± 0.55 | 1.43 ± 0.42 | |
| 176.33 ± 39.88 | 2.30 ± 0.13 | 2.49 ± 0.73 | 2.17 ± 0.60 | 1.52 ± 0.22 | |
| 1.980 | 3.670 | 3.824 | 1.577 | 0.736 | |
| 0.121 | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.199 | 0.533 | |
| 169.36 ± 33.07a | 2.33 ± 0.47a | 2.08 ± 0.46a | 1.92 ± 0.52a | 1.56 ± 0.37a | |
| 134.65 ± 41.48 | 1.67 ± 0.59 | 1.53 ± 0.62 | 1.60 ± 0.64 | 1.32 ± 0.42 | |
| 126.74 ± 29.67 | 1.60 ± 0.50 | 1.46 ± 0.52 | 1.44 ± 0.37b | 1.23 ± 0.28c | |
| 6.678 | 9.609 | 6.254 | 3.714 | 3.787 | |
| 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.027 | 0.026 | |
| 141.00 ± 42.81 | 1.80 ± 0.63 | 1.66 ± 0.66 | 1.65 ± 0.62 | 1.36 ± 0.42 | |
| 123.77 ± 22.78 | 1.52 ± 0.41 | 1.35 ± 0.32 | 1.42 ± 0.36 | 1.22 ± 0.25 | |
| 2.793 | 2.885 | 3.323 | 2.471 | 2.299 | |
| 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.015 | 0.024 |
Notes: a, b, cIndicates that there is significant difference between this group and the other two groups (P < 0.05).
Abbreviations: SCL-90, symptom checklist 90; SD, standard deviation.
Comparison Between SADS Score in Patients with Vitiligo and Chinese Norms (mean±SD)
| Variables | Patients | Chinese Norms | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.30 ± 6.38 | 8.03 ± 4.64 | 3.847 | 0.000 | |
| 5.13 ± 3.38 | 4.14 ± 2.62 | 3.163 | 0.002 | |
| 5.17 ± 3.67 | 3.92 ± 3.10 | 3.684 | 0.000 |
Abbreviations: SADS, social avoidance and distress scale; SD, standard deviation.
Univariate Analysis of Patients with Vitiligo in the Score of Total SADS, Social Avoidance and Social Distress (mean±SD)
| Variables | SADS Total Score | Social Avoidance | Social Distress |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.25 ± 6.58 | 5.69 ± 3.39 | 5.56 ± 3.83 | |
| 8.98 ± 5.91 | 4.35 ± 3.24 | 4.63 ± 3.40 | |
| 1.921 | 2.156 | 1.351 | |
| 0.057 | 0.033 | 0.179 | |
| 16.11 ± 5.58 | 7.67 ± 2.96 | 8.44 ± 3.13 | |
| 10.07 ± 5.67 | 5.23 ± 3.18 | 4.84 ± 3.49 | |
| 9.89 ± 6.55 | 4.83 ± 3.49 | 5.06 ± 3.67 | |
| 8.30 ± 7.18 | 4.00 ± 3.30 | 4.30 ± 3.95 | |
| 3.065 | 2.287 | 2.836 | |
| 0.031 | 0.082 | 0.041 | |
| 9.30 ± 5.63 | 4.71 ± 3.03 | 4.58 ± 3.31 | |
| 10.42 ± 6.60 | 4.54 ± 3.60 | 5.88 ± 3.39 | |
| 13.85 ± 7.02 | 7.23 ± 3.14 | 6.62 ± 4.74 | |
| 19.67 ± 10.12 | 11.33 ± 2.89 | 8.33 ± 7.23 | |
| 4.502 | 6.477 | 2.449 | |
| 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.067 | |
| 15.50 ± 7.14a | 7.50 ± 3.30a | 8.00 ± 4.17a | |
| 9.81 ± 6.10 | 4.71 ± 3.32 | 5.10 ± 3.49 | |
| 9.17 ± 5.75 | 5.00 ± 3.22 | 4.17 ± 3.32 | |
| 5.850 | 4.226 | 5.925 | |
| 0.004 | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Notes: aIndicates that there is significant difference between this group and the other two groups (P < 0.05).
Abbreviations: SADS, social avoidance and distress scale; SD, standard deviation.
Comparison Between MCMQ Score in Patients with Vitiligo and Chinese Norms (mean±SD)
| Variables | Patients (Min-Max) | Chinese Norms | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.44 ± 2.43 (14–26) | 19.48 ± 3.81 | −4.603 | 0.000 | |
| 15.34 ± 2.85 (7–22) | 14.44 ± 2.97 | 3.423 | 0.001 | |
| 9.48 ± 3.06 (5–18) | 8.81 ± 3.17 | 2.367 | 0.020 |
Abbreviations: MCMQ, medical coping modes questionnaire; SD, standard deviation.
Impact of Medical Coping on Patients’ Mental Health
| Variables | SCL-90 Total Score | Interpersonal Sensitivity | Depression | Anxiety | Phobic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.326 | 0.203 | 0.309 | 0.305 | 0.197 | ||
| 0.000 | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.033 | ||
| 0.583 | 0.482 | 0.628 | 0.576 | 0.437 | ||
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Abbreviation: SCL-90, symptom checklist 90.
Impact of Medical Coping on Patients’ Social Status
| Variables | Face Coping | Avoidance Coping | Yield Coping | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.263 | 0.254 | 0.526 | ||
| 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.000 | ||
| −0.266 | 0.173 | 0.472 | ||
| 0.004 | 0.062 | 0.000 | ||
| −0.222 | 0.282 | 0.490 | ||
| 0.016 | 0.002 | 0.000 | ||
Abbreviation: SADS, social avoidance and distress scale.