| Literature DB >> 35979186 |
Seyyed Mojtaba Mousavi1, Seyyed Alireza Hashemi2, Sonia Bahrani3, Asma Sadrmousavi-Dizaj4, Omid Arjmand3, Navid Omidifar5, Chin Wei Lai6, Wei-Hung Chiang1, Ahmad Gholami7.
Abstract
In this study, we have developed a new platform of polyoxometalate as a biocompatible and electrosensitive polymeric biosensor for the accurate detection of doxorubicin. For this purpose, we used a green synthesis approach using tartaric acid, glutamic acid, and kombucha solvent. Thanks to its bioinorganic components, the biogenic approach can chemically modify and improve the performance of the biosensor, which was experimentally confirmed. Our results showed excellent sensitivity (175.72 μA·μM-1·cm-2), low detection limit (DL, 8.12 nM), and low quantification limit (QL, 0.056 μM) when the newly developed biosensor was used. The results also show that the biosynthesized biosensor has improved performance in detecting DOX in the biological fluid with an accuracy of more than 99% depending on the components used, which underlines the high efficiency of the biosensor produced. Considering the body's physiological condition, the biosensor fabricated as a biocompatible component can show high efficiency. Therefore, its applicability for clinical use still needs to be studied in detail.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35979186 PMCID: PMC9377961 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2265108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 4.724
Figure 1(a) FTIR and (b) XRD results of SPT and SPT-T-G specimens.
Data obtained from the XRD analysis for SPT and SPT-T-G nanostructures.
| Sample | 2ϴ (°) | d-spacing (Å) | Chemical compound | Plane (HKL) | Crystalline structure | Crystalline size (Å) | Micro strain (%) | Reference code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPT | 12.8645 | 6.8834 | C12O8 | (1 0 0) | Monoclinic | 76.44221 | 4.503129 | 96-590-0040 |
| 16.9443 | 5.28984 | W48Na136O328 | (1 1 1) | Cubic | 115.4435 | 2.273826 | 96-591-0225 | |
| 21.0943 | 4.21383 | W8Na8O28 | (0 4 1) | Orthorhombic | 77.27145 | 2.736177 | 96-900-7741 | |
| 25.7856 | 3.45558 | C12O8 | (0 1 –2) | Monoclinic | 117.4237 | 1.490216 | 96-590-0040 | |
| 27.7323 | 3.22791 | W48Na136O328 | (0 2 2) | Cubic | 117.5984 | 1.382735 | 96-591-0225 | |
| 32.8073 | 2.72904 | W48Na136O328 | (1 1 3) | Cubic | 79.17859 | 1.755239 | 96-591-0225 | |
| 38.0566 | 2.37014 | W8Na8O28 | (1 9 0) | Orthorhombic | 120.8277 | 0.980631 | 96-900-7741 | |
| 38.9109 | 2.33491 | C12O8 | (0 0 4) | Monoclinic | 80.56572 | 1.457097 | 96-590-0040 | |
| 41.6281 | 2.1551 | W8Na8O28 | (1 1 2) | Orthorhombic | 81.24937 | 1.352824 | 96-900-7741 | |
| 46.018 | 1.97334 | Na8O4 | (0 2 2) | Cubic | 123.9971 | 0.784542 | 96-900-9064 | |
| 48.6876 | 1.87111 | C12O8 | (2 1 2) | Monoclinic | 83.36645 | 1.136789 | 96-590-0040 | |
| 54.6524 | 1.68960 | Na8O4 | (1 1 3) | Cubic | 85.4954 | 0.97741 | 96-900-9064 | |
| 64.8321 | 1.44351 | W48Na136O328 | (0 2 6) | Cubic | 89.97712 | 0.78342 | 96-591-0225 | |
| 69.3549 | 1.35652 | C12O8 | (3 2 3) | Monoclinic | 138.7834 | 0.485253 | 96-590-0040 | |
| 74.5461 | 1.27509 | W48Na136O328 | (1 1 7) | Cubic | 114.6281 | 0.55437 | 96-591-0225 | |
|
| ||||||||
| SPT-T-G | 8.019 | 11.0591 | S16C6 | (0 0 1) | Anorthic | 38.12231 | 14.49596 | 96-200-1129 |
| 16.7378 | 5.3143 | W48Na136O328 | (1 1 1) | Cubic | 76.80672 | 3.412017 | 96-591-0225 | |
| 20.3856 | 4.34683 | W8Na8O28 | (0 4 1) | Orthorhombic | 77.09752 | 2.791682 | 96-900-7741 | |
| 23.0692 | 3.85634 | Fe16 | (0 0 4) | Orthorhombic | 155.6814 | 1.197826 | 96-431-3217 | |
| 29.8097 | 2.97625 | S16C6 | (0 3 0) | Anorthic | 157.7764 | 0.990606 | 96-200-1129 | |
| 32.752 | 2.79776 | N1Cl1 | (0 1 1) | Cubic | 158.8874 | 0.898731 | 96-900-7495 | |
| 38.9324 | 2.32479 | C12O8 | (0 0 4) | Monoclinic | 161.7505 | 0.785001 | 96-590-0040 | |
| 46.9255 | 1.94074 | Fe16 | (4 0 0) | Orthorhombic | 166.6563 | 0.602292 | 96-431-3217 | |
| 58.3434 | 1.57447 | N1Cl1 | (1 1 2) | Cubic | 174.8340 | 0.492332 | 96-900-7495 | |
Figure 2FESEM images of (a–c) SPT and (d–f) SPT-T-G at diverse scale bars. Red arrows show amorph particles, and blue ones show well-resolved cubic nanostructures.
Figure 3Chemical structure of glutamic acid, tartaric acid, and synthesized sodium polytungstate.
Figure 4EDAX analysis of (a) SPT and (b) SPT-T-G.
Quantitative EDAX analysis of SPT and SPT-T-G.
| Sample | Element | Intensity | W% | A% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPT | C | 38.6 | 11.04 | 24.50 |
| O | 314.6 | 32.04 | 53.90 | |
| Na | 593.1 | 13.10 | 15.56 | |
| W | 234.0 | 44.95 | 6.73 | |
|
| ||||
| SPT-T-G | C | 145.6 | 29.09 | 39.05 |
| N | 38.5 | 14.98 | 17.29 | |
| O | 305.9 | 32.09 | 34.11 | |
| Na | 33.4 | 0.54 | 0.41 | |
| S | 368.1 | 2.58 | 1.37 | |
| Cl | 1175.1 | 9.03 | 4.19 | |
| Ca | 17.21 | 0.16 | 0.06 | |
| Fe | 332.6 | 5.93 | 1.78 | |
| W | 43.1 | 5.46 | 0.50 | |
Figure 5(a) CV curves and (b) Nyquist plots of bare GCE and modified GCE with STP and STP-T-P.
Figure 6Electrochemical performance of bare and modified GCE with STP and STP-T-P via SWV technique.
Figure 7(a) Evaluation of the electrokinetic behavior of the developed sensor via CV method under variable scan rates for anodic and cathodic peak currents; (b) calibration curve of anodic and cathodic peak currents at diverse scan rates.
Figure 8(a) SWV response of the modified GCE at a diverse concentration of DOX; (b) the inset plot shows the calibration curve of the process.
Comparison of different methods for determination of DOX.
| Method | Limit of detection | Lower limit of quantitation |
| Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPVa | 0.016 | 0.018 | 0.9971 | [ |
| DPVa | 0.016 | 0.050 | 0.9971 | [ |
| EISB | 0.09 pg·mL−1 | — | 0.99 | [ |
| DPV | 0.1 nM | — | 0.9981 | [ |
| SWV | 1.0 nM | — | 0.9954 | [ |
| DPAdSV | 2.8 nM | — | 0.99 | [ |
| SWV | 0.008 | 0.056 | 0.99 | [ |
| SWV | 8.12 nM | 56 nM | 0.9911 | This work |
aDifferential pulse voltammetry.bElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy.CAdsorptive stripping differential pulse voltammetry.
Determination of DOX in human plasma samples (n = 6).
| Samples | Added ( | Found ( | Recovery (RSD) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | 0.0 | ND | — |
| 0.1 | 0.0925 | 92.50 ± 3.22 | |
| 0.3 | 0.2966 | 98.86 ± 2.95 | |
| 0.5 | 0.4721 | 94.42 ± 3.78 |
Not detectable.