| Literature DB >> 35979032 |
Van Huy Tran1, Quang Trung Tran1,2, Thi Huyen Thuong Nguyen1, Cong Thuan Dang3, Markus M Lerch2, Ali A Aghdassi2, Ryoji Miayahara4.
Abstract
Background and study aims Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of malignancy-related death in Vietnam, with increasing incidence of non-cardia early gastric cancer (N-EGC). Data on accurate diagnosis of EGC and treatment by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Vietnam are very sparse. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of N-EGC and evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of ESD in Central Vietnam. Patients and methods We prospectively enrolled patients with N-EGC detected by magnified chromoendoscopy from December 2013 to August, 2018 in Central Vietnam. Selected cases of N-EGC received standardized ESD technique and have been following up carefully as in protocol. Results Among 606 GC patients, 46 had N-GEC and underwent ESD. The depth of invasion was pT1a in 33 (71.7 %), pT1b1 in 10 (21.7 %), and pT1b2 in three cases (6.6 %). Mild chronic atrophic gastritis, most being C2 (63 %), and gastritis-like EGC that did not appear malignant was the predominant type. ESD achieved a 97.8 % en bloc resection rate; the mean procedure time was 76 ± 22 minutes (range 24-155), and mean endoscopic tumor size was 23 ± 5 mm (range 13-52) and ESD sample size was 28 ± 7 mm (range 16.5-60). Complications consisted of two patients with bleeding and one with a minor perforation, all of which were successfully managed by endoscopy. The longest and the mean follow-up times were 84 and 64 months, respectively, with no recurrence. Conclusions A significant proportion patients with N-EGC have a background mucosa of mild chronic atrophic gastritis. Our results 7 years after starting ESD demonstrate early promising outcomes with the procedure. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35979032 PMCID: PMC9377828 DOI: 10.1055/a-1854-4587
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endosc Int Open ISSN: 2196-9736
Fig. 1 Diagram of patient selection process, in which there were 69 EGC cases. Fifteen patients were excluded: eight had undergone surgery that fulfilled the ESD indication and seven had cardia EGC. Five patients were lost to follow up and three refused treatment (one patient had liver metastasis more than 1 year later). Forty-six patients with non-cardia EGC were treated with ESD.
Patient demographics and clinical features.
|
|
|
|
|
| Male | 32 (69.5 %) | Noticeable anemia | 3 (6.5 %) |
| Female | 14 (30.5 %) | Remarkable weight loss | 2 (4.3 %) |
| Mean age (year) | 55 ± 10 | ||
| Family history of GC | 4 (8.7 %) | Severe Comorbidity | 3 (6.5 %) |
GC, gastric cancer.
EGC characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|
| Mucosal background | Background | ||
| Atrophy | Gastritis-like | 30 (65.2 %) | |
C1 | 6 (13 %) | H. pylori ( + ) | 37 (80.4 %) |
C2 | 29 (63 %) | Location | |
C3 | 9 (19.6 %) | In all atrophic areas | 39 (84.8 %) |
O1 | 1 (2.2 %) | 25 (54.3 %) | |
O2 | 1 (2.2 %) | + corpus | 14 (30.5 %) |
| EGC morphological type | At the atrophic borderline | 5 (10.9 %) | |
0-I | 5 (10.9 %) | Outside of atrophic area | 2 (4.3 %) |
0-IIa + c | 29 (63 %) | Tumor depth | |
0-IIa | 2 (4.3 %) | pT1a (m) | 33 (71.7 %) |
0-IIb | 4 (8.6 %) | pT1b1 (sm1) | 10 (21.7 %) |
0-IIc | 7 (15.2 %) | pT1b2 (sm2) | 3 (6.6 %) |
EGC, early gastric cancer.
Fig. 2Association between the endoscopically assessed atrophic mucosa and the locations of 46 EGC lesions. An asterisk indicates EGC located within an atrophic area, an X indicates EGC located at the atrophic border, and an # indicates EGC located outside the atrophic area.
Main outcomes of ESD.
| Variable | N (%) | Variable | N (%) |
| ESD size | 28 ± 7 (16.5–60) mm | Complications | |
| ESD time | 76 ± 22 (24–155) minutes | Bleeding | 2 (4.3 %) |
| Perforation | 1 (2.2 %) | ||
| Recurrence | 0 | ||
| En bloc resection rate | 45/46 (97.8 %) | ||
| R0 | 46/46 (100 %) |
ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Fig. 3 ared, 0-IIa EGC lesion in the antrum, inside the atrophic area. b Gastritis-like EGC lesions after marking for ESD; the C1 atrophic border line is the white marked line and the background mucosa have multiple gastritis erosions, which were clearer after performing chromoendoscopy with Indigo carmine. d (HE, × 100) and (HE, × 400) pathological results (Slide number: 8577) show carcinoma insitu in the mild atrophic gastritis background mucosa. e ESD sample. f ESD scar after 3 years of follow up.
Fig. 4EGC lesion size and time were regressively correlated, with r = 0.67, P < 0.01.
Comparison of ESD data in other countries.
|
Italy
|
France
|
Southeast Asia
| Vietnam | |
| Study period | 2005–2011 | 2010–2013 | 2009–2015 | 2013–2018 |
| Study method | Retrospective | Prospective | Retrospective | Prospective |
| No. cases | 20 | 319 | 35 | 46 |
| Size (mm) | Median 29 | 39 ± 23 | Median 20 (5–60) | 28±7 (16.5–60) |
| ESD time (minutes) | Medial 119.1 | 108.2 ± 62 | Median 105 (15–480) | 76 ±22 (24–155) |
| ESD knives | IT knife | Dual knife, | IT knife | IT2 knife |
| Hook knife | Flush knife | Hybrid knife | Flush knife | |
| En bloc resection rate | NA | 91.5 % | 32/35 (91.4 %) | 45/46 (97.8 %) |
| R0 rate | 18/20 (90 %) | 71.2 % | 27/35 (77.1 %) | 44/46 (95.7 %) |
| Complications | ||||
Severe bleeding | 0 | 15 (4.7 %) | 1 (2.9 %) | 2 (4.3 %) |
Perforation | 3/20 (15 %) | 26 (8.1 %) | 0 | 1 (2.2 %) |
ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.