| Literature DB >> 35979021 |
Ling Sun1, Jun-Jie Li1, Yu-Kai Xu1, Yu-Mei Xie1, Shu-Shui Wang1, Zhi-Wei Zhang1.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary artery stenosis is often associated with congenital heart disease. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stenting for branch pulmonary artery stenosis using a biodegradable nitride iron stent (IBS® Angel™) and right ventricular systolic and diastolic function.Entities:
Keywords: biodegradable stent; children; nitride iron stents; pulmonary artery stenosis; right ventricular function
Year: 2022 PMID: 35979021 PMCID: PMC9376250 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.914370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
FIGURE 1IBS® Angel™ Stent system.
FIGURE 2The distributions of congenital heart diseases in 11 patients.
Clinical characteristics.
| Case | Sex | Age | Weight | Diagnosis | Operation | Operation frequency |
| Case 1 | M | 55 | 19 | PA/VSD(I) | Pulmonary artery autologous pericardium repair, VSD repair, RVOT dredging, PDA ligation, ASD repair | 1 |
| Case 2 | M | 76 | 20 | PA/VSD(III) | AP shunt, Melbourne shunt, RVOT reconstruction (pericardial duct), pulmonary valve reconstruction (artificial single valve), VSD repair, atrial septostomy, pulmonary stenosis correction | 3 |
| Case 3 | M | 86 | 17.5 | VSD, PS, LPS | Correction of pulmonary artery stenosis, left pulmonary artery opening formation, VSD repair, single pulmonary valve formation | 2 |
| Case 4 | M | 45 | 17 | TOF | Correction of tetralogy of Fallot, ASD repair, PDA ligation, percutaneous balloon dilation of the left pulmonary artery | 2 |
| Case 5 | M | 36 | 14.5 | TGA/IVS | Switch operation | 1 |
| Case 6 | F | 51 | 16 | PA/VSD(I) | pulmonary valve reconstruction (artificial single valve), VSD repair | 1 |
| Case 7 | M | 46 | 14 | PA/VSD(I) | RVOT reconstruction (valved homograft conduit), percutaneous balloon dilation of the left pulmonary artery, valve replacement of pulmonary artery | 3 |
| Case 8 | M | 71 | 17 | TOF | Correction of tetralogy of Fallot | 1 |
| Case 9 | F | 74 | 18.5 | VSD, LPS, RPS | left and right pulmonary artery formation, VSD repair, PDA ligation, ASD repair, percutaneous balloon dilation of the left pulmonary artery, stent implantation of right pulmonary artery | 2 |
| Case 10 | M | 48 | 14.5 | TOF, PAPVC | Correction of tetralogy of Fallot and PAPVC | 1 |
| Case 11 | M | 69 | 17 | TOF | Correction of tetralogy of Fallot | 1 |
F, female; M, male; m, month; PA/VSD (I/III), pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (I/III type); TOF, tetralogy of Fallot; RPS/LPS, right or left pulmonary artery stenosis; PAPVC, partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection; ASD, atrial septal defect; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; TGA/IVS, complete transposition of the great artery/integrity of ventricular septum.
256-slice scanner multiple-detector computed tomography (MDCT) parameters and morphological manifestations.
| Case | Lesion vessels | A1 (mm) | A2 (mm) | A3 (mm) | L (mm) | Lesion location |
| Case 1 | LPA | 3.02 | 6.575 | 7.254 | 10.417 | middle |
| Case 2 | LPA | 3.699 | 10.058 | 6.381 | 9.653 | middle |
| Case 3 | LPA | 1.819 | 1.819 | 6.773 | 10.973 | opening |
| Case 4 | LPA | 0.86 | 0.86 | 3.77 | 13.827 | opening |
| Case 5 | RPA | 3.01 | 5.52 | 6.42 | 21.92 | middle |
| Case 6 | LPA | 2.887 | 2.887 | 6.854 | 13.79 | opening |
| Case 7 | RPA | 2.85 | 4.28 | 8.09 | 23.28 | middle |
| Case 8 | LPA | 3.667 | 3.667 | 10.222 | 11.866 | opening |
| Case 9 | LPA | 3.76 | 6.16 | 5.07 | 17.46 | middle |
| Case 10 | LPA | 4.714 | 5.053 | 8.082 | 9.16 | middle |
| RPA | 2.893 | 3.012 | 9.202 | 15.77 | middle | |
| Case 11 | LPA | 2.28 | 2.28 | 10.31 | 23.73 | opening |
A1, Narrowest diameter; A2, Proximal diameter; A3, Distal diameter; L, The length of the narrow.
FIGURE 3MDCT images of cases. (A): case 1 had PA/VSD, LPS; (B): case 8 had TOF, LPS; (C): case 3 had VSD, LPS; (D): case 5 had TGA, RPS.
FIGURE 43D images of branch pulmonary artery. (A): PA/VSD group; (B): TOF group; (C): VSD/PS group; (D): TGA group.
Heart catheterization evaluation and hemodynamic parameters.
| Case | Lesion vessels | A1 | A2 | L | Preoperative RV pressure | Preoperative mPA pressure | Preoperative | Pressure gradient | Stent | Postoperative RV pressure | Postoperat-ive mPA pressure | Pressure gradient | Balloon |
| Case 1 | LPA | 4.24 | 8.4 | 18.14 | 85/3(30) | 85/3(30) | 21/8(12) | 64 | 8 | 58/7(24) | 58/7(24) | 33 | 12atm |
| Case 2 | LPA | 4.8 | 8.9 | 23.2 | 76/4(28) | 63/10(28) | 25/13(17) | 38 | 8 | 64/9(27) | 55/10(25) | 24 | 12atm |
| Case 3 | LPA | 1.9 | 6.2 | 24.1 | 55/2(20) | 50/12(24) | — | — | 6 | 29/0(9) | — | — | 12atm |
| Case 4 | LPA | 0.9 | 3.5 | 10.8 | 50/1(17) | 46/4(18) | 22/13(16) | 24 | 5 | 35/0(11) | 34/7(16) | 9 | 14atm |
| Case 5 | RPA | 3.2 | 10.12 | 16 | 80/0(27) | 76/24(41) | 19/9(12) | 57 | 8 | 48/-1(15) | 48/10(22) | 23 | 16atm |
| Case 6 | LPA | 3.3 | 6.8 | 16.7 | 63/0(21) | 38/11(20) | 14/4(7) | 24 | 8 | — | 50/1(17) | 14 | 15atm |
| Case 7 | RPA | 2.39 | 8.0 | 15 | 53/0(17) | 33/10(17) | 12/10(10) | 21 | 8 | 30/0(10) | 30/3(12) | 8 | 14atm |
| Case 8 | LPA | 3.2 | 9.0 | 16.19 | 90/0(30) | 70/25(45) | 36/12(20) | 34 | 8 | 53/0(17) | 53/12(25) | 17 | 15atm |
| Case 9 | LPA | 3.1 | 4.9 | 12 | 90/1(33) | 90/14(39) | 28/13(18) | 62 | 6 | 56/6(29) | 55/9(24) | 16 | 16atm |
| Case 10 | LPA | 4.7 | 10 | 20 | 100/0(33) | 87/10(32) | 27/15(19) | 60 | 10 | 34/3(13) | 33/6(15) | 14 | 14atm |
| Case 11 | LPA | 4.06 | 11 | 16.1 | 65/3(24) | — | 25/10(15) | 40 | 10 | 48/1(18) | 48/10(22) | 7 | 14atm |
A1, Narrowest diameter; A2, Distal diameter; L, The length of the narrow; RV, right ventricle; mPA, main pulmonary artery pressure. *Diameter and length.
FIGURE 5The DSA images of before and after pulmonary artery stenting. (A): case 1 had PA/VSD, LPS and implanted IBS; (B): case 8 had TOF, LPS and implanted IBS; (C): case 3 had VSD, LPS and implanted IBS; (D): case 5 had TGA, RPS and implanted IBS.
Echocardiographic vessels parameters in 11 cases.
| Case | Lesion vessels | A0 | P0 | A1 | P1 | A2 | P2 | A3 | P3 | A4 | P4 |
| Case 1 | LPA | 4.7 | 82 | 7.7 | 61 | 6.3 | 64 | 7.9 | 38 | 8 | 29 |
| Case 2 | LPA | 4.7 | 61 | 7.8 | 20 | 7 | 45 | 6.1 | 40 | 5.4 | 45 |
| Case 3 | LPA | 1.6 | - | 4.7 | 41 | 4.7 | 41 | 4.8 | 18 | 4.5 | 21 |
| Case 4 | LPA | 2.9 | 16 | 4.1 | 9 | 4.2 | 9 | 4.1 | 11 | – | – |
| Case 5 | RPA | 4.8 | 61 | 7.4 | 21 | 6.8 | 40 | 6.5 | 31 | – | – |
| Case 6 | LPA | 4.7 | 59 | 7.3 | 39 | 7.8 | 44 | 7.5 | 38 | – | – |
| Case 7 | RPA | 3.7 | 46 | 7.8 | 13 | 6.2 | 37 | 6.5 | 22 | – | – |
| Case 8 | LPA | 4 | 36 | 7.7 | 21 | 6.5 | 3 | 7.4 | 3 | – | – |
| Case 9 | LPA | 2.7 | 90 | 4.6 | 8 | 5.2 | 15 | 4.3 | 9 | – | – |
| Case 10 | LPA | 9 | 21 | 8.4 | 7 | 8.1 | 20 | 7.4 | 24 | – | – |
| Case 11 | LPA | 6.5 | 43 | 9 | 39 | 9 | 41 | 9 | 48 | – | – |
A0, Preoperative narrowest diameter of target vessel stenosis; P0, Preoperative pressure gradient across stenosis; A1, Postoperative one day diameter of target vessel stenosis; P1, Postoperative one day pressure gradient across stenosis; A2, Postoperative one month diameter of target vessel stenosis; P2, Postoperative one month pressure gradient across stenosis; A3, Postoperative three month diameter of target vessel stenosis; P3, Postoperative three month pressure gradient across stenosis; A4, Postoperative six month diameter of target vessel stenosis; P4, Postoperative six month pressure gradient across stenosis.
Transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation the effective stenting.
| Preoperative | A0 (mm) | 4.58 ± 1.92 | – |
| P0 (mmHg) | 48.5 ± 26.9 | – | |
| Postoperative one day | A1 (mm) | 7.02 ± 1.6 | 0.011 |
| P1 (mmHg) | 25.33 ± 16.9 | 0.021 | |
| Postoperative one month | A2 (mm) | 7.57 ± 4.1 | 0.008 |
| P2 (mmHg) | 31.83 ± 17.97 | 0.083 | |
| Postoperative three month | A3 (mm) | 9.07 ± 9.2 | 0.011 |
| P3 (mmHg) | 24.83 ± 13.26 | 0.037 |
A0, Preoperative narrowest average diameters of the lesion vessels; P0, Preoperative average pressures gradient across stenosis; A1, Postoperative one day average diameters of the lesion vessels; P1, Postoperative one day average pressures gradient across stenosis; A2, Postoperative one month average diameters of the lesion vessels; P2, Postoperative one month average pressures gradient across stenosis; A2, Postoperative three month average diameters of the lesion vessels; P2, Postoperative three month average pressures gradient across stenosis; *: P < 0.05.
Echocardiographic parameters about right and left ventricular function.
| Preoperative | Postoperative | Postoperative | Postoperative | ||||
| S’ cm/s | 5–11 (8.44 ± 1.78) | 5.6–11 (9.29 ± 1.38) | 0.142 | 5–12 (7.48 ± 2.31) | 0.262 | 5–12 (8.02 ± 1.78) | 0.277 |
| TAPSE mm | 9.7–18.7 (15.23 ± 3.45) | 12.5–21 (16.45 ± 2.87) | 0.49 | 11.7–20.8 (15.55 ± 3.02) | 0.921 | 11.7–21 (15.25 ± 2.97) | 0.948 |
| FAC | 33%–61% (42.2% ± 8.82%) | 35%–66% (47.6% ± 9.44%) | 0.167 | 32%–69% (50.6% ± 11.56%) | 0.041 | 34%–72% (47.6% ± 13.5%) | 0.39 |
| E/A | 0.67–2 (1.37 ± 0.35) | 0.81–2.1 (1.43 ± 0.39) | 0.576 | 0.67–2.44 (1.43 ± 0.52) | 0.974 | 1.16–2.4 (1.77 ± 0.35) | 0.015 |
| E′/A′ | 1.17–2.48 (1.84 ± 0.41) | 1.11–2.75 (2.11 ± 0.53) | 0.25 | 0.88–2.8 (2.24 ± 0.57) | 0.035 | 1.4–3.2 (2.07 ± 0.52) | 0.411 |
| E/E′ | 3.17–11.6 (6.66 ± 2.29) | 3.96–9.7 (5.96 ± 1.68) | 0.309 | 3.63–9.14 (6.44 ± 1.54) | 0.818 | 4.11–9.86 (6.76 ± 2.22) | 0.974 |
| RA mm | 23.5–43 (30 ± 5.95) | 20–42 (28.6 ± 6.89) | 0.357 | 21–42 (29.47 ± 6.98) | 0.669 | 24–34 (28.2 ± 3.19) | 0.645 |
| RVD1 mm | 25.5–33 (28.65 ± 2.61) | 19–37 (28.5 ± 5.76) | 0.743 | 22.6–39 (29.12 ± 4.44) | 0.922 | 18.9–35 (27.04 ± 4.94) | 0.25 |
| RVD2 mm | 23.7–65 (46.1 ± 12.6) | 26.6–64.8 (46.8 ± 12.15) | 0.895 | 35–62 (47.34 ± 9.55) | 0.742 | 34.7–59.8 (46.02 ± 7.39) | 0.922 |
| RVD1/RVD2 | 0.46–1.11 (0.67 ± 0.21) | 0.37–0.98 (0.63 ± 0.15) | 0.921 | 0.44–0.83 (0.63 ± 0.11) | 0.947 | 0.45–0.74 (0.59 ± 0.09) | 0.535 |
| LVEF | 64%–81% (68.9% ± 5.96%) | 60%–80% (70.3% ± 7.29%) | 0.693 | 63%–76% (71.8% ± 3.71%) | 0.166 | 60%–78% (70.1% ± 6.89%) | 0.818 |
*P < 0.05.
FIGURE 6The boxplots of echocardiographic parameters. (A): The boxplots of S’ and TAPSE in different groups; (B): The boxplots of LVEF and FAC in different groups; (C): The boxplots of E/A, E′/A′ and E/E′ in different groups; (D): The boxplots of RVDA and RVD2 in different groups.
Echocardiographic parameters about right ventricular function.
| Normal value | Preoperative P | Postoperative | Postoperative | Postoperative | |
| S’ cm/s | ≥ 9 | 0.319 | 0.5 | 0.054 | 0.097 |
| TAPSE mm | ≥ 17 | 0.119 | 0.537 | 0.143 | 0.08 |
| FAC | ≥ 30% | 0.001 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.001 |
| E/A | 0.8–2.1 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.003 | <0.01 |
| E′/A′ | ≥ 1 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| E/E′ | ≤ 6 | 0.359 | 0.943 | 0.368 | 0.285 |
*P < 0.05.
FIGURE 7Echocardiographic parameters correlated analysis. (A): the correlation analysis of TAPSE and S’; (B): the correlation analysis of TAPSE and LVEF; (C): the correlation analysis of E/E′ and E′/A′; (D): the correlation analysis of RA and RVD1; (E): the correlation analysis of RA and RVD2; (F): the correlation analysis of RVD1 and RVD2.
The conditions of tricuspid and pulmonary valve regurgitation.
| Case | Preoperative TR | Preoperative | Postoperative | Postoperative | Postoperative | Postoperative | Postoperative | Postoperative |
| 1 | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Moderate-severe | Mild | Moderate-severe |
| 2 | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
| 3 | Mild | Moderate-severe | No | Moderate-severe | Mild | Moderate-severe | Mild | Moderate-severe |
| 4 | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
| 5 | No | No | No | No | No | No | Limited | No |
| 6 | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Mild |
| 7 | No | Mild-moderate | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Moderate | Mild | Moderate |
| 8 | Mild | Mild-moderate | Mild | Mild-moderate | Mild | Mild-moderate | Mild | Mild-moderate |
| 9 | No | Mild | No | No | Mild | Limited | Limited | Limited |
| 10 | Mild | Severe | Mild | Severe | Mild | Severe | Mild | Moderate-severe |
| 11 | Mild | Severe | Mild | Severe | Mild | Severe | Mild | Severe |
TR, tricuspid valve regurgitation; PR, pulmonary valve regurgitation.