| Literature DB >> 35978825 |
Lu Sun1, Xiaoliang Jin1, Liang Huang2, Jing Zhao1, Haifeng Jin1, Mingtao Chen3, Chunli Zhang3, Bin Lu1,4.
Abstract
Background: Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) can progress to gastric cancer (GC) thus requiring endoscopic surveillance. Here, we analyze various aspects of CAG progression, time, and mucosal background, to guide reasonable surveillance.Entities:
Keywords: atrophic gastritis; early detection of cancer; endoscopy; follow-up studies; gastric cancer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35978825 PMCID: PMC9377336 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.942091
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Flowchart of the study design. CAG, chronic atrophic gastritis; OLGA, operative link on gastritis assessment; OLGIM, Operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment.
Baseline characteristics of the included patients.
| All included patients | Total number of people (n=929) |
|---|---|
| Sex (male, %) | 48.9 |
| Age (Mean ± SD) | 56.59 ± 10.85 |
| Number of months of observation (Median, IQR) | 53 (24) |
| | 288 (31.0%) |
| OLGA group | Number of OLGA group (n=170) |
| OLGA 0 | 8 (4.7%) |
| OLGA I | 84 (49.4%) |
| OLGA II | 42 (24.7%) |
| OLGA III | 23 (13.5%) |
| OLGA IV | 13 (7.6%) |
| OLGIM group | Number of OLGIM group (n=170) |
| OLGIM 0 | 2 (1.2%) |
| OLGIM I | 72 (42.4%) |
| OLGIM II | 49 (28.8%) |
| OLGIM III | 31 (18.2%) |
| OLGIM IV | 16 (9.4%) |
| Kimura-Takemoto group | Number of Kimura-Takemoto group (n=236) |
| C-1 | 42 (17.8%) |
| C-2 | 111 (47.0%) |
| C-3 | 53 (22.5%) |
| O-1 | 13 (5.5%) |
| O-2 | 15 (6.4%) |
| O-3 | 2 (0.8%) |
SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; OLGA, operative link on gastritis assessment; OLGIM, Operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment.
Figure 2Cumulative rate of progress during the follow-up period. LGIN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; HGIN, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; GC, gastric cancer.
Figure 3Progression of the included patients during each year of the follow-up period. LGIN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; HGIN, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; GC, gastric cancer.
Information on cases that progressed to gastric cancer during the follow-up period.
| No. | Age | Sex | Endoscopic features at baseline | Time from baseline (months) | Treatment | Pathology of GC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Kimura-Takemoto | GA | IM | Level of differentiation | Histology | Depth | |||||
| 1 | 60 | Female | 2016.07 | C2 | Mild (antrum) | Mild (antrum) | 39 | ESD | moderate | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 2 | 69 | Female | 2014.11 | superficial | OLGA I | OLGIM I | 78 | ESD | moderate | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 3 | 56 | Male | 2019.05 | C3 | OLGA III | OLGIM III | 25 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 4 | 45 | Male | 2016.11 | C2 | OLGA II | OLGIM I | 43 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 5 | 67 | Male | 2017.05 | O2 | OLGA I | OLGIM II | 35 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 6 | 63 | Male | 2013.08 | C2 | Mild (antrum) | Mild (antrum) | 59 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 7 | 77 | Male | 2015.01 | C2 | OLGA III | OLGIM III | 35 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 8 | 50 | Female | 2017.05 | O3 | OLGA III | OLGIM III | 48 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 9 | 64 | Male | 2010.11 | C3 | Mild (antrum) | Severe (antrum) | 120 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 10 | 59 | Female | 2011.10 | C2 | Severe (antrum) | Mild (antrum) | 114 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
| 11 | 63 | Female | 2013.06 | O2 | OLGA III | OLGIM III | 72 | ESD | moderate | adenocarcinoma | submucosa |
| 12 | 64 | Male | 2017.03 | C3 | OLGA III | OLGIM III | 48 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | muscularismucosa |
| 13 | 67 | Male | 2017.08 | O2 | OLGA IV | OLGIM IV | 30 | Surgery | poor | adenocarcinoma | serosa |
| 14 | 56 | Male | 2018.05 | superficial | None | Mild (antrum) | 41 | ESD | well | adenocarcinoma | lamina propria |
The endoscopic data had a lack of pictures or text descriptions, and the Kimura-Takemoto classification was eventually determined by picture rereading, text description analysis, or telephone follow-up.
Pathological biopsy sampling included the gastric sinus and body but could not attain the five pieces required according to the updated Sydney System, so the OLGA/OLGIM judged in this way may have down-staged, or underestimated the disease.
OLGA, operative link on gastritis assessment; OLGIM, operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment; GA, gastric atrophy; IM, intestinal metaplasia; GC, gastric cancer; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Lesion progression in the updated Sydney System group and Kimura-Takemoto classification group.
| Staging/Classification | Lesions |
| Time distribution of each lesion progression(year) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGIN | HGIN | GC | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ≥5 | ||
| OLGA0 (8) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| |||||
| OLGAI (84) | 4 (4.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | LGIN*1 | LGIN*2 | LGIN*1 | |||
| OLGAII (42) | 4 (9.5%) | 1 (2.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | LGIN*2 | LGIN*2 | HGIN*1 | |||
| OLGAIII (23) | 3 (13.0%) | 1 (4.3%) | 1 (4.3%) | LGIN*2 | LGIN*1 | HGIN*1+GC*1 | |||
| OLGAIV (13) | 1 (7.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | HGIN*1 | LGIN*1 | GC*1 | |||
| OLGIM0 (2) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| |||||
| OLGIMI (72) | 4 (5.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | LGIN*1 | LGIN*2 | LGIN*1 | |||
| OLGIMII (49) | 4 (8.2%) | 1 (2.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | LGIN*1 | LGIN*1 | LGIN*2 | HGIN*1 | ||
| OLGIMIII (31) | 4 (12.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (3.2%) | LGIN*1 | LGIN*3 | GC*1 | |||
| OLGIMIV (16) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (12.5%) | 1 (6.3%) | HGIN*1 | HGIN*1+GC*1 | ||||
| C-1 (42) | 3 (7.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| LGIN*2 | LGIN*1 | |||
| C-2 (111) | 17 (15.3%) | 2 (1.8%) | 2 (1.8%) | LGIN*2 | LGIN*6 | LGIN*6+GC*1 | LGIN*3+HGIN*2+GC*1 | ||
| C-3 (53) | 9 (17.0%) | 1 (1.9%) | 3 (5.7%) | LGIN*1 | LGIN*1 | GC*1 | LGIN*4+GC*1 | LGIN*3+HGIN*1+GC*1 | |
| O-1 (13) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (7.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | HGIN*1 | LGIN*1 | ||||
| O-2 (15) | 2 (13.3%) | 0 (.0%) | 1 (6.7%) | LGIN*1 | GC*1 | LGIN*1 | |||
| O-3 (2) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | GC*1 | |||||
P1, OR1: P value and odds ratio in overall progression rates between OLGA III-IV and OLGA 0-II. P2, OR2: P value and odds ratio in HGIN, GC progression rates between OLGA III-IV and OLGA0-II. P3, OR3: P value and odds ratio in overall progression rates between OLGA III-IV and OLGA0-II. P4, OR4: P value and odds ratio in HGIN, GC progression rates between OLGA III-IV and OLGA0-II. P5, OR5: P value and odds ratio in overall progression rates between C3-O3 and C1-C2. P6, OR6: P value and odds ratio in HGIN, GC progression rates between C3-O3 and C1-C2.
OLGA, operative link on gastritis assessment; OLGIM, Operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment; LGIN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; HGIN, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; GC, gastric cancer. * means multiplication sign (x).
Figure 4Number and proportion of patients who underwent progression in each stage and classification. (A) Number and proportion of patients who underwent progression in each OLGA stage (B) Number and proportion of patients who underwent progression in each OLGIM stage (C) Number and proportion of patients who underwent progression in each Kimura-Takemoto classification. OLGA, operative link on gastritis assessment; OLGIM, Operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment; LGIN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; HGIN, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; GC gastric cancer.