| Literature DB >> 35978648 |
Cheng-Xing Long1, Jie-Qi Wu2, Zhou-Jin Tan3, Sheng-Ping Wang4.
Abstract
The changes of intestinal microbiota are closely related to the growth and development of animals. The current study is aimed at exploring the composition of the microbial community of pigs at different growth stages. Fresh fecal samples of three-breed hybrid pigs at three developmental stages (60, 120, and 180 days of age) were collected. The microbial composition was analyzed based on the 16S rDNA gene of bacteria Illumina NovaSeq sequencing platform. The results showed that the intestinal microbiota of pigs was distributed in 22 phyla, 46 classes, 84 orders, 147 families, and 287 genera. Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Spirochaetae, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the dominant phyla. Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, SMB53, Oscillospira, and Prevotella were the dominant genera. Among them, the abundance of Lactobacillus and SMB53 increased first and then decreased, while the change of Oscillospira was opposite. In addition, the abundance of Streptococcus increased while that of Prevotella decreased gradually. Moreover, with the increase of time and body weight, the microbial diversity showed a decreasing trend. In conclusion, the intestinal microbial composition of the three-breed hybrid pigs was relatively stable during the fattening stage, but there were significant differences in abundance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35978648 PMCID: PMC9377885 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5603451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Figure 1Overall description of sequencing data. (a) Sequence length analysis. (b) Venn diagram. TM stands for 60-day group. FM stands for 120-day group. SM stands for 180-day group.
Goods coverage and diversity indices of bacterial species during different growth stages.
| Group | Chao1 | Observed Species | Simpson | Shannon | Goods coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TM | 2803.01 ± 438.91∗∗ | 2402.62 ± 342.16∗∗ | 0.9743 ± 0.0196 | 8.4015 ± 0.5467∗ | 0.9834 ± 0.0034∗ |
| FM | 2493.18 ± 275.45∗ | 2148.06 ± 214.32∗∗ | 0.9638 ± 0.0164 | 7.8515 ± 0.3439 | 0.9857 ± 0.0023 |
| SM | 1946.21 ± 275.28 | 1617.18 ± 236.55 | 0.9329 ± 0.0637 | 6.9584 ± 0.9996 | 0.9885 ± 0.0017 |
Note: TM stands for 60-day group, FM stands for 120-day group, SM stands for 180-day group; compared with SM ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01.
Figure 2Comparison of bacterial alpha diversity analysis. (a) Chao1 index. (b) Observed Species index. (c) Shannon index. (d) Simpson index. TM stands for 60-day group. FM stands for 120-day group. SM stands for 180-day group.
Figure 3Average relative abundance of the on top 10 taxa in each group. (a) At phylum level. (b) At genus level. TM stands for 60-day group. FM stands for 120-day group. SM stands for 180-day group.
Main microbiota in different periods at phylum level.
| Sample | TM_60 d | FM_120 d | SM_180 d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firmicutes | 0.7873 ± 0.0998 | 0.8391 ± 0.0719 | 0.8251 ± 0.1202 |
| Bacteroidetes | 0.1633 ± 0.0756 | 0.1211 ± 0.0687 | 0.0729 ± 0.0584 |
| Spirochaetes | 0.0221 ± 0.0156 | 0.0079 ± 0.0081 | 0.0381 ± 0.0364 |
| Proteobacteria | 0.0089 ± 0.0134 | 0.0059 ± 0.0078 | 0.0316 ± 0.0599 |
| Actinobacteria | 0.0035 ± 0.0012∗ | 0.0131 ± 0.0047 | 0.0208 ± 0.0158 |
| Tenericutes | 0.0064 ± 0.0027 | 0.0074 ± 0.0033 | 0.0046 ± 0.0026 |
| TM7 | 0.0047 ± 0.0022∗ | 0.0025 ± 0.0013 | 0.0023 ± 0.0014 |
| Cyanobacteria | 0.0007 ± 0.0005∗ | 0.0013 ± 0.0005 | 0.0024 ± 0.0020 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.0008 ± 0.0003∗∗ | 0.0001 ± 0.0001 | 0.0001 ± 0.0001 |
| Fibrobacteres | 0.0005 ± 0.0007 | 0.0001 ± 0.0001 | 0.0001 ± 0.0001 |
| Others | 0.0018 ± 0.0003 | 0.0016 ± 0.0007 | 0.0021 ± 0.0011 |
Note: TM stands for 60-day group, FM stands for 120-day group, SM stands for 180-day group; compared with SM ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01.
Main microbiota in different periods at genus level.
| Sample | TM_60 d | FM_120 d | SM_180 d |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.2122 ± 0.1099 | 0.2502 ± 0.1345 | 0.1108 ± 0.0675 |
|
| 0.0344 ± 0.0185∗∗ | 0.0528 ± 0.0217∗∗ | 0.2198 ± 0.1382 |
|
| 0.0215 ± 0.0068 | 0.0861 ± 0.0522 | 0.0560 ± 0.0258 |
|
| 0.0612 ± 0.0078∗∗ | 0.0305 ± 0.0086 | 0.0349 ± 0.0060 |
|
| 0.0507 ± 0.0300 | 0.0507 ± 0.0473 | 0.0183 ± 0.0249 |
|
| 0.0221 ± 0.0156 | 0.0079 ± 0.0081 | 0.0380 ± 0.0364 |
|
| 0.0389 ± 0.0345∗ | 0.0133 ± 0.0037 | 0.0036 ± 0.0024 |
|
| 0.0197 ± 0.0090∗∗ | 0.0204 ± 0.0117∗∗ | 0.0025 ± 0.0008 |
|
| 0.0163 ± 0.0054∗∗ | 0.0089 ± 0.0031 | 0.0072 ± 0.0013 |
|
| 0.0097 ± 0.0064 | 0.0095 ± 0.0039 | 0.0094 ± 0.0042 |
| Others | 0.5134 ± 0.0554 | 0.4696 ± 0.0869 | 0.4994 ± 0.1039 |
Note: TM stands for 60-day group, FM stands for 120-day group, SM stands for 180-day group; compared with SM ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01.
Figure 4Comparison of microbial community structure among groups. (a) PCoA. (b) NMDS analysis. (c) LEfSe analysis with LDA score > 4.0. TM stands for 60-day group. FM stands for 120-day group. SM stands for 180-day group.