| Literature DB >> 35978381 |
Iulia Chiciudean1, Giancarlo Russo2, Diana Felicia Bogdan3,4, Erika Andrea Levei5, Luchiana Faur6,7, Alexandra Hillebrand-Voiculescu7,8, Oana Teodora Moldovan7,9, Horia Leonard Banciu10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Movile Cave (SE Romania) is a chemoautotrophically-based ecosystem fed by hydrogen sulfide-rich groundwater serving as a primary energy source analogous to the deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems. Our current understanding of Movile Cave microbiology has been confined to the sulfidic water and its proximity, as most studies focused on the water-floating microbial mat and planktonic accumulations likely acting as the primary production powerhouse of this unique subterranean ecosystem. By employing comprehensive genomic-resolved metagenomics, we questioned the spatial variation, chemoautotrophic abilities, ecological interactions and trophic roles of Movile Cave's microbiome thriving beyond the sulfidic-rich water.Entities:
Keywords: Chemoautotrophic; Competition-cooperation interactions; Cross-feeding dependencies; Genome-scale metabolic models; Romania; Sulfidic cave
Year: 2022 PMID: 35978381 PMCID: PMC9386943 DOI: 10.1186/s40793-022-00438-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Microbiome ISSN: 2524-6372
Fig. 1Schematic representations of the Movile Cave map (B), profile (C) and its localization in Romania and Europe (A). The sampling sites from this study are PMV1-PMV8 (modified from Sarbu et al. [25])
Description of the sites sampled in Movile Cave during December 2019
| Sample codes | Sampling sites characteristics | Sediment description | Microclimate |
|---|---|---|---|
Stations in the lower level are marked in bold, while stations in the upper level are in italic
Physicochemical and mineralogical composition of the sediment samples in Movile Cave
| Parameter (unit)/Sample | PMV1 | PMV2 | PMV3 | PMV4 | PMV6 | PMV7 | PMV8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 8.5 | 8.3 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Electrical conductivity (µS cm−1) | 270 | 751 | 955 | 1 237 | 1 739 | 119 | 60.6 |
| N (%SU) | 0.21 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 1.37 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
| C (%SU) | 9.1 | 4.8 | 3.9 | 8.8 | 8 | 6.6 | 4.1 |
| H (%SU) | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Ca (mg kg−1) | 172 900 | 125 000 | 119 100 | 255 100 | 159 500 | 136 900 | 92 300 |
| Al (mg kg−1) | 21 450 | 25 950 | 19 520 | 12 635 | 11 630 | 29 540 | 38 490 |
| Mg (mg kg−1) | 42 960 | 29 860 | 6 834 | 27 590 | 51 980 | 36 320 | 28 120 |
| Fe (mg kg−1) | 10 160 | 10 540 | 21 470 | 10 030 | 5 545 | 10 140 | 12 780 |
| K (mg kg−1) | 5 103 | 4 279 | 4 983 | 2 145 | 2 140 | 5 816 | 6 185 |
| Na (mg kg−1) | 415 | 289 | 126 | 336 | 564 | 374 | 240 |
| S (mg kg−1) | 902 | 3 003 | 13 270 | 5 730 | 30 480 | 1 610 | 136 |
| P (mg kg−1) | 162 | 239 | 357 | 110 | 163 | 186 | 124 |
| Mn (mg kg−1) | 278 | 216 | 138 | 38.5 | 99.1 | 184 | 343 |
| Ba (mg kg−1) | 86.5 | 135 | 60.3 | 429 | 87.3 | 183 | 110 |
| Ti (mg kg−1) | 202 | 246 | 127 | 230 | 149 | 196 | 87.8 |
| Sr (mg kg−1) | 75.4 | 106 | 52.2 | 1060 | 270 | 91.6 | 48.2 |
| V (mg kg−1) | 29.6 | 26.9 | 261 | 15.5 | 16.4 | 24.2 | 33.6 |
| As (mg kg−1) | 39.1 | 24.7 | 322.5 | 20.6 | 24.8 | 26.4 | 19.5 |
| Zn (mg kg−1) | 9.9 | 14.9 | 19.4 | 138 | 5.7 | 10.8 | 17.7 |
| Cr (mg kg−1) | 14.9 | 20.4 | 101 | 8 | 4.7 | 11.9 | 11.1 |
| Mineralogy (> 5%) | dolomite, quartz, calcite | quartz, calcite, muscovite | calcite | calcite, quartz, dolomite, muscovite | dolomite, gypsum, quartz | dolomite, calcite, quartz, muscovite | dolomite, muscovite, aragonite |
Fig. 2The plot of MDS analysis based on the chemical composition of sediments sampled from Movile Cave. The analysis shows the strong separation of PMV3 and PMV4 from the other samples and of PMV8 and PMV6 from the other samples and between each other. The Kruskal’s stress (1) = 0.207, indicates the significance of dissimilarity between samples. Samples in the Lake Room (PMV1, PMV3, and PMV4) are in blue, and samples from the other cave passages (PMV2, PMV6, PMV7, and PMV8) are in brown (see also Table 1)
Fig. 3The abundance and phylogeny of MAGs recovered from sediments of Movile Cave. A. Most abundant phyla (relative abundance > 20 RPKGs). B. Less abundant phyla (relative abundance < 20 RPKGs). C. Phylogenetic tree of MAGs from Movile Cave sediments, including their closely related MAGs from GTDB (GCA) and NCBI type material genomes (GCF) (type strain and/or reference genomes). The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the GTDB marker genes. The MAGs detected in this study are shown in blue or red for medium- or high-quality MAGs, respectively
Fig. 4Overview of pathways and genes involved in sulfur, nitrogen cycling, methane oxidation and CO2 fixation encoded by MAGs recovered from Movile Cave sediments. The color scheme gives the presence/absence of functional genes: presence is indicated in red, absence in grey. The involvement of each gene in specific pathways is indicated in the diagrams. Red arrows indicate oxidation, and the blue arrows show the reduction of compounds. Full arrows indicate the enzymatic reactions for which the coding genes were found in the datasets based on the analyzed MAGs. The dotted arrows show enzymatic reactions absent in the datasets
Fig. 5Competition-cooperation landscape of each sample and cross-feeding interactions across wet and dry galleries. A. The competition (MRO) and cooperation (MIP) scores (divided by the numbers of MAGs in the community) are shown for different reconstruction and simulation parameters: a. metaGEMs reconstructed only on genetic evidence and community simulation on complete medium (unconstrained environment); b. metaGEMs reconstructed by gap-filling for minimal media and community simulation on minimal media (constrained environment). B. and C. Alluvial diagrams showing compounds exchanged (SMETANA score = 1) in each condition (lower/wet and upper/dry gallery) between the donor (left) and receiver (right) phyla. The colors are used only to distinguish distinct components of the alluvial diagrams