| Literature DB >> 35978103 |
Ashish Yadav1, Lawrence J Beilin1, Rae-Chi Huang2, Phil Vlaskovsky1, John P Newnham3, Scott W White3, Trevor A Mori4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is now good evidence that events during gestation significantly influence the developmental well-being of an individual in later life. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between intrauterine growth trajectories determined by serial ultrasound and subsequent markers of adiposity and inflammation in the 27-year-old adult offspring from the Raine Study, an Australian longitudinal pregnancy cohort.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35978103 PMCID: PMC9492546 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-022-01203-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) ISSN: 0307-0565 Impact factor: 5.551
Fig. 1Flow diagram of Raine Study participants attending the 20, 22 and 27-year follow-up.
Flow diagram of Raine Study participants attending the 20, 22 and 27-year follow-up with completeadult body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and lifestyle data.
Fig. 2Fetal growth trajectories using abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), and head circumference (HC) anthropometric markers.
Reproduced from Yadav et al. [30]. DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003035 with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
General characteristics of the participants (Gen2) at 20, 22 and 27 years and their mothers (Gen1) during pregnancy.
| Characteristics | Year 20 ( | Year 22 ( | Year 27 ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | Males | Females | Males | Females | |
| Age (years) Mean (SD) | 20.1 (0.4) | 20.1 (0.4) | 22.2 (0.8) | 22.2 (0.8) | 26.7 (0.4) | 26.8 (0.4) |
| BMI (kg/m2) Median (Q1, Q3) | 23.5 (21.1,26.4) | 23.1 (20.9,26.4) | 24.2 (22.1,27.2) | 23.8 (21.5,28.0) | 24.7 (22.6,27.6) | 23.7 (22.6,27.6) |
| *BMI categories | ||||||
| <25 (kg/m2) | 64.5 | 67.7 | 60.6 | 61.5 | 51.4 | 61.6 |
| Overweight | 23.4 | 17.7 | 28.6 | 17.8 | 34.4 | 20.1 |
| Obese | 12.1 | 14.6 | 10.8 | 20.7 | 14.2 | 18.3 |
| Waist circumference (cm) Median (Q1, Q3) | 79.1 (74.8,87.8) | 73.9 (68.0,82.2) | 83.5 (77.0,91.0) | 76.0 (70.5,89.5) | 85.5 (79.8,94.3) | 76.6 (71.1,85.5) |
| hs-CRP (mg/L) Median (Q1, Q3) | 0.71 (1.2) | 1.38 (2.8) | 0.65 (1.0) | 1.53 (4.2) | 0.70 (1.4) | 1.10 (2.6) |
| Alcohol drinkers (%) | 75.3 | 70.1 | 85.0 | 79.8 | 74.8 | 69.9 |
| Alcohol intake (g/wk ethanol) Median (Q1, Q3) | 80.0 (10.0,90.0) | 50.0 (0.0,120.0) | 109.7 (39.8,240.3) | 50.0 (11.1,103.5) | 79.2 (0.0,202.5) | 42.2 (0.0,118.8) |
| Smoking (% smokers) | 15.6 | 16.1 | 17.4 | 16.4 | 23.4 | 21.0 |
| Physical Activity (METmin /week) Median (Q1, Q3) | 7386.0 (3546.0, 13050.0) | 9936.0 (3336.0, 16398.0) | 3816.0 (1893.0, 7164.0) | 2147.5 (801.0, 4563.0) | 2698.5 (1200.0, 5112.0) | 1920.0 (495.0, 3564.0) |
| Socioeconomic status (SEIFA score) Median (Q1, Q3) | 1072.8 (995.7, 1114.4) | 1075.9 (1006.8, 1121.5) | 1080.9 (1002.9, 1120.0) | 1069.0 (1006.8, 1116.5) | 1079.1 (1003.9, 1118.4) | 1069.3 (1006.8, 1116.5) |
| Educational status (%) | ||||||
| Category-1 | 81.6 | 72.4 | 52.4 | 51.5 | 21.5 | 19.6 |
| Category-2 | 15.0 | 20.7 | 26.0 | 19.8 | 32.6 | 28.0 |
| Category-3 | 3.4 | 6.9 | 21.6 | 28.7 | 45.8 | 52.4 |
| #Contraceptive use in females (%) | - | 60.2 | - | 59.6 | - | 48.9 |
| Ethnicity (% Caucasians) | 87.9 | 89.8 | 88.7 | 90.9 | 89.9 | 91.3 |
| Breastfed >6 months (%) | 57.7 | 57.9 | 58.5 | 58.1 | 58.8 | 53.8 |
| Birthweight (g) Mean (SD) | 3371.5 (552.3) | 3308.8 (510.2) | 3343.1 (581.9) | 3322.2 (516.5) | 3416.1 (572.5) | 3338.3 (528.4) |
| Birth length (cm) Mean (SD) | 49.3 (2.7) | 48.7 (2.3) | 49.1 (3.1) | 48.7 (2.2) | 49.5 (2.9) | 48.8 (2.3) |
| BMI (kg/m2) Median (Q1, Q3) | 22.9 (21.1,24.8) | 23.2 (21.2,25.9) | 22.8 (20.7,24.6) | 23.5 (21.0,26.2) | 22.9(21.1,25.5) | 23.4 (21.1,25.9) |
| Preterm delivery (%) | 4.8 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 4.1 |
| GDM (%) | 2.6 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 0 |
| Maternal smoking (%) | 21.2 | 23.2 | 18.3 | 24.0 | 16.5 | 25.6 |
| Alcohol drinkers (%) | 60.6 | 57.5 | 59.2 | 56.3 | 58.3 | 58.0 |
| Uncomplicated-HTN (%) | 26.4 | 18.5 | 25.8 | 20.7 | 26.2 | 19.2 |
| Complicated-HTN (%) | 3.5 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 2.3 |
| Low income (%) | 33.2 | 34.6 | 37.3 | 34.2 | 38.8 | 34.4 |
SD standard deviation, Q1 1st quartile or 25th percentile, Q3 3rd quartile or 75th percentile, BMI body mass index, hs-CRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
*BMI categories: <25, overweight (≥25 and <30), obese (≥30) [in kg/m2]; SEIFA: Socioeconomic indexes for areas; Educational status: Category-1 Those completing high school, Category-2 Those with apprenticeship or vocational training, Category-3 Those in university.
#Contraception refers to the use of hormonal contraceptives; GDM- gestational diabetes mellitus; HTN- hypertension; Low income- family income at the time of conception, low being annual income < $24,000 (AUS).
Fetal growth trajectories and their association with BMI, WC & hs-CRP.
| #Trajectories (Group membership) | Group-1 Low-falling 5.3% ( | Group-2 Low-stable 13.1% ( | Group-4 Average-falling 20.6% ( | Group-5 Average-rising 12.4% ( | Group-6 High-falling 18.3% ( | Group-7 High-rising 5.6% ( | Global | |
| BMI | Model 1 | −0.06 | −0.31 | −1.45** | 0.26 | −1.01* | 0.20 | 0.011 |
| Model 2 | 0.86 | 0.21 | −1.03* | −0.04 | −0.75 | −0.47 | 0.044 | |
| WC | Model 1 | −0.44 | −1.06 | −3.10* | 0.78 | −1.86 | 0.16 | 0.033 |
| Model 2 | 2.56 | 0.24 | −2.20* | 0.20 | −1.19 | −1.38 | 0.138 | |
| hs-CRP | Model 1 | 1.40* | 1.07 | 1.05 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.70** | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.48** | 1.07 | 1.06 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.70** | 0.001 | |
Linear mixed modeling results displayed.
BMI body mass index (β coefficient in kg/m2), WC waist circumference (β coefficient in cms), hs-CRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Exponentiated β coefficients).
Significant P values: *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001.
#Trajectories based on 1333 participants; Reference group is Group-3 (Average-stable) with a membership of 24.9% (n = 169) for abdominal circumference, Group-4 (Average-stable) with a membership of 42.4% (n = 288) for femur length and Group-4 (Average-stable) with a membership of 40.8% (n = 277) for head circumference.
Sample Size: Model 1: BMI and WC- 1242 observations representing 606 participants who attended one or more follow-up; hs-CRP 1139 observations/574 participants. Model 2: BMI and WC- 1223 observations/596 participants; hs-CRP- 1126 observations/566 participants.
Model 1 covariates- age, sex, female contraceptive use, ethnicity, socioeconomic status & physical activity; Model 2 covariates- Model 1 plus uncomplicated hypertension during pregnancy, maternal alcohol drinking, and maternal BMI at 16 weeks (only maternal BMI at 16 weeks for hs-CRP). Models for hs-CRP additionally adjusted for adult BMI.
Fig. 3Relationships observed between fetal growth trajectories and adult BMI, WC and hs-CRP.
Associations observed from linear mixed modeling (Model 1) between growth trajectories (A-Abdominal circumference, B-Femur Length and C-Head Circumference) and adult outcomes (BMI- Body mass index, WC waistcircumference, hs-CRP- high sensitivity C-reactive protein). Y-axes: Standard deviation scores or z-scores for AC, FL and HC. X-axes: Gestational age in weeks. Dashed lines (--) represent the reference trajectory group while solid-bold lines (–) represent those trajectory groups having a significant association with reference group. Minus sign (−) indicates a negative association while a plus sign (+) indicates a positive association.