Literature DB >> 35978096

Opioid antagonism in humans: a primer on optimal dose and timing for central mu-opioid receptor blockade.

Martin Trøstheim1,2, Marie Eikemo3, Jan Haaker4, J James Frost5, Siri Leknes6,3.   

Abstract

Non-human animal studies outline precise mechanisms of central mu-opioid regulation of pain, stress, affiliation and reward processing. In humans, pharmacological blockade with non-selective opioid antagonists such as naloxone and naltrexone is typically used to assess involvement of the mu-opioid system in such processing. However, robust estimates of the opioid receptor blockade achieved by opioid antagonists are missing. Dose and timing schedules are highly variable and often based on single studies. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of central opioid receptor blockade after opioid antagonism based on existing positron emission tomography data. We also create models for estimating opioid receptor blockade with intravenous naloxone and oral naltrexone. We find that common doses of intravenous naloxone (0.10-0.15 mg/kg) and oral naltrexone (50 mg) are more than sufficient to produce full blockade of central MOR (>90% receptor occupancy) for the duration of a typical experimental session (~60 min), presumably due to initial super saturation of receptors. Simulations indicate that these doses also produce high KOR blockade (78-100%) and some DOR blockade (10% with naltrexone and 48-74% with naloxone). Lower doses (e.g., 0.01 mg/kg intravenous naloxone) are estimated to produce less DOR and KOR blockade while still achieving a high level of MOR blockade for ~30 min. The models and simulations form the basis of two novel web applications for detailed planning and evaluation of experiments with opioid antagonists. These tools and recommendations enable selection of appropriate antagonists, doses and assessment time points, and determination of the achieved receptor blockade in previous studies.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35978096     DOI: 10.1038/s41386-022-01416-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   8.294


  45 in total

1.  Experience with alcohol and the endogenous opioid system in ethanol analgesia.

Authors:  H S Cutter; T J O'Farrell
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Simplified detection system for neuroreceptor studies in the human brain.

Authors:  A N Bice; H N Wagner; J J Frost; T K Natarajan; M C Lee; D F Wong; R F Dannals; H T Ravert; A A Wilson; J M Links
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Imaging opiate receptors in the human brain by positron tomography.

Authors:  J J Frost; H N Wagner; R F Dannals; H T Ravert; J M Links; A A Wilson; H D Burns; D F Wong; R W McPherson; A E Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Regional mu opioid receptor regulation of sensory and affective dimensions of pain.

Authors:  J K Zubieta; Y R Smith; J A Bueller; Y Xu; M R Kilbourn; D M Jewett; C R Meyer; R A Koeppe; C S Stohler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Effect of naloxone on primary and secondary hyperalgesia induced by the human burn injury model.

Authors:  J Brennum; F Kaiser; J B Dahl
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Do endogenous opioids mediate or fine-tune human pain relief?

Authors:  Marie Eikemo; Guro E Løseth; Siri Leknes
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 7.  State-dependent μ-opioid modulation of social motivation.

Authors:  Guro E Loseth; Dan-Mikael Ellingsen; Siri Leknes
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  PET imaging for receptor occupancy: meditations on calculation and simplification.

Authors:  Yumin Zhang; Gerard B Fox
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2012-03

Review 9.  Making Sense of Pharmacology: Inverse Agonism and Functional Selectivity.

Authors:  Kelly A Berg; William P Clarke
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 10.  The Role of Mu-Opioids for Reward and Threat Processing in Humans: Bridging the Gap from Preclinical to Clinical Opioid Drug Studies.

Authors:  Isabell M Meier; Marie Eikemo; Siri Leknes
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2021-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.