Literature DB >> 35977306

COVID-19 Home Monitoring After Diagnosis and Health Care Utilization in an Integrated Health System.

Anita D Misra-Hebert1, Xinge Ji2, Lara Jehi3, Alex Milinovich2, Elizabeth R Pfoh4, Michael W Kattan2, James B Young1.   

Abstract

This cohort study examines health care utilization patterns for patients with COVID-19 who were enrolled vs not enrolled in a home monitoring program. Copyright 2021 Misra-Hebert AD et al. JAMA Health Forum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35977306      PMCID: PMC8796892          DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Health Forum        ISSN: 2689-0186


Introduction

Remote monitoring programs have been implemented for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19[1] after hospital discharge[2,3] or emergency department (ED) visits.[4] The Cleveland Clinic Health System (CCHS) established a home monitoring program (HMP) for patients with positive test results for SARS-Co-V-2. We assessed health care utilization patterns for patients enrolled in the HMP compared with similar patients who were not enrolled.

Methods

We identified patients with positive test results for SARS-CO-V-2 in the CCHS (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention assay, Roche magnapure extraction, ABI 7500 DX polymerase chain reaction) from March 1 to July 31, 2020, from the CCHS COVID-19 registry, which included demographic and clinical variables. Utilization in the year before the SARS-Co-V-2 test (eg, hospitalizations, ED, outpatient visits) was obtained from the electronic medical record (EMR). While all patients with COVID-19 were offered HMP enrollment to receive telephone outreach (a description of the HMP can be found in eAppendix 1 in the Supplement), to more confidently capture EMR utilization data, we limited our analysis to patients with an assigned CCHS primary care physician (the study population is described in eAppendix 2 in the Supplement). Race/ethnicity was captured from the EMR and included, given its potential contribution to COVID-19 outcomes. Descriptive statistics were reported as counts (percentages) or median values (interquartile ranges). For demographic characteristic and comorbidity comparisons, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for numeric variables and χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Overlap propensity score weighting[5] using all collected variables was then used to address baseline group differences in those enrolled vs not enrolled in the HMP. The 30-day and 90-day utilization outcomes, including hospitalizations (primary outcome) and ED and outpatient visits, were measured while excluding ED visits or hospitalizations that occurred within 24 hours of the positive SARS-Co-V-2 test result. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with positive test results that were associated with hospitalization/ED or outpatient visits. This study was approved by the CCHS institutional review board as minimal risk; thus, consent was not required. The reporting follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. All statistical analyses were performed using the tidyverse and survey package with R software (R Foundation). Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the study population by HMP participation and subgroup are shown in Table 1. There were 3975 patients who participated and 3221 who did not. Those participating overall were younger; more likely to be women, Black individuals, and/or individuals with non-Hispanic ethnicity; and have more asthma diagnoses, a lower proportion of several other comorbidities, and more prior year outpatient visits. Overlap propensity score weighting and odds ratios (ORs) for the outcomes are shown in Table 2. There were lower odds of 30-day or 90-day hospitalization (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.88; and OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93, respectively) but no significant association of the HMP with 30-day or 90-day ED utilization (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.12; and OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.15, respectively), and there were higher odds of outpatient visits at 30 and 90 days (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.68-2.30; and OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.76-2.48, respectively). A subgroup analysis showed lower odds of future hospitalization that was limited to patients posthospitalization or ED visits (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.81; and OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89 for 30-day and 90-day hospitalization, respectively).
Table 1.

Patients With Positive SARS-CoV-2 Test Result by Home Monitoring Program Participation (Overall and Subgroups)

CharacteristicOverallOutpatientEmergency department/hospitalization
Positive test result, No. (%)P valuePositive test result, No. (%)P valuePositive test result, No. (%)P value
Home monitoring, noHome monitoring, yesHome monitoring, noHome monitoring, yesHome monitoring, noHome monitoring, yes
No.32213975NA19502672NA12711303NA
Age, median (IQR), y57.3 (38.9-72.6)48.1 (31.7-60.4)<.00157.6 (40.0-73.8)45.0 (30.2-58.1)<.00156.5 (37.3-70.9)52.9 (37.0-64.1)<.001
Sex
Male1389 (43.1)1595 (40.1).01735 (37.7)996 (37.3).80654 (51.5)599 (46.0).01
Female1832 (56.9)2380 (59.9)1215 (62.3)1676 (62.7)617 (48.5)704 (54.0)
Race
Black856 (26.6)1495 (37.6)<.001358 (18.4)856 (32.0)<.001498 (39.2)639 (49.0)<.001
White2034 (63.1)2047 (51.5)1387 (71.1)1534 (57.4)647 (50.9)513 (39.4)
Other331 (10.3)433 (10.9)205 (10.5)282 (10.6)126 (9.9)151 (11.6)
Missing154 (4.8)187 (4.7)106 (5.4)140 (5.2)48 (3.8)47 (3.6)
Ethnicity
Hispanic501 (15.6)304 (7.6)<.001311 (15.9)191 (7.1)<.001190 (14.9)113 (8.7)<.001
Non-Hispanic2561 (79.5)3486 (87.7)1525 (78.2)2331 (87.2)1036 (81.5)1155 (88.6)
Unknown159 (4.9)185 (4.7)114 (5.8)150 (5.6)45 (3.5)35 (2.7)
Comorbidities
Asthma453 (14.1)784 (19.7)<.001264 (13.5)497 (18.6)<.001189 (14.9)287 (22.0)<.001
COPD/emphysema286 (8.9)200 (5.0)<.001164 (8.4)75 (2.8)<.001122 (9.6)125 (9.6)>.99
Diabetes707 (21.9)699 (17.6)<.001386 (19.8)378 (14.1)<.001321 (25.3)321 (24.6).75
Hypertension1567 (48.6)1569 (39.5)<.001940 (48.2)928 (34.7)<.001627 (49.3)641 (49.2).98
Coronary artery disease465 (14.4)272 (6.8)<.001283 (14.5)138 (5.2)<.001182 (14.3)134 (10.3).002
Heart failure387 (12.0)198 (5.0)<.001227 (11.6)78 (2.9)<.001160 (12.6)120 (9.2).01
Cancer434 (13.5)376 (9.5)<.001276 (14.2)256 (9.6)<.001158 (12.4)120 (9.2).01
Transplant history36 (1.1)27 (0.7).0614 (0.7)17 (0.6).8822 (1.7)10 (0.8).04
Multiple sclerosis37 (1.1)26 (0.7).0418 (0.9)19 (0.7).5319 (1.5)7 (0.5).03
Connective tissue disease174 (5.4)225 (5.7).67108 (5.5)133 (5.0).4466 (5.2)92 (7.1).06
Inflammatory bowel disease92 (2.9)106 (2.7).6850 (2.6)72 (2.7).8642 (3.3)34 (2.6).36
Immuno-suppressive disease454 (14.1)372 (9.4)<.001255 (13.1)195 (7.3)<.001199 (15.7)177 (13.6).15
Previous utilization
Emergency department in previous year
Median (IQR)1.0 (0-2.0)1.0 (0-2.0)<.0010 (0-0)0 (0-2.0)<.0012.0 (1.0-4.0)2.0 (1.0-4.0).16
Mean (SD)1.6 (2.9)1.7 (2.7).060.7 (2.0)1.1 (2.2)<.0013.0 (3.5)2.9 (3.2).66
Outpatient in previous year
Median (IQR)4.0 (0-13.0)9.0 (3.0-18.0)<.0014.0 (1.0-12.8)8.0 (3.0-18.0)<.0013.0 (0-12.0)6.0 (1.0-18.0)<.001
Mean (SD)10.7 (19.2)14.3 (19.2)<.00110.2 (17.2)13.8 (18.5)<.00111.3 (21.9)13.4 (20.2).01
Hospitalization in previous year
Median (IQR)1.0 (0-3.0)1.0 (0-3.0).180 (0-1.0)1.0 (0-2.0)<.0012.0 (1.0-4.0)2.0 (1.0-4.0).24
Mean (SD)2.1 (3.4)1.2 (2.8).171.1 (2.2)1.3 (2.2).0013.6 (4.1)3.3 (3.5).09

Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range.

Table 2.

Patients With Positive SARS-CoV-2 Test Result by Home Monitoring Program Participation and the Overlap Between Propensity Score Weighted Characteristics and Outcomes Overall and by Subgroup

CharacteristicOverallOutpatientEmergency department/hospitalization
Home monitoring, noHome monitoring, yesHome monitoring, noHome monitoring, yesHome monitoring, noHome monitoring, yes
Count, No.322139751950267212711303
Age, ya50.850.850.050.052.752.7
Sex
Men42.642.638.338.349.049.0
Women57.457.461.761.751.051.0
Race
Black32.032.024.024.044.344.3
White57.157.165.165.144.644.6
Otherb10.910.910.910.911.111.1
Ethnicity
Hispanic11.411.412.012.011.011.0
Non-Hispanic83.883.882.482.485.885.8
Unknown4.84.85.65.63.23.2
Asthma16.316.315.215.217.817.8
COPD/emphysema6.56.54.54.59.49.4
Diabetes19.219.216.216.224.624.6
Hypertension43.143.140.140.148.648.6
Coronary artery disease9.59.58.18.111.811.8
Heart failure7.27.25.15.110.410.4
Cancer11.211.211.711.710.310.3
Transplant history0.90.90.70.71.11.1
Multiple sclerosis0.80.80.90.90.80.8
Immunosuppressive disease11118.98.91414
Connective tissue disease5.35.34.84.85.95.9
Inflammatory bowel disease2.82.82.62.63.03.0
Emergency department in previous year1.61.60.80.82.92.9
Outpatient visit in previous year12.412.412.212.212.312.3
Hospitalization in previous year2.02.01.11.13.43.4
Outcome
Emergency department
30 d14.513.49.910.221.418.9
OR (95% CI)0.91 (0.75-1.12)1.03 (0.76-1.39)0.85 (0.64-1.13)
90 d20.019.414.114.328.927.7
OR (95% CI)0.96 (0.81-1.15)1.01 (0.78-1.31)0.94 (0.73-1.21)
Outpatient
30 d63.177.171.178.853.374.4
OR (95% CI)1.97 (1.68-2.30)1.51 (1.23-1.87)2.55 (2.00-3.25)
90 d71.283.879.285.461.780.8
OR (95% CI)2.09 (1.76-2.48)1.54 (1.21-1.96)2.62 (2.02-3.40)
Hospitalization
30 d18.714.412.411.328.720.0
OR (95% CI)0.73 (0.60-0.88)0.90 (0.68-1.20)0.62 (0.48-0.81)
90 d25.321.117.716.337.229.4
OR (95% CI)0.79 (0.67-0.93)0.91 (0.71-1.15)0.70 (0.55-0.89)

Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OR, odds ratio.

Reported are either weighted proportions (for categorical variables) or weighted means (for numeric variables).

The Other category includes race other than Black or White, including Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, multiracial, and missing/unknown.

Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range. Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OR, odds ratio. Reported are either weighted proportions (for categorical variables) or weighted means (for numeric variables). The Other category includes race other than Black or White, including Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, multiracial, and missing/unknown.

Discussion

The COVID-19 HMP was associated with lower odds of hospitalization, particularly for the posthospital or ED subgroup, with no significant association with ED utilization up to 90 days after diagnosis and with higher odds of subsequent outpatient utilization. Limitations include that these findings are from a single health system, and our analytic methods may not have adjusted for all confounders, specifically the choice for HMP enrollment. The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted resource distribution discussions and concern for missed opportunities for chronic disease management.[6] This study’s outcomes support the need for randomized clinical trials to evaluate HMPs and consideration of targeted resource allocation for home monitoring after COVID-19 diagnosis or to other opportunities to maintain the health of patients during the pandemic.
  5 in total

1.  Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights.

Authors:  Fan Li; Laine E Thomas; Fan Li
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Hospital Discharged COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  William J Gordon; Daniel Henderson; Avital DeSharone; Herrick N Fisher; Jessica Judge; David M Levine; Laura MacLean; Diane Sousa; Mack Y Su; Robert Boxer
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  The Invisible Epidemic: Neglected Chronic Disease Management During COVID-19.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Alejandra Salazar; Maria Mirica; Lynn A Volk; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Remote patient monitoring for ED discharges in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ahmad A Aalam; Colton Hood; Crystal Donelan; Adam Rutenberg; Erin M Kane; Neal Sikka
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Hospital Readmissions After Implementation of a Discharge Care Program for Patients with COVID-19 Illness.

Authors:  Siqin Ye; Grant Hiura; Elaine Fleck; Aury Garcia; Joshua Geleris; Paul Lee; Nadia Liyanage-Don; Nathalie Moise; Neil Schluger; Jessica Singer; Magdalena Sobieszczyk; Yifei Sun; Harry West; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Addressing silent hypoxemia with COVID-19: Implementation of an outpatient pulse oximetry program in Vermont.

Authors:  Marlowe Galbraith; Patsy Kelso; Mark Levine; Richard C Wasserman; Jessica Sikka; Jennifer S Read
Journal:  Public Health Pract (Oxf)       Date:  2021-08-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.