Literature DB >> 35977208

Factors Associated With Chinese Adults' Vaccine Acceptance.

Haiyang Yang1, Jingjing Ma2.   

Abstract

This survey study assesses disparities in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and identifies approaches to improve vaccination rates among adults in China. Copyright 2021 Yang H et al. JAMA Health Forum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35977208      PMCID: PMC8796971          DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Health Forum        ISSN: 2689-0186


Introduction

Turning COVID-19 vaccines into vaccinations is a critical step to ending the COVID-19 pandemic.[1,2] It is thus imperative to understand the disparities in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and identify approaches to improve vaccination rates. The aim of this study was to add to this understanding.

Methods

This survey study received institutional review board clearance from Johns Hopkins University as well as approval by the National School of Development at Peking University where the data collection took place. The data were collected in January 2021, by which time the nationwide distribution of COVID-19 vaccines had just begun in China. A large-scale, nationally representative, random sample of 14 378 Chinese adults were invited to participate in this internet-based survey. The survey was conducted following the guidelines by the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). Participants consented before responding to the questionnaire, responded anonymously, and could terminate their participation at any point (eMethods 1 in the Supplement). Participants indicated whether they had been vaccinated for COVID-19. Those who had not been vaccinated indicated their willingness to receive the vaccine. Participants then rated their knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines on 4 scales (eMethods 2 in the Supplement). Next, we assessed how information about the vaccination behavior of the general public vs socially proximal others might be associated with vaccination decision-making. Participants who indicated that they were not yet willing to receive the vaccine were randomly assigned to respond to 1 of 2 versions of an additional question: one-half indicated what percentage of the general public had to be vaccinated for COVID-19 before they themselves would be vaccinated; for the other half, the reference group was “people you personally know.” All participants then completed sociodemographic measures. Responses to the vaccine knowledge items were averaged into a single measure (α = .73). A dummy variable was created to represent whether participants resided in Hubei, the province where COVID-19 was first found in China.[3] Ordinary least squares regression and mediation analyses (eMethods 3 in the Supplement) were conducted using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute) to examine the associations between vaccination measures and sociodemographic variables.

Results

A total of 12 651 participants (6145 [48.6%] women; mean age, 36.6 years; 7715 [61.0%] married; from 32 provincial regions) completed the study (88% response rate). Only 2% of participants were already vaccinated for COVID-19. Among the rest, 1.3% indicated that they definitely would not receive the vaccine, 3.5% probably would not, 9.1% were uncertain, 37% probably would, and 47% definitely would (see Table 1 for more details). An ordinary least squares regression revealed that women and individuals with lower incomes or education levels were less likely to indicate that they would receive the vaccine (Table 2). Higher vaccine knowledge ratings were associated with higher willingness to be vaccinated (r = 0.31; P < .001). Mediation analyses showed that knowledge ratings significantly mediated differences in vaccine acceptance across income and education levels but not gender.
Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics (n = 12 651)

CharacteristicNo. (% in category or mean of variable)aMean of willingness to be vaccinatedbWilling to be vaccinated, %c
Age, mean (SD), y12 649 (mean [SD], 36.6 [14.6])NANA
Gender
Women6145 (48.6)4.284.4
Men6504 (51.4)4.387.2
Monthly household income, mean (SD), ¥10 00011 876 (mean [SD], 1.7 [1.6])NANA
Education
With college degree9484 (75.0)4.386.8
Without college degree3162 (25.0)4.283.0
Marital status
Married7715 (61.0)4.385.9
Not married4936 (39.0)4.385.8
Location
Rural1382 (10.9)4.385.8
Urban11 269 (89.1)4.385.9
Province
Hubei631 (5.0)4.389.2
Other12 020 (95.0)4.385.7

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

The number of valid responses.

Responses were coded as willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine (1 = definitely will not; 2 = probably will not; 3 = not sure; 4 = probably will; 5 = definitely will).

The respective percentage of participants who selected either “definitely will” or “probably will” on the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance measure.

Table 2.

Disparities of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Across Sociodemographic Segments

VariableAssociation with willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccineaVaccine knowledge as a mediator of the associationb
β (SE)P valueDirect effect sizesIndirect effect size via knowledge
β (SE)95% CIβ (SE)95% CI
Gender, 1 = woman, 0 = man−0.075 (0.014)<.001−0.076 (0.015)−0.106 to −0.046−0.008 (0.005)−0.018 to 0.002
Monthly household income, ¥10 0000.024 (0.005)<.0010.005 (0.005)−0.005 to 0.0150.016 (0.002)0.013 to 0.020
Education, 1 = with college degree, 0 = without college degree0.022 (0.009)<.020.006 (0.011)−0.015 to 0.0260.038 (0.004)0.032 to 0.046
Marital status, 1 = married, 0 = not0.003 (0.021).88NANANANA
Location, 1 = urban, 0 = rural−0.035 (0.025).17NANANANA
Age, yc−0.001 (0.001).10NANANANA
Hubei, 1 = yes, 0 = no0.023 (0.033).48NANANANA
Intercept4.329 (0.058)<.001NANANANA

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

Results of ordinary least squares regression.

Results of 3 bootstrap mediation analyses. Gender, income, or education was used respectively as the independent variable, vaccine knowledge ratings as the mediator, and willingness to vaccinate as the dependent variable. The other sociodemographic variables were included as covariates.

Age was a continuous variable, which was included in the ordinary least squares regression along with the other continuous (eg, income) and categorical (eg, gender) variables as the predictors.

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable. The number of valid responses. Responses were coded as willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine (1 = definitely will not; 2 = probably will not; 3 = not sure; 4 = probably will; 5 = definitely will). The respective percentage of participants who selected either “definitely will” or “probably will” on the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance measure. Abbreviation: NA, not applicable. Results of ordinary least squares regression. Results of 3 bootstrap mediation analyses. Gender, income, or education was used respectively as the independent variable, vaccine knowledge ratings as the mediator, and willingness to vaccinate as the dependent variable. The other sociodemographic variables were included as covariates. Age was a continuous variable, which was included in the ordinary least squares regression along with the other continuous (eg, income) and categorical (eg, gender) variables as the predictors. Those not yet willing to be vaccinated indicated that they would receive the vaccine when a mean of 64% (SD, 22%) of the general public had been vaccinated. This ratio was significantly lower if the reference group was “people you personally know” (54%; SD, 29.9%; F1,1539 = 67.67; P < .001).

Discussion

In this survey study of Chinese adults, we found that women and individuals with lower incomes or education levels indicated that they were less willing to be vaccinated. Vaccine knowledge mediated the latter 2 associations. Individuals who were not yet willing to receive the vaccine took account of vaccination behaviors of others, particularly socially proximal others, in deciding when they would receive vaccination. Adding to a growing stream of research,[4,5] these findings highlight the need to address disparities in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across demographic segments and suggest that health policies for improving vaccination should consider leveraging vaccine knowledge dissemination and social influence. Finally, our research focused on China, the world’s most populous nation. However, the extent to which the results are generalizable to other regions requires further investigation.
  3 in total

1.  Association of Race/Ethnicity With Likeliness of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Health Workers and the General Population in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Authors:  Kevin Grumbach; Timothy Judson; Manisha Desai; Vivek Jain; Christina Lindan; Sarah B Doernberg; Marisa Holubar
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.

Authors:  Ensheng Dong; Hongru Du; Lauren Gardner
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Lazarus; Scott C Ratzan; Adam Palayew; Lawrence O Gostin; Heidi J Larson; Kenneth Rabin; Spencer Kimball; Ayman El-Mohandes
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 53.440

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Willingness to share contacts in case of COVID-19 positivity-predictors of collaboration resistance in a nation-wide Italian survey.

Authors:  Boris Bikbov; Mauro Tettamanti; Alexander Bikbov; Barbara D'Avanzo; Alessia Antonella Galbussera; Alessandro Nobili; Gemma Calamandrei; Valentina Candini; Fabrizio Starace; Cristina Zarbo; Giovanni de Girolamo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.