Literature DB >> 3597677

Comparison of the logistic and Cox regression models when outcome is determined in all patients after a fixed period of time.

P Peduzzi, T Holford, K Detre, Y K Chan.   

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of the logistic and Cox regression models for a prospective study when the outcome is binary and is determined in all patients after a fixed period of time. The similarities and differences between the regression coefficients and test statistics are given for the two-sample case. Extension of results to the multivariate case and under product binomial sampling are discussed. The results are illustrated using data from a clinical trial designed to evaluate the effect of a lipid lowering drug on progression of coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3597677     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90127-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chronic Dis        ISSN: 0021-9681


  6 in total

1.  Validation of genetic associations with acute GVHD and nonrelapse mortality in DISCOVeRY-BMT.

Authors:  Hancong Tang; Theresa Hahn; Ezgi Karaesmen; Abbas A Rizvi; Junke Wang; Sophie Paczesny; Tao Wang; Leah Preus; Qianqian Zhu; Yiwen Wang; Christopher A Haiman; Daniel Stram; Loreall Pooler; Xin Sheng; David Van Den Berg; Guy Brock; Amy Webb; Marcelo C Pasquini; Philip L McCarthy; Stephen R Spellman; Lara E Sucheston-Campbell
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-08-13

2.  Association of coffee consumption and CYP1A2 polymorphism with risk of impaired fasting glucose in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Paolo Palatini; Elisabetta Benetti; Lucio Mos; Guido Garavelli; Adriano Mazzer; Susanna Cozzio; Claudio Fania; Edoardo Casiglia
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  A comparison of Cox and logistic regression for use in genome-wide association studies of cohort and case-cohort design.

Authors:  James R Staley; Edmund Jones; Stephen Kaptoge; Adam S Butterworth; Michael J Sweeting; Angela M Wood; Joanna M M Howson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Statistical methods for dementia risk prediction and recommendations for future work: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jantje Goerdten; Iva Čukić; Samuel O Danso; Isabelle Carrière; Graciela Muniz-Terrera
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2019-10-08

5.  An empirical analysis of dealing with patients who are lost to follow-up when developing prognostic models using a cohort design.

Authors:  Jenna M Reps; Peter Rijnbeek; Alana Cuthbert; Patrick B Ryan; Nicole Pratt; Martijn Schuemie
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Implications of analysing time-to-event outcomes as binary in meta-analysis: empirical evidence from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Theodosia Salika; Rebecca M Turner; David Fisher; Jayne F Tierney; Ian R White
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.