Literature DB >> 35976400

Diagnostic performance of the 2021 Korean thyroid imaging reporting and data system in pediatric thyroid nodules.

Pyeong Hwa Kim1, Hee Mang Yoon2, Jung Hwan Baek3, Sae Rom Chung1, Young Jun Choi1, Jeong Hyun Lee1, Jin Seong Lee1, Ah Young Jung1, Young Ah Cho1, Boram Bak4, Dong Gyu Na5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 2021 K-TIRADS biopsy criteria for detecting malignant thyroid nodules in a pediatric population, making comparisons with 2016 K-TIRADS.
METHODS: This retrospective study included pediatric patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses. The diagnostic performance of 2021 K-TIRADS was compared with that of 2016 K-TIRADS. Simulation studies were performed by changing biopsy cut-off sizes for K-TIRADS 5 to 1.0 cm (K-TIRADS5-1.0cm) and 0.5 cm (K-TIRADS5-0.5cm), and for K-TIRADS 4 to 1.0 cm (K-TIRADS4-1.0cm) and 1.0-1.5 cm (K-TIRADS4-1.0~1.5cm). Subgroup analysis was performed in small (< 1.5 cm) and large nodules (≥ 1.5 cm).
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven thyroid nodules (54.9% malignant) from 221 pediatric patients were analyzed. All simulated 2021 K-TIRADS showed higher accuracy than 2016 K-TIRADS. Compared with 2021 K-TIRADS5-1.0cm, 2021 K-TIRADS5-0.5cm showed lower specificity (51.6% vs. 47.9%; p = 0.004) but higher sensitivity (77.2% vs. 90.3%; p < 0.001) and accuracy (62.7% vs. 68.9%; p < 0.001). Compared with 2021 K-TIRADS4-1.0cm, 2021 K-TIRADS4-1.0~1.5cm showed higher specificity (44.9% vs. 47.9%; p = 0.018) without significant difference in other diagnostic measures. Compared with 2016 K-TIRADS, 2021 K-TIRADS (biopsy cut-offs, 0.5 cm for K-TIRADS 5; 1.0-1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4) showed higher sensitivity (34.0% vs. 67.3%; p < 0.001) while maintaining specificity (89.4% vs. 88.2%; p = 0.790) in small nodules, and higher specificity (5.9% vs. 25.4%; p < 0.001) while maintaining sensitivity (100% vs. 98.7%; p = 0.132) in large nodules.
CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients, 2021 K-TIRADS showed superior diagnostic accuracy to 2016 K-TIRADS, especially with a biopsy cut-off of 0.5 cm for K-TIRADS 5 and 1.0-1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4. KEY POINTS: • All simulated 2021 K-TIRADS showed higher accuracy than 2016 K-TIRADS. • 2021 K-TIRADS with cut-off size for K-TIRADS 5 of 0.5 cm showed lower specificity but higher sensitivity and accuracy than that of 1.0 cm. • Compared with 2016 K-TIRADS, 2021 K-TIRADS (biopsy cut-offs, 0.5 cm for K-TIRADS 5; 1.0-1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4) showed higher sensitivity while maintaining specificity in small nodules, and higher specificity while maintaining sensitivity in large nodules.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Pediatrics; Thyroid; Thyroid neoplasm; Ultrasonography

Year:  2022        PMID: 35976400     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09037-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  1 in total

1.  Is the UICC/AJCC classification of primary tumor in childhood thyroid carcinoma valid?

Authors:  J Farahati; C Reiners; E P Demidchik
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.057

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.