Literature DB >> 35974830

Crystal structure of (2E)-1-(4-eth-oxy-phen-yl)-3-(4-fluoro-phen-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

Merle Bernhard1, Jacob C Lutter2, Allison Predecki1.   

Abstract

The title mol-ecule, C17H15FO2, was synthesized by a Claisen-Schmidt condensation with 4-fluoro-benzaldehyde and 4'-eth-oxy-aceto-phenone. The torsion angles between the 4-fluoro-phenyl ring and the alkene and the 4'-eth-oxy-phenyl ring and the 2-propen-1-one are -1.2 (4) and 1.2 (3)°, respectively; however, there is a larger torsion between the bonds comprising the 2-propen-1-one unit of 12.0 (4)°. The crystal packing is stabilized by inter-molecular C-H⋯O/F hydrogen bonding, π-π stacking, and H-π inter-actions. © Bernhard et al. 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4 and 4′ substitution; chalcones; conjugated torsions; crystal structure

Year:  2022        PMID: 35974830      PMCID: PMC9361380          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989022007423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Chalcones are a group of 1,3-diaryl-2-propen-1-one compounds that have been found to exhibit a wide variety of biological activity including anti­cancer, anti­microbial and anti-inflammatory properties (Sahu et al., 2012 ▸). Chalcones are also important starting materials for the synthesis of several pharmacologically inter­esting classes of heterocyclic compounds such as isoxazoles, pyrazolines and pyrazoles (Kamal et al., 2019 ▸). In our research involving the synthesis of chalcone derivatives, we have synthesized and obtained an X-ray structure for the title compound, C17H15FO2, 2(E)-1-(4-eth­oxy­phen­yl)-3-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-2-propen-1-one.

Structural commentary

This chalcone has aromatic rings with substitutions in the 4 position on both ends of the mol­ecule, where the phenyl on the alkene is fluorinated, and the phenyl on the carbonyl contains an ethoxide (Fig. 1 ▸). Both phenyl rings are inclined towards the same side of the mol­ecule thanks to the E geometry of the chalcone’s alkene. The compound is a heavily π-conjugated structure that is nearly planar. To measure the deviation from planarity, three torsion angles were examined. The angles involving the aromatic rings are nearly identical with little bend, where the torsion between the C8—C7 and C5—C4 bonds is −1.2 (4)°, and the torsion between the C8—C9 and C15—C10 bonds is 1.2 (3)°. However, the torsion angle of the chalcone between the O1—C9 and C7—C8 bonds is 12.0 (4)°, indicating a break in planarity. This single deviation causes a slight concave bend in the mol­ecule. The title compound crystallized as a racemic mixture in the space group Pca21; thus, a clockwise and anti­clockwise torsion of the chalcone are present with a 1:1 ratio in the unit cell.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of 2(E)-1-(4-eth­oxy­phen­yl)-3-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-2-propen-1-one. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

There are several other chalcones with a comparable 4 and 4′ set of substitutions that are summarized in Table 1 ▸ from a CSD database search. If the halogen (–X) is maintained as a fluorine, the other substituent (–R) varies as either a methyl, hydroxyl, meth­oxy, or eth­oxy group. Examination of the three torsion angles described above suggests that there is a trend in the degree of distortion from planarity, with an order of methyl, meth­oxy, eth­oxy, to hy­droxy by increasing planarity. While there are no direct examples that contain a halogen and an eth­oxy, we felt comparison of our compound to the nearest chloro- and bromo-substituted compounds was warranted. The closest examples are a bromo/meth­oxy and a chloro/meth­oxy 4,4′ -substituted chalcone. Both cases are more distorted from planar than our fluoro/eth­oxy chalcone. Lastly, we found a set of chalcones with an eth­oxy substituent, where there are chlorine atoms in the 2 and 3 position of the respective phenyl ring. Both of these cases are more planar than our chalcone.
Table 1

Torsions of 4,4′ substituted chalcones (°)

All torsions were measured in Mercury (v2020.2.0; Macrae et al., 2020 ▸), with the exception of the torsion angles from this work, which were calculated using the CONF command of SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸).

EntryX R Carbon­yl–alkene torsionAr­yl–alkene torsionAr­yl–carbonyl torsionSpace groupCCDC Dep. No.
1FMe18.7712.6913.71 P21/c 660304 a
2FOH2.410.996.18 P 2184323 b
3FOMe18.9511.502.92 Pbca 738291 c
4FOEt12.001.201.20 Pca21 This work
5ClOMe16.383.7825.77 Pbca 2070477 d
6BrOMe16.426.4324.69 Pc 2062759 e
72-ClOEt5.164.470.44 P 1550212 f
83-ClOEt0.860.932.60 P 1587066 f

Notes: (a) Butcher et al. (2007 ▸); (b) Sobolev et al. (2022 ▸); (c) Zhao et al. (2009 ▸); (d) Whitwood et al. (2021 ▸); (e) Wilhelm et al. (2022 ▸); (f) Harshitha et al. (2018 ▸).

Supra­molecular features

2(E)-1-(4-Eth­oxy­phen­yl)-3-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-2-propen-1-one crystallizes in the ortho­rhom­bic space group Pca21, with four mol­ecules occupying one unit cell. The mol­ecules pack using hydrogen bonding, π–π stacking, and H–π inter­actions (Figs. 2 ▸, 3 ▸, 4 ▸). There are four hydrogen bonds (Table 2 ▸) that inter­connect each mol­ecule to three of its neighbors. The first is between the C3—H3 bond and an adjacent F1 atom, the second pairs the C5—H5 bond and a nearby O1 atom, and the final two involve the C14—H14 and C16—H16A bonds with a neighboring O1 atom. Given the extent of conjugated π bonds throughout this mol­ecule, π–π stacking is present between adjacent mol­ecules along the a axis [centroid–centroid distance = 4.240 Å], with alternating mol­ecules related by the a glide plane of the Pca21 space group; this orients these mol­ecules such that adjacent mol­ecules are mirror images of one another with opposing chalcone bond torsions. Lastly, there are H–π inter­actions present between H17A and the aromatic ring comprised of C1–C6, as well as between H17C and this same ring on another mol­ecule, forming a chain of inter­actions that parallel the a axis.
Figure 2

Packing of the title compound viewed along the a axis. Hydrogen bonds and H–π bonds are shown as blue lines.

Figure 3

Packing of the title compound viewed along the b axis. Hydrogen bonds and H–π bonds are shown as blue lines.

Figure 4

Packing of the title compound viewed along the c axis. Hydrogen bonds and H–π bonds are shown as blue lines.

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Two hydrogen bonds were found automatically by SHELXL; including the C14—H14 and O1, and C16—H16A and O1 donor–acceptor pairs. The remaining two pairs were identified by inspection.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3⋯F1i 0.952.603.345 (3)136
C5—H5⋯O1ii 0.952.703.544 (3)149
C14—H14⋯O1iii 0.952.463.295 (3)146
C16—H16A⋯O1iii 0.992.603.470 (3)146

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

In comparison to the other chalcones described in Table 1 ▸, our structure packs in a unique space group Pca21, where many others pack in Pbca or P . Common themes that appear among these structures include π–π stacking and hydrogen bonding to the carbonyl oxygen. However, it is inter­esting to note that the chloro/meth­oxy and bromo/meth­oxy analogs pack with π–π stacking where the mol­ecules are mirror images from a plane that is colinear with the mol­ecular mean plane, rather than images related to a plane that is orthogonal to the mol­ecular mean plane as observed in our structure. Also, in the case where the –R substituent is a hydroxide, hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl group and and the carbonyl oxygen dominates the packing.

Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.43, update March 2022; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for 4,4′-phenyl-substituted chalcones resulted in multiple hits. Most closely related to the title compound are three 4-fluoro­phenyl-substituted chalcones: (E)-3-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-1-(4-methyl­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Butcher et al., 2007 ▸), (E)-3-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-1-(4-hydro­yxlphen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Sobolev et al., 2022 ▸), (E)-3-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-1-(4-meth­oxy­lphen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Zhao et al., 2009 ▸). Additionally, two 4′-meth­oxy-susbstituted compounds with 4-chloro or bromo­phenyl substitution were found, (E)-3-(4-chloro­phen­yl)-1-(4-meth­oxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Whitwood et al., 2021 ▸) and (E)-3-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-1-(4-meth­oxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Wilhelm et al., 2022 ▸). Two 4′-eth­oxy-substituted compounds were also found, (E)-3-(2-chloro­phen­yl)-1-(4-eth­oxy­lphen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Harshitha et al., 2018 ▸) and (E)-3-(3-chloro­phen­yl)-1-(4-eth­oxy­lphen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Harsh­itha et al., 2018 ▸). See Table 1 ▸ for relevant data from these structures.

Synthesis and crystallization

4-Fluoro­benzaldehyde (3 mmol) and 4-eth­oxy­aceto­phenone (3 mmol) were mixed in 95% EtOH (2.5 mL). An aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (0.3 mL, 15 mM) was added to the mixture dropwise. The mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 45 min. Cold distilled H2O (4 mL) was added and the mixture was cooled in an ice bath before isolating the solid product by vacuum filtration. The chalcone was purified by recrystallization with di­chloro­methane/hexane (4:1) to yield colorless crystals (77% yield). High-quality crystals for diffraction were grown from slow evaporation of 190 proof ethanol at room temperature, m.p. 392–394 K; IR (ATR) ν max 3067, 2936, 1653, 1596, 1572, 1504, 1157, 1033 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J = 5.5, 3.2 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C{1H} NMR (100MHz, CDCl3) δ 188.4, 163.5, 163.9 (d, 1 J C–F = 252.1 Hz), 142.6, 131.3 (d, 4 J C–F = 2.9 Hz), 131.0, 130.8, 130.2 (d, 3 J C–F = 8.6 Hz), 121.5 (d, 6 J C–F = 1.9 Hz), 116.0 (d, 2 J C–F = 22.0 Hz), 113.8, 55.5 ppm. 1H NMR data have previously been reported (Liu et al., 2001 ▸).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. Hydrogen atoms were generated using a riding model with geometric constraints and refined isotropically. Aromatic C—H distances are 0.95 Å, methyl­ene C—H distances are 0.99 Å, and methyl C—H distances are 0.98 Å. U iso(H) was 1.2 times U eq(C) for aromatic and methyl­ene hydrogen atoms, and 1.5 times U eq(C) for methyl hydrogen atoms. There is minor whole mol­ecule disorder visible in the residual peaks that was not refined since these peaks are rather small (< 0.26 e Å−3) and there was little improvement in the model.
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC17H15FO2
M r 270.29
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P c a21
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)7.1426 (4), 17.0566 (9), 11.1520 (6)
V3)1358.63 (13)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.24 × 0.11 × 0.11
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)’
T min, T max 0.691, 0.745
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections23454, 2438, 2365
R int 0.061
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.603
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.039, 0.104, 1.10
No. of reflections2438
No. of parameters182
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.27, −0.17

Computer programs: APEX4 (Bruker, 2021 ▸), SAINT (Bruker, 2002 ▸), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989022007423/zl5033sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989022007423/zl5033Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989022007423/zl5033Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 2191384 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C17H15FO2Dx = 1.321 Mg m3
Mr = 270.29Melting point = 119–121 K
Orthorhombic, Pca21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.1426 (4) ÅCell parameters from 7611 reflections
b = 17.0566 (9) Åθ = 3.1–25.3°
c = 11.1520 (6) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
V = 1358.63 (13) Å3T = 100 K
Z = 4Block, colorless
F(000) = 5680.24 × 0.11 × 0.11 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer2365 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.061
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)'θmax = 25.4°, θmin = 2.4°
Tmin = 0.691, Tmax = 0.745h = −8→8
23454 measured reflectionsk = −20→20
2438 independent reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.104H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.069P)2 + 0.1828P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2438 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
182 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. There is a minor disordered component visible in the residual peaks that is not refined, since there is little improvement in the model.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F10.4847 (3)0.00701 (11)0.7445 (2)0.0476 (6)
O10.3123 (3)0.37163 (10)0.25635 (16)0.0242 (4)
O20.3964 (2)0.71755 (10)0.44972 (18)0.0227 (4)
C10.4610 (4)0.06802 (16)0.6686 (3)0.0326 (7)
C20.4545 (4)0.05380 (16)0.5477 (3)0.0301 (6)
H20.4653890.0019570.5173280.036*
C30.4316 (4)0.11687 (16)0.4708 (3)0.0257 (6)
H30.4267260.1079930.3867210.031*
C40.4154 (3)0.19357 (15)0.5148 (2)0.0205 (6)
C50.4225 (4)0.20530 (15)0.6394 (2)0.0220 (6)
H50.4107140.2567680.6710750.026*
C60.4464 (4)0.14242 (17)0.7165 (3)0.0301 (6)
H60.4525420.1503260.8006920.036*
C70.3907 (3)0.25841 (15)0.4307 (2)0.0208 (6)
H70.3900570.2449650.3480200.025*
C80.3692 (4)0.33370 (14)0.4560 (2)0.0199 (5)
H80.3696960.3502000.5374010.024*
C90.3442 (3)0.39260 (15)0.3600 (2)0.0185 (5)
C100.3596 (3)0.47712 (15)0.3897 (2)0.0179 (5)
C110.3348 (4)0.53263 (15)0.2981 (2)0.0211 (5)
H110.3090410.5151910.2188990.025*
C120.3470 (3)0.61131 (15)0.3206 (2)0.0225 (6)
H120.3287450.6477400.2571900.027*
C130.3862 (3)0.63855 (14)0.4366 (2)0.0195 (6)
C140.4132 (3)0.58453 (15)0.5286 (2)0.0192 (5)
H140.4403820.6021460.6075280.023*
C150.4002 (4)0.50479 (15)0.5046 (2)0.0198 (5)
H150.4193620.4683000.5678160.024*
C160.4192 (4)0.74662 (15)0.5705 (3)0.0236 (6)
H16A0.5369210.7263160.6055900.028*
H16B0.3134460.7291850.6212920.028*
C170.4247 (4)0.83493 (15)0.5646 (3)0.0264 (6)
H17A0.5402140.8517240.5247860.040*
H17B0.4209360.8564640.6460470.040*
H17C0.3163960.8539910.5191790.040*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F10.0811 (15)0.0254 (9)0.0364 (10)0.0047 (9)−0.0034 (10)0.0135 (8)
O10.0317 (10)0.0254 (9)0.0156 (9)−0.0012 (7)0.0005 (8)−0.0020 (8)
O20.0303 (10)0.0174 (9)0.0204 (10)−0.0012 (7)−0.0030 (8)0.0031 (7)
C10.0432 (18)0.0207 (14)0.0338 (18)0.0018 (12)−0.0004 (13)0.0099 (13)
C20.0397 (15)0.0172 (12)0.0334 (16)0.0016 (11)0.0008 (13)−0.0019 (12)
C30.0283 (14)0.0233 (13)0.0256 (15)0.0002 (11)−0.0012 (11)−0.0040 (11)
C40.0185 (12)0.0206 (12)0.0225 (14)−0.0004 (9)−0.0001 (10)0.0007 (11)
C50.0281 (14)0.0191 (13)0.0190 (13)0.0004 (10)0.0017 (11)0.0002 (10)
C60.0391 (16)0.0305 (15)0.0208 (14)0.0000 (12)0.0007 (12)0.0009 (12)
C70.0221 (12)0.0237 (13)0.0166 (13)−0.0011 (10)0.0004 (10)−0.0002 (11)
C80.0234 (11)0.0211 (12)0.0153 (12)−0.0009 (10)0.0014 (10)−0.0016 (11)
C90.0157 (11)0.0237 (13)0.0161 (13)−0.0003 (9)0.0031 (9)0.0015 (10)
C100.0160 (11)0.0244 (13)0.0134 (12)−0.0005 (9)0.0025 (9)0.0022 (10)
C110.0234 (13)0.0275 (13)0.0125 (12)−0.0021 (10)−0.0020 (10)0.0023 (10)
C120.0257 (14)0.0239 (13)0.0181 (14)−0.0019 (10)−0.0040 (11)0.0060 (11)
C130.0191 (11)0.0193 (12)0.0200 (14)0.0001 (9)0.0010 (10)0.0021 (11)
C140.0227 (13)0.0227 (13)0.0121 (12)0.0010 (10)0.0000 (10)0.0002 (10)
C150.0215 (12)0.0222 (13)0.0158 (13)0.0020 (10)−0.0013 (10)0.0037 (10)
C160.0306 (13)0.0200 (13)0.0202 (13)−0.0007 (10)0.0029 (11)−0.0006 (11)
C170.0287 (13)0.0204 (13)0.0301 (15)0.0000 (10)0.0022 (12)−0.0021 (12)
F1—C11.352 (3)C8—H80.9500
O1—C91.231 (3)C9—C101.483 (3)
O2—C131.357 (3)C10—C151.396 (4)
O2—C161.444 (3)C10—C111.404 (3)
C1—C21.371 (5)C11—C121.368 (4)
C1—C61.381 (4)C11—H110.9500
C2—C31.385 (4)C12—C131.404 (4)
C2—H20.9500C12—H120.9500
C3—C41.402 (4)C13—C141.392 (3)
C3—H30.9500C14—C151.389 (4)
C4—C51.405 (4)C14—H140.9500
C4—C71.461 (4)C15—H150.9500
C5—C61.385 (4)C16—C171.508 (4)
C5—H50.9500C16—H16A0.9900
C6—H60.9500C16—H16B0.9900
C7—C81.324 (3)C17—H17A0.9800
C7—H70.9500C17—H17B0.9800
C8—C91.480 (3)C17—H17C0.9800
C13—O2—C16116.6 (2)C15—C10—C9123.3 (2)
F1—C1—C2118.9 (3)C11—C10—C9118.9 (2)
F1—C1—C6118.3 (3)C12—C11—C10121.3 (2)
C2—C1—C6122.7 (3)C12—C11—H11119.3
C1—C2—C3118.4 (3)C10—C11—H11119.3
C1—C2—H2120.8C11—C12—C13120.4 (2)
C3—C2—H2120.8C11—C12—H12119.8
C2—C3—C4121.2 (3)C13—C12—H12119.8
C2—C3—H3119.4O2—C13—C14124.8 (2)
C4—C3—H3119.4O2—C13—C12116.0 (2)
C3—C4—C5118.4 (2)C14—C13—C12119.2 (2)
C3—C4—C7119.4 (3)C15—C14—C13119.8 (2)
C5—C4—C7122.1 (3)C15—C14—H14120.1
C6—C5—C4120.5 (3)C13—C14—H14120.1
C6—C5—H5119.7C14—C15—C10121.4 (2)
C4—C5—H5119.7C14—C15—H15119.3
C1—C6—C5118.8 (3)C10—C15—H15119.3
C1—C6—H6120.6O2—C16—C17107.8 (2)
C5—C6—H6120.6O2—C16—H16A110.2
C8—C7—C4127.7 (3)C17—C16—H16A110.2
C8—C7—H7116.2O2—C16—H16B110.2
C4—C7—H7116.2C17—C16—H16B110.2
C7—C8—C9121.2 (2)H16A—C16—H16B108.5
C7—C8—H8119.4C16—C17—H17A109.5
C9—C8—H8119.4C16—C17—H17B109.5
O1—C9—C8120.3 (2)H17A—C17—H17B109.5
O1—C9—C10120.4 (2)C16—C17—H17C109.5
C8—C9—C10119.3 (2)H17A—C17—H17C109.5
C15—C10—C11117.8 (2)H17B—C17—H17C109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3···F1i0.952.603.345 (3)136
C5—H5···O1ii0.952.703.544 (3)149
C14—H14···O1iii0.952.463.295 (3)146
C16—H16A···O1iii0.992.603.470 (3)146
  10 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Antimalarial alkoxylated and hydroxylated chalcones [corrected]: structure-activity relationship analysis.

Authors:  M Liu; P Wilairat; M L Go
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Exploring pharmacological significance of chalcone scaffold: a review.

Authors:  N K Sahu; S S Balbhadra; J Choudhary; D V Kohli
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  3-(4-Fluoro-phen-yl)-1-(4-methoxy-phen-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

Authors:  Pu-Su Zhao; Xian Wang; Huan-Mei Guo; Fang-Fang Jian
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-05-29

5.  Redetermination of dihydro-artemisinin at 103 (2) K.

Authors:  Jerry P Jasinski; Ray J Butcher; H S Yathirajan; B Narayana; T V Sreevidya
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2007-12-06

6.  Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination.

Authors:  Lennard Krause; Regine Herbst-Irmer; George M Sheldrick; Dietmar Stalke
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.304

7.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01

10.  Mercury 4.0: from visualization to analysis, design and prediction.

Authors:  Clare F Macrae; Ioana Sovago; Simon J Cottrell; Peter T A Galek; Patrick McCabe; Elna Pidcock; Michael Platings; Greg P Shields; Joanna S Stevens; Matthew Towler; Peter A Wood
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.304

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.