| Literature DB >> 35974406 |
Evelyn Acquah1, Samuel H Nyarko2, Ebenezer N K Boateng3, Kwamena Sekyi Dickson4, Isaac Yeboah Addo5, David Adzrago6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unskilled birth attendance is a major public health concern in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Existing studies are hardly focused on the socio-demographic correlates and geospatial distribution of unskilled birth attendance in Chad (a country in SSA), although the country has consistently been identified as having one of the highest prevalence of maternal and neonatal deaths in the world. This study aimed to analyse the socio-demographic correlates and geospatial distribution of unskilled birth attendance in Chad.Entities:
Keywords: Chad; Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS); Geospatial; Multilevel analysis; Public health; Social demography; Traditional birth attendance; Unskilled birth attendance
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35974406 PMCID: PMC9382725 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13972-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 4.135
Background characteristics and prevalence of unskilled birth attendants
| Variables | Frequency ( | Percentage | Proportion of unskilled birth attendants | X2 ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 27 (0.000) | |||
| 15–19 | 1152 | 10.7 | 58.1 | |
| 20–24 | 2365 | 22.0 | 60.4 | |
| 25–29 | 2822 | 26.3 | 62.3 | |
| 30–34 | 2085 | 19.4 | 61.9 | |
| 35–39 | 1411 | 13.1 | 63.9 | |
| 40–44 | 712 | 6.6 | 59.6 | |
| 45–49 | 197 | 1.9 | 59.6 | |
| | 1.1e + 03 (0.000) | |||
| No formal education | 7000 | 65.1 | 71.3 | |
| Primary | 2568 | 23.9 | 51.3 | |
| Secondary | 1113 | 10.4 | 27.2 | |
| Higher | 64 | 0.6 | 1.7 | |
| | 1.3e + 03 (0.000) | |||
| Poorest | 2215 | 20.6 | 71.1 | |
| Poorer | 2307 | 21.5 | 69.3 | |
| Middle | 2171 | 20.2 | 70.5 | |
| Richer | 2164 | 20.1 | 65.6 | |
| Richest | 1888 | 17.6 | 25.8 | |
| | 204 (0.000) | |||
| Never in a marital union | 135 | 1.2 | 28.8 | |
| Married | 8984 | 83.6 | 64.4 | |
| Cohabitation | 900 | 8.4 | 46.2 | |
| Widowed | 177 | 1.7 | 54.5 | |
| Divorced | 229 | 2.1 | 48.4 | |
| Separated | 320 | 3.0 | 52.9 | |
| | 10 (0.001) | |||
| Not working | 5053 | 47.0 | 62.7 | |
| Working | 5692 | 53.0 | 60.5 | |
| | 57 (0.000) | |||
| 1 | 1556 | 14.5 | 52.8 | |
| 2–3 | 2962 | 27.6 | 62.6 | |
| 4 + | 6227 | 57.9 | 63.2 | |
| | 945 (0.000) | |||
| No | 7741 | 72.0 | 70.2 | |
| Yes | 3004 | 28.0 | 39.1 | |
| | 55 (0.000) | |||
| Then | 8734 | 81.3 | 63.0 | |
| Later | 791 | 7.4 | 61.9 | |
| No more | 1220 | 11.3 | 50.6 | |
| | 937 (0.000) | |||
| Less than 4 | 7204 | 67.0 | 71.2 | |
| 4 or more | 3541 | 33.0 | 41.9 | |
| | 776 (0.000) | |||
| Low | 7004 | 65.2 | 70.7 | |
| Moderate | 466 | 4.3 | 56.7 | |
| High | 3275 | 30.5 | 42.6 | |
| | 1.3e + 03 (0.000) | |||
| Low | 4539 | 42.3 | 79.0 | |
| Moderate | 1917 | 17.8 | 59.7 | |
| High | 4289 | 39.9 | 43.9 | |
| | 1.2e + 03 (0.000) | |||
| Urban | 2124 | 19.8 | 29.8 | |
| Rural | 8621 | 80.2 | 61.5 | |
| 10,745 | 61.5 | |||
Multilevel analysis of unskilled birth attendance
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio | Odds Ratio | Odds Ratio | Odds Ratio | |
| | ||||
| 15–19 | Ref | Ref | ||
| 20–24 | 0.97(0.78, 1.21) | 0.98(0.79,1.22) | ||
| 25–29 | 0.93(0.73, 1.18) | 0.93(0.73,1.18) | ||
| 30–34 | 0.94(0.72, 1.23) | 0.95(0.73,1.25) | ||
| 35–39 | 1.02(0.77, 1.37) | 1.03(0.76,1.37) | ||
| 40–44 | 0.83(0.60, 1.16) | 0.84(0.60,1.17) | ||
| 45–49 | 1.09(0.67, 1.76) | 1.12(0.69,1.80) | ||
| | ||||
| No formal education | Ref | Ref | ||
| Primary | 0.70***(0.61,0.81) | 0.76***(0.65,0.88) | ||
| Secondary | 0.37***(0.29,0.46) | 0.43***(0.34,0.53) | ||
| Higher | 0.05**(0.01,0.37) | 0.06**(0.01,0.48) | ||
| | ||||
| Poorest | Ref | Ref | ||
| Poorer | 0.77**(0.65,0.92) | 0.74**(0.62,0.88) | ||
| Middle | 0.87(0.73,1.04) | 0.83*(0.69,0.99) | ||
| Richer | 0.65***(0.54,0.78) | 0.66***(0.55,0.79) | ||
| Richest | 0.28***(0.22,0.36) | 0.52***(0.40,0.68) | ||
| | ||||
| Never in a marital union | 0.65(0.35,1.19) | 0.66(0.36,1.21) | ||
| Married | Ref | Ref | ||
| Cohabitation | 0.52***(0.42,0.65) | 0.54***(0.43,0.67) | ||
| Widowed | 0.81(0.54,0.78) | 0.89(0.59,1.34) | ||
| Divorced | 0.88(0.62,1.26) | 0.91(0.63,1.29) | ||
| Separated | 0.78(0.56,1.09) | 0.83(0.60,1.16) | ||
| | ||||
| Not working | 1.04(0.91,1.17) | 1.03(0.91,1.17) | ||
| Working | Ref | Ref | ||
| | ||||
| 1 | 0.74**(0.58,0.92) | 0.73**(0.58,0.92) | ||
| 2–3 | 1.10(0.94,1.29) | 1.10(0.94,1.29) | ||
| 4 + | Ref | Ref | ||
| | ||||
| No | Ref | Ref | ||
| Yes | 0.68***(0.60,0.79) | 0.75***(0.65,0.86) | ||
| | ||||
| Then | Ref | Ref | ||
| Later | 1.11(0.89,1.38) | 1.12(0.89,1.40) | ||
| No more | 0.76*(0.63,0.91) | 0.79*(0.65, 0.95) | ||
| | ||||
| Less than 4 | Ref | Ref | ||
| 4 or more | 0.41***(0.37,0.47) | 0.44***(0.39,0.49) | ||
| | ||||
| Low | Ref | Ref | ||
| Moderate | 0.77(0.39,1.54) | 0.76(0.40,1.44) | ||
| High | 0.67**(0.48,0.94) | 0.83(0.60,1.16) | ||
| | ||||
| Low | 5.68***(4.23,7.64) | 3.03***(2.26,4.06) | ||
| Moderate | 1.84***(1.25,2.71) | 1.34(0.93,1.93) | ||
| High | Ref | Ref | ||
| | ||||
| Urban | 0.25***(0.17,0.37) | 0.35***(0.24,0.52) | ||
| Rural | Ref | Ref | ||
| PSU variance (95% CI) | 3.80(3.23, 4.45) | 1.81(1.50, 2.16) | 1.80(1.52, 2.14) | 1.56(1.31, 1.85) |
| ICC | 0.54 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.32 |
| LR Test | χ2 = 2928.09 p = 0.0000 | χ2 = 1178.42 p = 0.0000 | χ2 = 1450.46 p = 0.0000 | χ2 = 1140.80 p = 0.0000 |
| Wald Chi-square | 638.76 | 417.57 | 821.68 | |
| Model fitness | ||||
| Log-likelihood | -5416.36 | -5087.58 | -5237.75 | -5009.66 |
| BIC | 10,851.29 | 10,425.78 | 10,540.47 | 10,316.35 |
| AIC | 10,836.72 | 10,229.16 | 10,489.49 | 10,083.32 |
| N | 10,745 | 10,745 | 10,745 | 10,745 |
AIC Akaike’s information criterion, ICC intra-cluster correlation
Ref reference category *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001
Fig. 1Hotspot analysis of unskilled birth attendance in Chad. Source: Authors’ construct (2021)
Fig. 2Clusters and outliers of unskilled birth attendance in Chad. Source: Authors’ construct (2021)
Fig. 3Education GWR coefficient for predicting unskilled birth attendance in Chad. Source: Authors’ construct (2021)
Fig. 4Occupation GWR coefficient for predicting unskilled birth attendance in Chad. Source: Authors’ construct (2021)
Fig. 5Desire GWR coefficient for predicting unskilled birth attendance in Chad. Source: Authors’ construct (2021)
Fig. 6Birth order GWR coefficient for predicting unskilled birth attendance in Chad. Source: Authors’ construct (2021)
Fig. 7ANC GWR coefficient for predicting unskilled birth attendance in Chad. Source: Authors’ construct (2021)
Fig. 8Community literacy GWR coefficient for predicting unskilled birth attendance in Chad. Source: Authors’ construct (2021)