Literature DB >> 35974120

Positive, Negative, or Mixed Feelings? A Person-Centered Approach to Consequences of First Penile-Vaginal Intercourse in College Students.

Sara A Vasilenko1, Tracy L Walters2, Alyssa N Clark2, Eva S Lefkowitz2.   

Abstract

Many adolescents and young adults have mixed feelings about their experience of first vaginal intercourse, experiencing both positive consequences like physical satisfaction and love, as well as negative consequences like guilt and anxiety. However, no study has examined the patterns of consequences individuals experience after first vaginal intercourse, which can provide a more nuanced sense of young adults' feelings. We used latent class analysis to examine consequences of first vaginal intercourse in a longitudinal study of college students in the Northeastern United States (N = 191; 45.6% female, 30.9% White/European American, 23.6% Asian American/Pacific Islander, 22.5% Hispanic/Latino, 14.7% Black/African American, 8.4% multiracial). For male college students, classes included Multidimensional Positive (49.4%), Intimacy and Satisfaction (4.39%), and Guilt and Regret (16.22%). For female college students, classes included Intimacy, Satisfaction, and Pain (40.84%), Primarily Negative (31.11%), and Mixed Feelings (20.86%). For male students, age at first vaginal intercourse, first intercourse with a non-relationship partner, religiosity, and non-use of contraceptives were associated with class membership; for female students, first intercourse with a non-relationship partner was associated with being* in classes marked by multiple negative consequences. Findings differ by gender and are partially in line with the sexual double standard, but provide a more nuanced picture, with the majority of both male and female college students likely to report positive consequences, specifically intimacy and physical satisfaction.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consequences of sex; First sexual intercourse; Latent class analysis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35974120     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02379-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  32 in total

1.  The transition of adolescent males to first sexual intercourse: anticipated or delayed?

Authors:  Renata Forste; David W Haas
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

2.  Effect Size, Statistical Power and Sample Size Requirements for the Bootstrap Likelihood Ratio Test in Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  John J Dziak; Stephanie T Lanza; Xianming Tan
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.125

3.  A Sex-Positive Framework for Research on Adolescent Sexuality.

Authors:  K Paige Harden
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-09

4.  Sexual Hookup Culture: A Review.

Authors:  Justin R Garcia; Chris Reiber; Sean G Massey; Ann M Merriwether
Journal:  Rev Gen Psychol       Date:  2012-06-01

5.  A girl thing: perceptions concerning the word "hymen" among young Swedish women and men.

Authors:  Monica Christianson; Carola Eriksson
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  The Double Standard at Sexual Debut: Gender, Sexual Behavior and Adolescent Peer Acceptance.

Authors:  Derek A Kreager; Jeremy Staff; Robin Gauthier; Eva S Lefkowitz; Mark E Feinberg
Journal:  Sex Roles       Date:  2016-04-06

7.  Virginity lost, satisfaction gained? Physiological and psychological sexual satisfaction at heterosexual debut.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; James Trussell; Nelwyn B Moore; J Kenneth Davidson
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2010-07

8.  Young Swedish women's experience of pain and discomfort during sexual intercourse.

Authors:  Eva Elmerstig; Barbro Wijma; Katarina Swahnberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: a functional perspective.

Authors:  M L Cooper; C M Shapiro; A M Powers
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-12

Review 10.  Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research.

Authors:  Mary Crawford; Danielle Popp
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2003-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.