| Literature DB >> 35973992 |
Dongmei Zhang1,2,3, Yunzhen Zhou1,2, Yanan Ma1,2, Ping Jiang1,2, Hongchao Lv4, Sijia Liu5, Yu Mu1,2, Chong Zhou1,2, Shan Xiao1,2, Guohua Ji1, Peng Liu1, Ning Zhang1,2, Donglin Sun1,2, Haiming Sun1,2, Nan Wu6,7, Yan Jin8,9.
Abstract
Precision medicine in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relies on validated biomarkers that help subgroup patients for targeted treatment. Here, we identified a novel candidate oncogene, ribosomal protein L22-like1 (RPL22L1), which was markedly elevated in HCC, contributed to HCC malignancy and adverse patient survival. Functional studies indicated RPL22L1 overexpression accelerated cell proliferation, migration, invasion and sorafenib resistance. Mechanism studies revealed that RPL22L1 activated ERK to induce atypical epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) progress. Importantly, the ERK inhibitor (ERKi) could potentiate sorafenib efficiency in RPL22L1-high HCC cells. In summary, these data uncover RPL22L1 is a potential marker to guide precision therapy for utilizing ERKi to enhance the sorafenib efficacy in RPL22L1-high HCC patients.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35973992 PMCID: PMC9381560 DOI: 10.1038/s41420-022-01153-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Death Discov ISSN: 2058-7716
Fig. 1Expression and prognosis importance of RPL22L1 in HCC.
A RPL22L1 mRNA levels in HCC and non-tumorous tissues were compared through TCGA and 14 independent GEO data sets. B RT-PCR analysis of RPL22L1 mRNA in 9 paired clinical HCC and adjacent non-tumor tissues. C RPL22L1 mRNA expression during HCC progression from GSE6764 dataset. D RPL22L1 mRNA expression in different grades of HCC from TCGA-LIHC dataset. E Representative images and score statistics of RPL22L1 IHC staining in 90 paired HCC and adjacent tissues. Case 1–3 represented 3 HCC patients, respectively. Scale bars = 200 μm. Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to RPL22L1 expression in F TCGA-LIHC dataset and G TMA-HCC data (log-rank test). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Correlation between RPL22L1 expression and clinicopathological features of HCC in TMA.
| Factors | All cases | RPL22L1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low expression | High expression | ||||
| 0.116 | |||||
| Female | 16 | 9 (56.3%) | 7 (43.7%) | ||
| Male | 74 | 26 (35.1%) | 48 (64.9%) | ||
| 0.631 | |||||
| <52 | 46 | 19 (41.3%) | 27 (58.7%) | ||
| ≥52 | 44 | 16 (36.4%) | 28 (63.6%) | ||
| I/II | 58 | 27 (46.6%) | 31 (53.4%) | ||
| III | 32 | 8 (25.0%) | 24 (75.0%) | ||
| ≤5.6 | 54 | 27 (50.0%) | 27 (50.0%) | ||
| >5.6 | 36 | 8 (22.2%) | 28 (77.8%) | ||
| 0.098 | |||||
| I | 61 | 27 (44.3%) | 34 (55.7%) | ||
| II | 29 | 8 (27.6%) | 21 (72.4%) | ||
| 0.113 | |||||
| Negative | 37 | 18 (48.6%) | 19 (51.4%) | ||
| Positive | 53 | 17 (32.1%) | 36 (67.9%) | ||
| <400 | 57 | 28 (49.1%) | 29 (50.9%) | ||
| ≥400 | 33 | 7 (21.2%) | 26 (78.8%) | ||
aThe pearson chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of different prognosis factors in patients with HCC from TMA.
| Factors | Cases | Univariate analysisa | Multivariate analysisa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95%CI) | HR (95%CI) | |||||
| Total | 90 | |||||
| 3.940 (1.607–9.660) | 4.352 (1.282–14.775) | |||||
| Low expression | 35 | |||||
| High expression | 55 | |||||
| 1.687 (0.568–5.017) | 0.347 | |||||
| Female | 16 | |||||
| Male | 74 | |||||
| 1.444 (0.627–3.325) | 0.387 | |||||
| <52 | 46 | |||||
| ≥52 | 44 | |||||
| 0.758 (0.319–1.801) | 0.530 | |||||
| I/II | 58 | |||||
| III | 32 | |||||
| 2.138 (0.858–5.324) | 0.103 | 0.925 (0.274–3.123) | 0.900 | |||
| ≤5.6 | 54 | |||||
| >5.6 | 36 | |||||
| 3.094 (1.188–8.059) | 2.796 (0.780–10.026) | 0.115 | ||||
| I | 61 | |||||
| II | 29 | |||||
| 16.364 (5.686–47.096) | 19.316 (5.545–67.292) | |||||
| Negative | 37 | |||||
| Positive | 53 | |||||
| 2.222 (0.912–5.418) | 0.079 | 0.742 (0.215–2.563) | 0.637 | |||
| <400 | 57 | |||||
| ≥400 | 33 | |||||
aCox regression model.
bLog-rank test.
Fig. 2Biological function of RPL22L1 in HCC cells.
A RT-PCR and B western blot verified that two stable RPL22L1-overexpressed cell lines were successfully established. C MTS assay showed that RPL22L1 promoted cell viability. D Colony formation assay indicated RPL22L1 facilitated cell proliferation. E Flow cytometry demonstrated RPL22L1 accelerated cell cycle progression. F RPL22L1 promoted cell migration as measured by wound-healing assay. Scale bars = 500 μm. G Transwell migration and H invasion assays showed RPL22L1 motivated cell migration and invasion. Scale bars = 500 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 3RPL22L1 induces atypical EMT by ERK activation.
A Western blotting analysis of EMT-associated molecules in RPL22L1-overexpressed L02 and SMMC7721 cells. B Representative images of IHC staining in 80 HCC patients. Case 1 was a HCC patient with low RPL22L1 and case 2 was a patient with high RPL22L1. Scale bars = 200 μm. Spearman’s correlation was performed. C Western blotting analysis of MAPK pathway-related proteins in RPL22L1-overexpressed L02 and SMMC7721 cells. D Western blots showed the effect of ERKi on cells. E MTS assays showed dose-dependent effect of ERKi on cell viability. F Transwell assays showed the effect of ERKi on cell migration and invasion. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Student’s t-test. NS non-significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 4ERKi synergizes with sorafenib in RPL22L1-high cells.
A MTS assay showed dose-dependent effect of sorafenib on cell viability. IC50 values were calculated. B Colony formation of cells treated with different concentrations of sorafenib. Colony numbers were counted. C IC50 values of sorafenib combined different ERKi were determined by MTS assays. D MTS and E colony formation assays showed cell proliferative ability under treatment with sorafenib alone or combination with different ERKi at 8μmol concentration. F Transwell assays showed cell migration and invasion capability after treatment with sorafenib alone or combination with different ERKi. Scale bars = 500 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Student’s t-test. NS non-significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. G Western blots showed the effect of sorafenib alone or combination with different ERKi on cells. H Illustration depicted RPL22L1 modulating sorafenib sensitivity via activation of ERK, and the enhancement of sorafenib efficacy by combining with ERKi.