Literature DB >> 35973601

Policy considerations that support equitable access to responsible, accountable, safe, and ethical uses of psychedelic medicines.

Sean J Belouin1, Lynnette A Averill2, Jack E Henningfield3, Stephen N Xenakis4, Ingrid Donato5, Charles S Grob6, Ann Berger7, Veronica Magar8, Alicia L Danforth9, Brian T Anderson10.   

Abstract

There is mounting evidence suggesting psychedelic and entactogen medicines (namely psilocybin and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine [MDMA]), in conjunction with proper psychosocial support, hold the potential to provide safe, rapid acting, and robust clinical improvements with durable effects. In the US, both psilocybin and MDMA have been granted Breakthrough Therapy designations by the US Food and Drug Administration and may potentially receive full FDA approval with similar regulatory considerations occurring in multiple countries. At the same time, regulatory changes are poised to increase access to legal or decriminalized psychedelic use in various non-medical settings. This review provides a brief discussion on the historical use of psychedelic medicines, the status of the empirical evidence, and numerous significant policy considerations that must be thoughtfully addressed regarding standards-of-practice, consumer protection, engagement of communities, safeguarding access for all, and developing data standards, which supports the responsible, accountable, safe, and ethical uses of these medicines in clinical, faith-based, and other contexts. We provide suggestions for how public health and harm reduction can be supported through a public-private partnership that engages a community of stakeholders from various disciplines in the co-creation and dissemination of best practices and public policies. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hallucinogen; Harm reduction; MDMA; Policy; Psilocybin; Psychedelic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35973601      PMCID: PMC9536012          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropharmacology        ISSN: 0028-3908            Impact factor:   5.273


  30 in total

Review 1.  The abuse potential of medical psilocybin according to the 8 factors of the Controlled Substances Act.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Roland R Griffiths; Peter S Hendricks; Jack E Henningfield
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Toward Risk-Benefit Assessments in Psychedelic- and MDMA-Assisted Therapies.

Authors:  Mazdak M Bradberry; Natalie Gukasyan; Charles L Raison
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 25.911

Review 3.  Novel psychopharmacological therapies for psychiatric disorders: psilocybin and MDMA.

Authors:  Michael C Mithoefer; Charles S Grob; Timothy D Brewerton
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 27.083

Review 4.  Psychedelics: Where we are now, why we got here, what we must do.

Authors:  Sean J Belouin; Jack E Henningfield
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Ethical Concerns about Psilocybin Intellectual Property.

Authors:  Konstantin Gerber; Inti García Flores; Angela Christina Ruiz; Ismail Ali; Natalie Lyla Ginsberg; Eduardo E Schenberg
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-01-01

6.  The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Harvey A Whiteford; Alize J Ferrari; Louisa Degenhardt; Valery Feigin; Theo Vos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Schedule I drug laws on neuroscience research and treatment innovation.

Authors:  David J Nutt; Leslie A King; David E Nichols
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Serotonin toxicity of serotonergic psychedelics.

Authors:  Benjamin Malcolm; Kelan Thomas
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  MDMA-assisted therapy for severe PTSD: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mitchell; Michael Bogenschutz; Alia Lilienstein; Charlotte Harrison; Sarah Kleiman; Kelly Parker-Guilbert; Marcela Ot'alora G; Wael Garas; Casey Paleos; Ingmar Gorman; Christopher Nicholas; Michael Mithoefer; Shannon Carlin; Bruce Poulter; Ann Mithoefer; Sylvestre Quevedo; Gregory Wells; Sukhpreet S Klaire; Bessel van der Kolk; Keren Tzarfaty; Revital Amiaz; Ray Worthy; Scott Shannon; Joshua D Woolley; Cole Marta; Yevgeniy Gelfand; Emma Hapke; Simon Amar; Yair Wallach; Randall Brown; Scott Hamilton; Julie B Wang; Allison Coker; Rebecca Matthews; Alberdina de Boer; Berra Yazar-Klosinski; Amy Emerson; Rick Doblin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Determining value of Coordinated Registry Networks (CRNs): a case of transcatheter valve therapies.

Authors:  Gregory Pappas; Jesse Berlin; Erika Avila-Tang; John Carroll; Joseph Drozda; Douglas Dumont; Thomas Gross; Kathleen Hewitt; Ajay Kirtane; David Kong; Mitchell Krucoff; John Lashinger; Nellie Lew; Michael Mack; Fred Masoudi; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Roxanna Mehran; Sharon-Lise Normand; Elizabeth Quin; Fred Resnic; Art Sedrakyan; Ronald Waksman; Larry Wood; Changfu Wu; Tianay Ziegler
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2019-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.