Literature DB >> 35972969

Beyond the main function: An experimental study of the use of hardwood boomerangs in retouching activities.

Eva Francesca Martellotta1,2, Yinika L Perston1,2,3, Paul Craft4,5, Jayne Wilkins1,2,6, Michelle C Langley1,2.   

Abstract

Retouched lithic tools result from the functional modification of their edges following knapping operations. The study of the later stages of the reduction sequence is fundamental to understanding the techno-functional features of any toolkit. In Australia, a gap exists in the study of the chaîne opératoire of lithic tools shaped or re-shaped through percussion retouching. In our previous works (Martellotta EF., 2021, Martellotta EF., 2022), we have presented evidence for the use of hardwood boomerangs for retouching purposes in Australian Aboriginal communities. Through a detailed experimental protocol, the present study demonstrates how boomerangs can function as retouchers. We found that the use-wear generated on the boomerang's surface during retouch activity is comparable to retouch-induced impact traces observed on Palaeolithic bone retouchers, as well as to experimental bone retouchers generated in our replication experiments. Finally, we explore the role that microscopic lithic chips embedded in the retouchers' surface play in the formation process of retouching marks. Our results address the need for a deeper investigation of percussion retouching techniques in Australian contexts, opening the possibility that uncommon objects-such as boomerangs-could be used for this task. This concept also highlights the broader topic of the highly diverse multipurpose application of many Indigenous tools throughout Australia. At the same time, the study reveals a deep functional connection between osseous and wooden objects-a topic rarely investigated in archaeological contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35972969      PMCID: PMC9380927          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  9 in total

1.  Are osseous artefacts a window to perishable material culture? Implications of an unusually complex bone tool from the Late Pleistocene of East Timor.

Authors:  S O'Connor; G Robertson; K P Aplin
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.895

2.  The mechanical properties of bone.

Authors:  F G Evans
Journal:  Artif Limbs       Date:  1969

3.  Wooden tools and fire technology in the early Neanderthal site of Poggetti Vecchi (Italy).

Authors:  Biancamaria Aranguren; Anna Revedin; Nicola Amico; Fabio Cavulli; Gianna Giachi; Stefano Grimaldi; Nicola Macchioni; Fabio Santaniello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lower Paleolithic bone tools from the 'Spear Horizon' at Schöningen (Germany).

Authors:  Thijs Van Kolfschoten; Simon A Parfitt; Jordi Serangeli; Silvia M Bello
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  The earliest evidence for the use of human bone as a tool.

Authors:  C Verna; F d'Errico
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.895

6.  A 300,000-year-old throwing stick from Schöningen, northern Germany, documents the evolution of human hunting.

Authors:  Nicholas J Conard; Jordi Serangeli; Gerlinde Bigga; Veerle Rots
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Knapping tools in Magdalenian contexts: New evidence from Gough's Cave (Somerset, UK).

Authors:  Silvia M Bello; Lucile Crété; Julia Galway-Witham; Simon A Parfitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Discovery of circa 115,000-year-old bone retouchers at Lingjing, Henan, China.

Authors:  Luc Doyon; Zhanyang Li; Hao Li; Francesco d'Errico
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using bones to shape stones: MIS 9 bone retouchers at both edges of the Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  Ruth Blasco; Jordi Rosell; Felipe Cuartero; Josep Fernández Peris; Avi Gopher; Ran Barkai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.