Dear Editor,Since the onset of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic, the direct causative role of the virus in COVID‐19‐associated chilblains (CAC) has remained under question due to the low rate of positivity to SARS‐CoV‐2 nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and blood serology.
Likewise, the suspected pivotal pathogenic role of upregulation of interferon type I (IFN‐I) is mainly indirectly supported by assessment of in situ immune response.From April 2020 to January 2022, we prospectively assessed children and adults with new‐onset CAC seen in the dermatology, infectious diseases, and adult and paediatric emergency departments, as well as the intensive care unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier. The study was approved by the local institutional review board (ID: 202000442).Overall, 50 consecutive outpatients were seen, mostly white European and with a female predominance (sex ratio 1·5), a median age of 21 years (range 6–74) and a median body mass index of 19·8 kg m−2 (range 14·8–26·6). CAC involved the feet and the hands, respectively, in 86% and 66% of patients. Raynaud phenomenon, BASCULE syndrome (Bier anaemic spots, cyanosis, urticaria‐like eruption) and subungual splinter haemorrhages (Figure 1a) were present in 18%, 13% and 8%, respectively. Complete recovery, persistence and recurrence of CAC were noted, respectively, in 93% (median duration 12 weeks, range 1–30), 7% (12 months of follow‐up) and 42·9%.
Figure 1
(a) Examples of clinical manifestations of COVID‐19‐associated chilblains. Left to right: (i) typical chilblain pattern with circumscribed red macules and papules overlying the dorsal and distal phalanges of the toes; (ii) acral erythema pattern with well‐delineated symmetrical erythema and slight oedema located on the distal part of the toes; (iii) close‐up view of typical chilblains and Raynaud phenomenon of the distal phalanges of the toes; (iv) chilblains of the toes associated with BASCULE syndrome, characterized by Bier anaemic macules, cyanosis, and multiple irregular red‐orange macules (white arrows); (v) dilated capillaries and subungual splinter haemorrhages on the distal part of the nail plate. (b) Whole‐blood interferon (IFN) score and relative expression of the six interferon‐stimulated genes (ISGs) used for the IFN signature in healthy volunteers (HV; n = 24), a cohort of patients with COVID 19‐associated chilblains (CAC; n = 19), a cohort of critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in the intensive care unit (ICU; n = 72) and a cohort of nonhospitalized patients with nonsevere COVID‐19 (benign; n = 8). Relative quantification of ISGs was performed using the nCounter analysis system (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA). (c) Plasma ISG score (IFN signature). The cutoff value for positive IFN signature was > 3·2 (lower positive = 2·3–3·2, negative < 2·3). From left to right: patients with COVID 19‐associated chilblains (n = 19); nonhospitalized patients with nonsevere COVID‐19 without CAC (n = 8); and critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in the intensive care unit (n = 72). ISGs were analysed using restricted cubic splines and are displayed as continuous variables.
(a) Examples of clinical manifestations of COVID‐19‐associated chilblains. Left to right: (i) typical chilblain pattern with circumscribed red macules and papules overlying the dorsal and distal phalanges of the toes; (ii) acral erythema pattern with well‐delineated symmetrical erythema and slight oedema located on the distal part of the toes; (iii) close‐up view of typical chilblains and Raynaud phenomenon of the distal phalanges of the toes; (iv) chilblains of the toes associated with BASCULE syndrome, characterized by Bier anaemic macules, cyanosis, and multiple irregular red‐orange macules (white arrows); (v) dilated capillaries and subungual splinter haemorrhages on the distal part of the nail plate. (b) Whole‐blood interferon (IFN) score and relative expression of the six interferon‐stimulated genes (ISGs) used for the IFN signature in healthy volunteers (HV; n = 24), a cohort of patients with COVID 19‐associated chilblains (CAC; n = 19), a cohort of critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in the intensive care unit (ICU; n = 72) and a cohort of nonhospitalized patients with nonsevere COVID‐19 (benign; n = 8). Relative quantification of ISGs was performed using the nCounter analysis system (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA). (c) Plasma ISG score (IFN signature). The cutoff value for positive IFN signature was > 3·2 (lower positive = 2·3–3·2, negative < 2·3). From left to right: patients with COVID 19‐associated chilblains (n = 19); nonhospitalized patients with nonsevere COVID‐19 without CAC (n = 8); and critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in the intensive care unit (n = 72). ISGs were analysed using restricted cubic splines and are displayed as continuous variables.To assess the causal role of SARS‐CoV‐2 in CAC, we analysed SARS‐CoV‐2 real‐time PCR in nasopharyngeal swabs and SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG, IgM and/or IgA serologies that were positive, in 10% and 23% of cases, respectively. Neutralizing antibody response using microneutralization assay was present in one case of isolated IgA antibodies. Serum SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid antigen detection was positive in 13%. Given all the virological tests, formal proof of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection could be established in 22% of patients, including 32% of children and 18% of adults. Using multivariate analysis, the comparison of the pertinent clinical, histologic and biologic characteristics of the patients with and without virologically proven SARS‐CoV‐2 infection was not significantly discriminating.In total, 30 patients with CAC were assessed for whole‐blood interferon‐stimulated gene (ISG) expression, showing an increase of ISG compared with controls. To determine whether this ISG upregulation was different between CAC and other COVID‐19 phenotypes, we analysed available values of the ISG scores within the first 50 days after onset of infectious symptoms in the cohorts of patients with CAC (n = 19), patients with COVID in the intensive care unit (n = 72) and nonhospitalized patients with COVID‐19 and without CAC (n = 8). The latter group had COVID‐19 confirmed by real‐time PCR nasopharyngeal swab, and had a benign condition not requiring oxygenation, antibiotics, steroids or antiviral agents. The results are represented in Figure 1(b, c). In the CAC cohort, the first ISG measures at day 10 were similar to those of acute infection, and the overall kinetics revealed an identical shape compared with mild or severe COVID‐19, turning to normal values around day 20. Two of 47 patients had circulating anti‐IFN‐α2 antibodies above the cutoff (> 34 ng mL−1).In our series, the characteristics of CAC, including an overall balanced sex ratio, predominance of patients with low BMI, and clinical presentation and outcome, were broadly similar to those previously described.
,
We found significant high frequencies of Raynaud phenomenon, BASCULE syndrome and subungual splinter haemorrhages, possibly explained by the prospective study design and an absence of clinical details in some of the large series.The role of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection as a trigger of CAC has been widely debated due to the low levels of positive real‐time PCR nasopharyngeal and IgG serologies, which are within the ranges, respectively, of 5·5–13·3% and 7·2–11·8%.
,
In our series, by using a microneutralization assay for isolated IgA antibodies and serum SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid antigen detection, we found an overall virological confirmation of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in 22% of patients, including 32% in children. This latter result is consistent with the frequency of 30–37% of seroconversion observed in previous series of children with asymptomatic and/or mild SARS‐CoV‐2 infection during the acute and convalescent periods,
,
adding new arguments for a causative role of SARS‐CoV‐2 in CAC.We confirmed that IFN‐I signalling was increased in whole blood of patients with CAC but the kinetics of ISG over time were like those of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection without CAC. These results underscore the dynamics of systemic immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Yet, previous histopathological findings revealed that CAC comprise a highly lymphocytic inflammatory process with an IFN‐I microenvironment, as evidenced by extensive epidermal and dermal expression of MxA (myxovirus resistance protein) and pJAK1 (phosphorylated Janus kinase 1) in the endothelial cells and surrounding tissue, and rich presence of plasmacytoid dendritic cells.
,
Thus, if a pivotal role of IFN‐I should be envisaged in the pathogenesis of CAC, it may be rather through local tissue‐specific susceptibility to a physiological antiviral IFN‐I response than to systemic overexpression of ISGs after COVID‐19.
Authors: V Sánchez-García; R Hernández-Quiles; E de-Miguel-Balsa; A Docampo-Simón; I Belinchón-Romero; J M Ramos-Rincón Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 9.228
Authors: Lisa M Arkin; John J Moon; Jennifer M Tran; Samira Asgari; Cliona O'Farrelly; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Edward W Cowen; Jacqueline W Mays; Anne Marie Singh; Beth A Drolet Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Jeff R Gehlhausen; Alicia J Little; Christine J Ko; Marc Emmenegger; Carolina Lucas; Patrick Wong; Jon Klein; Peiwen Lu; Tianyang Mao; Jillian Jaycox; Eric Wang; Nelson Ugwu; Cate Muenker; Dilgash Mekael; Rhonda Q Klein; Robert Patrignelli; Richard Antaya; Jennifer McNiff; William Damsky; Kathy Kamath; John Shon; Aaron M Ring; Inci Yildirim; Saad Omer; Albert I Ko; Adriano Aguzzi; Akiko Iwasaki Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Zheng Quan Toh; Jeremy Anderson; Nadia Mazarakis; Melanie Neeland; Rachel A Higgins; Karin Rautenbacher; Kate Dohle; Jill Nguyen; Isabella Overmars; Celeste Donato; Sohinee Sarkar; Vanessa Clifford; Andrew Daley; Suellen Nicholson; Francesca L Mordant; Kanta Subbarao; David P Burgner; Nigel Curtis; Julie E Bines; Sarah McNab; Andrew C Steer; Kim Mulholland; Shidan Tosif; Nigel W Crawford; Daniel G Pellicci; Lien Anh Ha Do; Paul V Licciardi Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-03-01
Authors: Alfredo Tagarro; Francisco José Sanz-Santaeufemia; Carlos Grasa; Elena Cobos; Julia Yebra; Jose Antonio Alonso-Cadenas; Fernando Baquero-Artigao; Juan Miguel Mesa-Guzmán; Beatriz Pérez-Seoane; Cristina Calvo; María Luisa Herreros; Cristina Epalza; Susana Melendo; Sara Dominguez-Rodriguez; Paula Vidal; Mónica Pacheco; Alvaro Ballesteros; María Bernardino; Sara Villanueva-Medina; Paula Rodríguez-Molino; Sandra Miragaya Castro; Jacques Rivière; Rosa Garcés; Begoña Santiago; Victoria Fumadó; María Urretavizcaya-Martínez; María Luz García-García; María Penín; Fernando Cava; Elena Sáez; María Isabel Iglesias-Bouzas; Blanca Herrero; Teresa de Jesús Reinoso; Cinta Moraleda Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2021-09-25 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: C M Magro; J J Mulvey; J Laurence; S Sanders; A N Crowson; M Grossman; J Harp; G Nuovo Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 11.113