Literature DB >> 35971474

Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of Information in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Shared on YouTube.

Emre Anıl Özbek1, Mehmet Armangil2, Mustafa Onur Karaca1, Abdullah Merter1, Merve Dursun1, Hakan Kocaoğlu1.   

Abstract

Purpose  Most of the internet users search online on YouTube for their health problems and the treatments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality and the reliability of the videos on YouTube for Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods  The search was made by typing the keywords "Carpal tunnel syndrome" and/or "CTS" into the YouTube search engine, the first 50 videos on the first three pages of YouTube were evaluated. Of these videos, title, duration, number of views, days since uploaded, view ratio (view per day), number of likes, number of dislikes, video power index (VPI), video source, and video content data were recorded. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria were used to evaluate the reliability of videos, where the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Carpal tunnel syndrome-specific score (CTS-SS) were used to evaluate the quality of the videos. Results  The mean duration of the videos was 364.12 seconds (min 57, max 1,638) and the total duration of videos was 18,206 seconds. The mean number of views was 140,916.1 (min 10,543, max 1,271,040) and total number of views was 7,045,804. The mean JAMA score was 1.8 (min 1, max 4), the mean GQS was 2.72 (min 1, max 5), and the mean CTS-SS was 4.74 (min 1, max 14). There was no significant effect of video content on VPI, JAMA, GQS, or CTS-SS ( p >0.05). The JAMA, GQS, CT-SS scores of the videos from physicians and academic sources were significantly higher compared with other sources ( p <0.05). Conclusion  YouTube is one of the most frequently used resource for patients to get information about their diagnosis and treatment methods and it consists of videos with low reliability and quality for CTS. We believe that the creation of an internet-based information resource, which the patients can refer to is one of the current social responsibilities of the physicians and the academicians. Level of Evidence  This is a Level V study. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carpal tunnel syndrome; Internet; YouTube; education; quality; reliability

Year:  2021        PMID: 35971474      PMCID: PMC9375686          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wrist Surg        ISSN: 2163-3916


  16 in total

1.  Quality of information on the Internet about carpal tunnel syndrome: an update.

Authors:  Kevin Lutsky; Joseph Bernstein; Pedro Beredjiklian
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.

Authors:  W M Silberg; G D Lundberg; R A Musacchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A quality analysis of internet-based information on common hand pathology.

Authors:  Martin Kelly; Deirdre M Seoighe; Joseph F Baker; Jim Kennedy; Damien P Byrne; Kieran O'Shea
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Patient Resources for the Management of Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Rohit G Jayakar; Natalie L Leong; Michael P Leathers; Riley J Williams; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Comparing Diagnostic and Treatment Recommendations of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Available on the Internet With AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Jerrod Steimle; Speros Gabriel; Ryan Tarr; Brandon Kohrs; Patrick Johnston; David Martineau
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-01-17

6.  YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction.

Authors:  J T Cassidy; E Fitzgerald; E S Cassidy; M Cleary; D P Byrne; B M Devitt; J F Baker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The Influence of Cost Information on Treatment Choice: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Thompson Zhuang; Joost T P Kortlever; Lauren M Shapiro; Laurence Baker; Alex H S Harris; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Laura M Krivicich; Nikhil N Verma; Jorge Chahla
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Hyun Sik Gong; Jin Woo Park; Young Ho Shin; Kahyun Kim; Kwan Jae Cho; Goo Hyun Baek
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Matthew R Cohn; Connor Wakefield; Fadi Hamati; Robert F LaPrade; Brian Forsythe; Adam B Yanke; Jorge Chahla
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.