Literature DB >> 3597108

The gatekeeping funnel: tracking a major PSA campaign from distribution through gatekeepers to target audience.

S L Hammond, V S Freimuth, W Morrison.   

Abstract

This article presents the gatekeeping funnel as a model of the process that a public service announcement (PSA) goes through from distribution until it reaches its target audience. Process measures such as bounceback postcards, the Broadcast Advertisers Report (BAR), and analysis of audience response are suggested as ways of monitoring this funneling process. The model is then applied to the National Cancer Institute's PSA campaign designed to promote cancer prevention awareness. Three waves of PSAs were distributed between March 1984 and May 1985. Two of these waves of PSAs were targeted to the general public and the third wave was targeted to black audiences. Bounceback postcards, BAR data, and the Cancer Information Service (CIS) call data exemplify the gatekeeping funnel model described in the article. When the messages were distributed, they had the potential of reaching 170 million adults with televisions. BAR data show that the gatekeeping function narrowed the number of people potentially exposed to the messages to 24 million, or 14% of the total. Yet only 144,000 people, or less than one-tenth of 1% responded to the messages by calling the CIS number and asking about cancer prevention. This analysis may help PSA campaign planners to develop more realistic expectations for message effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3597108     DOI: 10.1177/109019818701400203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Q        ISSN: 0195-8402


  4 in total

1.  Past lessons and new uses of the mass media in reducing tobacco consumption.

Authors:  A C Erickson; J W McKenna; R M Romano
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Cancer prevention counseling on telephone helplines.

Authors:  D M Anderson; K Duffy; C D Hallett; A C Marcus
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Advertising health: the case for counter-ads.

Authors:  L Dorfman; L Wallack
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  A proposal for comprehensive newborn hearing screening to improve identification of deaf and hard-of-hearing children.

Authors:  A Eliot Shearer; Jun Shen; Sami Amr; Cynthia C Morton; Richard J Smith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 8.864

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.