Flavio Henrique Silveira Tomazi1, Ricardo Augusto Conci2, Claiton Heitz1, Pedro Yoshito Noritomi3, Luciane Macedo de Menezes1, Eduardo Martinelli Santayana de Lima1, Eduardo Rolim Teixeira4. 1. School of Health and Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Doo Sul, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Predio 06 Bairro: Partenon, Porto Alegre, RS, 90619-900, Brazil. 2. Department of Oral Surgery, State University of Western Parana, Cascavel, Parana, Brazil. 3. 3D Technologies Division, Renato Archer Technology Information Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. School of Health and Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Doo Sul, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Predio 06 Bairro: Partenon, Porto Alegre, RS, 90619-900, Brazil. eduardo.teixeira@pucrs.br.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It is known that a correct transverse maxillary dimension is a key factor for a stable occlusion, which brings functional and esthetic benefits for the patient. In patients presenting maxillary atresia and the completion of bone growth, a highly recommended option for correction is the surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) associated with the Hyrax appliance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of tooth anchorage variations of the Hyrax appliance in SARME through finite element analysis, evaluating which anchorage option might be associated with more effective orthopedic results with less undesired side effects. METHODS: Five different dental anchoring conditions for the Hyrax appliance were simulated through FE analysis applying premolars and molars as anchorage, having the same force applied by the activation of the Hyrax screw (0.5 mm) in all groups. The maxillary displacement results (axes X, Y, and Z) and generated stresses for both teeth and maxillary bone were calculated and represented using a color scale. RESULTS: All groups presented significant bone displacement and stress concentration on anchoring teeth, with the group presenting anchorage in the 1st and 2nd molars showing the greatest maxillary horizontal displacement (axis X) and suggesting the lowest tendency of dental vestibular inclination. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in dental anchorage might substantially affect the maxillary bone and teeth displacement outcome. The protocol for the Hyrax apparatus in SARME applying the 1st and 2nd molars as anchorage might generate less tilting and inclination of the anchoring teeth.
PURPOSE: It is known that a correct transverse maxillary dimension is a key factor for a stable occlusion, which brings functional and esthetic benefits for the patient. In patients presenting maxillary atresia and the completion of bone growth, a highly recommended option for correction is the surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) associated with the Hyrax appliance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of tooth anchorage variations of the Hyrax appliance in SARME through finite element analysis, evaluating which anchorage option might be associated with more effective orthopedic results with less undesired side effects. METHODS: Five different dental anchoring conditions for the Hyrax appliance were simulated through FE analysis applying premolars and molars as anchorage, having the same force applied by the activation of the Hyrax screw (0.5 mm) in all groups. The maxillary displacement results (axes X, Y, and Z) and generated stresses for both teeth and maxillary bone were calculated and represented using a color scale. RESULTS: All groups presented significant bone displacement and stress concentration on anchoring teeth, with the group presenting anchorage in the 1st and 2nd molars showing the greatest maxillary horizontal displacement (axis X) and suggesting the lowest tendency of dental vestibular inclination. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in dental anchorage might substantially affect the maxillary bone and teeth displacement outcome. The protocol for the Hyrax apparatus in SARME applying the 1st and 2nd molars as anchorage might generate less tilting and inclination of the anchoring teeth.