| Literature DB >> 35968374 |
Weimin Zheng1,2, Ling Wang1,2, Beining Yang1,2, Qian Chen3, Yongsheng Hu4, Jubao Du5, Xuejing Li6, Xin Chen1,2, Wen Qin7, Kuncheng Li1,2, Jie Lu1,2, Nan Chen1,2.
Abstract
The previous studies have found significant brain structural and functional changes in cerebral regions after spinal cord injury (SCI), but few studies have explored the cerebellar-cerebral circuit changes in SCI. This study aims to study the brain structural changes of cerebellar subregions and its functional connectivity (FC) changes with cerebrum in complete thoracolumbar SCI (CTSCI), and screen out the regions that play relatively important roles in affecting sensorimotor function. Eighteen CTSCI patients and 18 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to characterize the brain structural changes of cerebellar subregions [from the Anatomical Automatic Labeling (AAL116)], seed-based FC was used to evaluate the cerebellar-cerebral FC changes and support vector machine (SVM) analysis was used to search for sensitive imaging indicators. CTSCI patients showed slightly structural atrophy in vermis_3 (p = 0.046) and significantly decreased FC between cerebellum and cerebral sensorimotor-, visual-, cognitive-, and auditory-related regions (cluster-level FWE correction with p < 0.05). Additionally, SVM weight analysis showed that FC values between vermis_10 and right fusiform gyrus had the greatest weight in functional changes of CTSCI. In conclusion, different degrees of structural and functional changes occurred in each subregion of cerebellum following CTSCI, and FC change between vermis_10 and right fusiform gyrus plays the most important role in dysfunction and may become an important neural network index of rehabilitation therapy.Entities:
Keywords: cerebellar subregions; cerebral cortex; complete thoracolumbar spinal cord injury; functional connectivity; resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 35968374 PMCID: PMC9374132 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.914549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 5.152
Clinical data of 18 complete thoracolumbar spinal cord injury (CTSCI) patients and 18 healthy controls (HCs).
| CTSCI | HC |
| |
| Age | 48.5 ± 9.86 | 45.17 ± 10.35 | 0.963 |
| Gender (man/woman) | 16/2 | 16/2 | 1.000 |
| Etiology | 15 trauma/1 | − | − |
| Level of lesion | T6-L3 | − | − |
| ASIA | 18A | − | − |
| Time since injury (months) | 1-348 | − | − |
| Motor scores (0–100) | 50.72 ± 1.88 | − | − |
| Pinprick | 72.78 ± 9.07 | − | − |
| Light touch | 72.83 ± 9.11 | − | − |
| Sensory scores (0–224) | 145.61 ± 18.18 | − | − |
| VAS | 7.56 ± 2.19 | − | − |
The level of lesion refers to the neurological level. ASIA impairment scale: A: complete—no sensory or motor function is preserved in sacral segments S4–S5; B, incomplete—sensory but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level and extends through sacral segments S4-S5; C: incomplete—motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and more than half of the keymuscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of <3; D: incomplete—motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and at least half of the key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of >3. Sensory score: sum of segmental light touch and pinprick classifications. CTSCI, complete thoracolumbar spinal cord injury; HC, healthy control; M, month; ASIA, American Spinal Injury Association; VAS, visual analog scale.
FIGURE 1Anatomical automatic labeling (AAL) maps of the cerebellum and vermis subregions.
Regions of significant different connectivity between complete thoracolumbar spinal cord injury (CTSCI) patients and healthy controls (HCs).
| ROIs | Brain regions | Cluster voxels | MNI coordinates (mm) | Maximum Z | ||
| x | y | z | ||||
| Cbe1.L | PUT.R | 47 | 33 | 6 | 3 | −4.67 |
| Cbe2.L | ACG.L | 40 | −6 | 24 | 27 | −4.40 |
| Cbe3.L | CAL.R | 51 | 18 | −51 | 6 | −3.92 |
| FFG.L | 91 | −39 | −42 | −24 | −5.96 | |
| MOG.L | 157 | −48 | −81 | 6 | −5.23 | |
| MOG.R | 85 | 48 | −84 | 3 | −5.20 | |
| PoCG.L | 133 | −60 | −9 | 21 | −4.68 | |
| Cbe3.R | ITG.L | 97 | −51 | −48 | −12 | −4.92 |
| Cbe4-5.R | CAL.R | 76 | 24 | −60 | 12 | −4.44 |
| SOG.L | 63 | −15 | −90 | 33 | −4.77 | |
| SOG.R | 45 | 18 | −90 | 21 | −5.02 | |
| PHG.L | 63 | −30 | −6 | −24 | −5.07 | |
| STGp.R | 53 | 48 | 9 | −24 | −4.49 | |
| STG.L | 39 | −66 | −39 | 24 | −4.53 | |
| Cbe10.L | IFGtri.R | 102 | 48 | 36 | 0 | −5.32 |
| Ver3 | PreCG.R | 136 | 63 | −6 | 42 | −4.96 |
| Ver7 | ACG.L | 54 | 0 | 18 | 30 | −5.04 |
| Ver9 | SMA.R | 51 | 9 | 12 | 63 | −4.29 |
| Ver10 | FFG.R | 43 | 42 | −48 | −24 | −4.22 |
ROIs, regions of interest; CTSCI, complete thoracolumbar spinal cord injury; HC, healthy control; Cbe, cerebellum; Ver, vermis; PUT, Putamen; ACG, anterior cingulate gyrus; CAL, calcarine; FFG, fusiform; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; PoCG, postcentral gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; SOG, supra-occipital gyrus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; STGp, superior temporal pole; STG, superior temporal gyrus; IFGtri, trigonometric inferior frontal gyrus; PreCG, precentral gyrus; SMA, supplementary motor area; R, right; L, left.
FIGURE 2When all the cerebellar subregions were defined as ROIs, CTSCI patients showed significantly decreased FCs in the sensorimotor-, visual-, cognitive-, and auditory-related regions. ROI, regions of interests; CTSCI, complete thoracolumbar spinal cord injury; FC, functional connectivity; Cbe, cerebellum; Ver, vermis; PUT, Putamen; ACG, anterior cingulate gyrus; CAL, calcarine; FFG, fusiform; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; PoCG, postcentral gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; SOG, supra-occipital gyrus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; STGp, superior temporal pole; STG, superior temporal gyrus; IFGtri, trigonometric inferior frontal gyrus; PreCG, precentral gyrus; SMA, supplementary motor area; R, right; L, left.
FIGURE 3(A) Support vector machine (SVM) weight analysis was performed according to the predicted results to evaluate the impact of FC changes of each cerebellar subregion following CTSCI. The AUC value, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of this binary classification were 0.94, 93.33, 94.44, and 94.44%, respectively. (B) SVM weight analysis showed that the FC values between the vermis_10 and right fusiform gyrus had the greatest weight in the functional changes of CTSCI. FC, functional connectivity; CTSCI, complete thoracolumbar spinal cord injury; AUC, area under the curve; Cbe, cerebellum; Ver, vermis; PUT, Putamen; ACG, anterior cingulate gyrus; CAL, calcarine; FFG, fusiform; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; PoCG, postcentral gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; SOG, supra-occipital gyrus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; STGp, superior temporal pole; STG, superior temporal gyrus; IFGtri, trigonometric inferior frontal gyrus; PreCG, precentral gyrus; SMA, supplementary motor area; R, right; L, left.