| Literature DB >> 35968156 |
X Xue1,2,3, G Liu1, Q Tang2, H Shi2, D Wu2,3, C Jin2,3, H Zhao2,3, Y Wei1, Y Zhang2,3.
Abstract
To ensure the quality and safety of herbs, the content of 54 elements in MOUTAN CORTEX (MC) was determined by the ICP-AES and ICP-MS, and the health risks of Cu, As, Cd, Pb, Hg and rare earth elements (REEs) were assessed. These herbs were collected from 5 producing areas in Anhui Province, China, namely Wuhu, Tongling, Bozhou, Xuancheng and Chizhou. The multi-elements fingerprint identification of MC in Anhui Province was established. The total amount of macro-elements from Wuhu and Tongling is significantly lower than Bozhou. Among all MC from 5 producing areas, the highest content is Ca. Except for Bozhou, the content of macro-elements and REES in the other 4 origins of MC is from highest to lowest: Ca > K > Mg > Al > Fe > Na and Ce > La > Nd > Y > Pr > Er > Yb > Eu > Ho > Tb > Tm > Lu. The chemical forms of Cd in MC from Bozhou with the highest percentage were PH2O of high toxicity and migration, while the other 4 regions were PNaCl of low activity and mobility. There was a great difference in the content of inorganic elements and chemical forms of Cd between the MC produced from the plain (Bozhou) and the hilly areas (Wuhu, Tongling, Chizhou and Xuancheng). Except for Cd, the content of Cu, As, Pb and Hg in MC did not exceed the limit. The results of PTWIFact and ADI for Cd and REEs showed that MC herbs did not pose a risk to human health. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13762-022-04402-6.Entities:
Keywords: Cadmium; Element distribution; Heavy metals; MOUTAN CORTEX (MC); Producing area; Risk assessment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35968156 PMCID: PMC9361998 DOI: 10.1007/s13762-022-04402-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran) ISSN: 1735-1472 Impact factor: 3.519
Fig. 1Sampling locations in China
Method for extracting chemical forms of Cd
| Extraction step | Chemical form | Extracting agent | Extracted substance | Digestion conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inorganic (PEtOH) | 80% ethanol | Inorganic metals giving priority to nitrate, chloride and aminophenol metals | HNO3-to-H2O2 ratio: 4:1 |
| 2 | Water-soluble (PH2O) | Ultrapure water | Water-soluble metals associated with organic acids and M(H2PO4)2 | HNO3-to-H2O2 ratio: 4:1 |
| 3 | Pectate and protein-integrated (PNaCl) | 1 mol/L NaCl | Pectate and protein-integrated metals | HNO3-to-H2O2 ratio: 4:1 |
| 4 | Insoluble heavy metal phosphates (PHAc) | 2% acetic acid (HAc) | Insoluble MHPO4, M3(PO4)2 and other metal-phosphate complexes | HNO3-to-H2O2 ratio: 4:1 |
| 5 | Oxalate (PHCl) | 0.6 mol/L HCl | Metal-oxalate complexes | HNO3-to-H2O2 ratio: 4:1 |
| 6 | Residual form (PR) | – | Residues | 8mLHNO3 and 2mLH2O2 |
Fig. 2Multi-elements distribution fingerprint map of MC herbs (WH—Wuhu, TL—Tongling, XC—Xuancheng, CZ—Chizhou, BZ—Bozhou). Heavy metals and toxic elements are excluded
Analytical results of the macro-elements in MC herbs. Sum (a): The sum of the concentrations of all macro-elements
| 8 Elements | Macro-elements content (mg.kg−1 ± SD of the sampling sites, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhu | Tongling | Xuancheng | Chizhou | Bozhou | Mean | RSD% | |
| Ca | 9067 ± 2112 | 10,176 ± 1219 | 8370 ± 686 | 25,369 ± 2732 | 22,113 ± 7363 | 15,019 | 54 |
| K | 3728 ± 808 | 3364 ± 575 | 4363 ± 351 | 11,812 ± 1531 | 9841 ± 1828 | 6621 | 59 |
| Mg | 824 ± 138 | 882 ± 98 | 1288 ± 219 | 2132 ± 188 | 2832 ± 490 | 1591 | 55 |
| P | 805 ± 267 | 997 ± 460 | 1019 ± 103 | 2214 ± 223 | 2153 ± 573 | 1438 | 48 |
| S | 412 ± 62 | 435 ± 133 | 539 ± 70 | 1246 ± 108 | 1325 ± 314 | 791 | 57 |
| Al | 286 ± 105 | 350 ± 98 | 789 ± 205 | 1254 ± 219 | 1065 ± 305 | 749 | 57 |
| Fe | 170 ± 61 | 201 ± 53 | 452 ± 123 | 756 ± 129 | 744 ± 209 | 465 | 61 |
| Na | 111 ± 81 | 98 ± 29 | 109 ± 12 | 299 ± 23 | 890 ± 73 | 301 | 113 |
| Sum(a) | 15,401 | 16,503 | 16,929 | 45,081 | 40,963 | 26,976 | |
Analytical results of the rare earth elements in MC herbs. Sum(b): The sum of the concentrations of all rare earth elements
| 16 Elements | Rare earth element content (mg.kg−1 ± the sampling sites, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhu | Tongling | Xuancheng | Chizhou | Bozhou | Mean | RSD% | |
| Sc | 0.096 ± 0.04 | 0.133 ± 0.05 | 0.143 ± 0.05 | 0.081 ± 0.02 | 0.090 ± 0.05 | 0.109 | 25 |
| Y | 0.615 ± 0.34 | 0.380 ± 0.32 | 0.397 ± 0.10 | 0.350 ± 0.10 | 0.195 ± 0.07 | 0.387 | 39 |
| La | 1.210 ± 0.63 | 0.838 ± 0.69 | 1.010 ± 0.22 | 0.757 ± 0.14 | 0.340 ± 0.16 | 0.831 | 39 |
| Ce | 1.530 ± 0.85 | 1.147 ± 0.75 | 1.925 ± 0.39 | 1.008 ± 0.20 | 0.716 ± 0.34 | 1.265 | 37 |
| Pr | 0.218 ± 0.11 | 0.149 ± 0.12 | 0.201 ± 0.04 | 0.147 ± 0.03 | 0.079 ± 0.04 | 0.159 | 34 |
| Nd | 0.814 ± 0.40 | 0.565 ± 0.43 | 0.759 ± 0.16 | 0.568 ± 0.11 | 0.321 ± 0.14 | 0.605 | 32 |
| Sm | 0.155 ± 0.07 | 0.108 ± 0.08 | 0.144 ± 0.03 | 0.107 ± 0.02 | 0.067 ± 0.03 | 0.116 | 30 |
| Eu | 0.032 ± 0.02 | 0.018 ± 0.02 | 0.023 ± 0.01 | 0.014 ± 0 | 0.006 ± 0.01 | 0.019 | 52 |
| Gd | 0.162 ± 0.08 | 0.111 ± 0.09 | 0.139 ± 0.03 | 0.107 ± 0.02 | 0.066 ± 0.03 | 0.117 | 31 |
| Tb | 0.019 ± 0.01 | 0.012 ± 0.01 | 0.015 ± 0 | 0.011 ± 0 | 0.006 ± 0 | 0.012 | 37 |
| Dy | 0.106 ± 0.05 | 0.071 ± 0.06 | 0.082 ± 0.02 | 0.065 ± 0.01 | 0.046 ± 0.02 | 0.074 | 30 |
| Ho | 0.021 ± 0.01 | 0.014 ± 0.01 | 0.015 ± 0 | 0.012 ± 0 | 0.009 ± 0 | 0.014 | 31 |
| Er | 0.060 ± 0.03 | 0.042 ± 0.03 | 0.046 ± 0.01 | 0.038 ± 0.01 | 0.029 ± 0.01 | 0.043 | 27 |
| Tm | 0.008 ± 0 | 0.006 ± 0 | 0.007 ± 0 | 0.006 ± 0 | 0.005 ± 0 | 0.006 | 22 |
| Yb | 0.044 ± 0.02 | 0.031 ± 0.02 | 0.034 ± 0.01 | 0.028 ± 0 | 0.023 ± 0.01 | 0.032 | 24 |
| Lu | 0.005 ± 0 | 0.003 ± 0 | 0.003 ± 0 | 0.002 ± 0 | 0.001 ± 0 | 0.003 | 43 |
| LREEs/HREEs | 3.807 | 4.216 | 5.504 | 4.202 | 4.024 | 3.807 | 4.351 |
| Sum(b) | 5.094 | 3.626 | 4.944 | 3.302 | 2.000 | 3.793 | |
Analytical results of the heavy metals and toxic elements in MC herbs. Sum(c): The sum of the concentrations of the heavy metals and toxic elements
| 5 Elements | Heavy metals and toxic elements (mg.kg−1 ± the sampling sites, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhu | Tongling | Xuancheng | Chizhou | Bozhou | Mean | Limiting value | RSD% | |
| Cu | 3.395 ± 0.70 | 4.432 ± 1.63 | 3.684 ± 0.23 | 9.472 ± 1.77 | 11.029 ± 2.14 | 6.402 | 20 | 56 |
| As | 0.080 ± 0.03 | 0.110 ± 0.05 | 0.223 ± 0.03 | 0.202 ± 0.04 | 0.187 ± 0.08 | 0.160 | 2.0 | 39 |
| Cd | 0.778 ± 0.76 | 0.287 ± 0.09 | 0.448 ± 0.21 | 0.358 ± 0.03 | 0.070 ± 0.01 | 0.388 | 0.3 | 67 |
| Hg | 0.004 ± 0 | 0.004 ± 0 | 0.004 ± 0 | 0.004 ± 0 | 0.003 ± 0 | 0.004 | 0.2 | 5 |
| Pb | 2.897 ± 2.63 | 0.936 ± 0.31 | 1.616 ± 0.52 | 1.241 ± 0.18 | 0.457 ± 0.11 | 1.429 | 5 | 65 |
| Sum(c) | 7.154 | 5.769 | 5.975 | 11.277 | 11.746 | 8.384 | ||
Fig. 3Distribution map of heavy metals and toxic elements in MC herbs (WH—Wuhu, TL—Tongling, XC—Xuancheng, CZ—Chizhou, BZ—Bozhou)
Analytical results of 25 trace elements in MC herbs. Sum(d): The sum of the concentrations of 25 trace elements
| 25 Elements | Trace elements content (mg.kg−1 ± the sampling sites, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhu | Tongling | Xuancheng | Chizhou | Bozhou | Mean | RSD% | |
| Ba | 39.366 ± 24.40 | 25.933 ± 21.07 | 25.811 ± 6.06 | 46.232 ± 2.57 | 38.698 ± 10.69 | 35.208 | 26 |
| Sr | 72.153 ± 15.64 | 64.902 ± 41.89 | 21.034 ± 7.93 | 107.723 ± 18.38 | 135.277 ± 40.52 | 80.218 | 54 |
| Zn | 17.779 ± 4.62 | 13.819 ± 2.74 | 12.996 ± 0.95 | 32.923 ± 2.65 | 25.041 ± 6.59 | 20.511 | 41 |
| Mn | 19.416 ± 9.31 | 12.908 ± 3.50 | 26.252 ± 4.10 | 23.370 ± 4.59 | 14.799 ± 4.30 | 19.349 | 29 |
| Si | 105.906 ± 66.56 | 161.997 ± 86.41 | 25.607 ± 12.34 | 64.435 ± 49.93 | 23.286 ± 16.66 | 76.246 | 77 |
| B | 21.299 ± 2.10 | 20.474 ± 2.08 | 27.959 ± 2.15 | 21.052 ± 1.43 | 29.127 ± 3.83 | 23.982 | 17 |
| Li | 0.217 ± 0.08 | 0.230 ± 0.09 | 0.603 ± 0.14 | 0.374 ± 0.11 | 0.882 ± 0.20 | 0.461 | 61 |
| Be | 0.013 ± 0.01 | 0.009 ± 0.01 | 0.026 ± 0.01 | 0.016 ± 0 | 0.004 ± 0 | 0.014 | 59 |
| Ti | 43.962 ± 10.43 | 53.223 ± 5.70 | 47.557 ± 6.18 | 44.357 ± 9.78 | 47.570 ± 7.46 | 47.334 | 8 |
| V | 0.412 ± 0.15 | 0.558 ± 0.18 | 1.257 ± 0.29 | 0.755 ± 0.22 | 0.978 ± 0.42 | 0.792 | 42 |
| Cr | 2.346 ± 0.83 | 2.302 ± 0.68 | 8.280 ± 1.21 | 4.178 ± 0.99 | 3.952 ± 1.18 | 4.211 | 58 |
| Co | 0.187 ± 0.06 | 0.167 ± 0.06 | 0.316 ± 0.04 | 0.194 ± 0.04 | 0.233 ± 0.09 | 0.220 | 27 |
| Ni | 1.207 ± 0.44 | 1.148 ± 0.62 | 1.651 ± 0.34 | 1.719 ± 0.18 | 1.077 ± 0.28 | 1.360 | 22 |
| Ge | 0.008 ± 0 | 0.012 ± 0 | 0.007 ± 0 | 0.004 ± 0 | 0.005 ± 0 | 0.007 | 40 |
| Br | 1.995 ± 0.87 | 1.334 ± 0.43 | 1.897 ± 0.17 | 1.551 ± 0.21 | 1.593 ± 0.34 | 1.674 | 16 |
| Rb | 6.082 ± 3.30 | 5.848 ± 0.88 | 5.126 ± 0.32 | 4.538 ± 0.84 | 6.808 ± 1.71 | 5.680 | 15 |
| Mo | 0.301 ± 0.10 | 0.195 ± 0.10 | 0.302 ± 0.04 | 0.203 ± 0.02 | 0.297 ± 0.06 | 0.260 | 21 |
| Sn | 0.137 ± 0.07 | 0.130 ± 0.06 | 0.051 ± 0.04 | 0.066 ± 0.07 | 0.074 ± 0.03 | 0.091 | 43 |
| Sb | 0.134 ± 0.14 | 0.152 ± 0.07 | 0.185 ± 0.04 | 0.156 ± 0.04 | 0.123 ± 0.03 | 0.150 | 16 |
| I | 0.212 ± 0.05 | 0.176 ± 0.06 | 0.146 ± 0.04 | 0.136 ± 0.02 | 0.101 ± 0.01 | 0.154 | 27 |
| Cs | 0.048 ± 0.02 | 0.063 ± 0.02 | 0.117 ± 0.03 | 0.078 ± 0.04 | 0.100 ± 0.05 | 0.081 | 34 |
| Tl | 0.052 ± 0.02 | 0.052 ± 0.01 | 0.041 ± 0.01 | 0.042 ± 0.01 | 0.029 ± 0.01 | 0.043 | 22 |
| Bi | 0.007 ± 0 | 0.007 ± 0 | 0.011 ± 0 | 0.008 ± 0 | 0.007 ± 0 | 0.008 | 23 |
| Th | 0.071 ± 0.02 | 0.080 ± 0.02 | 0.177 ± 0.05 | 0.100 ± 0.03 | 0.127 ± 0.06 | 0.111 | 38 |
| U | 0.023 ± 0.01 | 0.025 ± 0.01 | 0.022 ± 0 | 0.022 ± 0.01 | 0.070 ± 0.04 | 0.033 | 65 |
| Sum(d) | 333.333 | 365.744 | 207.431 | 354.232 | 330.258 | 318.198 | - |
The 6 chemical forms of Cd in MC expressed by the percentage of total content
| Wuhu | Tongling | Xuancheng | Chizhou | Bozhou | Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEtOH (%) | 3.2 | 5.8 | 12.2 | 5.8 | 7.1 | 6.8 |
| PH2O (%) | 15.2 | 13.9 | 17.6 | 21.9 | 24.1 | 18.5 |
| PNaCl (%) | 56.4 | 47.9 | 37.2 | 25.5 | 9.1 | 35.2 |
| PHAC (%) | 8.0 | 11.6 | 14.5 | 17.4 | 21.3 | 14.6 |
| PHCl (%) | 4.1 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 5.4 |
| PR (%) | 13.1 | 18.1 | 14.2 | 21.2 | 30.6 | 19.4 |
Fig. 4Chemical form of Cd in MC was expressed as percentage of total concentration
Fig. 5Scattering points of the first two typical discriminant functions in MC herbs
Health risk assessment results of MC and decoction
| Cd | PTWI (μg.kg−1) | REEs | ADI (ug.kg−1.d−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max | Min | Max | Min | ||
| MC | 1.046 | 0.481 | MC | 0.241 | 0.0947 |
| Water decoction of MC | 0.215 | 0.133 | |||
| Limit value | 0.6 | Limit value | 70 | ||
PTWI: the tolerable weekly intake per kilogram of body weight; ADI: the lifetime average daily pollutant intake