| Literature DB >> 35967996 |
Giorgia Fabbri1, Luisa Magrin1, Flaviana Gottardo1, Leonardo Armato1, Barbara Contiero1, Matteo Gianesella1, Enrico Fiore1.
Abstract
Claw disorders are a relevant welfare issue in the cattle industry, fast and accurate diagnoses are essential for successful treatment and prevention. The present study aimed to develop an equation to assess the presence of solar hemorrhages from real-time ultrasound images texture analysis at slaughter. Eighty-eight hind feet were collected at the slaughterhouse from 44 Holstein male veal calves. The claws were trimmed by a veterinarian hoof-trimmer, approximately 30 min after the calves' slaughter, and classified into healthy and affected by solar hemorrhages. At the same time, ultrasound images were collected for each claw. Sole soft tissues' thickness was measured, and texture analysis was performed using MaZda software. The resulting parameters from sole soft tissues' measurements and texture analysis were screened with a stepwise linear discriminant analysis using the absence or presence (0/1) of solar hemorrhages as the dependent variable. Results from the stepwise analysis identified 9 variables (among 279) as predictors, and an equation was developed and used to predict the presence or absence of solar hemorrhages on the scanned claws by binary measure: values ≤0.5 counted as 0, while those >0.5 as 1. Validation of the equation was performed by testing predicted lesions (LESpred) against the clinically evaluated lesions (LESeval) with a confusion matrix, a ROC analysis, and a precision-recall curve. Results of the present study suggest that the equation proposed has a good potential for detecting effectively hemorrhages of the sole by ultrasound imaging texture means, and could be used to monitor unsatisfactory housing and management conditions at the farm level, and for early management intervention and prevention.Entities:
Keywords: claw lesions; sole hemorrhage; texture analysis; ultrasound; veal calves
Year: 2022 PMID: 35967996 PMCID: PMC9372481 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.899253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Operational flow chart of the methods in the study. Steps 1–3 were performed at the slaughterhouse and consisted in: securing the limbs to the support (step 1), claw trimming and lesion recording (step 2), ultrasound imaging (step 3). Step 4 was texture analysis with Mazda program on US images and measurement of S1, S2, and S3 sole soft tissue thickness. Steps 5–7 were performed statistically and consisted in: selection of the variables to include in the equation using stepwise analysis (step 5), development of the equation (step 6), and validation of the equation and performance testing using ROC, precision-recall curve and confusion matrix.
Results from the confusion matrix on LESpred (estimated using the 0.5 cutoff on the results from the prediction equation) tested against LESeval (clinically evaluated lesion) indicating the sensitivity (proportion of true positive cases that were correctly identified), the specificity (proportion of true negative cases that were correctly identified), the accuracy (proportion of correctly identified cases as both true positive and true negative), the precision (proportion of correctly identified true positive cases belonging to the actual (true positive and false positive) group), and the misclassification rate of the proposed method.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Sensitivity (95% CI) | 0.93 (0.88–0.96) |
| Specificity (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.79–0.90) |
| Accuracy | 0.90 |
| Precision | 0.87 |
| Misclassification rate | 9.71 |
95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Comparison between the visually assessed sole hemorrhages (LESeval), observed during trimming, and those predicted by the equation (LESpred).
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Healthy | 61 | 52 | 9 |
| Affected | 114 | 106 | 8 |
| Total | 175 | 158 | 17 |
Figure 2Results of the receiver operator curve (ROC) for the results of the prediction equation showing an area under the curve of 96% (AUC=0.961; 95% CI: 0.55–0.69; positive likelihood ratio = 13.5) using an optimal cut-off value of 0.61, sensitivity was 88.6%, and specificity was 93.4%. All the variables included were statistically significant.
Figure 3Precision-recall curve based on the results of the prediction equation obtained with the variables selected with the stepwise method (AUC = 0.97).