| Literature DB >> 35967819 |
Wei-Ting Wong1, Chun-Hsien Wu2, Lan-Hui Li3,4, De-Yu Hung1, Hsiao-Wen Chiu1, Hsien-Ta Hsu5,6, Chen-Lung Ho7, Oleg V Chernikov8, Shu-Meng Cheng2, Shih-Ping Yang2, Chih-Hsin Chung9, Kuo-Feng Hua1,4,10, Chin-Fah Wang11.
Abstract
The intracellular sensor NACHT, LRR, and PYD domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome controls caspase-1 activity and the maturation and release of the cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18. The NLRP3 inflammasome has attracted the attention of the pharmaceutical industry because it promotes the pathogenesis of many diseases, making it a promising target for drug development. Litsea cubeba (Lour.) is a plant traditionally used as a seasoning in Taiwan and in other Asian countries. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory activity of the leaves of L. cubeba against the NLRP3 inflammasome. We found that the ethanol extract of L. cubeba leaves (MLE) inhibited the NLRP3 inflammasome in macrophages by reducing caspase-1 activation and IL-1β secretion. MLE reduced pyroptosis in macrophages and inhibited the release of NLRP3 and apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC). In a mechanistic study, MLE reduced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and preserved mitochondrial integrity, which led to reduced mitochondrial DNA release into the cytosol. MLE did not reduce the expression levels of NLRP3, IL-1β precursor or TNF-α in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated macrophages. These results indicated that MLE inhibited the NLRP3 inflammasome by suppressing the activation signals of the NLRP3 inflammasome but not by reducing the priming signal induced by LPS. In addition, oral administration of MLE (20-80 mg/kg) ameliorated dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in a mouse model. Notably, mice that received MLE (1 and 2 g/kg) daily for 7 days did not exhibit visible side effects. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis found that α-Terpinyl acetate (27.2%) and 1,8-Cineole (17.7%) were the major compounds in MLE. These results indicated that L. cubeba leaves have the potential to be a nutraceutical for preventing and improving NLRP3 inflammasome-related diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Litsea cubeba; NLRP3 inflammasome; cytokines; dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis; macrophages
Year: 2022 PMID: 35967819 PMCID: PMC9363825 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.871325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1MLE inhibits the NLRP3 inflammasome. (A–E) LPS-primed J774A.1 macrophages were incubated with MEL for 0.5 h before ATP stimulation for an additional 0.5 h. The levels of IL-1β in the supernatants were analyzed by ELISA (A) and western blot (B). (C) The column diagram represents the fold change of IL-1β in (B) compared with the control group analyzed by ImageJ. (D) The levels of pro-caspase-1 (p45) and active caspase-1 (p10) in the supernatants were analyzed by western blot. (E) The column diagram represents the fold change of p10 in (D) compared with the control group analyzed by ImageJ. (F,G) LPS-primed J774A.1 macrophages were incubated with MEL for 0.5 h before nigericin stimulation for an additional 0.5 h (F) or MSU stimulation for an additional 24 h (G). The levels of IL-1β in the supernatants were analyzed by ELISA. The western blot images are representative of three different experiments. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001 compared to NLRP3 inflammasome-activated cells.
FIGURE 2MLE inhibits pyroptosis. (A–E) LPS-primed J774A.1 macrophages were incubated with MEL for 0.5 h before ATP stimulation for an additional 0.5 h. The levels of LDH in the supernatants were analyzed by an LDH release kit (A), and the levels of ASC in the supernatants were analyzed by western blot (B). (C) The column diagram represents the fold change of ASC in (B) compared with the control group analyzed by ImageJ. (D) The levels of NLRP3 in the supernatants were analyzed by western blot. (E) The column diagram represents the fold change of NLRP3 in (D) compared with the control group analyzed by ImageJ. (F) J774A.1 macrophages were incubated with MEL for 24 h, and the levels of LDH in the supernatants were analyzed by an LDH release kit. (G) J774A.1 macrophages were incubated with MEL for 24 h, and the cell numbers were calculated by the Trypan Blue exclusion test of cell viability. The western blot images are representative of three different experiments. The LDH and cell counting data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 compared to the LPS + ATP group in (A–E) or compared to the vehicle-treated group in (G).
FIGURE 3MLE did not inhibit the priming signals of the NLRP3 inflammasome. (A–F) J774A.1 macrophages were incubated with MEL for 0.5 h before LPS stimulation for an additional 6 h. (A) The levels of proIL-1β in the cell lysates were analyzed by western blot. (B) The column diagram represents the fold change of proIL-1β in (A) compared with the control group normalized to actin analyzed by ImageJ. (C) The levels of NLRP3 in the cell lysates were analyzed by western blot. (D) The column diagram represents the fold change of NLRP3 in (C) compared with the control group normalized to actin analyzed by ImageJ. The levels of IL-6 (E) and TNF-α (F) in the supernatants were analyzed by ELISA. The western blot images are representative of three different experiments. The ELISA data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001 compared to the LPS group.
FIGURE 4MLE inhibited activation signals of the NLRP3 inflammasome by reducing mitochondrial damage. (A–E) LPS-primed J774A.1 macrophages were incubated with MEL for 0.5 h before ATP stimulation for an additional 0.5 h. (A) Mitochondrial ROS production was analyzed by MitoSOX staining using flow cytometry. (B) The column diagram represents the mean fluorescence intensity of MitoSOX in (A). (C) Mitochondrial membrane integrity was analyzed by MitoTracker Deep Red and Green staining using flow cytometry. (D) The column diagram represents the% of low MitoTracker Deep Red signal (R2) in (C). (E) Mitochondrial DNA release into the cytosol was analyzed by the detection of cytochrome c oxidase I DNA in the cytosol. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 compared to the LPS + ATP group.
FIGURE 5MLE ameliorates DSS-induced colitis in a mouse model. (A) Images of representative diarrhea and bloody stool from mice. (B) Effect of MLE on body weight loss. (C) Effect of MLE on colonic shortening. (D) The column diagram represents the colon length in (C). (E) Effect of MLE on colonic damage analyzed by H&E staining. (F) Effect of MLE on splenomegaly. (G) The column diagram represents the spleen weight in (F). (H) Effect of MLE on the levels of IL-1β in colon tissue. (I) Effect of MLE on the levels of IL-6 in colon tissue. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *, **, and *** indicate a significant difference at the level of p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively, compared to vehicle + DSS mice.
FIGURE 6Preliminary safety evaluation of mice exposed to MLE. (A,B) Effect of MLE on body weight. (C) H&E staining of tissue sections from vehicle- or MLE-fed mice.
FIGURE 7Chromatograms obtained from GC-MS screening of MLE.
Chemical compositions of MLE analyzed by GC-MS.
| Compound I.D. | LRIExp | LRILit | Concentration (%) | Identification |
| Sabinene | 974 | 975 | 0.2 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| 1,002 | 1,004 | 0.1 | MS, LRI | |
| Limonene | 1,029 | 1,029 | 5.6 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| 1,8-Cineole | 1,033 | 1,031 | 17.7 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| γ-Terpinene | 1,057 | 1,059 | 0.1 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| 1,069 | 1,070 | 1.8 | MS, LRI | |
| Terpinolene | 1,086 | 1,088 | 0.2 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| Linalool | 1,094 | 1,096 | 0.6 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| 1,096 | 1,098 | 0.6 | MS, LRI | |
| 1,125 | 1,122 | 0.2 | MS, LRI | |
| Citronellal | 1,150 | 1,153 | 0.3 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| δ-Terpineol | 1,166 | 1,166 | 0.9 | MS, LRI |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 1,176 | 1,177 | 1.2 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| α-Terpineol | 1,190 | 1,189 | 7.4 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| Bornyl acetate | 1,287 | 1,288 | 0.1 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| Terpinen-4-ol acetate | 1,301 | 1,299 | 2.5 | MS, LRI |
| α-Terpinyl acetate | 1,346 | 1,349 | 27.2 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| β-Elemene | 1,388 | 1,390 | 0.4 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| β-Caryophyllene | 1,416 | 1,419 | 4.9 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| ( | 1,450 | 1,451 | 0.3 | MS, LRI |
| α-Humulene | 1,451 | 1,454 | 0.5 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| 1,469 | 1,466 | 0.1 | MS, LRI | |
| γ-Muurolene | 1,476 | 1,479 | 0.1 | MS, LRI |
| β-Selinene | 1,489 | 1,490 | 0.3 | MS, LRI |
| α-Muurolene | 1,499 | 1,500 | 0.4 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| (e,e)-α-Farnesene | 1,502 | 1,505 | 0.3 | MS, LRI |
| γ-Cadinene | 1,510 | 1,513 | 0.4 | MS, LRI |
| δ-Cadinene | 1,521 | 1,523 | 1.2 | MS, LRI |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 1,580 | 1,583 | 0.6 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| t-Cadinol | 1,638 | 1,640 | 0.2 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| t-Muurolol | 1,641 | 1,642 | 0.6 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| α-Cadinol | 1,652 | 1,654 | 0.8 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| Ethyl hexadecanoate | 1,990 | 1,993 | 6.4 | MS, LRI |
| Ethyl heptadecanoate | 2,086 | 2,089 | 0.1 | MS, LRI |
| Phytol | 2,097 | 2,110 | 6.1 | MS, LRI, CO-ST |
| Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 2,161 | 2,162 | 3.0 | MS, LRI |
| Ethyl 9,12,15-octadecatrienoate | 2,170 | 2,169 | 4.2 | MS, LRI |
| Ethyl Oleate | 2,173 | 2,174 | 0.3 | MS, LRI |
| Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 2,192 | 2,193 | 1.3 | MS, LRI |
| Eicosanoic acid, ethyl ester | 2,392 | 2,395 | 0.3 | MS, LRI |
aLRIExp = Determined LRI relative to n-alkanes (C8-C30) on DB-5 capillary column. bLRILit = LRI on DB-5 capillary column from reference 14. cIdentification by MS = NIST 17 and Wiley 11 libraries spectra, and the literatures; LRI was same as references 14–16. CO-ST, co-injection and comparison with the l LRI and mass spectra of standards.